About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox News ignores Dem support of Congressional members enrolling in public option to falsely cast them as "hypocrites"

December 05, 2009 4:36 pm ET — 15 Comments

A Fox News Bulls & Bears segment discussing Republican Sen. Tom Coburn (OK)'s amendment to the health reform bill that would force members of Congress to join the public option if it becomes law focused on the supposed "hypocrisy" of Democrats supporting a public option that they would not enroll in. In fact, despite the alleged efforts of GOP Senators to keep Democrats from signing on to the amendment, Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown, Christopher Dodd, Al Franken, and Barbara Mikulski have since become co-sponsors -- with Democratic co-sponsors now outnumbering Republican co-sponsors of the amendment.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Fox host, contributors falsely accuse Senate Dems of being "hypocrites" because they back a public option in which they won't enroll

Host Brenda Buttner: "Congress is saying to us, 'We're going to give you a government-run option.' Why shouldn't we tell 'em 'Hey, if it's so good, why don't you take it?'" At the opening of the Fox News show Bulls & Bears, host Brenda Buttner said: "Congress, you pass a government-run health care plan, you take a government-run health care plan. That's what some Senate Republicans are pushing for, but their amendment's expected to get shot down." Later on, she said, "Congress is saying to us, 'We're going to give you a government-run option.' Why shouldn't we tell 'em 'Hey, if it's so good, why don't you take it?'" [Fox News Channel's Bulls & Bears, 12/5/09]

Fox Business commentator Gary B. Smith on Congressional Democrats: Make "this big bunch of hypocrites ... eat their own cooking." During the discussion, Gary B. Smith said: "I love this, it's beautiful. You know, this big bunch of hypocrites sitting in Congress, who are saying to the average American, 'Look, this is what you should have.' Great, let them eat their own cooking." He later echoed Republican Sen. Coburn by saying, "Why can't they lead by example? They're the ones saying we definitely need this public option." [Bulls & Bears, 12/5/09]

Fox News contributor Tobin Smith to Congressional Democrats: "If health care's so important ... you should eat that dog food." Tobin Smith purported to highlight Democratic hypocrisy by comparing the public option to "dog food," asserting: "Come on man, if you're gonna make this -- if health care's so important, A., you should eat that dog food, and then B., you should look Americans in the eye and tell them why the heck we need this option plan in the first place." [Bulls & Bears, 12/5/09]

But Senate Democrats outnumber Republicans as co-sponsors of the amendment requiring them to enroll in public option 

Democratic Senators outnumber Republicans as amendment co-sponsors. The seven cosponsors of amendment 2789 to the Senate health reform bill include four Democrats and three Republicans: Sens. David Vitter (R-LA), Richard Burr (R-NC), Orrin Hatch (R-UT), Sherrod Brown (D-OH), Christopher Dodd (D-CT), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), and Al Franken (D-MN). [Accessed via Thomas]

Amendment requires "members of Congress to enroll in the public option." Amendment 2789 requires House and Senate members to enroll in the public option. From the amendment:

(D) REQUIREMENT OF MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO ENROLL IN THE PUBLIC OPTION.-

(i) REQUIREMENT.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, all Members of Congress shall be enrolled in the community health insurance option when established by the Secretary.

(ii) INELIGIBLE FOR FEHBP.--Effective on the date on which the community health insurance option is established by the Secretary, no Member of Congress shall be eligible to participate in a health benefits plan under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code

(iii) EXCEPTION.--Notwithstanding clauses (i) and (ii), if a Member of Congress resides in a State which opts out of providing a community health insurance option, that Member may be enrolled in a health benefits plan under chapter 89 of title 5, United States Code, during any period which that State has opted out.

Coburn, Vitter allegedly resisted allowing Democratic co-sponsors of amendment. Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown told The Hill on December 3 that Republican Sens. Coburn and Vitter have "not said yes to allow me to be a co-sponsor ... I've called their office four times."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (December 05, 2009 5:07 pm ET)
      6 1
      Fox News, Should they Co-op me and change their name to Bad News?
      Would it make them more Fair & Balanced if they stepped into "The Poet's" Shoes?
      Could Fox News handle that kind of Instant Credibility?
      Or would they revert back to their Comfort Zone consisting of Slime & Morbidity?

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by eweston8542983 (December 05, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
      7  
      To be expected from Faux Gnues.
      A bit of Republican gamesmanship gone sour? Bet that wasn't in the recently publiushed game plan.
      If it totally backfires on them I'll count it as a very nice birfday preasent.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by truthseeker77 (December 05, 2009 6:30 pm ET)
      1 5
      I'm very excited, because as part of the 80% who get insurance by employer, I will be able to save 100 or 200 in my yearly premiums 7 years from now.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (December 05, 2009 7:38 pm ET)
        11  
        Yes, as opposed to paying 3 to 4 thousand more. That sounds like reason to celebrate.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rodtanner (December 05, 2009 11:38 pm ET)
           
        Thank your Rethuglican buddies in Congress for that. The legislation contemplated meaningful reform. The Adults had to water it down so much to get anything past the Rethuglican Guard of the Great Corporate Piracy, this is all that's left.

        One gets what one votes for, bucko.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jim359 (December 05, 2009 8:05 pm ET)
      7  
      The Irony of this move be the Repiggies is soooo delicious!
      Instead of this "poison pill" derailing the process, Sen. Brown and company have called the Repiggies on their BS. I love it!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (December 06, 2009 11:40 am ET)
        3  
        Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown - My Senator!

        I contributed to his campaign, too.
        ~
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (December 06, 2009 11:51 am ET)
          4  
          And Babs Mikulski too! Every once in a while, I can actually be proud to be a Marylander...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rodtanner (December 05, 2009 11:34 pm ET)
         
      As much as I appreciate Media Matters and its efforts, I sometimes wonder what is the point. The troglodytes who watch Fox News are never going to know this. They'll simply believe the lies out of ignorance.

      Perhaps what we need is a "Mentality Matters" blog that reports about the idiocy of 80 percent of our voting populous. That would, of course, include most Republican members of the U.S. Senate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Cheney2012 (December 06, 2009 12:11 am ET)
        7
      Oh sure..co-sponsoring amendment they know will be defeated is irrelevant.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ReasonAndResolve (December 06, 2009 1:06 am ET)
        6  
        We shall see. and we shall see just how many Republicans run from it - I would bet the number approaches forty (making it safe for 49 Democrats to vote yes...lol). Do the math and tell me who wins...lol. I'll give you a hint: it won't be the Gop.

        Need another hint?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (December 06, 2009 11:54 am ET)
        5  
        No, Darth, your beloved insurance-industry janissaries (a.k.a. RepugnantCons) laid down a bluff and got called on it. So you guys show your cards, if you actually have any besides insurance-industry calling cards...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by uppity (December 06, 2009 4:06 am ET)
         
      cheney2012-
      So why did the gNOp propose the amendment if they knew it wouldn't pass?
      Could it be part of their stated plan to propose amendment after amendment just to delay-delay-delay a vote on the whole bill - in the hope that their tactics will force the majority to gut the whole thing - to the benefit of gNOp corporate string-pullers?
      But not irrelevant to the bank accounts of gNOp Senators, right?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (December 06, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
      3  
      It would seem that the republicans in Congress would be tired of being exposed for the obstructionists that they are.

      Gregg writes and circulates a document on Senate rules specifically designed to derail hcr, gets caught, tries to justify his actions.

      30 republicans vote against the Franken Amendment, the news gets out and they blame Franken. They don't regret the way they voted but regret getting caught.

      Vitter and Coburn write an amendment which would force members of Congress to enroll in the PO, resist democrats' attempts to co-sponsor the bill, Fuchs Noose calls democrats hypocrites, doesn't mention amendment has more co-sponsors who are members of the Democratic Party than the Republican Party.

      All around cluelessness. Across the board.

      A failure of epic proportions.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (December 06, 2009 5:00 pm ET)
      2  
      Why don't the Dems sponsor legislation stating that any congressperson that votes against health care legislation forfeits their government-paid insurance?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.