Glenn Beck: Media Matters' 2009 Misinformer of the Year
Glenn Beck's well of ridiculous was deep and poisonous before he launched his Fox News show, but the inauguration of the 44th president of the United States -- and the permissive cheerleading of his Fox News honchos -- uncorked the former Morning Zoo shock jock's unique brand of vitriol, stage theatrics, and hyperbolic fright, making him an easy choice for Media Matters' 2009 Misinformer of the Year.
When he wasn't calling the president a racist, portraying progressive leaders as vampires who can only be stopped by "driv[ing] a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers," or pushing the legitimacy of seceding from the country, Beck obsessively compared Democrats in Washington to Nazis and fascists and "the early days of Adolf Hitler." He wondered, "Is this where we're headed," while showing images of Hitler, Stalin, and Lenin; decoded the secret language of Marxists; and compared the government to "heroin pushers" who were "using smiley-faced fascism to grow the nanny state."
Like his predecessor, Beck spat on scruples, frequently announcing his goal to get administration officials fired. He increasingly acted not as a media figure, but as the head of a political movement, while helping to bring fringe conspiracies of a one-world government into the national discourse.
And he all too frequently helped to set the mainstream media's agenda.
Glenn Beck's disturbing use of race and race-baiting
Appearing on Fox & Friends in June to discuss a White House "beer summit" between President Obama, a white Massachusetts police officer, and a black Harvard professor who had been arrested entering his own home, Beck uttered perhaps his most infamous words to date, calling the president a "racist" with "a deep-seated hatred for white people or the white culture." The statement drew widespread derision and condemnation, and Fox News immediately sought to distance itself from the statement. But Beck's divisive commentary was likely no surprise to his followers, coming as it did at the end of a week-long deluge of race-baiting that included the claim that Obama "has real issues with race," and Beck's incessant talk of Obama's policies as a form of minority reparations. Just one month earlier, Beck had agreed that Obama was elected because of race and not policies, and in May he called then Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor a "racist."
In the controversy that followed Beck's inflammatory charge that the president is racist, his Fox News show began to hemorrhage advertisers, and Beck began to beg his viewers to "call a friend and tell them to watch the show this week." By September, Beck, who had become "tired of the race thing" and who claimed he doesn't "think the race thing works anymore," apparently decided it was time to move on. He later would blame politicians for charges of racism and call "false cries of racism" "dangerous." Beck then sat down for an interview with CBS' Katie Couric where he would express regret for the way he phrased the claim that Obama is a racist, but then emphasized that the issue of Obama's racism is a "serious question."
In the months since Beck called Obama a "racist" with a "deep-seated hatred of white people," at least 80 advertisers have reportedly dropped their ads from his Fox News show, yet he has faced no apparent repercussions from Fox News. Then again, Rupert Murdoch apparently agrees with Beck that Obama is a racist. (Or maybe not.)
Beck's red scare tactics
Beck introduced himself to Fox News viewers in 2009 by announcing that he was "tired of the politics of left and right," which leads its participants to do insane things, like accusing political opponents of "trying to turn us into communist Russia." Setting aside for the sake of brevity Beck's long history of calling progressive figures communists and Marxists, he almost immediately put lie to his professed aversion. Yes, taking to the airwaves the following week on his radio show, Beck concluded, "I do believe that Barack Obama is a socialist" who "has Marxist tendencies." Beck explained:
BECK: He may be a full-fledged Marxist. He has surrounded himself by Marxists his whole life."
Alas, the remainder of 2009 would see Beck unleash a tirade against Obama's "full-fledged" Marxism, blaming "fearless leader, Comrade Obama" for overseeing the "destruction of the West"; citing Obama administration policies and promising to show how "they line up with some of the goings-on in history's worst socialist, fascist countries"; calling Obama's economic recovery package "truly stepping beyond socialism" and "starting to look at fascism"; declaring that Obama is "so clearly" a socialist, citing his work as a community organizer as clear proof of such; claiming that Obama is "a Marxist who is "setting up a class system"; and comparing health care reform to socialism.
Beck's red scare was not limited to Obama himself. During a May 28 discussion with Bill O'Reilly, Beck proclaimed of Obama, "His friends and nominees and everything -- they're all Marxist." And over the course of 2009, Beck's McCarthy-esque list of known communists proved to be long and distinguished, including the Democratic and Republican parties, former White House communications director Anita Dunn, SEIU president Andy Stern, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Communications Commission, FCC official Mark Lloyd, proponents of maintaining free market principals in Internet competition, Sonia Sotomayor, and media reform activists at Free Press.
By way of example, Beck spent most of his hour-long Fox show one October evening discussing video of then-White House communications director Anita Dunn, who had cited Mao Zedong as one of two political philosophers -- the other being Mother Theresa -- she cites to illustrate the advice that "you don't have to follow other people's choices and paths" or "let external definition define how good you are internally." Ignoring the numerous political figures on the right -- including those who routinely appear on Fox News and Glenn Beck's very show -- who have cited Mao's teachings in the past, Beck distorted the video, claiming she "worships" "her hero" Mao.
By October 30, Beck -- who began the year decrying those who would denigrate the national debate by calling political opponents socialists -- had redrawn the battle lines:
BECK: I have said to you before, and we laid the case out last night. These are revolutionaries. You must decide, America, and your friends must decide. There's no sidelines here. You're either on the side of the revolutionaries for Marxism and a new Venezuela here in America, or the revolutionaries of 1776.
Beck's Law: If Obama did it, always say that Hitler did it, too
On June 30, Wal-Mart joined the Center for American Progress and SEIU in announcing support for health care reform efforts. The next day on his Fox News show, Beck made one of the countless Nazi and Hitler comparisons he made this year:
BECK: This is what happened in the 1940s. Look, this is what happened in Europe in the 1930s. It's what happened in Italy. It's what happened in the national socialist country of Germany in the 1930s under Hitler. These companies get into bed and think, "Well, we're going to be fine. We'll just take a little bit of this."
Then, they're trapped. These are bullies that are pushing these companies. And these companies are naive, at best, that they think they can get into bed with the devil, and then be able to control it.
In his uninterrupted efforts to attack and smear progressives, Beck would repeatedly prove the accuracy of Godwin's Law. Beck called Obama's proposal to expand the foreign service, AmeriCorps, and the Peace Corps "what Hitler did with the SS" and compared the closing of car dealerships to what happened under the Nazis, warning, "Gang, at some point, they're going to come for you." Incidentally, this would not be Beck's only reference to Martin Niemoller's lectures. Responding to Anita Dunn's criticism of Fox News' overt partisanship, Beck compared the channel to Jews during the Holocaust, with other media outlets representing the silent bystanders.
Beck's embrace of violent, anti-government rhetoric
Beck's adoration of theatrics reached a fevered pitch in April. After claiming, "I think it would be just faster if they just shot me in the head," Beck created a classic cable news moment when, in criticizing the president's policies, he pretended to pour gasoline on an average American, stating, "President Obama, why don't you just set us on fire? For the love of Pete, what are you doing?" Beck would go on to use violent imagery throughout the year, distorting the face and voice of a "concerned parent" who attacked Dunn for her Mao reference as if he were a mafia informant, purporting to boil a frog to illustrate that "we've been tossed quickly into boiling water," and invoking civil rights marchers having fire hoses turned on them to spur opposition to health care reform.
Rhetorically as well, Beck spent 2009 at the forefront of the emerging right-wing culture of paranoia, his persecution complex manifesting itself in claims that "they are going to silence voices like mine" and suggestions that "you" would "have to shoot me in the forehead before I will let you into my house to tell me how to raise my children; you will have to shoot me in the forehead before you take away my gun; you will have to shoot me in the forehead before I acquiesce and be silent." This especially unhinged rallying cry continued:
BECK: [T]hey cannot move on these things, because they are building a machine that will crush the entrepreneurial sprit and the freedom that our founding fathers designed. This machine, whatever it is they are building, will crush it. Do not let them build another piece. So while I turn away, I want to make sure that I have at least 10 million eyes watching -- watching every single move they're making.
[...]
We know why they're doing what they're doing. Now you need to do what you do, and as long as that is peaceful, we will save our country.
Beck alternately suggested that former White House adviser Van Jones or ACORN would kill him and that SEIU would break his legs. He stated that he "fear[s]" that he'll be silenced by a "thug-ocracy" that includes ACORN, SEIU, and Obama. Beck compared the Obama administration to the bat-wielding Al Capone from The Untouchables, claiming, "You take these guys on, and they will bash your brains out"; suggested that the administration was out to destroy him; argued that the Obama administration would use bombings of a Canadian pipeline to justify taking over oil companies; and suggested that government wants "more problems" so "they can use the iron fist and crush people."
Beck claimed the 2008 election was a coup conducted "through the guise of an election" and warned that "the country may not survive Barack Obama"; he hosted a guest who claimed the "only chance we have as a country right now is" for Osama bin Laden to "detonate a major weapon" in the United States. Beck charged the Obama administration with "putting a gun to America's head" through its approach to legislating, attacked White House advisers Cass Sunstein and John Holdren by stating that they "will be responsible for many, many deaths," and said the White House and progressives are "taking you to a place to be slaughtered."
Against the backdrop of this hyperbolic fright, Beck discussed poisoning Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, encouraged his followers to "hold a meeting" with politicians "in front of their house," and encouraged people to attend a November rally in Washington to "see the whites of their eyes," warning, "There is coming a point to where the people will have exhausted all of their options; when that happens, look out."
Beck was simultaneously calling on his followers to eschew violence, since "one lunatic like Timothy McVeigh could ruin everything," and claiming, "It's not time to pick up guns" or "blow anything up," all while warning, "Somebody's going to do something stupid, and it will change the republic overnight."
Beck uses Fox News show as tool for organizing conservatives
On March 13, Beck used his Fox News show to tearfully announce his 9-12 Project, weeping as he declared, "I just love my country, and I fear for it," then stiffening his spine to add, "They don't surround us; we surround them." Within days, Beck was denying interest in running for office, telling Fox News' Patti Ann Browne that "we would run out of missiles. Seriously, that would be the most overused phrase in my administration, 'What do you mean, we're out of missiles?' "
As Media Matters demonstrated, the anti-government tea party protest movement operated as a de facto subsidiary of Fox News, and no one better illustrates the interconnected nature of Fox News and the tea parties than Glenn Beck. On April 6, with an image of his 9-12 Project flag waving behind him, Beck let his followers know where they could "celebrate with Fox News" at "FNC Tax Day Tea Parties." Three days later, Beck announced that he would be participating in a tea party fundraiser prior to speaking at a tea party event and used his Fox News show to tie the tea party protests to Thomas Paine. Then, his persecution complex in overdrive, Beck declared that "[t]here are forces at play that are doing everything they can to make this -- tax day at San Antonio, the Alamo -- about me," informing his followers that he would not be giving the keynote address at the San Antornio Fox News Tax Day Tea Party, as had been originally planned. Beck would eventually marry his anti-government paranoia to his tea party advocacy, claiming that a Department of Homeland Security report on right-wing extremism was somehow directed at tea partiers.
Beck's political activity continued in August as he began aggressively promoting "the biggest 9-12 tea party yet, on Capitol Hill." Beck's involvement with the 9-12 protest movement led CNN's Howard Kurtz to ask whether Beck is "a talk show host" or "a leader of a movement." Underscoring Beck's role leading the 9-12/tea party movement, Fox News footage of the rally included signs paying homage to one of Beck's numerous conspiracy theories, that of Obama's nefarious "civilian national security force." Beck would go on to dubiously claim that the protest was the "largest march on Washington ever," a claim he based on "overseas" reporting; he would subsequently cite a university he could not recall to claim that 1.7 million attended his protest. To cap it all off, Beck laughably argued that President Obama should have given his Nobel Peace Prize to "the Tea Party goers and the 9-12 project."
In the aftermath of his successful rally, Beck looked to more traditional ways to use his perch to engage in political activity. As the special election in New York's 23rd Congressional District drew to a close, Beck, along with several of his Fox News colleagues, aggressively campaigned for independent conservative candidate Doug Hoffman, on the grounds that GOP candidate Dede Scozzafava was too moderate, and thus did not pass their ideological purity test. He also offered to host a fundraiser for GOP Rep. Michele Bachmann, and encouraged his followers to "leave" the Republican Party as "the best way to get Republicans to change."
Having used his radio and Fox News shows to cultivate a legion of followers, Beck now seems poised to push the movement forward, promising a new "multi-level" plan for his 9-12 project that involves more conventions, meetings with conservative "minds," and a rally at the Lincoln Memorial. Becks' laudable goal: nothing less than to "save our country." And it seems the GOP and the tea partiers have finally answered Beck's call.
Beck's wild conspiracy charts
Regular viewers of the Glenn Beck show this year were treated to a litany of charts and graphs, purportedly laying out a myriad of suspicious connections among things with names like ACORN, SEIU, the Tides Foundation, and two brothers named Rathke. Oh, and occasionally fictional characters. These charts were frequently depicted as trees, and often represented by encircled words with lines showing how each circle is connected. Occasionally they involved defacing the U.S. flag.
Beck's conspiracy theories made room for Sotomayor and the Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund, the National Endowment for the Arts, White House adviser Valerie Jarrett, Che Guevara, Mumia Abu-Jamal, OnStar, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and "almost everything."
When Beck famously spelled "OLIGARH" to illustrate the type of political system the grandest of conspiracies was constructing, he simply claimed a day later that his misspelling proved "you can't spell 'oligarch' without the czars." When he used a game of Connect 4 to illustrate one of his many conspiracy theories, he accidentally won before he could use the game piece representing Obama, but pressed on anyway, only able to make his grand point after cheating at a child's game in which he was playing against himself.
In Beck's conspiratorial world, union officials make decisions on whether to send additional troops to Afghanistan, community organizers are deliberately undermining the financial system, ACORN is designing "government-run health care," and the whole cast of conspirators is establishing a "maximum wage" to redistribute wealth and fixing elections in New York and Minnesota. Oh, and New Orleans' response to Hurricane Katrina was an effort to hide ACORN corruption.
The irony, of course, is that for each of the illusory connections Beck draws between his political enemies, there exists an actual connection between Beck and some of the more controversial actors in the world of right-wing activism.
He's not saying there are FEMA concentration camps ...
One of the methods to Beck's madness is the attempted debunking -- a clever little trick whereby Beck professes his desire to prove false a wild conspiracy theory, but finds himself unable to, thereby lending it credibility without actually endorsing its veracity. A fine illustration of this technique can be found in Beck's efforts to "debunk" rumors of the Obama administration's FEMA concentration camps. On March 4, Beck appeared on Fox & Friends and declared, "We are a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination." He subsequently stated that he "wanted to debunk" the theory that FEMA was building camps, but added: "I can't debunk them." His non-debunking continued:
BECK: It is -- it is our government. If you trust our government, it's fine. If you have any kind of fear that we might be headed towards a totalitarian state, look out, buckle up. There is something going on in our country that is -- ain't good.
On his Fox News program later that day, Beck claimed, "I don't believe in the FEMA prison," and later stated, "If these things exist, that's bad, and we will cover it. If they don't exist, it's irresponsible to not debunk this story." One month later, Beck hosted James Meigs, Popular Mechanics' editor-in-chief, to debunk the stories. To recap, Beck had first warned of "a country that is headed towards socialism, totalitarianism beyond your wildest imagination," then had brought up the rumors of FEMA concentration camps that he "wanted to debunk" but could not. Later that day he professed, "I don't believe in the FEMA prisons," but again suggested he could not debunk them. It was a month before he got around to definitively debunking them.
Beck rejoices after America loses bid to host 2016 Olympics
On September 28, White House officials announced that President Obama and first lady Michelle Obama would travel to Copenhagen in order to help the Chicago Olympic Committee present its bid to host the 2016 Olympics. One day later, Beck took to the airwaves, leading the charge in attacking Chicago as a city unfit to host the Olympics. In addition to asking "[w]hose agenda" Obama was "really pushing," Beck complained that the Second City was too violent for the Olympics and said that Chicago was less favorably suited to hold the Olympics than Rio de Janeiro, Madrid, and Tokyo because of the city's history of organized crime:
BECK: Rio de Janeiro is one of the three other cities competing against Chicago for the 2016 games. Madrid and Tokyo are the other two. It's a tough choice, what should we do? What should we do?
Well, in the America that I grew up in, we would use logic. The way the IOC normally does it is do select the city which presents the superior plan. OK, that makes sense. All right, does the best job in organizing. Oh, Chicago is good at community organizing, and organized labor, and organized mafia. Oops. Did I say that out loud?
When the IOC subsequently awarded the games to Rio de Janeiro, Beck giddily begged his followers, "Please let me break this news to you. Oh, it's so sweet." As his sidekick Stu began to make the news, Beck implored his followers to "savor" the moment, claiming, "We can always hope" that Obama is the first head of state to fail to secure an Olympics bid. Beck subsequently claimed to have "no problem" with Chicago hosting the Olympics.
Beck's slavery fetish
During a February appearance on Fox & Friends, Beck said of the economic stimulus plan, "It is slavery." Beck's enslavement to that metaphor nearly rivaled his obsession with Marxists, Leninists, and 1930s Germany for his most ridiculous rhetorical flourish.
According to Beck, slavery was coming at the hands of government, ACORN, SEIU, student loans, the census, Dale and Wade Rathke, politicians, progressives, federal assistance, and debt. And, as one would expect, only the 9-12 protesters could defend freedom from the onslaught of slavery.
Beck leads the charge in misinforming on the news of the day
The Sotomayor nomination
In a May 1 statement on the retirement of Supreme Court Justice David Souter, Obama stated that he considered the "quality of empathy" one of the qualifications he would seek in a nominee. The morning of May 26, Obama announced Sonia Sotomayor as his nominee, and Beck immediately combined the right's willful ignorance of the long list of conservatives citing empathy as a desired quality in a judge with his own brand of racial invective:
BECK: They're just like, "Hey, Hispanic chick lady! You're empathetic?" She says yep. They say, "You're in!" That's the way it really works.
During the confirmation process, Beck would argue that Hitler's empathy led to genocide and allege that Sotomayor is "a Marxist" and evidence of a "hostile takeover" of the country.
Health care reform falsehoods
In a February 9 Bloomberg commentary, long-time health care misinformer and former New York Lt. Gov. Betsy McCaughey launched the falsehood that a provision in the economic recovery act would allow the federal government to take over health care and "dictate treatments." The following day, McCaughey appeared on Beck's Fox News show to repeat her false claim, and by Feburary 11, Beck had fully adopted the falsehood as his own:
BECK: So this is -- really, this is the beginning -- I mean, this is the way it happens in every society. I mean, you know, the extreme example is what happened in Germany, when -- they actually had a chart on how many potatoes you could, you know, make, how many hours you could work, how many fields you could till, et cetera, et cetera. And if you couldn't do very much, well, then, you didn't get, you know, the primo health care.
That's just the way it works when everybody has to share for the common good. Sometimes for the common good, you just have to say, "Hey, Grandpa, you've had a good life. Sucks to be you." That's not compassion.
Indeed, throughout the 2009 health care reform debate, Beck has repeatedly tied reform efforts to Nazi efforts to kill the elderly and newborns, taken ownership of Sarah Palin's egregiously false death panels smear, and adopted the distortion that the uninsured would face time in jail under reform proposals. When a nonbinding task force in November recommended that women aged 40 to 49 years not get routine mammogram screenings, Beck was driving the conservative demagoguery machine, adopting the tired death panels smear to claim that these guidelines -- that are binding on no single entity or human -- were yet further proof that death panels existed.
Suffice it to say that the moment Fox News issued Glenn Beck its imprimatur to spread conservative misinformation, the national public discourse was destined to be slightly off-kilter, and the national media's self-proclaimed rodeo clown took viewers and listeners on one wild ride through distortions and falsehoods.

















I salute you, Glenn Beck. Real Man of Genius.
For a Man that has Spit out every insult except to Defame someone's Daughter.
I feel Sean Hannity's Pain for i know he Coveted this Award.
Rev Wright, Bill Ayers, i never been proud of my Country, Poor Sean all that work & no Reward.
Speak truth to power.
Mr. News
I think there should be a Lifetime Liars Achievement Award. They should call it The Becky. Glenn has earned it. Here is just a sampling:
Obama is creating a Nazi-like civilian force.
Van Jones is a convicted felon.
ACORN is receiving billions of dollars.
Eco-terrorists bombed radio tower in Washington.
1.7 million Tea Baggers at 9/12 rally
UAW workers earn average $154.00 per hour.
Carbon dioxide not a dangerous pollutant.
Anita Dunn worships Mao.
Obama threatened to close Nebraska military base.
Guinness might want to look into this. I think Beck has set a record.
As an eternal optimist, I'll take whatever pleasure I can that Beck's knocked Hannity from the center of the RW media spotlight. He used to be next in line to El Rushbo! How the mighty have fallen.
Sure, Beck is a danger to America & Americans, but there's that...
;o)
Glen Beck is just speaking the truth.. Which you guys
used to do .. oh.oh.. I think you used to do. Real people like
to hear the truth and if you don't like Glen Beck in telling it
then call him on the red phone and tell him sooooo.. If you have
something to say that he has said is wrong, please, please call
him... otherwise don't waist your breath...
Look - If you know the truth and don't want to say it the way it is and keeping to yourself and the master planners that you are to benefit yourself.. COntinue.. the strings will soon be unloosen one day..
Praying for you all -
Glen Beck - Continue speaking the truth to let us know the truth and the inside of everything that is going in our GOV, SENT, WASH...
That's why MMFA says that these fools tell "falsehoods".
But you should feel free to call them liars. We posters aren't under the same restrictions.
Oh, and only a parser extraordinaire would try and say a falsehood is different than a lie, or that MMfA doesn't discern intent or talk about bias. Wow.
Has "parsing" morphed into the understanding that different words have different shades of meaning?
In everyday conversation, what connotation do you think the term "falsehood" carries? When someone innocently misstates a fact, do you say they just leveled a 'falsehood'?
What would you suggest, anyway? If the word "falsehood" suggests intent, then how would it be possible to point out a falsehood without making a commentary about intent?
Pronunciation: \ˈfȯls-ˌhu̇d\
Function: noun
Date: 13th century
1 : an untrue statement : lie
Take it up with Merriam or Webster.
I think there is a difference between lying and spreading misinformation, as in just repeating something that's false.
I just don't know what the best way is to differentiate between the two, but i think that's the only point anyone's trying to make.
That's the difference you're desperately trying to ignore here.
Beck is a serial misinformer. He's likely a serial liar too, but MMFA doesn't call him that, because they don't try to label the intent of anyone.
But continue on derailing the thread - that's about the only thing you're good at.
People can differ whether Beck intends to deceive (why bother getting into his supposed motives), but what MMfA argues is much less arguable is that Beck told something that is observably false.
And the fact that you made a big deal out of what you are now apparently admitting isn't a big deal is even more evidence that you're desperate!
Let it go, you're wrong, and you look less informed the more that you post.
There is reason for the semantics, and it is impartiality.
3. something not consistent with fact: something that does not correspond with the known or observable facts
MW:
2 : absence of truth or accuracy
Cambridge:
a lie or a statement which is not correct
Wiktionary:
# The state of being false.
# A false statement, esp. an intentional one; a lie
Don't tell falsehoods.
Webster's:
# a false statement; lie
# a false belief, theory, idea, etc.
Infoplease:
2. something false; an untrue idea, belief, etc.:
3. the act of lying or making false statements.
4. lack of conformity to truth or fact.
Your argument is similar to conflating the noun Plant to automatically converting to Marijuana... the idea of sets and subsets... oh, never mind.
A fib.
I simply explained why MMFA doesn't use the word "liar".
And a lie is different than a falsehood. It's not parsing words at all. Look up the definitions. A falsehood is something that's untrue. A lie is something that's untrue, said with the intent to deceive. And that's why MMFA doesn't use the word LIE, because of that difference. And, unlike Newsbusters or Accuracy in Media, MMFA doesn't talk about conservative bias. Posters talk about those two things, and should feel free to, but MMFA stays away from that.
But your post is clearly a personal attack. Seems like all you can do are derailing posts and personal attacks that are intended to derail threads too.
Post your opinions and leave the imaginary hall monitoring at the door, nobody is interested.
Sorry Tommy, but were looking in the mirror as you thought that up?
I can't disagree with that, I just thought her initial response to Nerzog was silly, especially when he was inserting tongue in cheek while being absolutely correct.
It needed no correction or clarification from her.
However, the king of all parsers should refrain from using that particular adjective.
And yes, you are free to say I'm silly and a dirty flirt, and add nada to the conversation, as I willingly plead guilty. ;-0)
And yes, you are free to say I'm silly and a dirty flirt, and add nada to the conversation, as I willingly plead guilty. ;-0)
So that's not a lie or falsehood? ;-)
Would I lie to you, honey?
Now would I say something that wasn't true?
I'm asking you, suger, would I liiiiiiiiie to you?
:-0)
Winners get burger king crowns.
Ans welcome home in two short days, Snoopy.
So, you're just willing to grant, after the large assemblage of evidence above, that Mr. Beck has worked quite hard to achieve his award, climbing over several other very worthy contenders, such as Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Reilly, Rove, anyone with the last name Cheney? Great! Perhaps next year there will be a 'Thread Derailer of the Year', and you will have something to compete for.
TRANSLATION: I have nothing to say relevant to the thread subject -- so I'll content myself with attacking one poster on miniscule word parsing -- that way, I still "win"! WHOOPIE!!
Again, though, what we see is your personal animus towards me rearing its ugly, ugly, nasty head.
And you shouldn't look any further than your own off topic attacks on me to see a vicious tirade against a fellow poster.
And you can head back to Free RepubliKKK. No one here cares what you have to say.
In whose opinion? Oh, that would be yours! Personally, I like reading DellDolly's responses. Opinions are simply that.
key words: intent to deceive
Doesn't that make Beck a "LIAR"?
His intent is to deceive, don't you agree>
Call it what it is.
No one was trying to do that.
I explained why MMFA doesn't call him a liar. That describes THEIR behavior, not Beck's. It doesn't mitigate his behavior or soften his rhetoric in the least! What a crazy thing to say.
What about if your nose grows?
I think we could settle this "arguement" if anyone happens to know the answers. Ha!
I am baffled as to why you didn't understand that I wasn't describing my own attitudes and opinions here and was clearly explaining why MMFA doesn't call him a liar.
You are really becoming obsessive. I could picture myself posting something similar to what DellDolly said and I doubt very strongly that you'd have replied, much less attacked. Her post was conversational; it wasn't lecturing or talking down to anyone.
I think your level of dislike has pushed you over the edge to where you feel you need to attack anytime you see her name on a post.
For the record, she was correct about the difference between lie and falsehood. You can tell a falsehood without intending to. You aren't telling a lie without intent to deceive.
It's also pretty difficult to take criticisms of behavior seriously from someone who dishonestly takes words out of context, makes wild generalizations about liberals, and says "that's my opinion" instead of engaging in debate over the merits of his opinion. Those are all pretty "arrogant" things.
Fair enough.
By the way, could we all agree to stop using the term "spew?"
What I don't do, which is what you do all the time, haul out drive by sweeping broad generalizations of my past "inappropriate" behavior, such as "dishonestly takes words out of context, makes wild generalizations about liberals, and says "that's my opinion" instead of engaging in debate over the merits of his opinion".
As for my generalizations about liberals, I apologize if you're so thin-skinned it stings a little. I read stuff here written by liberal posters all the time about cons and conservatives that make my generalizations about as impotent as you can get - but you don't criticize their choice of words or their generalizations, now do you? Do you think I am offended by their slurs? No. Because it is what it is, a generalization. Most understand that, harmless rhetoric not directed at any one individual. Group criticism, if you will.
That's the difference between you and me. I don't get as easily offended as you do. Unlike you, I take what I dish out and am no victim.
And those broad generalizations about you are very accurate. They may not describe every post you've ever made here, but they paint an accurate picture of most of your posts.
And you clearly do get offended and teed off, and that is undeniable by anyone besides you, and you portray yourself as a victim on a regular basis.
Be careful though, your mouth and your temper has always been your worst enemy. It will rear it's ugly head soon, in the meantime I will be the thorn in your side. As I said, it keeps you honest, or as honest as you can, which ain't much.
Happy Holidays!
The truth needs defenders, that's for sure. Especially from people like you.
But I don't need a single defender. I am not here to make friends. The truth needs defenders. I defend the truth. That means I debunk you and call you out when you make a troll post. But it's nothing personal for me.
You, on the other hand, most of your posts that reply to me are examples of your personal animus towards me. And everyone else sees it.
Snap!
What none of this garbage addresses is your arrogance. If Dolly is "arrogant" by what you said, then so are you.
Come on, I know you have it in you. Tell me how Beck is the patriot here, defending "his" county from Obama the commie, fascist, nazi man that he is.
Thanks for clearing that up Dimwit. I was wondering what language you considered appropriate for this thread. Thanks also for the permission to call Beck a liar.
Here, let me help you out - "dimwit" is not appropriate for any useful discussion. Feeling any clearer now?
This was the Rodeo Clown's year, hands down.
Basically, he received a license from Murdoch to bring right-wing hate radio to us over the telly.
Can't imagine how we can sink much lower than the Rodeo Clown?
We previously would have said, "top his performance", but this being Beck...
This is probably because of his WWII comments.
Every time I hear him speak, I think of Tokyo Rose (1946) South Pacific. Check her out on Wikipedia. You will find a lot of similarities in his moral bending propaganda. She was a lot better looking though.
To quote from Beck's version of the book of Revelations: "Behold, I make all things poo."
List of 94 Dropped Sponsors here.
I bet he is proud and will go for winning 2010's award.
CONGRADULATIONS Becky!
*Inmitating clapping*
He is DISINFORMER.
He is DISINFORMER.
You better check with Dolly on that one. She'll let you know whether your distinctions are valid, and whether this article's headline is appropriate.
Because if you are, you should disabuse yourself of that notion.
MMFA chooses to use "falsehood" and "misinformer" vs "lie" and "disinformation". I simply explained why they don't use those words, because those words imply intent, and they don't try to identify intent - they let the readers determine if there was some intent to deceive. That allows them to highlight conservative misinformation that might come from someone or some source that's not generally considered a conservative! That allows them to not be painted with the same brush that we can use to discredit sites that push "bias" allegations without a reasonable argument behind them.
Your statement implied that I gave direction to MMFA about which words to use. I didn't. That's the problem with what you said, which is why I said you were delusional - because you were.
Just wait until 2010, then 2012!!!
At least Glenn has common sense, and loves this country.
Fox News harbors the greatest liars in the world.
And I just wanna say again: Congratulations, Glenda!!
With this award, you'll no longer have to cry about yourself or your teabagging wingnut friends being left out of consideration for Time magazine's Person of the Year.
While the list of factual atrocities from the Mormonster are impressive, your "Misinformer of the Year" description of him falls short of what I think he really deserves.
I'd go with something that uses every one of Carlin's "The seven words you can't say on TV."
At least twice.
Now we've descended to this.
No wonder we (progressives!) can't get anything passed...we're all progressives here, and all we can do is bash eachother...how'd all that work out? I stopped reading after the eighth complaint about the difference between falsehood and lie!!! Seriously???
Can we just agree that Glenn Beck is at best an ignorant moron and at worst a malicious all-out assault on our country!
How is it that the left gets blamed for ruining the country by the right, while all along they are the ones raping OUR country!
If you support and believe the bilge shoveled by Beck, you are simply a groupie, not a conservative.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_c5nGN_FlFg
The best part about Becky is his knowledge of history. Pretty much the historic knowledge of any "morning zoo" radio hack.
Disinformation = A deliberate and calculated lie to advance an ideology. Propaganda.
Let's not fool ourselves here. This is not simply Misinformation.
This is Disinformation.
Call it what it is.
And just for fun:
Glenn Beck to English Translator
"Nation/America"
My gang of teabaggin' droolers.
"I'm not saying"
I'm saying. I just said it and I'll say it again.
"I want to be wrong"
I don't care if I make any sense whatsoever. I just want to scare you.
"Our Founding Fathers believed"
I have no clue what they believed. Couldn't care less. It's what I want you to believe.
"But what if I'm right?"
See: "I want to be wrong."
"You can't make this stuff up!"
You can't, but I can. (See Next)
"I'm not a journalist"
I don't have to be held accountable or responsible for anything I say.
"He's/She's a racist"
I'm a racist and I'm upset that He/She is not a racist in the way you're normally supposed to be a racist.
"So what he's saying is.."
He's not saying that.
"If you connect the dots"
Mr. X or Mrs. Y or Organization Z is/are a Radical(s).
"I'm taking Friday afternoon off"
I'm writing 3 more books, 2 movies and a play.
"You don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to understand..."
You only have to be dumber than I am.
"You won't believe what we have on today's show."
Self explanatory.
"Nation/America"
My gang of teabaggin' droolers.
"I'm not saying"
I'm saying.
"So how do we really know?"
Ignore what you know and suspend common sense.
"I want to be wrong"
I don't care if I make any sense whatsoever. I just want to scare you.
"Our Founding Fathers believed"
I have no clue what they believed, nor do I care what they believed. I just want you to believe.
"But what if I'm right?"
See: "I want to be wrong."
"You can't make this stuff up!"
You can't, but I can. (See Next)
"I'm not a journalist"
I don't have to be held accountable or responsible for anything I say.
"He's a racist"
I'm a racist and I'm mad that he isn't a racist in the way you're supposed to be a racist.
"So what he's saying is.."
He's not saying that.
"If you connect the dots"
Mr. Z or Mrs. Y is a Radical.
"I'm taking Friday afternoon off"
I'm writing 3 more books, 2 movies and a play
"You don't need to be a Rocket Scientist to understand..."
You only have to be dumber than I am.
"You won't believe what we have on today's show."
Self explanatory.
We must deny these lunatics from influencing Youth and simple minded who don't understand or know of American History and how we arrived at our freedoms. May we all learn how we all found the greatest democracy in the world and defended the rights of all humanity.
Enjoy this & feel free to pass this along
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y08uJ42X48
check this out:
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/glenn-beck/statements/
- link
The independent fact-checking website politifact called Palin's "death panel" talk their Lie of the Year.
And I would argue that 95% of what Beck says is just opinion that is not backed up by anything at all - certainly not accurate history or real facts. The few times Beck dares to foray into the world of "facts", he gets it wrong almost every time.
1.Labor union president Andy Stern is "the most frequent visitor" at the White House.
2.Less than 10 percent of Obama's Cabinet appointees "have any experience in the private sector."
3."In the health care bill, we're now offering insurance for dogs."
4."Mitt Romney ... gave you government health care that is now bankrupting the state" of Massachusetts.
5.Forty-five percent of doctors "say they'll quit" if health care reform passes.
6.John Holdren, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, "has proposed forcing abortions and putting sterilants in the drinking water to control population."
7."Why do we have automatic citizenship upon birth? We're the only country in the world that has it."
Do you realize I could likely crop video and link together statements that would make Ronald Reagan say he himself is a Communist? That's the type of "video" Becky does.
cropped videos:
Pick someone like beck saying a cropped statement. ...then lets send it to the FCC and Fox news and see if any libel issues have been broken. Don't forget to attach your real name and photo to it, you should stand behind openly the material you have, found?
When your sure about what you have found? you wont need to stand behind any wake avatars (like the giant G above)or such to be believed. After all your a truth seeker. Please help expose these fake videos you have eluded too and the charges brought forth regarding them being faked. Where do I find that info
As far as the Van Jones junk, this man does not appear to be a communist now. There is NO evidence that he still adheres to any kind of communistic dogma and lots of evidence that his thinking has evolved over 20 years.
There is a nagging suspicion that redemption and change occur over time, although in Beck's case this can't be proven.
In an interview with "O" magazine, Van Jones also talked about an admiration for some of Ronald Reagan's qualities.
To use Becky's... and apparently your... line of logic, that would mean Reagan was a Communist.
That's the problem, the so-called "facts" on which he bases opinion are completely distorted and off-base.
BUT, the misinformer(s) of the year are:
Gretchen Carlson, Steve Doocy, and Brian Kilmeade of Fox & Friends. By far. They represent themselves as a morning NEWS reporting show, but they are everything but that. They masque their commentary as news. Beck, O'Reilly and Hannity at least don't pretend that they are new reporters. Carlson, Doocy and Kilmeade do. Yet, their interviews are biased as hell. They only interview one side and they give softball questions to the right. They bash the left and any guest that gives a liberal view point. They always drop in comments to bash anything Obama, democrat, or liberal. I honestly watch this show every chance I get because it is pure comedy to me. It enrages me at the same time, but it is like some vice. I just enjoy how horrible these people are. The comments they make, the biasness they possess, and the stupidity the espouse is quite amazing to me. I have watch hundreds of episodes over the years and am always amazed day in and day out. They will do anything to push the "conservative" view point and bash any liberal view point.
I have countless examples, but they completely misstate facts and go along with it. They report it as news too. That is the huge thing, but the spin they throw on everything is beyond amazing. They are on 3 hours a day.....opposed to 1 hour a day. They work in tandem too, which makes it worse. It is the fact they are "news reporters" as opposed to commentators. That is a huge difference.
Fox and Friends win in a cakewalk.
However, I have one clarification: By my count, the current dropped sponsor total is 94 (5 alone dropped him last week).
Neither Beck nor I like what they say. If they want to come on Brvk' site and change that statement, Beck and the rest of us would enjoy that.
I find it stupid that the left hates the right, and the right hates the left, but the right are not as hateful as the left.
If I come to this site, got to HuffProstitutes, or most any site I can find, I find more hate in 20 minutes a day, then I would have heard if I had listened to Rush for 20 years.
I spent 5 minutes a month on Rush and the other real patriots on the radio and TV, I spent most of my time on MSDNC, the Hate America Radio Network, so I can know the enimity.
I can not find a Right Wing Site where the Right gives hateful posts like they do on so many left sites.
That is a serious question. Let me know where the so-called right wing haters post against the left.
Fox & Friends by far takes the cake. Gretchen Carlson, Steve Doocy, and Brian Kilmeade are not as insane as Glen Beck, but their commentary is just as dangerous, but the masquerade themselves as "news reporters," unlike Beck who is a "commentator." It is far more dangerous disguising yourself as a news show as opposed to a commentating show. They do this 3 hours a day with astounding bias. The way they always drop in comments in support of conservative slant and bashing anything Obama, liberal or democrat with subtle and not so subtle remarks.
Fox and Friends is the greatest danger in the misinformatin they espouse.
You see, we are happy to accept moderates... but, you guys aren't having it anymore, are you... and if he isn't fully for, "Guns, God, and Gold," then what use is he to your side?
You are in the world of the least tolerant people in America --the progressives that worship media matters.
I wonder how many slackers Soros pays to follow Beck for a living?
If you want a sympathetic ear, to to Big Government's coverage of this story. http://www.breitbart.tv/media-matters-names-beck-misinformer-of-the-year-2009/
http://politifact.com/truth-o-meter/personalities/glenn-beck/statements
for starters...
The baseball bat was in reference to this statement made by Andy Stern of the SEIU: "[W]e prefer to use the power of persuasion, but if that doesn’t work we use the persuasion of power."
Hmmm... who is the thug?
Glenn, this is truly an honor.
Definition of misinformed: to give false or misleading information. You idiots!!! He states nujmerous times that some of what he states our his OPINIONS, and the factual info he Dares the WHITE HOUSE to call to correct any "mis-information." And dammm, if that phone never rings!! Trust me, if GB is giving incorrect information, the liberal media (well like the one that awarded him this ridciculous award) would be first to call him on it... But all we here are accusations.
I think you guys ought to go back to school and learn what is real and not real. When he talks about situations, he is not saying that is what it is...he fears that is what it may become...it's called an OPINION.
Ironic how the media blasted the teaparty goers as violent and causing problems..YET, there was not one arrest!! But at the summits for the Global Warmings, there was a large number of arrests...so how is this double standard looking? Good, as long as you're on the liberal side..right? Like, Rangel, evading taxes, yet he writes these tax laws... and Nelson, taking a bribe that may not even be constitutionally legal....if anyone else did it, they would be prosecuted.
So J.H. why don't you start reporting real news, instead of wasting our time with your liberal rhetoric!!!
Heck, we can watch GB together and you can learn a thing or two about Obama's ties...oh, you would learn soooo much!!!
Glenn Beck is attacked, with these opinion pieces which are really very weak, and as biased as this site purports (falsely) to be on guard against.
Address this: Glennbeck.com sells a newsletter that nearly outsells the NYTimes. The ratings for his show, and Fox in general prove like-minded Americans are not buying what you are selling here.
What does this mean? This site is irrelevant, and a minority misinformation party. Nobody is sharing your opinion, check the ratings for Fox vs. Cnn, Msnbc, Cbs, Abc, Pbs, and the rest of the state controlled liberaL media. Beck represents the truth, and the majority. Oh that smarts doesnt it? Keep high fiving each other, or join the discussion instead of bashing away ineffectively.