Fox Nation, Big Government advance smear that Jennings is "linked to shocking sex talk"
Fox Nation and Big Government are trumpeting the latest smear on Department of Education official Kevin Jennings: that Jennings is, in the words of Fox Nation, "linked to shocking teen sex talk," referring to a recorded exchange that occurred during a "Queer Sex and Sexuality" workshop during a 2000 conference sponsored by Jennings' organization, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). In fact, Jennings reportedly criticized "some of the" workshop's "content" when the recordings were first released in 2000, and the people involved in conducting the controversial discussion -- none of whom were GLSEN employees -- were either terminated or resigned.
Fox Nation, Big Government attempt to link Kevin Jennings to "shocking sex talk" at GLSEN conference
Fox Nation: "Safe School Czar Linked To Shocking Teen Sex Talk." In a December 7 post titled "Safe School Czar Linked to Shocking Teen Sex Talk," Fox Nation linked to and quoted a December 5 Gateway Pundit post stating that in 2000, GLSEN held a conference that "made it clear that the organization was not so much about tolerance as it was about teaching children about sex."

Big Government posts "a shocking report on Obama's deviant Safe School Czar Kevin Jennings." On December 7, Big Government posted an item that reprinted some of the December 5 Gateway Pundit article, which Big Government called "a shocking report on Obama's deviant Safe Schools Czar Kevin Jennings." The Big Government post included an audio clip from a workshop during the 2000 GLSEN conference in which participants discussed sexual behavior. The Big Government item claimed that "this is not about supporting or not supporting gays or gay rights. This post is about the radical agenda of groups like GLSEN and activists like Kevin Jennings."
In fact, Jennings criticized the content of the workshop, and the workshop's organizers were fired or resigned
Boston Herald: GLSEN, Jennings "agreed" that seminar leaders "crossed a line." On May 18, 2000, the Boston Herald reported that GLSEN "agreed yesterday that three workshop leaders crossed a line with raunchy content directed at students as young as 14 years old." In the article, Jennings, who was the executive director of GLSEN at the time, was quoted saying, "We need to make our expectations and guidelines to outside facilitators much more clear because we are surprised and troubled by some of the accounts we've heard." From the Herald:
"Like the Parents Rights Coalition and the Department of Education, GLSEN is also troubled by some of the content that came up during this workshop," said Kevin Jennings, national executive director of the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network.
He said people who run workshops in the future will get clearer guidelines, though Jennings said the network's annual conference at Tufts University should not be judged on the 30-student seminar "What They Didn't Tell You About Queer Sex and Sexuality in Health Class."
"We need to make our expectations and guidelines to outside facilitators much more clear," said Jennings. "Because we are surprised and troubled by some of the accounts we've heard." [Boston Herald, 5/18/2000, accessed via Nexis]
Boston Globe: Jennings expressed "concerns" about workshop discussion. In a May 18, 2000, Boston Globe article (accessed via Nexis), Jennings criticized the contents of the tape, saying that "from what I've heard, I have concerns as well," and that sexual educational programs "need to be delivered in an age appropriate and sensitive manner." He also claimed that his organization was being unfairly criticized by the Parents Rights Coalition, which had attended the workshop and taped it. According to Jennings: "[T]he people who have the tape know what our mission is, they know that our work is about preventing harassment and they know that session was not the totality of what was offered at a conference with over 50 sessions. Our mission is being misrepresented."
The seminar's organizers were fired or resigned as a result. According to a May 20, 2000, Boston Herald article, of the three state Department of Education employees or contractors who led the seminar, one was fired, one resigned, and one had his contract canceled, as a result of the discussion. From the Boston Herald: "One presenter at the workshop was fired and a second resigned. In explaining his actions yesterday, [then-Massachusetts state education czar David P.] Driscoll said the sessions 'went too far' with explicit discussions about sexual techniques. Driscoll said he had canceled the contract of a third presenter at the March workshop, which included frank talk about how to use a condom and how to perform oral sex."
















Our nation deserves better than the toxic poisoning of our national debate. Until these skunks are called out for what they are and the damage that refuting their obnoxious distortions are doing, our whole country suffers. The offensiveness won't stop getting credibility it doesn't deserve until that happens on a large scale,
It was a huge local controversy at the time and was dubbed "fistgate" by one local newspaper publisher
.
This is another BigGov.com cherry-picked molotov cocktail. More wingnut head will explode and the their blogs will carry on one more "guilt by association" crusade of hysterical homophobia and hate.
;) j/k
[BARF]
:-)
I mean, audio sound bites.
"I wish I were a lesbian".
Or
"Get those pants off". (I think he was giving that order to Beck.)
(Not F. Scoot & William, I meant Marty Fitzgerald and Toothless Joe Faulkner, two local inebriates.)
No shoot Sherlock...what do you think homosexuals do when they get together for a little recreation...bake cookies?
Not only were the words expressed in the seminar disgusting...the visual aspects are even worse...especially when you put a face with the behavior.
"No shoot Sherlock...what do you think homosexuals do when they get together for a little recreation...bake cookies?"
The workshop instructor on the heavily-edited tape makes no mention of homosexual sex. She could have been addressing heterosexual fellatio, in response to a direct question from a young girl in her audience. But there is no way to know that, is there?
The narrator/editor sees to all that.
"Not only were the words expressed in the seminar disgusting..."
And the same words can be heard on "Talk Sex with Sue Johanson", a live phone-in program airing on Oxygen TV. Or on Howard Stern's radio show.
Oh yeah, you go git'em wes. Hang'em high!
" ...the visual aspects are even worse...especially when you put a face with the behavior."
Oh really. Disgusting visual? What if it was not Jennings' face they used but instead used.... well I don't know.....how about Pamela Anderson? Mmmmm, Pam and fellatio? Would that float your boat?
This particular smear meets every requirement standard for classic "propaganda" and YOU loudly, proudly embrace it. Wanna brag about what a "free thinker" you are?
BTW, did you know the guy who recorded and narrated that audio tape paid 30 bucks to attend that workshop? How many "children" do you think forked over their 30 bucks to get in?
You are a shameless, hate-mongering bigot, wesley, and you wear it like a badge. So sad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
"It's like they take pride in being ignorant!" ~Barack Obama
-----------------------------------------------------------------
There is no such thing as "bad knowledge." Why are the so proud of their ignorance?
Out of all those who were there, how many actually complained about the content?
----------------------------------
The Midnight Review
This is why I hate religion: Religion hates knowledge.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Same mental disease when it comes to evolution.
------------------------------------------
The Midnight Review
Using words like prima facie may show sime intelligence, but your understanding of "czar" belies that notion and just shows your ignorance. It is a "nickname" to indicate an area of concentration of responsibility, expertise, or administrative focus upon a particular task. Nothing more. The word has no more meaning or legal authority than pundit, or maven, "mogul" or point man.
No matter what Fox, or Beck, or BigGovernment says to get you riled up against the President, this is the one true definition:
I defy you to find any evidence that a cabinet "czar" represents an official governmnent position of sweeping authority that is an invention outside the constitutional authority of the executive branch.
Go ahead and try. It is a "nickname".
Now, having shown you the official English language definition of the word "czar" as used in United States vernacular, I expect never to see you make this argument again. To do so again will graduate you from "ignorant" to "stupid".