About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: Fox News advances anti-ACORN demagoguery to attack health care reform

December 22, 2009 6:34 pm ET — 12 Comments

On Your World, guest host Charles Payne and John McCormack of The Weekly Standard advanced the claim that the Senate health care reform bill "would give cash to ACORN," with Payne stating that "I would assume it's in the low millions" and calling it "so egregious" that taxpayer money would fund ACORN; on-screen text stated as fact that the "Senate health care bill would give cash to ACORN." In fact, neither the original bill nor the manager's amendment mentions ACORN; conservatives have repeatedly cited general funding provisions to raise the possibility of ACORN receiving federal funds in order to attack legislation.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Your World advances talking point that Senate health care bill "would give cash to ACORN"

From the December 22 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto:

fnc-20091222-acorn

Payne: "I would assume it's in the low millions, but still, it's so egregious." During Your World, Payne and McCormack discussed provisions in the Senate health care reform bill that would provide grant funding to community groups for the purposes of enhancing minority health care and public education outreach. McCormack stated, "And I spoke to a legislative expert on Capitol Hill, and they said that ACORN would definitely qualify. There was no language in the bill excluding ACORN. And, I mean, the question of whether or not ACORN is awarded, they definitely qualify. The question of whether they are awarded is another matter." Payne went on to ask, "Why would ACORN, even with this language that we're talking about, after all the things that have been exposed by this -- about this organization still be allowed access to taxpayer money?" Payne later said he "assumed" that ACORN stood to receive "in the low millions" and claimed that "it's so egregious that it would -- that we'd be taking taxpayer money to fund these sort of things or even letting these loopholes go through."

FACT: Neither Senate bill nor manager's amendment mentions ACORN

Senate bill, manager's amendment contain no language mentioning ACORN. Media Matters for America searched the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Majority Leader Harry Reid's manager's amendment. Neither document contains language specific to ACORN.

Conservatives previously cited ACORN to attack legislation that did not contain language mentioning the group

Media claimed Democrats were attempting to direct millions of dollars in government money to ACORN in the financial bailout bill. During debate over the 2008 financial bailout bill, media figures advanced the claim that Democrats sought to direct millions in funding to ACORN. Neither the draft proposal nor the final version of the bill contained any language mentioning ACORN. Those making the false claim were misrepresenting a provision -- later removed -- that would have directed 20 percent of any profits realized on troubled assets purchased under the plan into two previously established funds: the Housing Trust Fund and the Capital Magnet Fund, funds that would have been distributed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development in the form of block grants to states, which would then award grants to qualified applicants.

Media figures adopted GOP spin that economic recovery act awarded funds to ACORN. During the legislative debate over the 2009 Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act, numerous media figures adopted the GOP spin that the stimulus bill awarded funds to ACORN, despite the fact that no language in the legislation mentioned the group. At one point, conservative radio host Bill Cunningham claimed the legislation gave "up to $4.2 trillion" to ACORN.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mary59 (December 22, 2009 6:46 pm ET)
      5  
      I found a little poem for the Fox people to set them straight and help them to stop demonizing ACORNs.

      "Little by little," the acorn said,
      As it slowly sank in its mossy bed,
      "I am improving every day,
      Hidden deep in the earth away."
      Little by little each day it grew;
      Little by little it sipped the dew;
      Downward it sent out a threadlike root;
      Up in the air sprung a tiny shoot,
      Day after day, and year after year,
      Little by little the leaves appear;
      And the slender branches spread far and wide,
      Till the mighty oak is the forest's pride.


      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 22, 2009 6:50 pm ET)
        4  
        How's that gonna help Mary ? They hate trees too. They want to keep that ACORN so small they can drown it in a bathtub.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (December 22, 2009 7:23 pm ET)
          4  
          Too true: [http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:z_64zaB4QgKUSM:http://www.planetjune.com/blog/images/acorn1.jpg]

          Little by little the Faux lies grew
          And wing-nuts sipped the awful goo
          Downward they went, with no reality root
          Like the NRA, they just point and shoot
          Day after day and year after year
          Little by little their lies grow fear
          And the crazed rhetoric spreads far and wide
          Till ACORN to the health plan gets tied.


          Report Abuse
    • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (December 22, 2009 7:18 pm ET)
      7  
      Ahh, we're back on the ACORN thing again. Well, to paraphrase the prevailing wingnut sentiment thereof...

      ACORN'S COMING!!! WE'RE ALL GONNA DIIIIEEEEEE!...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (December 22, 2009 8:01 pm ET)
        3  
        Wow, for a while there it was "WE'RE ALL GONNA BE SLAVES!"
        But now ACORN is going skip slavery and go straight to genocide?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bilbo_dies (December 23, 2009 12:39 pm ET)
             
          But now ACORN is going skip slavery and go straight to genocide?

          Of course, you have heard of the "Death Panels', right?
          Who do you think will head the death panels?
          Acorn, that's who.





          BTW <sarc>
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (December 22, 2009 10:32 pm ET)
      3  
      I can't think of a single bill passed under Obama that has NOT included funding for ACORN, according to Fox News anyway ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (December 23, 2009 5:53 am ET)
      2  
      This is getting just about as dumb as the number of wing nuts ats Becks 9/12 thing. Lets just say ACORN will get the total GDP of the world for the next 99 years, and move on with life.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (December 23, 2009 6:47 am ET)
      2  
      What makes the whole Acorn obsession even better is when you realize that the same Republicans who demanded they be stripped of funding over hypothetical advice to fake pimps voted overwhelming against Franken's bill to strip military contractors of immunity in rape cases.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (December 23, 2009 12:43 pm ET)
           
        Those were two entirely different types of cases.

        I mean really, in the one case it was right in the fine print where it said something about being raped and locked in a shipping container was part of the job description.

        In the other is was a fake pimp and ho who were looking for advice on setting up an undercover brothel.

        See, two entirely different cases.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (December 23, 2009 8:23 am ET)
      2  
      The conservatives are obsessed with ACORN because they're all nuts.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Don Hussein Fabuloso (December 24, 2009 2:44 am ET)
        1  
        Interesting, maybe they're all busy fighting the war on Xmas, but these ACORN-related threads are surprisingly wingnut-free. Could it be that all of the imbeciles who were here screeching for blood have finally caught on that they were being played?
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.