About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Glenn Beck: Media Matters' 2009 Misinformer of the Year

December 21, 2009 11:45 am ET — 208 Comments

Glenn Beck's well of ridiculous was deep and poisonous before he launched his Fox News show, but the inauguration of the 44th president of the United States -- and the permissive cheerleading of his Fox News honchos -- uncorked the former Morning Zoo shock jock's unique brand of vitriol, stage theatrics, and hyperbolic fright, making him an easy choice for Media Matters' 2009 Misinformer of the Year.

When he wasn't calling the president a racist, portraying progressive leaders as vampires who can only be stopped by "driv[ing] a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers," or pushing the legitimacy of seceding from the country, Beck obsessively compared Democrats in Washington to Nazis and fascists and "the early days of Adolf Hitler." He wondered, "Is this where we're headed," while showing images of Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin; decoded the secret language of Marxists; and compared the government to "heroin pushers" who were "using smiley-faced fascism to grow the nanny state."

Like his predecessor, Beck spat on scruples, frequently announcing his goal to get administration officials fired. He increasingly acted not as a media figure, but as the head of a political movement, while helping to bring fringe conspiracies of a one-world government into the national discourse.

And he all too frequently helped to set the mainstream media's agenda.

Glenn Beck's disturbing use of race and race-baiting

Appearing on Fox & Friends in June to discuss a White House "beer summit" between President Obama, a white Massachusetts police officer, and a black Harvard professor who had been arrested entering his own home, Beck uttered perhaps his most infamous words to date, calling the president a "racist" with "a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture." The statement drew widespread derision and condemnation, and Fox News immediately sought to distance itself from the statement. But Beck's divisive commentary was likely no surprise to his followers, coming as it did at the end of a week-long deluge of race-baiting that included the claim that Obama "has real issues with race," and Beck's incessant talk of Obama's policies as a form of minority reparations. Just one month earlier, Beck had agreed that Obama was elected because of race and not policies, and in May he called then Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a "racist."

In the controversy that followed Beck's inflammatory charge that the president is racist, his Fox News show began to hemorrhage advertisers, and Beck began to beg his viewers to "call a friend and tell them to watch the show this week." By September, Beck, who had become "tired of the race thing" and who claimed he doesn't "think the race thing works anymore," apparently decided it was time to move on. He later would blame politicians for charges of racism and call "false cries of racism" "dangerous." Beck then sat down for an interview with CBS' Katie Couric where he would express regret for the way he phrased the claim that Obama is a racist, but then emphasized that the issue of Obama's racism is a "serious question."

In the months since Beck called Obama a "racist" with a "deep-seated hatred of white people," at least 80 advertisers have reportedly dropped their ads from his Fox News show, yet he has faced no apparent repercussions from Fox News. Then again, Rupert Murdoch apparently agrees with Beck that Obama is a racist. (Or maybe not.)

Beck's red scare tactics

Beck introduced himself to Fox News viewers in 2009 by announcing that he was "tired of the politics of left and right," which leads its participants to do insane things, like accusing political opponents of "trying to turn us into communist Russia." Setting aside for the sake of brevity Beck's long history of calling progressive figures communists and Marxists, he almost immediately put lie to his professed aversion. Yes, taking to the airwaves the following week on his radio show, Beck concluded, "I do believe that Barack Obama is a socialist" who "has Marxist tendencies." Beck explained:

BECK: He may be a full-fledged Marxist. He has surrounded himself by Marxists his whole life."

Alas, the remainder of 2009 would see Beck unleash a tirade against Obama's "full-fledged" Marxism, blaming "fearless leader, Comrade Obama" for overseeing the "destruction of the West"; citing Obama administration policies and promising to show how "they line up with some of the goings-on in history's worst socialist, fascist countries"; calling Obama's economic recovery package "truly stepping beyond socialism" and "starting to look at fascism"; declaring that Obama is "so clearly" a socialist, citing his work as a community organizer as clear proof of such; claiming that Obama is "a Marxist who is "setting up a class system"; and comparing health care reform to socialism.

Beck's red scare was not limited to Obama himself. During a May 28 discussion with Bill O'Reilly, Beck proclaimed of Obama, "His friends and nominees and everything -- they're all Marxist." And over the course of 2009, Beck's McCarthy-esque list of known communists proved to be long and distinguished, including the Democratic and Republican parties, former White House communications director Anita Dunn, SEIU president Andy Stern, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, FCC official Mark Lloyd, proponents of maintaining free market principals in Internet competition, Sonia Sotomayor, and media reform activists at Free Press.

By way of example, Beck spent most of his hour-long Fox show one October evening discussing video of then-White House communications director Anita Dunn, who had cited Mao Zedong as one of two political philosophers -- the other being Mother Theresa -- she cites to illustrate the advice that "you don't have to follow other people's choices and paths" or "let external definition define how good you are internally." Ignoring the numerous political figures on the right -- including those who routinely appear on Fox News and Glenn Beck's very show -- who have cited Mao's teachings in the past, Beck distorted the video, claiming she "worships" "her hero" Mao.

By October 30, Beck -- who began the year decrying those who would denigrate the national debate by calling political opponents socialists -- had redrawn the battle lines:

BECK: I have said to you before, and we laid the case out last night. These are revolutionaries. You must decide, America, and your friends must decide. There's no sidelines here. You're either on the side of the revolutionaries for Marxism and a new Venezuela here in America, or the revolutionaries of 1776.

Beck's Law: If Obama did it, always say that Hitler did it, too

On June 30, Wal-Mart joined the Center for American Progress and SEIU in announcing support for health care reform efforts. The next day on his Fox News show, Beck made one of the countless Nazi and Hitler comparisons he made this year:

BECK: This is what happened in the 1940s. Look, this is what happened in Europe in the 1930s. It's what happened in Italy. It's what happened in the national socialist country of Germany in the 1930s under Hitler. These companies get into bed and think, "Well, we're going to be fine. We'll just take a little bit of this."

Then, they're trapped. These are bullies that are pushing these companies. And these companies are naive, at best, that they think they can get into bed with the devil, and then be able to control it.

In his uninterrupted efforts to attack and smear progressives, Beck would repeatedly prove the accuracy of Godwin's Law. Beck called Obama's proposal to expand the foreign service, AmeriCorps, and the Peace Corps "what Hitler did with the SS" and compared the closing of car dealerships to what happened under the Nazis, warning, "Gang, at some point, they're going to come for you." Incidentally, this would not be Beck's only reference to Martin Niemoller's lectures. Responding to Anita Dunn's criticism of Fox News' overt partisanship, Beck compared the channel to Jews during the Holocaust, with other media outlets representing the silent bystanders.

Beck's embrace of violent, anti-government rhetoric

Beck's adoration of theatrics reached a fevered pitch in April. After claiming, "I think it would be just faster if they just shot me in the head," Beck created a classic cable news moment when, in criticizing the president's policies, he pretended to pour gasoline on an average American, stating, "President Obama, why don't you just set us on fire? For the love of Pete, what are you doing?" Beck would go on to use violent imagery throughout the year, distorting the face and voice of a "concerned parent" who attacked Dunn for her Mao reference as if he were a mafia informant, purporting to boil a frog to illustrate that "we've been tossed quickly into boiling water," and invoking civil rights marchers having fire hoses turned on them to spur opposition to health care reform.

Rhetorically as well, Beck spent 2009 at the forefront of the emerging right-wing culture of paranoia, his persecution complex manifesting itself in claims that "they are going to silence voices like mine" and suggestions that "you" would "have to shoot me in the forehead before I will let you into my house to tell me how to raise my children; you will have to shoot me in the forehead before you take away my gun; you will have to shoot me in the forehead before I acquiesce and be silent." This especially unhinged rallying cry continued:

BECK: [T]hey cannot move on these things, because they are building a machine that will crush the entrepreneurial sprit and the freedom that our founding fathers designed. This machine, whatever it is they are building, will crush it. Do not let them build another piece. So while I turn away, I want to make sure that I have at least 10 million eyes watching -- watching every single move they're making.

[...]

We know why they're doing what they're doing. Now you need to do what you do, and as long as that is peaceful, we will save our country.

Beck alternately suggested that former White House adviser Van Jones or ACORN would kill him and that SEIU would break his legs. He stated that he "fear[s]" that he'll be silenced by a "thug-ocracy" that includes ACORN, SEIU, and Obama. Beck compared the Obama administration to the bat-wielding Al Capone from The Untouchables, claiming, "You take these guys on, and they will bash your brains out"; suggested that the administration was out to destroy him; argued that the Obama administration would use bombings of a Canadian pipeline to justify taking over oil companies; and suggested that government wants "more problems" so "they can use the iron fist and crush people."

Beck claimed the 2008 election was a coup conducted "through the guise of an election" and warned that "the country may not survive Barack Obama"; he hosted a guest who claimed the "only chance we have as a country right now is" for Osama bin Laden to "detonate a major weapon" in the United States. Beck charged the Obama administration with "putting a gun to America's head" through its approach to legislating, attacked White House advisers Cass Sunstein and John Holdren by stating that they "will be responsible for many, many deaths," and said the White House and progressives are "taking you to a place to be slaughtered."

Against the backdrop of this hyperbolic fright, Beck discussed poisoning Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, encouraged his followers to "hold a meeting" with politicians "in front of their house," and encouraged people to attend a November rally in Washington to "see the whites of their eyes," warning, "There is coming a point to where the people will have exhausted all of their options; when that happens, look out."

Beck was simultaneously calling on his followers to eschew violence, since "one lunatic like Timothy McVeigh could ruin everything," and claiming, "It's not time to pick up guns" or "blow anything up," all while warning, "Somebody's going to do something stupid, and it will change the republic overnight."

Beck uses Fox News show as tool for organizing conservatives

On March 13, Beck used his Fox News show to tearfully announce his 9-12 Project, weeping as he declared, "I just love my country, and I fear for it," then stiffening his spine to add, "They don't surround us; we surround them." Within days, Beck was denying interest in running for office, telling Fox News' Patti Ann Browne that "we would run out of missiles. Seriously, that would be the most overused phrase in my administration, 'What do you mean, we're out of missiles?' "

As Media Matters demonstrated, the anti-government tea party protest movement operated as a de facto subsidiary of Fox News, and no one better illustrates the interconnected nature of Fox News and the tea parties than Glenn Beck. On April 6, with an image of his 9-12 Project flag waving behind him, Beck let his followers know where they could "celebrate with Fox News" at "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties." Three days later, Beck announced that he would be participating in a tea party fundraiser prior to speaking at a tea party event and used his Fox News show to tie the tea party protests to Thomas Paine. Then, his persecution complex in overdrive, Beck declared that "[t]here are forces at play that are doing everything they can to make this -- tax day at San Antonio, the Alamo -- about me," informing his followers that he would not be giving the keynote address at the San Antornio Fox News Tax Day Tea Party, as had been originally planned. Beck would eventually marry his anti-government paranoia to his tea party advocacy, claiming that a Department of Homeland Security report on right-wing extremism was somehow directed at tea partiers.

Beck's political activity continued in August as he began aggressively promoting "the biggest 9-12 tea party yet, on Capitol Hill." Beck's involvement with the 9-12 protest movement led CNN's Howard Kurtz to ask whether Beck is "a talk show host" or "a leader of a movement." Underscoring Beck's role leading the 9-12/tea party movement, Fox News footage of the rally included signs paying homage to one of Beck's numerous conspiracy theories, that of Obama's nefarious "civilian national security force." Beck would go on to dubiously claim that the protest was the "largest march on Washington ever," a claim he based on "overseas" reporting; he would subsequently cite a university he could not recall to claim that 1.7 million attended his protest. To cap it all off, Beck laughably argued that President Obama should have given his Nobel Peace Prize to "the Tea Party goers and the 9-12 project."

In the aftermath of his successful rally, Beck looked to more traditional ways to use his perch to engage in political activity. As the special election in New York's 23rd Congressional District drew to a close, Beck, along with several of his Fox News colleagues, aggressively campaigned for independent conservative candidate Doug Hoffman, on the grounds that GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava was too moderate, and thus did not pass their ideological purity test. He also offered to host a fundraiser for GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann, and encouraged his followers to "leave" the Republican Party as "the best way to get Republicans to change."

Having used his radio and Fox News shows to cultivate a legion of followers, Beck now seems poised to push the movement forward, promising a new "multi-level" plan for his 9-12 project that involves more conventions, meetings with conservative "minds," and a rally at the Lincoln Memorial. Becks' laudable goal: nothing less than to "save our country." And it seems the GOP and the tea partiers have finally answered Beck's call.

Beck's wild conspiracy charts

Regular viewers of the Glenn Beck show this year were treated to a litany of charts and graphs, purportedly laying out a myriad of suspicious connections among things with names like ACORN, SEIU, the Tides Foundation, and two brothers named Rathke. Oh, and occasionally fictional characters. These charts were frequently depicted as trees, and often represented by encircled words with lines showing how each circle is connected. Occasionally they involved defacing the U.S. flag.

Beck's conspiracy theories made room for Sotomayor and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Endowment for the Arts, White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, Che Guevara, Mumia Abu-Jamal, OnStar, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and "almost everything."

When Beck famously spelled "OLIGARH" to illustrate the type of political system the grandest of conspiracies was constructing, he simply claimed a day later that his misspelling proved "you can't spell 'oligarch' without the czars." When he used a game of Connect 4 to illustrate one of his many conspiracy theories, he accidentally won before he could use the game piece representing Obama, but pressed on anyway, only able to make his grand point after cheating at a child's game in which he was playing against himself.

In Beck's conspiratorial world, union officials make decisions on whether to send additional troops to Afghanistan, community organizers are deliberately undermining the financial system, ACORN is designing "government-run health care," and the whole cast of conspirators is establishing a "maximum wage" to redistribute wealth and fixing elections in New York and Minnesota. Oh, and New Orleans' response to Hurricane Katrina was an effort to hide ACORN corruption.

The irony, of course, is that for each of the illusory connections Beck draws between his political enemies, there exists an actual connection between Beck and some of the more controversial actors in the world of right-wing activism.

He's not saying there are FEMA concentration camps ...

One of the methods to Beck's madness is the attempted debunking -- a clever little trick whereby Beck professes his desire to prove false a wild conspiracy theory, but finds himself unable to, thereby lending it credibility without actually endorsing its veracity. A fine illustration of this technique can be found in Beck's efforts to "debunk" rumors of the Obama administration's FEMA concentration camps. On March 4, Beck appeared on Fox & Friends and declared, "We are a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination." He subsequently stated that he "wanted to debunk" the theory that FEMA was building camps, but added: "I can't debunk them." His non-debunking continued:

BECK: It is -- it is our government. If you trust our government, it's fine. If you have any kind of fear that we might be headed towards a totalitarian state, look out, buckle up. There is something going on in our country that is -- ain't good.

On his Fox News program later that day, Beck claimed, "I don't believe in the FEMA prison," and later stated, "If these things exist, that's bad, and we will cover it. If they don't exist, it's irresponsible to not debunk this story." One month later, Beck hosted James Meigs, Popular Mechanics' editor-in-chief, to debunk the stories. To recap, Beck had first warned of "a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination," then had brought up the rumors of FEMA concentration camps that he "wanted to debunk" but could not. Later that day he professed, "I don't believe in the FEMA prisons," but again suggested he could not debunk them. It was a month before he got around to definitively debunking them.

Beck rejoices after America loses bid to host 2016 Olympics

On September 28, White House officials announced that President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama would travel to Copenhagen in order to help the Chicago Olympic Committee present its bid to host the 2016 Olympics. One day later, Beck took to the airwaves, leading the charge in attacking Chicago as a city unfit to host the Olympics. In addition to asking "[w]hose agenda" Obama was "really pushing," Beck complained that the Second City was too violent for the Olympics and said that Chicago was less favorably suited to hold the Olympics than Rio de Janeiro, Madrid, and Tokyo because of the city's history of organized crime:

BECK: Rio de Janeiro is one of the three other cities competing against Chicago for the 2016 games. Madrid and Tokyo are the other two. It's a tough choice, what should we do? What should we do?

Well, in the America that I grew up in, we would use logic. The way the IOC normally does it is do select the city which presents the superior plan. OK, that makes sense. All right, does the best job in organizing. Oh, Chicago is good at community organizing, and organized labor, and organized mafia. Oops. Did I say that out loud?

When the IOC subsequently awarded the games to Rio de Janeiro, Beck giddily begged his followers, "Please let me break this news to you. Oh, it's so sweet." As his sidekick Stu began to make the news, Beck implored his followers to "savor" the moment, claiming, "We can always hope" that Obama is the first head of state to fail to secure an Olympics bid. Beck subsequently claimed to have "no problem" with Chicago hosting the Olympics.

Beck's slavery fetish

During a February appearance on Fox & Friends, Beck said of the economic stimulus plan, "It is slavery." Beck's enslavement to that metaphor nearly rivaled his obsession with Marxists, Leninists, and 1930s Germany for his most ridiculous rhetorical flourish.

According to Beck, slavery was coming at the hands of government, ACORN, SEIU, student loans, the census, Dale and Wade Rathke, politicians, progressives, federal assistance, and debt. And, as one would expect, only the 9-12 protesters could defend freedom from the onslaught of slavery.

Beck leads the charge in misinforming on the news of the day

The Sotomayor nomination

In a May 1 statement on the retirement of Supreme Court Justice David Souter, Obama stated that he considered the "quality of empathy" one of the qualifications he would seek in a nominee. The morning of May 26, Obama announced Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee, and Beck immediately combined the right's willful ignorance of the long list of conservatives citing empathy as a desired quality in a judge with his own brand of racial invective:

BECK: They're just like, "Hey, Hispanic chick lady! You're empathetic?" She says yep. They say, "You're in!" That's the way it really works.

During the confirmation process, Beck would argue that Hitler's empathy led to genocide and allege that Sotomayor is "a Marxist" and evidence of a "hostile takeover" of the country.

Health care reform falsehoods

In a February 9 Bloomberg commentary, long-time health care misinformer and former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey launched the falsehood that a provision in the economic recovery act would allow the federal government to take over health care and "dictate treatments." The following day, McCaughey appeared on Beck's Fox News show to repeat her false claim, and by Feburary 11, Beck had fully adopted the falsehood as his own:

BECK: So this is -- really, this is the beginning -- I mean, this is the way it happens in every society. I mean, you know, the extreme example is what happened in Germany, when -- they actually had a chart on how many potatoes you could, you know, make, how many hours you could work, how many fields you could till, et cetera, et cetera. And if you couldn't do very much, well, then, you didn't get, you know, the primo health care.

That's just the way it works when everybody has to share for the common good. Sometimes for the common good, you just have to say, "Hey, Grandpa, you've had a good life. Sucks to be you." That's not compassion.

Indeed, throughout the 2009 health care reform debate, Beck has repeatedly tied reform efforts to Nazi efforts to kill the elderly and newborns, taken ownership of Sarah Palin's egregiously false death panels smear, and adopted the distortion that the uninsured would face time in jail under reform proposals. When a nonbinding task force in November recommended that women aged 40 to 49 years not get routine mammogram screenings, Beck was driving the conservative demagoguery machine, adopting the tired death panels smear to claim that these guidelines -- that are binding on no single entity or human -- were yet further proof that death panels existed.

Suffice it to say that the moment Fox News issued Glenn Beck its imprimatur to spread conservative misinformation, the national public discourse was destined to be slightly off-kilter, and the national media's self-proclaimed rodeo clown took viewers and listeners on one wild ride through distortions and falsehoods.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 21, 2009 11:50 am ET)
      23 5
      Congratulations, Glenn. It wasn't easy for you, I know. Look at the competition: Sean Hannity, who has only a nodding acquaintance with reality; Bill O'Reilly, who still cannot get over the fact that soul food restaurants are not filled with people shouting for more "iced tea, MF'er"; Pat Buchanan, who is, sadly, the "brains" of his family; all the AM shock jocks, from whose ranks you came but never really graduated.

      I salute you, Glenn Beck. Real Man of Genius.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (December 21, 2009 12:23 pm ET)
        11 7
        Yes WildcatProgressive, Congratulations are in Order.
        For a Man that has Spit out every insult except to Defame someone's Daughter.
        I feel Sean Hannity's Pain for i know he Coveted this Award.
        Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, i never been proud of my Country, Poor Sean all that work & no Reward.


        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
        • Author by News Corpse (December 21, 2009 3:53 pm ET)
          8 4
          Sean may be disappointed but at least Sarah got her due for Lie of the Year.

          I think there should be a Lifetime Liars Achievement Award. They should call it The Becky. Glenn has earned it. Here is just a sampling:

          Obama is creating a Nazi-like civilian force.
          Van Jones is a convicted felon.
          ACORN is receiving billions of dollars.
          Eco-terrorists bombed radio tower in Washington.
          1.7 million Tea Baggers at 9/12 rally
          UAW workers earn average $154.00 per hour.
          Carbon dioxide not a dangerous pollutant.
          Anita Dunn worships Mao.
          Obama threatened to close Nebraska military base.

          Guinness might want to look into this. I think Beck has set a record.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by News Corpse (December 21, 2009 3:57 pm ET)
          16 4
          And let's not forget Beck's striking visual aids:

          [http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2449/3948444296_83aec7c254.jpg]
          Report Abuse
          • Author by CCCP (December 23, 2009 11:30 pm ET)
              1
            It's not media matters, its media manipulated by statist organization. More you disinform, more viewers Glen Beck gets. Great job!
            Report Abuse
        • Author by drknowit_all (December 21, 2009 5:47 pm ET)
             
          lol
          Report Abuse
        • Author by SteevK (December 22, 2009 1:10 am ET)
          6 4
          Poor Sean myst be feeling quite left out these days. Whenever the non-Fox media represents hate-radio/TV demagogues, they name Rush & Beck ONLY! It must grate him every time he hears this used - sort of like Coulter, who grieved that SHE was no longer on the "liberal media's hit list"

          As an eternal optimist, I'll take whatever pleasure I can that Beck's knocked Hannity from the center of the RW media spotlight. He used to be next in line to El Rushbo! How the mighty have fallen.

          Sure, Beck is a danger to America & Americans, but there's that...

          ;o)

          Report Abuse
          • Author by ArguingwithIdiots (December 23, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
              1
            Beck is a danger only to liberals. He was right about Van Jones and Acorn. You cannot dispute that. No one knows if he is lying about health care because no one knows whats in the final bill. I cannot believe it. I thought this site was actually in the middle and exposed falsehoods and smears on both sides but all it is is a bunch of liberal threads telling each other how right they are. Just like the Keith Olberman show. Hell will freeze over is he ever has anyone on his show to the right of Jeanene Garafola who will actually debate him. This is exactly what MediaMatters is. More like ConservativeMediaMatters.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
             
          You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by rtejon (December 21, 2009 5:51 pm ET)
        2 1
        Nice dig at Bud Light drinkers.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (December 22, 2009 1:25 pm ET)
        6 2
        Yes, amazing that voters were able to make a choice at all. Other contestants were right there with Beck. Of course the usual suspects like Hannity, Limbaugh, Buchanan, and O'Reilly. Then there is most of the ABC newsies who seem to tilt far, far to the right. Sometimes I wonder if Wallace really was Mike's kid at all since he is so detached from reality reporting on such a regular basis. Then there is the host of other minor right wing nuts who blather on and on. But in the end, Beck does take the cake. He fibs regularly and seems to have no moral rudder at all.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:16 pm ET)
          1
        You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Truth007 (December 23, 2009 4:37 pm ET)
          1
        Hello Gentlemen or should I say Puppets!

        Glen Beck is just speaking the truth.. Which you guys
        used to do .. oh.oh.. I think you used to do. Real people like
        to hear the truth and if you don't like Glen Beck in telling it
        then call him on the red phone and tell him sooooo.. If you have
        something to say that he has said is wrong, please, please call
        him... otherwise don't waist your breath...

        Look - If you know the truth and don't want to say it the way it is and keeping to yourself and the master planners that you are to benefit yourself.. COntinue.. the strings will soon be unloosen one day..

        Praying for you all -

        Glen Beck - Continue speaking the truth to let us know the truth and the inside of everything that is going in our GOV, SENT, WASH...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (December 21, 2009 12:02 pm ET)
      14 3
      I prefer "Liar of the Year", but...okay.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 1:18 pm ET)
        17 6
        MMFA doesn't call what these fools do "lies", because that word implies 'intent'. MMFA doesn't try to discern intent. They let us do that, but that's why they don't talk about "bias" either - "bias" implies intent.

        That's why MMFA says that these fools tell "falsehoods".

        But you should feel free to call them liars. We posters aren't under the same restrictions.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 1:39 pm ET)
          10 27
          Why do you feel the need to correct everybody and then proceed to tell them what language they "feel free" to use here? Your arrogance knows no bounds, I don't know who you think you are, especially considering the numerous times MMfA has banned you for this or that. Save your directives Sue.

          Oh, and only a parser extraordinaire would try and say a falsehood is different than a lie, or that MMfA doesn't discern intent or talk about bias. Wow.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Brabantio (December 21, 2009 2:04 pm ET)
            12 3
            Why do you disagree with that? How else do you distinguish between something intentionally deceptive and something that's simply not true, for whatever other reason?

            Has "parsing" morphed into the understanding that different words have different shades of meaning?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pongotwistleton (December 21, 2009 2:10 pm ET)
              2 15
              Brab,

              In everyday conversation, what connotation do you think the term "falsehood" carries? When someone innocently misstates a fact, do you say they just leveled a 'falsehood'?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Brabantio (December 21, 2009 2:17 pm ET)
                10 1
                Sure, why not? It's the same as saying "That's not true". It doesn't suggest that the person was intending to mislead, as "that's a lie" does.

                What would you suggest, anyway? If the word "falsehood" suggests intent, then how would it be possible to point out a falsehood without making a commentary about intent?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
                  7 14
                  Main Entry: false·hood
                  Pronunciation: \ˈfȯls-ˌhu̇d\
                  Function: noun
                  Date: 13th century

                  1 : an untrue statement : lie

                  Take it up with Merriam or Webster.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Ruby (December 21, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
                    15 1
                    The point trying to be made is that, in order to accuse someone of lying, it has to be clear that they knew what was true and intentionally said something different.

                    I think there is a difference between lying and spreading misinformation, as in just repeating something that's false.

                    I just don't know what the best way is to differentiate between the two, but i think that's the only point anyone's trying to make.
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 3:37 pm ET)
                    12 3
                    Many falsehoods are also lies, but not all falsehoods are lies, and if you'll note, the definitions of "falsehood" don't include the intent to deceive. "Lie" does.

                    That's the difference you're desperately trying to ignore here.

                    Beck is a serial misinformer. He's likely a serial liar too, but MMFA doesn't call him that, because they don't try to label the intent of anyone.

                    But continue on derailing the thread - that's about the only thing you're good at.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
                      5 15
                      Desperately? I am saying for you to try and tell us what MMfA does and doesn't do is not exactly necessary, I hate to burst your bubble. None of us has an issue with categorizing Beck as a liar, why you think MMfA shies away from it is a little ridiculous. He is what he is, despite your wordsmith nonsense.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by open_mind (December 21, 2009 3:59 pm ET)
                        10 1
                        MMfA wisely avoids the argument whether it is a lie or not. That is the point. In the end it really does not matter whether there was intent to deceive in the false statement. What is important is that the truth be put straight. MMfA does not want the argument to stray from the point that is obviously more important.

                        People can differ whether Beck intends to deceive (why bother getting into his supposed motives), but what MMfA argues is much less arguable is that Beck told something that is observably false.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
                        7 5
                        Hey, I'm not the one who made a big deal out of my explanation - that would be you.

                        And the fact that you made a big deal out of what you are now apparently admitting isn't a big deal is even more evidence that you're desperate!
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by WontonTiger (December 22, 2009 4:20 pm ET)
                           
                        Your "bias" is apparent, yet MM would not accuse you of bias, as it's not what they do.

                        Let it go, you're wrong, and you look less informed the more that you post.

                        There is reason for the semantics, and it is impartiality.
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by John Paradox (December 21, 2009 4:06 pm ET)
                    6  
                    Encarta:
                    3. something not consistent with fact: something that does not correspond with the known or observable facts


                    MW:
                    2 : absence of truth or accuracy


                    Cambridge:
                    a lie or a statement which is not correct

                    Wiktionary:
                    # The state of being false.
                    # A false statement, esp. an intentional one; a lie

                    Don't tell falsehoods.

                    Webster's:
                    # a false statement; lie
                    # a false belief, theory, idea, etc.

                    Infoplease:
                    2. something false; an untrue idea, belief, etc.:
                    3. the act of lying or making false statements.
                    4. lack of conformity to truth or fact.

                    Your argument is similar to conflating the noun Plant to automatically converting to Marijuana... the idea of sets and subsets... oh, never mind.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
                  3 17
                  "If the word "falsehood" suggests intent, then how would it be possible to point out a falsehood without making a commentary about intent?"

                  A fib.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Brabantio (December 21, 2009 2:40 pm ET)
                    13  
                    I'm accustomed to hearing "falsehood" as closer to "untruth" than "lie", which isn't accurate. Perhaps "untruth" is what they should say. "Fib", however, suggests something trivial or inconsequential. I'm hoping you didn't mean to suggest that misinformation in the media is trivial.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by Easy to refute wingnuts (December 22, 2009 11:49 am ET)
                         
                      "Untruth" is too close to "double-plus untruth", and we all know where that leads...
                      Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 2:09 pm ET)
            13 2
            Did I correct anyone above? Nope.

            I simply explained why MMFA doesn't use the word "liar".

            And a lie is different than a falsehood. It's not parsing words at all. Look up the definitions. A falsehood is something that's untrue. A lie is something that's untrue, said with the intent to deceive. And that's why MMFA doesn't use the word LIE, because of that difference. And, unlike Newsbusters or Accuracy in Media, MMFA doesn't talk about conservative bias. Posters talk about those two things, and should feel free to, but MMFA stays away from that.

            But your post is clearly a personal attack. Seems like all you can do are derailing posts and personal attacks that are intended to derail threads too.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
              9 24
              Every post of yours has a old maid schoolmarmish tone to it. From your stupid off topic scoldings to word meaning corrections to constantly explaining why MMfA does what they do and what their intent is; it's nothing more than you trying to suck up to the person responsible here for yanking posters from this website. You just want to get in their good graces so they look more sympathetically on you when you lose it someday and start on some viscous tirade against a fellow poster.

              Post your opinions and leave the imaginary hall monitoring at the door, nobody is interested.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by worrierking (December 21, 2009 2:44 pm ET)
                15 3
                "Schoolmarmish"? "Hall monitoring"? "Scolding"?

                Sorry Tommy, but were looking in the mirror as you thought that up?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
                  6 20
                  The rest of you may be intimidated by Sue's admonitions, or dare not to question her, but it only prompts me to give her a taste of her own medicine from time to time. Just to keep her honest, you know :)
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by worrierking (December 21, 2009 3:26 pm ET)
                    11  
                    I'm pretty sure that everyone knows how successful their admonitions towards me would be. (Except for my wife's.)

                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by LKL (December 21, 2009 3:44 pm ET)
                    15 2
                    Oh gosh, thank you so much for your bravery in accusing someone of having an "old maid schoolmarmish tone"! Now we need no longer cower before her . . .
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by open_mind (December 21, 2009 4:02 pm ET)
                    8 1
                    I've tangled with DellDolly a few times before and (as I have said before) I think at times she can be freakishly and unnecessarily belligerent. That said, she is right about this. I am not going to disagree just for the sake of disagreement.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 4:07 pm ET)
                      5 16
                      "I think at times she can be freakishly and unnecessarily belligerent"

                      I can't disagree with that, I just thought her initial response to Nerzog was silly, especially when he was inserting tongue in cheek while being absolutely correct.

                      It needed no correction or clarification from her.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by juliajayne1 (December 21, 2009 4:32 pm ET)
                        11 5
                        Hey Suzy, I think DD is a good poster, but like you, I would apply the adjective school marmish as well as scold lickity split. She's bossy too. And I do think she is who you say. Not that there's anything wrong with that....;-)

                        However, the king of all parsers should refrain from using that particular adjective.

                        And yes, you are free to say I'm silly and a dirty flirt, and add nada to the conversation, as I willingly plead guilty. ;-0)
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by jeter2 (December 21, 2009 4:58 pm ET)
                          4 9
                          Brave girl. You are probably on Sue's aka Dell Dolly's Hit List now!! :-O

                          And yes, you are free to say I'm silly and a dirty flirt, and add nada to the conversation, as I willingly plead guilty. ;-0)

                          So that's not a lie or falsehood? ;-)
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by juliajayne1 (December 21, 2009 5:12 pm ET)
                            9 5
                            Would I lie to you?

                            Would I lie to you, honey?

                            Now would I say something that wasn't true?

                            I'm asking you, suger, would I liiiiiiiiie to you?

                            :-0)
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by snoopy (December 22, 2009 1:48 pm ET)
                            4 1
                            Nah jeter, it's not a lie or falsehood. It's just a good old case of blue balls! ;)
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by juliajayne1 (December 22, 2009 2:52 pm ET)
                              4  
                              Wow, early Christmas present. Three of my fave posters all in a row. Hi guys!

                              Ans welcome home in two short days, Snoopy.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by juliajayne1 (December 22, 2009 3:18 pm ET)
                                2 1
                                Doh......I meant welcome home tomorrow. I keep thinking it's Monday still...ha!
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by mary59 (December 22, 2009 4:25 pm ET)
                                  4 1
                                  Awright, jj, hits great seeing ya here and glad that Snoop is landing back in TX. Bring on the festivities!
                                  Report Abuse
              • Author by The_Cat (December 21, 2009 2:45 pm ET)
                15 2
                Let me guess, right ON. Glenn Beck is completely indefensible, and so you have settled on a strategy of attacking DellDolly instead?

                So, you're just willing to grant, after the large assemblage of evidence above, that Mr. Beck has worked quite hard to achieve his award, climbing over several other very worthy contenders, such as Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Rove, anyone with the last name Cheney? Great! Perhaps next year there will be a 'Thread Derailer of the Year', and you will have something to compete for.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Ruby (December 21, 2009 2:46 pm ET)
                8  
                Then stop engaging her.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 2:50 pm ET)
                  5 16
                  Guilty as charged, and fully responsible for what I write/or have written. Knocking her off her self imposed pedestal once in awhile is good for morale, if nothing else.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mjh (December 21, 2009 3:08 pm ET)
                    14 5
                    "Guilty as charged, and fully responsible for what I write/or have written. Knocking her off her self imposed pedestal once in awhile is good for morale, if nothing else." -- wrong OFF


                    TRANSLATION: I have nothing to say relevant to the thread subject -- so I'll content myself with attacking one poster on miniscule word parsing -- that way, I still "win"! WHOOPIE!!

                    Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 3:41 pm ET)
                9 5
                I'm not out to suck up to anyone. Anyone who has read my posts would know that.

                Again, though, what we see is your personal animus towards me rearing its ugly, ugly, nasty head.

                And you shouldn't look any further than your own off topic attacks on me to see a vicious tirade against a fellow poster.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by wzwriter (December 21, 2009 4:52 pm ET)
                8  
                Post your opinions and leave the imaginary hall monitoring at the door, nobody is interested.

                And you can head back to Free RepubliKKK. No one here cares what you have to say.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by coldteablues19577325 (December 21, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
                8  
                "Every post of yours has a old maid schoolmarmish tone to it."

                In whose opinion? Oh, that would be yours! Personally, I like reading DellDolly's responses. Opinions are simply that.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Lizinbklyn (December 21, 2009 3:25 pm ET)
              5  
              "A lie is something that's untrue, said with the intent to deceive."

              key words: intent to deceive

              Doesn't that make Beck a "LIAR"?

              His intent is to deceive, don't you agree>
              Report Abuse
              • Author by southerngal (December 21, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
                7 13
                Of course they are. Lies, untruths, falsehoods, fibs, etc. Getting entangled in splicing up the word meaning for any of them is just ridiculous. Beck is a shameless liar and a misinformer, and a nut. To try and soften his rhetoric by claiming MMfA only says he spews "falsehoods" is just silly.

                Call it what it is.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
                  10 4
                  "To try and soften his rhetoric by claiming MMfA only says he spews "falsehoods" is just silly."

                  No one was trying to do that.

                  I explained why MMFA doesn't call him a liar. That describes THEIR behavior, not Beck's. It doesn't mitigate his behavior or soften his rhetoric in the least! What a crazy thing to say.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (December 21, 2009 4:05 pm ET)
                  8  
                  If you want mind-reading, go to aim.org, mrc.org newsbusters.org or listen to Beck and Limbaugh. They will all be happy to explain all of their enemies' thinking and motives as they have done every time I have had the occasion to hear/watch/read them.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by jeter2 (December 21, 2009 4:19 pm ET)
                    3 11
                    Do your pants catch on fire only when you're lying? Or could a falsehood set them off too? ;-)

                    What about if your nose grows?

                    I think we could settle this "arguement" if anyone happens to know the answers. Ha!
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by mr.swifty (December 21, 2009 8:43 pm ET)
                     
                  Are you trying to correct DD because you don't like how she tries to correct other posters? If I understand correctly, you're agreeing with everyone here on the thread topic, including DD. You're just picking a fight with DD in hopes of derailing the conversation. I thought trolling and personal attacks were not allowed on MMfA.
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 3:46 pm ET)
                7 4
                MMFA apparently doesn't agree that they can fairly or appropriately determine whether or not someone is lying. That's why they use "falsehood" and "misinformer" and don't talk about lies and bias.

                I am baffled as to why you didn't understand that I wasn't describing my own attitudes and opinions here and was clearly explaining why MMFA doesn't call him a liar.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Firefly1 (December 21, 2009 5:38 pm ET)
                     
                  Maybe Media Matters was only going for Aliteration -- all those lovely Ms" Media Matter's Misinformer of the Year?"
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
                  1
                You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by CCCP (December 23, 2009 11:36 pm ET)
                 
              Because Media Manipulators afraid of liability, since GB does not disinform, he puts the facts with people and gives his own opinion.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by ScienceBuff (December 21, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
            15 4
            right ON-
            You are really becoming obsessive. I could picture myself posting something similar to what DellDolly said and I doubt very strongly that you'd have replied, much less attacked. Her post was conversational; it wasn't lecturing or talking down to anyone.

            I think your level of dislike has pushed you over the edge to where you feel you need to attack anytime you see her name on a post.

            For the record, she was correct about the difference between lie and falsehood. You can tell a falsehood without intending to. You aren't telling a lie without intent to deceive.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by n'est-ce pas (December 21, 2009 11:08 pm ET)
              5 8
              I have to speak up for right ON. I almost never agree with his politics, but he's absolutely right about DellDolly. She's constantly appointing herself Lady of the Thread, and it's egregious and it's unique to her. She's obnoxious.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by ScienceBuff (December 22, 2009 8:26 am ET)
                7 1
                I don't disagree with your assessment of DellDolly. She and I have locked horns a few times. However, I don't believe that the post of hers to which he responded here warranted the kind of attack he launched. It's almost becoming a pattern that when she posts he will respond (at the times of the day he's on duty) with an attack. He really has become obsessive about her and many of his attacks are pretty petty. She deserves rebuke sometimes, but he carries it to such an extreme that it just seems like he's trying to pick a fight.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Brabantio (December 22, 2009 9:29 am ET)
                  5 2
                  I agree completely. The tone is completely unnecessary. If he wanted to say that there's no difference between "falsehood" and "lie", he could make that argument in a civil manner. The whole first paragraph was bunk, since she didn't order any directives or make any corrections whatsoever. There was nothing "arrogant" about it.

                  It's also pretty difficult to take criticisms of behavior seriously from someone who dishonestly takes words out of context, makes wild generalizations about liberals, and says "that's my opinion" instead of engaging in debate over the merits of his opinion. Those are all pretty "arrogant" things.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by n'est-ce pas (December 22, 2009 9:55 am ET)
                    5 2
                    You guys are probably right, but there's a cumulative affect to these kinds of feuds. I would imagine that it's hard enough to post a conservative viewpoint on this website without someone nitpicking dang near everything you said. Like I said, I don't agree with right ON on almost any topic, but I can sympathize with him in regards to DellDolly.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (December 22, 2009 11:10 am ET)
                      1 5
                      n'est-ce pas,

                      Fair enough.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by DellDolly (December 22, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
                      3 3
                      Yeah, that nitpicking doesn't happen. I'm not sure why you "imagine" it would. The objections are based on factual information and falsehoods spewed. It's sad that you would try the same 'both sides are guilty' argument without any factual information to back you up.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by n'est-ce pas (December 22, 2009 3:38 pm ET)
                        3 4
                        Sad? Like, your heart hurts when you contemplate the rhetorical trap you see me stumbling toward? Maybe you could put on your Super Mom cape and swoop down from your perch to rescue me from my folly.... Like I said, you're obnoxious.
                        By the way, could we all agree to stop using the term "spew?"
                        Report Abuse
                  • Author by southerngal (December 22, 2009 11:09 am ET)
                    1 8
                    Well, the difference between you and me is if I think a post or a poster is arrogant I respond specifically to what I am referring to, at that moment. Other posters can judge for themselves if they agree or not, at that moment, I am fine with that. In this instance, Dolly's response to Nerzog was arrogant, in my opinion.

                    What I don't do, which is what you do all the time, haul out drive by sweeping broad generalizations of my past "inappropriate" behavior, such as "dishonestly takes words out of context, makes wild generalizations about liberals, and says "that's my opinion" instead of engaging in debate over the merits of his opinion".

                    As for my generalizations about liberals, I apologize if you're so thin-skinned it stings a little. I read stuff here written by liberal posters all the time about cons and conservatives that make my generalizations about as impotent as you can get - but you don't criticize their choice of words or their generalizations, now do you? Do you think I am offended by their slurs? No. Because it is what it is, a generalization. Most understand that, harmless rhetoric not directed at any one individual. Group criticism, if you will.

                    That's the difference between you and me. I don't get as easily offended as you do. Unlike you, I take what I dish out and am no victim.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by DellDolly (December 22, 2009 12:12 pm ET)
                      7 1
                      Liar. No one believes your assertion that my response was arrogant, and we don't believe that your reply was because YOU believed that it was arrogant.

                      And those broad generalizations about you are very accurate. They may not describe every post you've ever made here, but they paint an accurate picture of most of your posts.

                      And you clearly do get offended and teed off, and that is undeniable by anyone besides you, and you portray yourself as a victim on a regular basis.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by southerngal (December 22, 2009 12:21 pm ET)
                        2 6
                        Sue, Batting you around is for kicks, sport. I am on to you and that drives you bonkers, you know I know exactly who you are and your phony history around here, and that drives you nuts. You need it when others rush to your defense here, because you can't do it alone, I get that.

                        Be careful though, your mouth and your temper has always been your worst enemy. It will rear it's ugly head soon, in the meantime I will be the thorn in your side. As I said, it keeps you honest, or as honest as you can, which ain't much.

                        Happy Holidays!
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by DellDolly (December 22, 2009 12:50 pm ET)
                          6 3
                          Yeah, troll, you think you know me? Not. And you think we don't know you? Not.

                          The truth needs defenders, that's for sure. Especially from people like you.

                          But I don't need a single defender. I am not here to make friends. The truth needs defenders. I defend the truth. That means I debunk you and call you out when you make a troll post. But it's nothing personal for me.

                          You, on the other hand, most of your posts that reply to me are examples of your personal animus towards me. And everyone else sees it.
                          Report Abuse
                    • Author by Brabantio (December 22, 2009 1:34 pm ET)
                      8 1
                      What the hell are you talking about? When you criticize Dolly for what she does, that's specific, but my citation of your behavior is "sweeping broad generalizations"? And this is on the same thread where you say:
                      Every post of yours has a old maid schoolmarmish tone to it. From your stupid off topic scoldings to word meaning corrections to constantly explaining why MMfA does what they do and what their intent is; it's nothing more than you trying to suck up to the person responsible here for yanking posters from this website.
                      Is there an "off-topic" issue on this particular thread? If not, then aren't you straying just a bit from "specifically...at that moment" and wandering into "generalization" mode? Feel free to explain the difference, if you can. I notice you don't deny the claims, you just take issue with them being pointed out.
                      I read stuff here written by liberal posters all the time about cons and conservatives that make my generalizations about as impotent as you can get - but you don't criticize their choice of words or their generalizations, now do you?
                      When they lump people together unfairly, I certainly do object. What you do, however, goes well beyond generalized discussion of "conservatives", though. You attribute motives to specific posters here when you get backed into a corner, based on your absurd depiction of "liberals". Some liberals do that as well, and I've objected to that sort of behavior any number of times from them as well.

                      What none of this garbage addresses is your arrogance. If Dolly is "arrogant" by what you said, then so are you.
                      Report Abuse
          • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (December 21, 2009 4:46 pm ET)
            11 2
            Hey Right On, I see you like to attack the posters here. I thought it was the job of a right wing nut blowhard to defend Beck at all costs?

            Come on, I know you have it in you. Tell me how Beck is the patriot here, defending "his" county from Obama the commie, fascist, nazi man that he is.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by drknowit_all (December 21, 2009 5:52 pm ET)
               
            arrogance...thats me. just dont correct my spelling like the last peasent. Anywho Watch out for the knowitalls
            Report Abuse
        • Author by pongotwistleton (December 21, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
          6 16
          But you should feel free to call them liars. We posters aren't under the same restrictions.

          Thanks for clearing that up Dimwit. I was wondering what language you considered appropriate for this thread. Thanks also for the permission to call Beck a liar.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by LKL (December 21, 2009 3:48 pm ET)
            9 2
            Thanks for clearing that up Dimwit. I was wondering what language you considered appropriate for this thread.


            Here, let me help you out - "dimwit" is not appropriate for any useful discussion. Feeling any clearer now?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (December 21, 2009 1:22 pm ET)
        5 1
        nerzog, You show more temperance than Glenn Beck ever has.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by carlh (December 21, 2009 1:26 pm ET)
           
        Palin got lie of the year from Politifact, but believe you me Beck was a close second.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by phatcracker2006 (December 22, 2009 11:31 am ET)
        3 1
        Or propagandist the likes of Joseph Goebbels would be proud of.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CCCP (December 23, 2009 11:32 pm ET)
          1
        If he lies, why somebody openly from WH comes for a discussion with him?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (December 21, 2009 12:07 pm ET)
      9 1
      Rush, Hannity, Palin, and Bachmann must be jealous. They tried so hard...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Limit Corp. Ownership (December 21, 2009 1:31 pm ET)
        9 1
        Indeed,
        This was the Rodeo Clown's year, hands down.

        Basically, he received a license from Murdoch to bring right-wing hate radio to us over the telly.

        Can't imagine how we can sink much lower than the Rodeo Clown?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (December 21, 2009 2:19 pm ET)
          8 1
          Won't 2010 be fun as Beck tries to bottom his 2009 performance?

          We previously would have said, "top his performance", but this being Beck...
          Report Abuse
          • Author by The_Cat (December 21, 2009 2:47 pm ET)
            9 1
            Don't sell Beck short. I think he's more than up to it. He is, after all, a perfect example of a bottom. A horse's bottom.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by ArguingwithIdiots (December 23, 2009 7:20 pm ET)
               
            How can you "bottom" from having twice as high ratings at 5 in the afternoon than MSNBC's 8 O'Clock Olberman slot? The only people who really think Beck is at the "bottom" is far left wing nutjobs who think that everyone is wrong unless they agree with the liberal view.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by koolmax2 (December 21, 2009 2:05 pm ET)
           
        Were all not done trying, just wait until 2010, then 2012!!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:15 pm ET)
           
        You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by CCCP (December 23, 2009 11:39 pm ET)
           
        By the order and decision of WH, MM annonced the news....
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sac6200 (December 21, 2009 12:08 pm ET)
         
      Thank you Glenn Beck for all you do to uncover the coruption and ingorance in the government and media.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by joedla1117 (December 21, 2009 12:09 pm ET)
      5 1
      I think he may also make worse person in the world on MSNBC.
      This is probably because of his WWII comments.
      Every time I hear him speak, I think of Tokyo Rose (1946) South Pacific. Check her out on Wikipedia. You will find a lot of similarities in his moral bending propaganda. She was a lot better looking though.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 21, 2009 12:16 pm ET)
      14 2
      I'm waiting for cheney2012 or reallytiredinSF to come on and talk about how everything Glenn Beck says is gospel, and we are awful people to think otherwise.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LKL (December 21, 2009 12:17 pm ET)
      8 1
      A well-deserved honor, Glenn! Congratulations!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
           
        You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by New Frontier (December 21, 2009 12:32 pm ET)
      11 1
      Chalk up a win on your blackboard, Glenn. Now you can commence Operation Feel Sorry For Me-I'm Being Unfairly Picked On Again.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 21, 2009 12:46 pm ET)
        12 2
        Or, as I prefer to think of it, the 12-22 project. Everything was different the day after Glenn was named Misinformer of the Year. Glenn will provide 12 examples of why we should feel sorry for him (Chose his belief on God based on ability to get laid will be one of them.) and 22 things we as a society can do to get more people to act like sheep and follow anything he says or does.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by New Frontier (December 21, 2009 1:28 pm ET)
          8 1
          He needs a way to use his "award" to feed his massive persecution complex, and the 12/22 Project might just be the ticket.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (December 21, 2009 1:42 pm ET)
          9 1
          Should make it the 12/25 project. He's already 'hijacked' a major Jewish holiday, why should Xmas be left alone?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 21, 2009 2:12 pm ET)
            5 1
            For the life of me, I could not come up with 25 things we can do to make more people follow Beck. 22 was stretching it. If you turn it into the New Year's Eve project, I'm really sunk.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (December 21, 2009 2:56 pm ET)
              6 1
              Good point. Of course, waiting 'til New Year's day gives us not enough things. But it does give a fresh start, and hopes that more advertisers will bail from his strange broadcasts.

              To quote from Beck's version of the book of Revelations: "Behold, I make all things poo."
              Report Abuse
          • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:14 pm ET)
               
            You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by stopbeck (December 21, 2009 1:12 pm ET)
         
      Great post. Although, by my count Glenn Beck has lost 94 sponsors (5 alone last week).

      List of 94 Dropped Sponsors here.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cghendricks973 (December 21, 2009 1:16 pm ET)
         
      Thank you for a well written summary. I enjoyed reading it very much.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (December 21, 2009 1:36 pm ET)
      6 1
      Kind of interesting, though. Glenn never really was a big part of the Birther issue, which was a pretty huge source for comedy last year. Strangely enough Glenn claims that he thought there was something to it, but that it was a trap to marginalize conservatives. Huh. As if nearly every subject Glenn did last year could not be described in those exact terms as well.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (December 21, 2009 1:53 pm ET)
      7 1
      I am shocked. SHOCKED! That Mr. "Tells it like it is" is the Misinformer of the year. I can't believe this. You guys just don't like what he has to say is why you made him Misinformer of the Year...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Boxer1979 (December 21, 2009 1:55 pm ET)
      8 1
      Glenn Beck: Media Matters' 2009 Misinformer of the Year

      I bet he is proud and will go for winning 2010's award.

      CONGRADULATIONS Becky!

      *Inmitating clapping*
      Report Abuse
      • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:13 pm ET)
           
        You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by platanoman3029 (December 21, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
      6 1
      Yup, he's right up there. Who receives the silver?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 21, 2009 2:13 pm ET)
        7 1
        I'm gonna go with Hannity by a whisker over Sarah "Death Panels" Palin.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (December 21, 2009 3:00 pm ET)
          11 1
          I agree with Hannity for the silver. O'Reilly is a contender, but he stumbles once in a while into the reality universe. Hannity never visits there.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:13 pm ET)
           
        You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Unreality (December 21, 2009 2:00 pm ET)
      8 1
      Correction he is not "misinformer"
      He is DISINFORMER.
      Disinformation is false or inaccurate information that is spread deliberately. It is synonymous with and sometimes called Black propaganda. It may include the distribution of forged documents, manuscripts, and photographs, or spreading malicious rumors and fabricated intelligence.


      Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is unintentionally false.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by pongotwistleton (December 21, 2009 2:06 pm ET)
        3 14
        Correction he is not "misinformer"
        He is DISINFORMER.


        You better check with Dolly on that one. She'll let you know whether your distinctions are valid, and whether this article's headline is appropriate.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
          13 5
          Are you under some delusion that I instructed MMFA on what word to use?

          Because if you are, you should disabuse yourself of that notion.

          MMFA chooses to use "falsehood" and "misinformer" vs "lie" and "disinformation". I simply explained why they don't use those words, because those words imply intent, and they don't try to identify intent - they let the readers determine if there was some intent to deceive. That allows them to highlight conservative misinformation that might come from someone or some source that's not generally considered a conservative! That allows them to not be painted with the same brush that we can use to discredit sites that push "bias" allegations without a reasonable argument behind them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pongotwistleton (December 21, 2009 2:23 pm ET)
            4 14
            Thanks Dolly, I already read your first lecture on the subject, up above. I was just concerned that not everybody read your words of wisdom. Otherwise they'd have known, thanks to your insight, why MMFA headlined this article with "misinformer," rather than some other term. Keep up the good work!
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mjh (December 21, 2009 2:34 pm ET)
              13  
              So, pongo -- have you any words of wisdom on the subject of Glenda Beck being named MM Misinformer of the Year, or do you wish to continue to debate the use of the synonyms misinform and disinform?


              Report Abuse
              • Author by pongotwistleton (December 21, 2009 2:48 pm ET)
                4 10
                I think he's a disinformer and a liar, but now I know why mmfa chose to characterize him merely as a "misinformer," and I'm satisfied with that.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
              9 3
              Actually, no.

              Your statement implied that I gave direction to MMFA about which words to use. I didn't. That's the problem with what you said, which is why I said you were delusional - because you were.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by koolmax2 (December 21, 2009 2:02 pm ET)
         
      HYPOCRITES! You all will get what you deserve with this President and this healthcare fiasco!

      Just wait until 2010, then 2012!!!

      At least Glenn has common sense, and loves this country.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by manofmystique (December 21, 2009 2:24 pm ET)
      7 1
      I believe Fox News' Sean Hannity won the dubious honors last year. I thought there would be no one who could compete with Hannity for "misinformer of the year" honors, however, Glenn Beck is a serious contender and he deserve the recognition without advocating for it.
      Fox News harbors the greatest liars in the world.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:13 pm ET)
           
        You are obviously a socialist. Cause you don't want to hear the facts and truth either... very sad.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 21, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
      11 3
      "I'd like to thank MMfA for recognizing the work I put into coming up with my craziness. I'd like to thank Mao Tse-Tung, without whose image I would have been lost. Oh, my goodness ... who else? I don't want to forget anyone. Oh, Roger Ailes for giving me a platform and buying up 30% of the ads on my show when other advertisers left me. Bill O'Reilly, for having me on his show and making me look somewhat sane. And of course, all my cultist ... err, um, viewers, who run out and buy gold now that it's at its peak. Buy high and sell low, that's my philosophy. Lastly, but certinaly on leastly, I'd like to thank Lou Dobbs. That may sound odd, but Lou's insanity gave me a jumping off point. In a way, you could say I stood on the shoulders of giant insanity to see a little farther into crazy."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mjh (December 21, 2009 2:29 pm ET)
      10 3
      I was cruising over at Newshounds when I heard the good news . . .

      And I just wanna say again: Congratulations, Glenda!!

      With this award, you'll no longer have to cry about yourself or your teabagging wingnut friends being left out of consideration for Time magazine's Person of the Year.

      [http://mikeely.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/glenn_beck_crying.png]

      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (December 21, 2009 2:36 pm ET)
      8  
      Much too polite...

      While the list of factual atrocities from the Mormonster are impressive, your "Misinformer of the Year" description of him falls short of what I think he really deserves.

      I'd go with something that uses every one of Carlin's "The seven words you can't say on TV."

      At least twice.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by djamieg (December 21, 2009 4:10 pm ET)
         
      Yow. The only thing more juvenile that Beck's own rantings is the squabbling of the posters here. Grow up and get outside wonce in a while.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnny_nyc (December 21, 2009 4:29 pm ET)
         
      My my, how things have changed in a few short years and not for the better either: MMFA's first Misinformer of the Year was Chris Matthews.

      Now we've descended to this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (December 21, 2009 4:48 pm ET)
      6 1
      All this back and forth about what is a lie or a falsehood is tiring me out. Can we all agree that Beck is a simple minded jerk that just want to make a name for himself, regardless of what it does to our country.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jayray2k (December 21, 2009 7:27 pm ET)
           
        Right?
        No wonder we (progressives!) can't get anything passed...we're all progressives here, and all we can do is bash eachother...how'd all that work out? I stopped reading after the eighth complaint about the difference between falsehood and lie!!! Seriously???

        Can we just agree that Glenn Beck is at best an ignorant moron and at worst a malicious all-out assault on our country!

        How is it that the left gets blamed for ruining the country by the right, while all along they are the ones raping OUR country!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (December 22, 2009 12:24 pm ET)
        3  
        Well, it was the longest night of the year, and they had some time on their hands.......
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (December 21, 2009 5:14 pm ET)
        12  
        Keep up the wonderful work Glenn.
        "Wonderful work" = calling the President of the United States a "white-hating racist".
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (December 21, 2009 5:43 pm ET)
        13 5
        Again, stop calling yourself a "conservative." You aren't a conservative and your use of that term to describe yourself is an insult and embarrassment to all TRUE conservatives.

        If you support and believe the bilge shoveled by Beck, you are simply a groupie, not a conservative.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jayray2k (December 21, 2009 7:29 pm ET)
           
        Seriously? After reading all that you still don't get it?? WOW!! See what we are up against here?!?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (December 22, 2009 12:07 am ET)
        7 1
        And stop showing off your html skills, that picture is stuck in it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by PurpleState (December 22, 2009 4:40 pm ET)
        4  
        Today we salute you, Mr. Random Clip-Art Clueless Conservative Guy.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by RealTruthseeker (December 22, 2009 6:37 pm ET)
        6  
        Need to change your user name to "deludedconservative" to talk connect Becky and "speaking truth" in any way, shape, or form.

        The best part about Becky is his knowledge of history. Pretty much the historic knowledge of any "morning zoo" radio hack.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Escape Goat Nation (December 21, 2009 5:30 pm ET)
         
      Misinformation = A mistake. An accidental error.

      Disinformation = A deliberate and calculated lie to advance an ideology. Propaganda.

      Let's not fool ourselves here. This is not simply Misinformation.
      This is Disinformation.
      Call it what it is.

      And just for fun:
      Glenn Beck to English Translator

      "Nation/America"
      My gang of teabaggin' droolers.

      "I'm not saying"
      I'm saying. I just said it and I'll say it again.

      "I want to be wrong"
      I don't care if I make any sense whatsoever. I just want to scare you.

      "Our Founding Fathers believed"
      I have no clue what they believed. Couldn't care less. It's what I want you to believe.

      "But what if I'm right?"
      See: "I want to be wrong."

      "You can't make this stuff up!"
      You can't, but I can. (See Next)

      "I'm not a journalist"
      I don't have to be held accountable or responsible for anything I say.

      "He's/She's a racist"
      I'm a racist and I'm upset that He/She is not a racist in the way you're normally supposed to be a racist.

      "So what he's saying is.."
      He's not saying that.

      "If you connect the dots"
      Mr. X or Mrs. Y or Organization Z is/are a Radical(s).

      "I'm taking Friday afternoon off"
      I'm writing 3 more books, 2 movies and a play.

      "You don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to understand..."
      You only have to be dumber than I am.

      "You won't believe what we have on today's show."
      Self explanatory.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coldteablues19577325 (December 21, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
      8  
      OMG!!! Stunning ... simply stunning! :-)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gamoss1 (December 21, 2009 7:34 pm ET)
         
      Unstable, liar, ridiculous, clown, racist, fool, un-American, inciteful, dangerous, mean. Just venting. Thanks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Escape Goat Nation (December 21, 2009 7:39 pm ET)
         
      Glenn Beck to English Translator

      "Nation/America"
      My gang of teabaggin' droolers.

      "I'm not saying"
      I'm saying.

      "So how do we really know?"
      Ignore what you know and suspend common sense.

      "I want to be wrong"
      I don't care if I make any sense whatsoever. I just want to scare you.

      "Our Founding Fathers believed"
      I have no clue what they believed, nor do I care what they believed. I just want you to believe.

      "But what if I'm right?"
      See: "I want to be wrong."

      "You can't make this stuff up!"
      You can't, but I can. (See Next)

      "I'm not a journalist"
      I don't have to be held accountable or responsible for anything I say.

      "He's a racist"
      I'm a racist and I'm mad that he isn't a racist in the way you're supposed to be a racist.

      "So what he's saying is.."
      He's not saying that.

      "If you connect the dots"
      Mr. Z or Mrs. Y is a Radical.

      "I'm taking Friday afternoon off"
      I'm writing 3 more books, 2 movies and a play

      "You don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to understand..."
      You only have to be dumber than I am.

      "You won't believe what we have on today's show."
      Self explanatory.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by highlyunlikely (December 21, 2009 8:31 pm ET)
         
      while Palin's lies were funnier, Beck did deserve the award for sheer volume and greater absurdity. great pick.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by my4cents (December 21, 2009 9:19 pm ET)
      5 1
      I am sure Beck would wear this as a badge of Tea Party Honor but I hope enough sane people see that he misinforms lot more than he informs, and make him irrelevant.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 22, 2009 11:35 am ET)
        5  
        You think a lot of sane people currently watch and listen to Glenn Beck?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TMM (December 21, 2009 10:08 pm ET)
         
      This is a terrific piece of journalism!! It lays bare what a dangerous and foul jerk Beck is and it reveals some of the damage he is doing to the fabric of American civil society. But maybe people should not think about Beck as such but consider that these assaults on all of us are bought and paid for by Rupert Murdoch, a nasty little man who specializes in this kind of ugly, lowest common denominator, journalistic crap. It is Murdoch who brings us Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Bill O'Reilly and a host of other right wing smear artists who poison public discourse and who have tried for more than a year to de-legitimize Barak Obama. It is Murdoch who puts on Fox News a radically slanted and utterly right wing outlet for his propaganda. It is Murdoch to whom Cheney, Palin, Beonner, DeMint, Bolton and others turn when they want to give a softball interview. Rupert Murdoch is doing more to destroy political civility and comity between Americans than any other person or media. So why single out Glen Beck? If Murdoch didn't want the President being called a racist he wouldn't put his face on the tube! Murdoch is the issue.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by vueartist8157 (December 22, 2009 12:20 am ET)
         
      Lets get it right - LIAR OF THE YEAR - he with co-winner Rush Limp.etc. How could any right thinking American support these fools and their opinions. These people thumb their noses in the face of democracy everyday at the expense of all freedom loving Americans.
      We must deny these lunatics from influencing Youth and simple minded who don't understand or know of American History and how we arrived at our freedoms. May we all learn how we all found the greatest democracy in the world and defended the rights of all humanity.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sansbeck (December 22, 2009 5:29 am ET)
         
      This some how makes him look like an evil genius, but I must say he's always looked more like a mad simpleton to me. Is it frightening that alot of people choose to be blindly led around by him? Of Course! Is he one of the HATE stars in my new video? YES!

      Enjoy this & feel free to pass this along
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y08uJ42X48
      Report Abuse
    • Author by today's blessing (December 22, 2009 8:10 am ET)
         
      yesterday, i fact-checked the premise of this article at politifact. you guys are absolutely correct that beck is truth-challenged.

      check this out:

      http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/glenn-beck/statements/
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (December 22, 2009 9:00 am ET)
      7 1
      Over 100 comments and not one of them defended Beck (unless I missed it). That says a lot.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jms (December 22, 2009 10:58 am ET)
      1 13
      Glenn Beck - Media Matters' 2009 Misinformer of the Year. Translation: He is the greatest threat to our socialist agenda and we must take him down by any means. It won't work. Happy 2010. The congressional landslide is upon us.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 22, 2009 11:30 am ET)
        12  
        Wow, you've gone and figured it out. It has nothing to do with his continually spouting off completely untrue statements. No, it's because Glenn Beck, with his made-for-Faux-idiots tears is a threat to the Socialist agenda. Way to crack the code. (By the way, shouldn't you be searching for that elusive Kenyan birth certificate? Or trying to figure out how we were able to go back in time and plant a birth notice in Hawaiian papers 48 years ago?)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (December 22, 2009 12:28 pm ET)
        10 2
        we must take him (Glenn Beck) down by any means. It won't work.
        Beck's own words are the only means we need resort to, and it does work, otherwise you wouldn't concern yourself. And with all the space provided to you, you failed to offer any point-by-point defense of Beck. Mainly because there is no defense.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by jms (December 22, 2009 2:27 pm ET)
          1 7
          Well, let's see, I was going to take down the MMFA post point by point but as I went through it I found that all of their issues were regarding Beck's OPINIONS. When Beck has made statements of fact he has backed it up with video (e.g. Van Jones is a communist). The reality is MMFA doesn't like his OPINIONS so they have to disingeniously say he is misinforming. As for Beck saying Obama is a racist, again, this is his OPINION, not a "lie". I happen to disagree with him. I think Obama is prejudiced but definitely not a racist.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by mary59 (December 22, 2009 2:37 pm ET)
            7 3
            Opinions should be based upon facts. There is no evidence that Obama is a racist or prejudiced. With a black father and a white mother, raised by white grandparents, it's pretty hard to state this opinion of yours with any credibility.

            As far as the Van Jones junk, this man does not appear to be a communist now. There is NO evidence that he still adheres to any kind of communistic dogma and lots of evidence that his thinking has evolved over 20 years.

            There is a nagging suspicion that redemption and change occur over time, although in Beck's case this can't be proven.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 22, 2009 3:45 pm ET)
            9 2
            I think you're a complete moron who molests his dog daily and refers to all African-Americans as "n-words" when you are at home alone. You're right ... no lie there at all, just an opinion.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by RealTruthseeker (December 22, 2009 6:48 pm ET)
            6 1
            But, the thing is, Van Jones is not a communist. What Becky has done is crop video out of context.

            In an interview with "O" magazine, Van Jones also talked about an admiration for some of Ronald Reagan's qualities.

            To use Becky's... and apparently your... line of logic, that would mean Reagan was a Communist.

            That's the problem, the so-called "facts" on which he bases opinion are completely distorted and off-base.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (December 22, 2009 11:40 pm ET)
            7  
            The reality is MMFA doesn't like his OPINIONS
            The reality is that YOU don't like MMFA's OPINION.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by RightLeaningFoxHater (December 22, 2009 11:06 am ET)
         
      I disagree flat out with this. I consider myself a moderate, right leaning libertarian. But, you expect this out of a psycho like Glenn Beck. It is clear Glen Beck's show is commentary.

      BUT, the misinformer(s) of the year are:

      Gretchen Carlson, Steve Doocy, and Brian Kilmeade of Fox & Friends. By far. They represent themselves as a morning NEWS reporting show, but they are everything but that. They masque their commentary as news. Beck, O'Reilly and Hannity at least don't pretend that they are new reporters. Carlson, Doocy and Kilmeade do. Yet, their interviews are biased as hell. They only interview one side and they give softball questions to the right. They bash the left and any guest that gives a liberal view point. They always drop in comments to bash anything Obama, democrat, or liberal. I honestly watch this show every chance I get because it is pure comedy to me. It enrages me at the same time, but it is like some vice. I just enjoy how horrible these people are. The comments they make, the biasness they possess, and the stupidity the espouse is quite amazing to me. I have watch hundreds of episodes over the years and am always amazed day in and day out. They will do anything to push the "conservative" view point and bash any liberal view point.

      I have countless examples, but they completely misstate facts and go along with it. They report it as news too. That is the huge thing, but the spin they throw on everything is beyond amazing. They are on 3 hours a day.....opposed to 1 hour a day. They work in tandem too, which makes it worse. It is the fact they are "news reporters" as opposed to commentators. That is a huge difference.

      Fox and Friends win in a cakewalk.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by stopbeck (December 22, 2009 11:35 am ET)
         
      A fitting recognition for the many distortions peddled by Glenn Beck.

      However, I have one clarification: By my count, the current dropped sponsor total is 94 (5 alone dropped him last week).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by emmjim (December 22, 2009 11:49 am ET)
         
      I have listened to Beck, and find he is a commentator and a comedian, at times. The main thing the hateful left doesn't like, is that Beck plays video of each traitor, letting them say all the hateful things against our country,

      Neither Beck nor I like what they say. If they want to come on Brvk' site and change that statement, Beck and the rest of us would enjoy that.

      I find it stupid that the left hates the right, and the right hates the left, but the right are not as hateful as the left.

      If I come to this site, got to HuffProstitutes, or most any site I can find, I find more hate in 20 minutes a day, then I would have heard if I had listened to Rush for 20 years.

      I spent 5 minutes a month on Rush and the other real patriots on the radio and TV, I spent most of my time on MSDNC, the Hate America Radio Network, so I can know the enimity.

      I can not find a Right Wing Site where the Right gives hateful posts like they do on so many left sites.

      That is a serious question. Let me know where the so-called right wing haters post against the left.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by RightLeaningFoxHater (December 22, 2009 12:14 pm ET)
         
      I have to disagree with Beck as being the misinformer of the year, why?

      Fox & Friends by far takes the cake. Gretchen Carlson, Steve Doocy, and Brian Kilmeade are not as insane as Glen Beck, but their commentary is just as dangerous, but the masquerade themselves as "news reporters," unlike Beck who is a "commentator." It is far more dangerous disguising yourself as a news show as opposed to a commentating show. They do this 3 hours a day with astounding bias. The way they always drop in comments in support of conservative slant and bashing anything Obama, liberal or democrat with subtle and not so subtle remarks.

      Fox and Friends is the greatest danger in the misinformatin they espouse.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by cramsti (December 22, 2009 1:19 pm ET)
         
      Hello, interesting
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluestate69 (December 23, 2009 12:18 am ET)
      4 1
      glenn beck is always pointing. didn't his mother tell him not to point? hitler pointed a lot too!!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bluestate69 (December 23, 2009 12:27 am ET)
        4  
        the pointing goes along with his accusatory method of paranoid fright mongering. what would he do if obama came into his studio? he wouldn't know what to do. through his delusional, fact-less, daily conspiracy concoctions, he has made obama into the boogie man. at the end of the day, the obama beck has created, doesn't exist, except in beck's mind.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DixieChyc (December 23, 2009 9:55 am ET)
      1 8
      The constant attacks against Glenn Beck shows how much of a threat Beck is to secular progressive ideology. Claims of racism were (and still is) slung repeatedly towards anyone who disagreed with President Obama, his czars, others in his administration, and anyone else that traditionalists and conservatives disagreed with. There are millions of us who do not want to see the US continue to sink into the PC mire that the Europeans find themselves stuck in. I would not discount what the traditionalists and conservatives can accomplish as they stand together for the right to disagree with the secular progressives.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DixieChyc (December 23, 2009 10:00 am ET)
          8
        By the way, have you heard that Democrat Parker Griffith announced Tuesday that he was wwitching parties? Griffith, a now former Blue Dog, said he could no longer align himself with a party that continues to pursue legislation that is bad for our country, hurts our economy and drives us further and further into debt. How many more might follow?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (December 23, 2009 2:42 pm ET)
          4  
          If that is what Griffith thinks then I hope he is happy in his new home. Best of luck to him.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 23, 2009 3:35 pm ET)
          6  
          Griffith's party switch should make the average IQ of both parties increase.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by RKAllen (December 24, 2009 12:43 am ET)
          5 2
          Considering this would make him a "moderate Republican," which you guys plan on getting rid of next year and replacing them with "more conservative candidates," then his time in office should be pretty short lived, shouldn't it? Especially if he ends up running against another Democrat and the "conservative" candidate guy that Fox News, Limbaugh, and the others tell their listeners they should vote for.

          You see, we are happy to accept moderates... but, you guys aren't having it anymore, are you... and if he isn't fully for, "Guns, God, and Gold," then what use is he to your side?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by New Frontier (December 23, 2009 1:02 pm ET)
        8  
        Glenn Beck never attacked anyone or accused anyone of being a racist, conservatives' rights to simply disagree without being called racists (see below) are in grave danger. Europeans are so stuck in PC mire that they've outlawed minarets in Switzerland and Muslim garb in France. Praise Oh Holy Beck. And Merry Christmas to that "white-hating racist, Barack Obama".
        [http://www.americanmadness.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/enhanced-buzz-13146-1252961789-0.jpg]
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DixieChyc (December 23, 2009 1:27 pm ET)
          1 9
          Congratulations on finding a looney tune. There are those no matter what group gathers. LOL! Netiher Beck nor any tea partiers I know or have seen would agree with this.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by New Frontier (December 23, 2009 1:46 pm ET)
            6 1
            Looney tune? No, it's one of your average, falsely accused, tea partiers--who happens to be a little more forthright about their "disagreements". An average conservative Glenn Beck fan "who disagreed with President Obama, his czars, others in his administration." As you said, there are millions of 'em, and more's the pity.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Shrink the State (December 23, 2009 2:15 pm ET)
          1 9
          New frontier,
          You are in the world of the least tolerant people in America --the progressives that worship media matters.

          I wonder how many slackers Soros pays to follow Beck for a living?

          If you want a sympathetic ear, to to Big Government's coverage of this story. http://www.breitbart.tv/media-matters-names-beck-misinformer-of-the-year-2009/
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Shrink the State (December 23, 2009 2:53 pm ET)
        1 9
        you tell'em Dixie. I agree 100%
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (December 23, 2009 3:51 pm ET)
          7  
          shrink and dixie...how's this..

          http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/glenn-beck/statements

          for starters...
          Report Abuse
        • Author by WildcatProgressive (December 23, 2009 3:56 pm ET)
          5 2
          I'm not sure you should be signing out of one screen name and signing in with another just to agree with yourself. Feels a little crepy.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (December 23, 2009 4:27 pm ET)
        7 1
        The constant attacks against Glenn Beck shows how much of a threat Beck is to secular progressive ideology.
        Well I guess the same could be said about Barack Obama as a supposed threat to the conservative traditionalists. What of it?
        Claims of racism were (and still is) slung repeatedly towards anyone who disagreed with President Obama, his czars, others in his administration, and anyone else that traditionalists and conservatives disagreed with.
        I don't know if you noticed or not, but Beck (along with several popular conservative traditionalists) have called the President a "racist" or something to that effect several times. It just seems odd to me that in light of that information you seem to think conservatives are under attack. I can only tell you that I have heard and seen some conservatives say very racist things about the President. I am willing to agree that not all opposition is racial, but I think it is fair to say it has some influence - especially regarding the vitriol we see.
        There are millions of us who do not want to see the US continue to sink into the PC mire that the Europeans find themselves stuck in. I would not discount what the traditionalists and conservatives can accomplish as they stand together for the right to disagree with the secular progressives.
        I do not discount what the conservative traditionalists can accomplish. That is why I vote against them. Their view is not of the future, IMO, but of the dark past. I am not interested in what they are selling.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CCCP (December 23, 2009 11:42 pm ET)
            1
          You will vote for bright future of SOCIALISM. suggested reading : Animal farm, Heart of the dog, White guardian...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by emdright (December 23, 2009 1:44 pm ET)
         
      All this video and all these posts... and yet not one specific lie mentioned.

      The baseball bat was in reference to this statement made by Andy Stern of the SEIU: "[W]e prefer to use the power of persuasion, but if that doesn’t work we use the persuasion of power."

      Hmmm... who is the thug?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by Shrink the State (December 23, 2009 2:11 pm ET)
      5 10
      Media matters --- we are on to your game of deceit. How many slackers does Soros pay to track Beck?
      Glenn, this is truly an honor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (December 24, 2009 12:44 am ET)
        9 2
        What does that even matter how many people track Beck? I suppose you would prefer Beck not be held accountable for his remarks. I guess that is just too bad for you (and for Beck).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by A true American (December 23, 2009 3:10 pm ET)
        2
      Media Matters...lol... just another liberal media group who does not want to hear the facts..like CNN NBC CNBC and MSNBC...oh the occasional ABC. Like the saying goes... "If you want to annoy a liberal use facts and logic." That what he and fox is doing... and you liberals and left wing nut who belong in Europe see and hear the facts on cable TV and you got... ANNOYED... WOW. Maybe you people should check the facts before making garbage like this. This country was founded on the principles written in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution... the've been doing good for 200+ years yet all you people want someone else controlling your life as well as everybody else's. If you want that just go the Europe... Trust me no one is stopping you. Why do it hear??? So have fun when all of us Real Americans who still believe in the principles written in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are saying.. We told you so. Oh and by the way... your outnumbered.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Former Conservative Gone Good (December 23, 2009 4:41 pm ET)
         
      What I'm wondering is how he's still on the air with all the sponsors he lost over the past six months? Or is his show being funded by an Anonymous Outside Source, now? ::tsk::
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Angelbampeb (December 23, 2009 6:46 pm ET)
        2
      Wow!!! The Liberal media has spoken on whom they fear the most. Amazing how there are soo many rotten and dishonest people in Washington, and you choose Glenn Beck. If you ever watch his show, from beginning to end (without listening to what you want to hear and discarding what you don't) then you would know his show is full of opinions, associations, and facts. Unlike the biast media, that won't report the controversial stuff...he chooses to keep the American people informed. So you have failed to incite where he is "misinforming" ?
      Definition of misinformed: to give false or misleading information. You idiots!!! He states nujmerous times that some of what he states our his OPINIONS, and the factual info he Dares the WHITE HOUSE to call to correct any "mis-information." And dammm, if that phone never rings!! Trust me, if GB is giving incorrect information, the liberal media (well like the one that awarded him this ridciculous award) would be first to call him on it... But all we here are accusations.
      I think you guys ought to go back to school and learn what is real and not real. When he talks about situations, he is not saying that is what it is...he fears that is what it may become...it's called an OPINION.
      Ironic how the media blasted the teaparty goers as violent and causing problems..YET, there was not one arrest!! But at the summits for the Global Warmings, there was a large number of arrests...so how is this double standard looking? Good, as long as you're on the liberal side..right? Like, Rangel, evading taxes, yet he writes these tax laws... and Nelson, taking a bribe that may not even be constitutionally legal....if anyone else did it, they would be prosecuted.
      So J.H. why don't you start reporting real news, instead of wasting our time with your liberal rhetoric!!!
      Heck, we can watch GB together and you can learn a thing or two about Obama's ties...oh, you would learn soooo much!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ocelot (December 23, 2009 11:23 pm ET)
        2
      This website is quite obviously not interested in moving the debate forward between liberal and conservative. It is simply a vehicle for bashing, and backslapping amoung the the like-minded liberal bashers.
      Glenn Beck is attacked, with these opinion pieces which are really very weak, and as biased as this site purports (falsely) to be on guard against.
      Address this: Glennbeck.com sells a newsletter that nearly outsells the NYTimes. The ratings for his show, and Fox in general prove like-minded Americans are not buying what you are selling here.
      What does this mean? This site is irrelevant, and a minority misinformation party. Nobody is sharing your opinion, check the ratings for Fox vs. Cnn, Msnbc, Cbs, Abc, Pbs, and the rest of the state controlled liberaL media. Beck represents the truth, and the majority. Oh that smarts doesnt it? Keep high fiving each other, or join the discussion instead of bashing away ineffectively.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by irondog (December 24, 2009 10:58 am ET)
         
      I am no fan of Glenn Beck but,I was in DC when they had the Tea-bag meetings,and trust me ,there was a lot more than 60 thousand people there....we have a PROBLEM folks....this reminds me of just before the Civil War,...can they ALL be nuts?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by irondog (December 24, 2009 11:20 am ET)
         
      I am Black, I must admit I think it is a stretch to call Mr. Beck a race baiter.Obama is a Black man,granted, but I think whatever color he was Beck would still say what he says.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.