About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Washington Times continues anti-gay war on Kevin Jennings, "Obama's buggery czar"

December 08, 2009 2:10 pm ET — 9 Comments

The Washington Times continued its anti-gay war on Department of Education official Kevin Jennings in a December 8 editorial entitled "Obama's buggery czar," the paper's ninth editorial smearing Jennings since late September. The Times editorial advanced several false and misleading claims in order to paint Jennings as a "moral malefactor" who supported and promoted "kids having sex with adults" as well as "homosexuality and promiscuity."

Wash. Times again falsely suggested Jennings ignored statutory rape

Wash. Times: In speech, "moral malefactor" Jennings discussed advising "a 15-year-old...who was having sex with an older man" to "use a condom." In the December 8 editorial, The Washington Times claimed: "Mr. Jennings is the moral malefactor who gave a speech about how he merely advised a 15-year-old high-school sophomore who was having sex with an older man that, 'I hope you knew to use a condom.'" The Times previously claimed in a September 28 editorial that Jennings had "encouraged" the "statutory rape" of the student.

In fact, counseled student was 16, the age of legal consent, as the Times has previously acknowledged. Despite the Times' suggestion that the student Jennings counseled regarding an encounter he had with an older man was 15-years-old, as Media Matters has previously reported, the student has confirmed that he was 16 at the time of the incident, which is and was the age of consent in Massachusetts. Indeed, the Times itself has already acknowledged the evidence that the student in question was 16 at the time.

Wash. Times baselessly attempted to link Jennings to NAMBLA

Wash. Times: Jennings "expressed admiration for Harry Hay, a notorious and extremely prominent supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association."  The December 8 editorial also charged that Jennings "expressed admiration for Harry Hay, a notorious and extremely prominent supporter of the North American Man Boy Love Association."  The Times previously claimed on October 4 that "the late Hay was a 'gay-rights' activist most notorious for supporting the North American Man Boy Love Association."

In fact, Jennings' praise of Hay had nothing to do with NAMBLA.  Jennings mentioned Harry Hay in a 1997 speech to GLSEN and the transcript was published by anti-gay activist Peter LaBarbera. However, Jennings' praise was of Hay's work as an early gay rights activist and had nothing to do with NAMBLA, as the Times suggested. Jennings reportedly stated: "One of the people that's always inspired me is Harry Hay, who started the first ongoing gay rights groups in America.  In 1948, he tried to get people to join the Mattachine Society.  It took him two years to find one other person who would join.  Well, [in] 1993, Harry Hay marched with a million people in Washington, who thought he had a good idea 40 years before."

Wash. Times distorted book passage to claim GLSEN reading list promoted "being exploited by homosexual pedophiles"

Wash. Times: Jennings promoted relationships between children and "homosexual pedophiles" through GLSEN reading list, which tries "to make sex between children and adults seem normal and acceptable." The December 8 editorial also claimed that Jennings "not only thought there was nothing wrong with boys having sex with older men (or girls having sex with older women), but he also played a role in promoting such relationships." As evidence, the Times reported that the organization that Jennings founded, the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN) compiled a list of suggested readings for students, some of which are "shocking" and "clearly promote homosexuality and promiscuity." According to the Times, "the readings try to make sex between children and adults seem normal and acceptable.  Being exploited by homosexual pedophiles is portrayed as something that can make children happy and fulfilled."

But Times distorted book passage to claim GLSEN reading list promoted idea that "being exploited by homosexual pedophiles... can make children happy and fulfilled."  According to the Times, "eleven of the recommended books were examined by Scott Baker from Breitbart.tv and re-examined by The Washington Times."  The Times claimed that according to their examination of the texts, the readings promote the idea that "being exploited by homosexual pedophiles is portrayed as something that can make children happy and fulfilled." But, as evidence, the Times distorts at least one of the readings. The Times claimed that a passage in Queer 13, one of the books on the GLSEN reading list, describes "a 13-year old boy who has sexual encounters with older men. His experience caused him to desperately want sex." The Times quotes the author as saying "that feeling of doing it to them and them doing the same for me was just too damn good." However, contrary to the suggestion that this passage depicted a child made "happy and fulfilled" by sexual encounters with older men, the author said his encounters included "brutal and painful experiences" and described this period of his life as "the beginning of my worthlessness." From Queer 13, page 45:

This was the year I realized I was helpless, different, wholly alone and defenseless. This was the beginning of my worthlessness. It was always pointed out to me that I wasn't good enough and that there was always someone somewhere doing better, and that no matter what I did, I could still have done better.

Times cropped GLSEN disclaimer on reading list to omit that GLSEN recommended that adults review content before providing to youths.  The Times wrote of GLSEN's Booklink disclaimer: "The organization Web site reassures us, 'All BookLink items are reviewed by GLSEN staff for quality and appropriateness of content.'" The Times omits that the GLSEN disclaimer goes on warn that "some titles for adolescent readers contain mature themes," and "recommend[s] that adults selecting books for youth review content for suitability." From the BookLink section of GLSEN's website:

Times editorial latest example of Wash. Times anti-gay war on Jennings

Wash. Times penned eight other editorials smearing Jennings. According to a search of the Nexis database, the Times' editorial board wrote at least eight editorials specifically targeting Jennings between the dates of September 28 and October 22. At least two additional editorials published during that period portrayed him in a negative light.

Editorials advanced falsehoods and distortions to discredit Jennings. As Media Matters for America has extensively documented, a number of the Times' editorials targeting Jennings advanced false claims or distortions and are riddled with anti-gay rhetoric.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 08, 2009 2:14 pm ET)
      1  
      Buggery. *sigh* A victimless crime if ever there was one.

      The maturity level of these right-wingers never ceases to amaze me.

      The level of denial as well...

      -----------------------------------------------------------------
      Between all the Skeletons and Homosexuals, is there enough room left in the Republican's closet for even a light Windbreaker?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (December 08, 2009 10:53 pm ET)
         
      Wow. Projection, distortion, and deliberate ignorance, all rolled into one MMFA piece.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (December 08, 2009 10:56 pm ET)
         
      May I also add that many of these anti-Obama tea-baggers don't seem to know what they're talking about when they use the word "czar" and have no historical context.

      I understand that the economy as well as accusations of Obama being a socialist don't apply to this article. But, why is there a fascination with "czars" now that Obama is president? Bush had czars.

      Not only that, but those who call him a communist or socialist and use the word "czar" for people Obama appoints have no historical context of Russia. The last czar, Nicholas II, fell to the Bolsheviks, and was a pretty conservative country before then.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shruggery (December 09, 2009 8:47 am ET)
           
        What I love is how Jennings supporters manage to deny accusations rather than promoting him on his merits... however difficult it might be to promote having sex with aborted fetuses.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by tman418 (December 09, 2009 7:44 pm ET)
             
          Denying these false accusations is necessary. And what does sex with aborted fetuses have to do with Jennings?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by SigSoldat (December 09, 2009 4:31 pm ET)
          1
        Anti-gay? I haven't read anything where they are passing judgement on what two adults do within the privacy of their relationship. They are attacking the homosexual community that is intent of pushing this information on kids that are easily influenced.

        Homophobic? A phobia is an irrational fear. I don't know anyone that "fears" homosexuals or homosexuality, but I know a lot of them that dislike it and with good reason. Homosexuals are (generally) extremely permiscuous. They are also involved in more dangerous sex than the average person. And, as evidenced by the books and "educational" material pushed to children, it's clear that the homosexuals would tell every kid that fisting, public restroom or park sex, and hooking up with older men at movie houses is a normal and healthy thing. The only thing people "fear" is that this dangerous behavior will be accepted as normal or healthy and forced on society.

        If anyone wants the truth, here's a link to the original news story and it is REPLETE with disgusting examples that any normal parent would not want their child exposed to. It is very clear that the homosexual activists are attempting to entice kids to join their ranks so they have more people to practice their deviancies with.

        http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2009/12/breaking-obamas-safe-schools-czar-is-promoting-porn-in-the-classroom-kevin-jennings-and-the-glsen-reading-list/
        Report Abuse
    • Author by marie anderson (December 09, 2009 1:14 pm ET)
         
      I am alway perplexed at the irony of progressive reporting. It states in the articles above how this man is being victimized by the media. How about reporting the facts about the organization he belongs to and what they believe is appropriate reading. In red ink above it plainly states that some of the content is mature...well I don't know how many grade-school children are that mature...have any of you read the books associated with this organization? It's gross and x-rated material. At a conference in 2000 at Tuff's University he was speaking to an audience with minors (14 year old's) an speaking about "fisting"..well this is absolutley unexceptible! As a parent I don't want my children reading these books or participating in school functions with x-rated speech!!! I have family who are gay and are just as disgusted by this man...wake up...just because you are a liberal you don't have to agree with every administartive appointee...think for yourself!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (December 09, 2009 8:03 pm ET)
           
        #1. At that conference, Jennings himself was not the speaker talking about fisting. In fact, the workshop itself, which was 1 of 50 sessions, was run by 2 HIV/AIDS educators. Jennings himself criticized it, and one of the educators was fired, the other one resigned.

        #2. He is not forcing anyone to read these books and strongly urges adults to review it before allowing children to have access to the books.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mrhebert74 (December 10, 2009 1:34 am ET)
             
          Owned. But let's look at marie's comic masterpiece a little more closely. First of all, she opens strongly with a misspelling and unnecessary bold type. Are you, like me, "alway" perplexed at wingnut typography efforts? Then on strongly with using the word "irony" without explaining what is ironic. She moves on to suggesting that progressives report "the facts," citing the red "ink" printed above, the very same red type that makes tman's point #2. Outstanding. But marie doesn't stop there. She goes on to ask whether any of us have read the "gross and x-rated" books that she clearly has not, offering the falsehood explained by tman's point #1 as, possibly, an elaboration about GLSEN's books? GREAT wingnut logic: "A falsehood about X is evidence for Y." But let me not gloss over the masterstroke that is "Tuff's University." It even overshadows the potent mix of unneccesary apostrophe, misspelled "and," and "unexceptible" that follow in rapid succession. And now on to two well-roasted wing-chestnuts. First, a deft mixture of "Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children!?" with "Isn't it outrageous what these public schools are doing to society?" And then, the classic "I have friends who are gay." Sure you do, sweetie. Are those gay friends in your head, by any chance?

          Fellow ironic progressives, I hope you too appreciate the beauty of marie's post.
          Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.