About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Columnist Shapiro falsely smears Obama nominee as "alleged former spy for Fidel Castro"

December 16, 2009 1:25 pm ET — 20 Comments

In a smear piece attacking the National Council of La Raza, columnist Ben Shapiro falsely described Mari Del Carmen Aponte, a former board member of the group whom President Obama nominated to be U.S. ambassador to El Salvador, as "an alleged former spy for Fidel Castro." In fact, the FBI reportedly cleared Aponte of allegations that she had been recruited as a Cuban spy.

FBI reportedly debunked Shapiro-forwarded claim Aponte was a "former spy for Fidel Castro"

From Shapiro's December 16 syndicated column:

If you were president of the United States, would you hire an alleged former spy for Fidel Castro to be ambassador to El Salvador, a country teetering on the brink of hard-core socialism? President Obama just did.

On Dec. 9, Obama nominated Mari Del Carmen Aponte to be ambassador to El Salvador, despite the fact that in the late 1990s, the FBI discovered that she was working with Cuban intelligence officers. According to Insight Magazine, "When the FBI eventually questioned her about her involvement with Cuban intelligence, she reportedly refused to cooperate."

Why would Aponte escape the Obama administration's scrutiny? Because she is a former board member of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), the largest Hispanic advocacy organization in the United States, with 300 affiliated community-based organizations, many of which run like local ACORN offices.

But the FBI cleared Aponte of "rumors" of Cuban recruitment. A February 12, 1999, Miami Herald article stated that President Clinton had nominated Aponte to be ambassador to the Dominican Republic in 1998, but she withdrew her nomination after she became "entangled in rumors that Cuban spies once tried to recruit her" and "the spy tale began circulating in Washington gossip circles." The article reported that "[t]he FBI has cleared" Aponte of the allegation, which was first forwarded by a Cuban defector "[w]ithout offering any evidence" to support it. From the article:

The FBI has cleared a former White House volunteer entangled in rumors that Cuban spies once tried to recruit her, and President Clinton will nominate her to a top government job, officials say.

"The agents who vet people's backgrounds gave her a clean bill of health," White House National Security Council spokesman Bob Nash said of Washington lawyer Mari Carmen Aponte.

[...]

Clinton had nominated Aponte as ambassador to the Dominican Republic last year but she withdrew Oct. 25, citing "personal reasons," after the spy tale began circulating in Washington gossip circles.

Months earlier, the FBI had given her a top-security clearance for the ambassadorial post even though the bureau was aware of the Cuban spy tale, Clinton administration officials confirmed.

One Aponte friend said she withdrew after staffers at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Jesse Helms, R-N.C., vowed the panel would ask her tough personal questions as part of her confirmation process. A committee spokesman declined comment.

The spy tale dates back to 1993, when Florentino Aspillaga, an intelligence agent with Cuba's Interior Ministry who had defected in 1987, told it to Miami's Diario las Americas newspaper.

Without offering any evidence, Aspillaga alleged that Cuban spies were trying to recruit Aponte through her Cuban-born boyfriend, Roberto Tamayo, who was known to frequently visit the Cuban diplomatic mission in Washington.

What Aspillaga apparently didn't know was that Tamayo, a Washington businessman, was also in contact with the FBI.

"Tamayo was a valuable source of information about some of the personalities within the Cuban Interests Section," retired FBI counterintelligence agent Ed Joyce told The Washington Times last month.

[...]

Aponte's friends said that as soon as she learned of Aspillaga's allegations, she went to the FBI to inquire about Tamayo, and later arranged a meeting between him and the FBI agents.

She broke up with him in 1994, after he insisted on going on a trip to Cuba over her objections, the friends said.

Publication Shapiro cites for Aponte claim had previously stated it "could not confirm" allegations

Shapiro's claim taken from unconfirmed "confidential intelligence memo." Shapiro's claim that Aponte "reportedly refused to cooperate" with the FBI is taken from a February 22, 1999, Insight on the News article, which cites a "confidential intelligence memo delivered to Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Jesse Helms of North Carolina" as the basis of the allegation. The Insight article refers to an earlier article that first repeated the allegations in the confidential memo. According to that March 23, 1998, article (accessed via Nexis), "Insight could not confirm" the allegations in the memo regarding Aponte.

Insight on the News was a biweekly magazine published until April 2004 by News World Communications, the company controlled by Rev. Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church that also operates The Washington Times and the wire service United Press International; it was succeeded by a web-only publication that has since been shut down.

Insight had history of making false, dubious claims. As Media Matters for America has detailed, the Insight website reported in January 2007, citing no named sources, that then-Sen. Hillary Clinton was responsible for spreading information that Obama, then her opponent in the 2008 Democratic presidential primaries, "spent at least four years in a so-called Madrassa or Muslim seminary, in Indonesia." The accusation that Obama attended a madrassa as a child was immediately debunked by CNN, among others.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Conchobhar (December 16, 2009 2:01 pm ET)
      3 1
      Personally, I've been around long enough to figure that "allegations," coming from the Right, are probably untrue, and should be taken as positive character references.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by edgewaterprog (December 16, 2009 2:16 pm ET)
        1 1
        Or at means that she sat in a room with a Cuban cigar one time.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (December 16, 2009 4:24 pm ET)
        4 1
        I know, you've got to love the nerve of these people.

        They start unfounded rumors, kick-off needless investigations, which end up finding NOTHING... and then those same people come back and act like it was somehow profound that there were rumors in the first place!

        So basically... if the right can make $#!t up about you, then you're unfit to serve.

        I swear I hate these gott damned scumbags. Shapiro should be sued for libel.

        --------------------------------------------------------------------
        I'm so sick of their $#!t.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by tman418 (December 16, 2009 3:04 pm ET)
      2 1
      I really hope people in the MSM can get on this fast. The right will run fast with this, really fast.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Midnight Kevin (December 17, 2009 10:19 am ET)
           
        From what I noticed, a lot of people I talk to dismiss this kind of "news" as nonsense, and they believe everyone else would do so as well, so they aren't too concerned about it. Unfortunately, that only allows it to fester and invigorate the right, whom are under tight control from their leaders.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (December 16, 2009 3:23 pm ET)
      2 1
      Ben Shapiro. Now longer a virgin, still a d-bag.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (December 16, 2009 3:42 pm ET)
      3 1
      So, admitting that there are countries as well as groups worldwide that would rather see America fail than succeed, Mr. Shapiro has added an arrow to their quiver.

      Yes, enemies of America, all you have to do is try to recruit the best and brightest among us to your nefarious cause (whatever that may be), and journalists such as Shapiro here will make sure they are tried and convicted in the press without delay if they are ever nominated to a position of actual responsibility.

      Mr. Shapiro, why do you hate America?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 16, 2009 5:13 pm ET)
        2 1
        Off topic, but Cuba-related. I heard a dittobot caller to Boss Hogg's show this morning alerting Limbaugh that Obama was going to "release" Gitmo prisoners to a prison that was within 20 miles of a nuclear power plant.

        Rush called this "very convenient", whatever that meant.

        The caller, who sounded a bit like Larry the Cable Guy said he "just wanted to get this out there" to let people know what their government is "doing to them".

        I guess he's fine with those prisoners being even closer to a communist country with an air force and a history of being armed by Soviets. Wingnuts just don't think like normal people.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by The_Cat (December 16, 2009 6:15 pm ET)
          2 1
          An interesting exchange, to be sure, Col. Harlan Sanders. For your last sentence, you likely could've stopped after the first four words...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (December 16, 2009 8:15 pm ET)
          2 1
          I am sure that by wingnut logic, keeping the prisoners at Gitmo meant that any escaped turrists would go and kill and turrize commies - who deserve it. It's so hard to keep up with wingnut logic because they fervently adhere to mutually exclusive talking points depending on the point they want to make at a particular second in time.

          Case in point:

          1. You have multiple conservative websites regurgitating the same list of supposed "Muslim acts of terrorism in the USA" (many are examples that happened on US soil from 9/11 to 1/2009 - under President Bush's terms) in order to make the supposed annecdotal argument that Islam is not a "religion of peace".

          2. Then you have the same wingnut contingency arguing that there have been "no acts of terrorism on US soil under President Bush after 9/11" or "President Bush kept us safe after 9/11" - conveniently discounting the examples used above to smear Islam.

          The goal of a large portion especially of the right (and to be fair - partisans of all kinds) seems just to win every argument by simply dismissing all of the inconvenient evidence. It is the way children argue.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jeff191 (December 16, 2009 7:17 pm ET)
      3  
      O h how Fox loves that word(alleged)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rrastro (December 16, 2009 8:35 pm ET)
      1  
      commentary is not news.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave (December 16, 2009 9:03 pm ET)
          4
        She actually was an "alleged" spy. She was cleared, but still alleged. Shapiro is correct. The Duke lacrosse team was allegedly a bunch of rapists, too. Sh*t Happens.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jeff191 (December 17, 2009 11:08 am ET)
             
          after you are cleared you are no longer alleged. I can allege anything I want but I have no right to use that term regarding someone who has been proven innocent. I really have no right to say it on a "news" program
          Report Abuse
        • Author by Handsome Pete (December 17, 2009 11:26 am ET)
          3  
          Ben the virgin didn't report that the FBI cleared her, which, considering it's a pertinent fact, makes him an alleged "journalist".
          Report Abuse
        • Author by stuckinthemiddle (December 17, 2009 12:41 pm ET)
             
          The article actually referred to her as "alleged former spy." She is not an "alleged former spy." When she was cleared by the FBI she was no longer an "alleged former spy." Just like if you are cleared of murder charges you are no longer the "alleged murderer." That is the beauty of the American justice system, you are innocent UNTIL proven guilty. It seems some people are too quick to pass judgement on people of a particular political leaning lately.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (December 18, 2009 9:08 am ET)
             
          The Duke lacrosse team was allegedly a bunch of rapists, too.
          According to your analogy, the Duke lacrosse players can forever be called "alleged rapists". Do you think that is a fair to the players - all of whom were cleared?

          If there are no pending allegations of wrong-doing, a person is no longer "alleged" to have done something wrong. This really shouldn't be so hard.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by rasotis (December 16, 2009 10:21 pm ET)
      2 1
      Does anyone else think the phrase "falsely smears" is a double negative?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by daarth_reagan (December 16, 2009 11:21 pm ET)
           
        Does anyone else think the phrase "falsely smears" is a double negative?

        It is in the way Media Matters is using it here. In fact, Shapiro doesn't "falsely smear" Mari Del Carmen Aponte. He correctly identifies her as an "alleged" former spy.

        It is Media Matters that has falsely smeared Ben Shapiro for falsely smearing Mari Del Carmen Aponte. Got that?
        Report Abuse