About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

NPR reporter Liasson to continue validating Fox's news programs while ignoring its 24-7 political operation

December 07, 2009 2:39 pm ET — 26 Comments

National Public Radio national political correspondent Mara Liasson has reportedly declined a request by NPR executives that she reconsider appearing regularly on Fox News because of "what they perceived as the network's political bias," according to Politico, which also reported that "Liasson defended her work for Fox by saying that she appears on two of the network's news programs, not on commentary programs with conservative hosts." In fact, the "news programs" on which Liasson appears, Special Report and Fox News Sunday, echo Fox's right-wing opinion shows, often featuring smears, falsehoods, doctored and deceptive editing, and GOP talking points.

Liasson reportedly declined NPR's request to reconsider Fox News appearances

Liasson reportedly defended appearing on Fox because she appears only on Fox's "news" shows. In a December 7 article, Politico reported:

Executives at National Public Radio recently asked the network's top political correspondent, Mara Liasson, to reconsider her regular appearances on Fox News because of what they perceived as the network's political bias, two sources familiar with the effort said.

According to a source, Liasson was summoned in early October by NPR's executive editor for news, Dick Meyer, and the network's supervising senior Washington editor, Ron Elving. The NPR executives said they had concerns that Fox's programming had grown more partisan, and they asked Liasson to spend 30 days watching the network.

At a follow-up meeting last month, Liasson reported that she'd seen no significant change in Fox's programming and planned to continue appearing on the network, the source said.

NPR's focus on Liasson's work as a commentator on Fox's "Special Report" and "Fox News Sunday" came at about the same time as a White House campaign launched in September to delegitimize the network by painting it as an extension of the Republican Party.

One source said the White House's criticism of Fox was raised during the discussions with Liasson. However, an NPR spokeswoman told POLITICO that the Obama administration's attempts to discourage other news outlets from treating Fox as a peer had no impact on any internal discussions at NPR.

Liasson defended her work for Fox by saying that she appears on two of the network's news programs, not on commentary programs with conservative hosts, the source said. She has also told colleagues that she's under contract to Fox, so it would be difficult for her to sever her ties with the network, which she has appeared on for more than a decade.

But Special Report frequently features doctored video, cropped quotes, smears of Obama officials, falsehoods, and shoddy journalism

Wilson: Jennings "admitted" that "he failed to alert authorities when a 15-year-old boy told him he was involved in a sexual relationship with an older man." On the October 6 edition of Special Report, correspondent Brian Wilson stated: "School safety czar Kevin Jennings is currently under fire because he admitted that in 1988, when he was a high school teacher, he failed to alert authorities when a 15-year-old boy told him he was involved in a sexual relationship with an older man. One member of the House believes Jennings would not have his current job if czars were required to face Senate confirmation hearings." Wilson repeated the 15-year-old age claim even though FoxNews.com previously acknowledged that the student was of legal age -- 16 years old -- at the time.

Baier smears Jennings as failing to report "sexual abuse." On October 1, host Bret Baier joined Fox News' witch hunt against Jennings, claiming that "Education Secretary Arne Duncan is standing behind his so-called safe schools czar after revelations that Kevin Jennings did not report a case of sexual abuse he encountered as a schoolteacher."

Video doctoring: Goler reverses meaning of Obama quote to falsely suggest he supports European-style health care. On April 24, White House correspondent Wendell Goler cropped a comment by President Obama and took it out of context -- effectively reversing the statement's meaning -- to falsely suggest that Obama supports creating a health care system "like the European countries." Goler claimed that Obama "doesn't want to do it halfway" on health care, and then aired a clip from a March 26 online town hall event of Obama saying, "If you're going to fix it, why not do a universal health care system like the European countries?" Following the clip, Goler reported: "His critics worry universal health care would mean government-run health care." In fact, Obama actually said, "Now, the question is, if you're going to fix it, why not do a universal health-care system like the European countries?" [emphasis added] In doing so, Obama was paraphrasing the town hall question he had been asked -- "Why can we not have a universal health care system, like many European countries, where people are treated based on needs rather than financial resources?" -- before explaining why he opposed such a system.

Fox's Garrett deceptively cropped Obama remark on judicial role. On May 1, saying it was a "description of how the president hopes his nominee will interpret the law," congressional correspondent Major Garrett aired a clip in which Obama stated: "I view that quality of empathy, of understanding and identifying with people's hopes and struggles, as an essential ingredient for arriving at just decisions and outcomes." Garrett then said: "That aggravates those who believe justices should follow the Constitution and legislative intent." But Garrett omitted Obama's very next sentence, in which he stated: "I will seek somebody who is dedicated to the rule of law, who honors our constitutional traditions, who respects the integrity of the judicial process and the appropriate limits of the judicial role."

Special Report repeatedly advanced CEI fellow's accusations that NASA is "manipulating data on climate change" without noting CEI received millions from oil industry. On December 3, Special Report host Bret Baier reported that Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) senior fellow Christopher Horner has threatened to sue NASA, alleging that the space agency has distorted climate change data. However, Baier never noted that CEI has received millions of dollars from Exxon Mobil Corp. and foundations linked to the oil industry.

Baier distorts CBO report to claim premiums "will actually go up" under Senate bill. On December 1, Baier misrepresented the Congressional Budget Office's (CBO) analysis of the Senate health care bill's effect on insurance premiums by claiming that "depending on how you read" the report, insurance "premiums for many people will actually go up" under the bill. In fact, CBO estimated that premiums would only increase for individuals purchasing insurance on their own -- about 17 percent of the insurance market in 2016 -- and that affordability credits would substantially lower costs for many of those individuals, a majority of whom would receive those subsidies.

Hume repeats debunked falsehood that recent temps undermine global warming. On November 30, senior political analyst Brit Hume claimed that global warming is undermined by the "huge problem" that "[t]here's been no apparent increase in global temperatures over the past 11 years." In fact, scientists have rejected the claim that recent temperatures undermine or refute global warming.

Fox News lets Breaux discuss health care reform without revealing he is a health care lobbyist. On November 10, correspondent Carl Cameron failed to disclose that former Sen. John Breaux (D-LA), who Cameron said "warns Democratic leaders now that trying too much too fast could backfire and undermine achievable [health care] reforms," has lobbied Congress this year about health reform for the trade group Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA).

Baier trumpets CAIR conspiracy theory charges made by author with anti-Islam history. On October 15, Baier said: "Republican lawmakers say the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, is trying to infiltrate Capitol Hill by placing interns in key positions," an allegation stemming from a right-wing book whose author has a history of making outrageous and anti-Islamic assertions and is published by WorldNetDaily, which has its own history of making outrageous allegations and inflammatory remarks.

Rosen: "Rats could attack us in the sewers and court systems if all of Cass Sunstein's writings became law." On September 9, reporter James Rosen joined Glenn Beck's "czars" witch hunt by distorting Obama administration official Cass Sunstein's writings about organ donation and animal rights.

Special Report packs in health care falsehoods. In an August 24 report on how, in the words of Baier, "Republicans are trying to position themselves as the party looking out for seniors' well-being," Rosen advanced the conservative talking point that Democrats plan to cut Medicare benefits for seniors and presented the widely debunked "death panel" falsehood as a he said-she said. Rosen also advanced the smear that Veterans Health Administration (VHA) officials are referring veterans to a booklet that encourages them to end their lives prematurely.

Baier falsely suggests Obama has cited Canada as possible health reform model. On June 29, Baier falsely suggested that Obama has cited Canada's medical system as a "possible model" for his health care reform plan. In fact, Obama has explicitly rejected a Canadian-style health care system.

Special Report falsely suggests activism question deleted from questionnaire for Sotomayor. A June 4 report by legal correspondent Shannon Bream falsely suggested that Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) eliminated a question on judicial activism from the questionnaire for Sonia Sotomayor's Supreme Court nomination. In fact, Leahy reportedly removed the question in 2007 pursuant to a bipartisan agreement. The following day, Baier corrected Bream's report by acknowledging that the question was deleted "long before Sotomayor was picked for the high court."

Not to be outdone, Fox News Sunday is a consistent source of misinformation

"Death book" distortions abound on Fox News Sunday. On the August 24 edition of Fox News Sunday, Chris Wallace hosted former Bush administration aide Jim Towey to discuss his recent Wall Street Journal op-ed, "The Death Book for Veterans," and in doing so promoted numerous distortions about the end-of-life educational booklet used by the VHA. In addition to forwarding the smear that the booklet is a "death book," Wallace promoted Towey's distortion that the booklet encourages veterans to "pull the plug" -- it doesn't; Wallace and Towey both claimed that the Bush administration suspended use of the booklet -- it didn't; and Wallace claimed that a VHA document requires doctors to direct veterans to the booklet -- it doesn't.

Wallace revives rationing bogeyman. On August 16, Wallace repeatedly advanced the conservative talking point that Democrats' health care reform proposals would create a system of rationing care, omitting the fact that rationing already happens under the current system. Indeed, Wallace did not acknowledge that rationing already occurs, even after his guest, American Medical Association president J. James Rohack, said, "[T]here's a myth that rationing doesn't occur right now. ... That's why this bill's important. It gets rid of some of the rationing that's occurring right now."

Wallace hosts Limbaugh on Fox News Sunday for half-hour deluge of misinformation. Wallace dedicated the first half of his November 1 program to an interview with radio host Rush Limbaugh, during which Wallace allowed and in some cases prompted Limbaugh to advance numerous misleading, baseless, or outrageous claims, as well as engage in inflammatory attacks on President Obama.

Wallace calls climate scientists "fudgers" who "tried to suppress opposition." On December 6, Wallace advanced the baseless claim that emails stolen from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia (CRU) showed that "some of the climate scientists were apparently fudgers and tried to suppress opposition comments."

Wallace falsely claims health care bills direct task force to decide what services "aren't covered." On November 22, Wallace falsely claimed that it's a "fact" that the House and Senate health care bills direct the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force to "determine what services, what tests, screening, are covered and aren't covered," and asked whether that amounts to "government rationing." In fact, the bills require insurers to implement task force recommendations in favor of specific preventive care, but they are not required to adopt those that recommend against preventive screening.

Despite finding the time to discuss "bow-gate," Fox News Sunday ignored reports of alleged Blackwater bribes. Despite finding the time on the November 15 broadcast of Fox News Sunday to discuss the manner in which Obama greeted the emperor of Japan, there was no time during the program devoted to recent reports that officials at Xe Services -- formerly Blackwater Worldwide -- had allegedly authorized about $1 million in bribery payments to Iraqi officials in the aftermath of a fatal shooting involving Blackwater security guards. By contrast, Fox News Sunday had previously devoted 18 minutes of broadcast time to discussing videos of conservative activists James O'Keefe and Hannah Giles posing as a pimp and a prostitute while asking for assistance from employees at an ACORN office, which followed Fox News' aggressive promotion and coverage of the undercover videos.

Fox News Sunday falsely portrays military as uniformly behind sending more troops to Afghanistan. On the September 27 edition of Fox News Sunday, Wallace presented the military as uniformly behind U.S. commander in Afghanistan Gen. Stanley McChrystal's reported request for additional military forces, opposed only by civilian administration officials such as Vice President Joe Biden. But the Army chief of staff and other military officials have reportedly expressed doubts about sending more troops to Afghanistan.

Wallace claimed Holder, confirmed 75-21, "got into office by the skin of his teeth." On February 22, Wallace claimed that Attorney General Eric Holder "got into office by the skin of his teeth." However, Holder was confirmed by the Senate in a 75-21 vote, and the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 17-2 in favor of reporting his nomination to the full Senate.

Wallace on Obama: "pettiness," "childishness"; Obama admin. "biggest bunch of crybabies." Wallace has claimed Obama did not appear on his show because of "pettiness" and "childishness," and has called the Obama administration the "biggest bunch of crybabies I have dealt with in my 30 years in Washington."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by wzwriter (December 07, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
      7  
      Mara Liasson was given the opportunity to sever her ties with Faux News, and chose not to do so. Now it's up to the powers-that-be at NPR to sever THEIR tier with HER.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Rocnjohnny (December 07, 2009 3:20 pm ET)
        3  
        Like a deer in the headlights. Fox must be paying really good for her to sell them her credibility. What a loss.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bad News (December 07, 2009 7:03 pm ET)
          1 1
          Well now in Fairness to Ms. Liasson she has always been a bit of a Right Leaner.
          If she leaves who do you expect to take her place, June Cleaver?
          Better the Evil you Know than the Evil that is Unknown.
          At best when she leaves they will replace her with an Identical Clone.

          Speak truth to power.


          Mr. News
          Report Abuse
      • Author by goonhee9633 (December 07, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
        3  
        No doubt about it. She needs to go. She is an embarrassment to what is most often an honest and objective presentation of the news.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NoSpinner (December 07, 2009 2:51 pm ET)
      1  
      Media Matters:
      You forgot to include this gem:
      Beck, Special Report cropped Dunn quote to falsely claim she said Mao was "the man she turns to most"

      Continuing Fox News' witch hunt against members of the Obama administration, both Glenn Beck and Special Report misleadingly cropped White House communications director Anita Dunn's remarks at a high school graduation ceremony to falsely claim that she was, in Beck's words, "proclaiming Mao [Zedong] as ... the man that she turns to most." In fact, Dunn actually said that Mao and Mother Theresa were "the two people that I turn to most to basically deliver a simple point, which is, you're going to make choices"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Looking_4_Truth (December 07, 2009 3:28 pm ET)
      2  
      If Liasson is NPR's "top political correspondent" that would give me pause. I have always held NPR in high regard, and don't consider Liasson's opinions as a reflection of the entire organization, more of a reflection of herself. Her insistence to associate herself with Fox programming, their rhetoric and tactics speaks more to her distancing herself from objective, accurate and honest reporting. No credibility as a journalist whatsoever. I think she has a huge ego and enjoys basking in the visibility. NPR can't really do much about her, because she and her cohorts would be shouting some sort of discrimination to any and all who'd listen. Its probably best just to ignore them as I do.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Major Tom (December 07, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
      4  
      Why is Juan Williams Exempt from this scrutiny?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by latichever (December 07, 2009 5:04 pm ET)
        4  
        Despite her statement, there are no fox news shows.

        I've been saying for years that she and Williams should simply be fired from NPR because it violates all codes of ethics for a journalist to work for a political party.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Major Tom (December 07, 2009 6:12 pm ET)
          2  
          I thought for a while that Williams would be a great counterbalance, I thought Fox underestimated him, and that he would outshine Hume, Krauhammer, Kristol, and Barnes... But the passionate, take-nothing-from-nobody guy I would listen to on the Tavis Smiley Show, and on News and Notes, was leashed it seemed, and when I saw him apologizing for Bush, and almost beaming adoration under the thumb of Bill O'Reilly, I was shocked into near anger... And I haven't had the kind of respect for him that I used to, since... I don't know if Juan or Maura should be fired, but I do think they need to take a long look at themseves and muster the courage to produce an ounce of integrity... That would be a start.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bilbo_dies (December 07, 2009 7:45 pm ET)
            2  
            Juan is pretty right leaning all on his own although, occassionally, he will put notice to some of the outrageous allegations that pour forth from the rest of the panel.
            It is one of my favorite moments when he lets go and the camera cuts to Bill Kristol, who looks like he wants to jump across the table and strangle him.

            Since when is Fox New Sunday a "news" show? It is an out and out political opinion show, nothing more.
            (e.g. What's your opinion on Obama's socialist agenda Bill?)

            I don't think I have ever seen "Special Report" so I can't have an opinion on it, well, other than the fact that I bet it is very "special".
            Report Abuse
        • Author by MaineiacMan (December 07, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
            6
          They dont work for a political party. She and Williams make a nice addition to the Fox NEWS hour. I enjoy the differing opinions, apparently you dont.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Major Tom (December 07, 2009 7:15 pm ET)
            2  
            The problem, FYI, is that there are no differing opinions on Fox, the people who comment on that network just vary in the degree they do agree. As for working for a political party, that maybe so, and I can't say Liasson is particularly opinionated, but I have heard some of what Juan Williams believes. I have heard him dominate arguments versus typical conservative thought, and what I see on Fox is a shadow of what I have heard on NPR.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (December 07, 2009 8:06 pm ET)
            2  
            Yeah, sure, MaineiacMan. FAUX is all about differing opinions.

            That's what Rupert Murdoch media outlets are known for.
            ~
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MaineiacMan (December 07, 2009 9:09 pm ET)
                2
              How can they be if you want all liberal views yanked from Fox.

              Going to go after Beckel, Colmes? Estrich next? That might be your best strategy actually. That'll make it very dull to watch.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (December 07, 2009 9:25 pm ET)
                2  
                No, there's no need to go after "liberal views" at FAUX.

                FAUX does not show liberal views. It shows right wing blowhards and allegedly liberal responders, the latter being paid to be weak and ineffective.

                Much like your comments, except for the getting paid and allegedly liberal parts.
                ~
                Report Abuse
                • Author by MaineiacMan (December 08, 2009 7:29 am ET)
                     
                  Maybe MMFA can start up a Mara Liasson (and Juan Williams) link in the "most popular tags" section at the bottom of the page to highlight all of thier right wing rhetoric and angry hate speech.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by jeff191 (December 08, 2009 5:11 pm ET)
               
            I am uncomfortable with giving Fox any credibility, but I dont think thats a real problem, even some of my friends who describe themselves as right wing ,will admit that they dont take Hannity and Beck etc seriously. It is entertainment for them and a place where they can get their news without thinking too hard after a long day.
            I disagree that these NPR hosts should be fired though. If everyone with a scrap of decency leaves Fox, it certainly wont be any better.
            It would be nice if Fox would go away or reform but thats not going to happen. They are a force to be dealt with. The inclusion of talented intelligent reasonable commentators on their program can only help to slightly elevate the tone there. It may even provide some contrast to the Fox ranters and provide a reasonable argument for some viewers. Calling for the firing of NPR staff for appearing on Fox will only serve to reenforce Fox viewthat Npr is a liberal,biased medium
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bip84124092 (December 09, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
           
        Let's hope he's not.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (December 07, 2009 5:39 pm ET)
      1  
      GOP "plants" are everywhere. Some, perhaps, unwitting, but other are surely on the payroll. Liasson is obviously one of them. NPR should do better than that, like get rid of her. It is conflict of interest, I would say. National "PUBLIC" Radio as opposed to Mr. Murdock's "private" opinion channel.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (December 07, 2009 7:49 pm ET)
        1  
        The biggest problem here is that Liasson is on contract with Fox and NPR.
        To quit either she would have to break contract, not necessarily an easy thing to do. If either Fox or NPR wants to break contract then they have the same issues. If someone has violated the contract terms then there usually is an out, if not........ cue the lawyers.


        BTW, I am not in her corner, just pointing out some facts.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (December 07, 2009 8:41 pm ET)
        3  
        Cokie Roberts is another.
        Whenever Liasson and Roberts come on NPR, you can feel the condescension towards Democrats in their supposed objective view.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Jonathan Swiftboat (December 07, 2009 6:17 pm ET)
        1
      Interestingly, not a single example of Ms. Liasson commenting in a partisan or untrue manner was cited in the story, nor was any such bias cited by in previous comments. Fox News Channel is the price America pays for having the First Amendment, but if Ms. Liasson is offering unbiased commentary that by itself raises the level of the Fox programs, that should be applauded. Of course, if she fails to challenge lies or misstatements on Fox that would be challenged on NPR, then her credibility should be questioned.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (December 07, 2009 6:58 pm ET)
      2  
      $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (December 07, 2009 11:19 pm ET)
      1  
      In fact, the "news programs" on which Liasson appears, Special Report and Fox News Sunday, echo Fox's right-wing opinion shows, often featuring smears, falsehoods, doctored and deceptive editing, and GOP talking points.


      liasson is too naive to realize what she is taking part in.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Farzan (December 07, 2009 11:21 pm ET)
         
      Mara Liasson decidedly feels at home when with any Fox buddy. Her eyes get even bigger whenever she hears Obama's voice to express total exasperation. It is simple: money is just too high to leave Fox and go back to that NPR abbey.
      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.