About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Perino's "convoluted" attack on health care bill is all fuzzy math

December 21, 2009 3:05 pm ET — 16 Comments

On Fox & Friends, Dana Perino used an apples-to-oranges comparison to raise doubts about reports that the Senate health care bill would reduce the number of uninsured people by 31 million. In fact, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has stated that under current law, 54 million people will be uninsured by the end of 2019 and that under the Senate bill, 23 million people would be uninsured -- a difference of 31 million people.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Perino asks, "How did we suddenly get to 54 million uninsured?"

Perino used apples-to-oranges comparison to cast doubt on whether bill will reduce uninsured by 31 million. On the December 21 edition of Fox & Friends, Perino said, "[T]hey keep saying that 31 million people are going to be insured under this bill. But in the CBO report, it says 23 million will remain uninsured." She added, "So, I don't know, how did we suddenly get to 54 million uninsured? I thought we were at 30 million uninsured. It's just so convoluted, and it's the reason that America has very little confidence in this bill."

CBO confirms: Uninsured would increase to 54 million by 2019 under do-nothing scenario

CBO indeed estimated that under current law, 54 million would be uninsured by 2019. In a chart included in a December 19 analysis of the manager's amendment to the Senate health care bill, CBO said that under current law, 54 million nonelderly people would be uninsured by 2019:

Perino's "30 million" uninsured figure is for 2008 and excludes undocumented immigrants and others with access to public insurance. By saying, "I thought we were at 30 million uninsured," Perino falsely suggested that the "30 million" figure contradicted CBO's estimate that under current law, there would be 54 million uninsured people in 2019 -- a comparison she used to cast doubt on reports that the Senate legislation would reduce the number of uninsured by 31 million people. But this is an apples-to-oranges comparison. The 30 million figure that Perino cited refers to the number of uninsured in 2008 after subtracting undocumented immigrants, as well those already eligible for but not enrolled in public insurance programs. Following Obama's September 9 address to a joint session of Congress -- during which Obama said that "[t]here are now more than 30 million American citizens who cannot get coverage" -- Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag wrote in a September 10 blog post:

Today, the Bureau of the Census released the most recent data on the number of uninsured Americans. The report, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2008, reveals that 46 million people were uninsured in 2008, the last year for which there are data. These data are based on the Current Population Survey. With two different numbers, there has been some confusion as to which is accurate. Well, both are -- and the President's version is more focused on the relevant target population for health reform since it excludes unauthorized immigrants.

The Census report indicates that of the 46 million uninsured individuals, 34 million were native born and 2.8 million were naturalized citizens. The report thus shows that there were 36.8 million uninsured U.S. citizens (native born and naturalized) in 2008. An alternative calculation includes legal immigrants, which based on a figure from the Pew Hispanic Center would bring the total to something like 39 million.

Some ambiguity surrounds how to treat individuals who are already eligible for public insurance programs like Medicaid and S-CHIP but do not enroll in those programs, which estimates from the Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured suggest may amount to millions of individuals. These individuals are uninsured but some interpretations would suggest they should not be counted among those who "cannot get" coverage. Subtracting them from the total would produce a number closer to 30 million.

To be conservative, the President thus stated that "more than 30 million American citizens" cannot get coverage.

CBO confirms: Senate bill would reduce number of uninsured by 31 million by end of 2019

Elmendorf: Number of uninsured "would be reduced by about 31 million" by 2019 under Senate health care bill. CBO director Douglas Elmendorf wrote in the December 19 analysis that under the Senate health care bill, "[b]y 2019, CBO and [the Joint Committee on Taxation] estimate, the number of nonelderly people who are uninsured would be reduced by about 31 million, leaving about 23 million nonelderly residents uninsured (about one-third of whom would be unauthorized immigrants)."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (December 21, 2009 3:32 pm ET)
      5  
      Hey, Dana, here's a hint.

      When something seems confusing to you, when it seems 'off', the proper thing to do is to complete some research before you assume that it's truly 'off'! That way you can avoid making a fool of yourself.

      Emily Latella, watch out, you have some stiff competition.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (December 21, 2009 3:40 pm ET)
      4  
      That's not FUZZY MATH!

      That's either not reading what they said or intentionally LYING!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by blk-in-alabam (December 21, 2009 7:16 pm ET)
        2  
        Dana Perino was reading what she was supposed to say,and saying it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (December 21, 2009 4:02 pm ET)
      4  
      Fuzzy math to match her fuzzy history.

      "I was panicked a bit because I really don't know about...the Cuban Missile Crisis,...It had to with Cuba and missles, I'm pretty sure."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Unreality (December 21, 2009 4:53 pm ET)
      3  
      Imagine having a very high paying gig where you are encouraged to promote your own incuriosity and act stupid.

      BTW: I've learned anecdotally that the number of uninsured is a growing number, with more Americans without insurance than estimates. A chat with my insurance agent the other day indicated that many people in California are foregoing insurance to make house payments, and others who have lost jobs are finally giving up insurance to pay for basic living expenses.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rrastro (December 22, 2009 1:21 am ET)
          4
        and under the new bill they are tax cheats
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (December 22, 2009 1:38 pm ET)
             
          Yup, they sure will be. And they should be. But if they are truly that destitute, they'll be given subsidies to help pay for their insurance.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rrastro (December 23, 2009 3:06 am ET)
               
            no, the federal gov hos no business requiring the purchase of a product you may not want and do not need.

            what if insurance costs more than the subsidy? You become a criminal!
            Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (December 21, 2009 4:56 pm ET)
      4  
      Ms. Perino, you have a bachelor's in mass communication, and a master's degree in public affairs reporting. This level of ignorance, being unable to read a fairly simple report by the CBO, does not speak well to the academic standards of either school you attended.

      With a little further research, you will discover that the taxes for health reform begin at $250,000 for an individual, and $500,000 for a family, so you got that wrong too.

      If you're so concerned that not everyone will be covered, shouldn't you really be arguing for single payer, along with the rest of us godless libruls? Or, did it escape your attention that this was the logical conclusion of your admittedly slow and cumbersome thought process? This is real life, Ms. Perino, which tends to be more of a pass/fail situation, rather than one in which results are bent to a curve. You've failed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LagalLeft (December 21, 2009 7:05 pm ET)
         
      I saw that show and my jaw dropped. Dana didn't have a clue as to what was going on in the White House when she was W's press secretary. It's a hoot now to see her on Fox trying to sound like an analyst in everything from health care to foreign policy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by open_mind (December 21, 2009 8:22 pm ET)
      2  
      Jeesh. I thought this woman had a brain. She is just as bad as the rest of the Fox "News"ers.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by jbrantow (December 22, 2009 10:18 am ET)
        2  
        don't forget just last week perrino said that under gw bush, there were no terrorist attacks on US soil. She's delusional and empty.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jbrantow (December 22, 2009 10:17 am ET)
      4  
      a room full of misinformed morons bouncing their "intelligent" ideas off each other.....comedy but pathetically sad.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.