Beck's Misinformer of the Year defense rests on falsehoods
Glenn Beck devoted the full hour of his Fox News show to responding to "some liberal blogs" that had named him Misinformer of the Year, asserting that the blogs "didn't back it up with any facts." Beck's 60-minute rebuttal ignored numerous facts set forth by Media Matters for America undermining a litany of Beck's claims throughout 2009; moreover, his defense itself rested on misrepresentations and false claims.
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Beck claims "some blogs" failed to "back it up with any facts" in naming him Misinformer of the Year
From the January 4 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:
BECK: We've been preparing this program -- this series of programs, the next five programs -- for about a month and a half, and while I was on vacation last week, some liberal blogs named me the Misinformer of the Year. But what I loved about it was, they didn't back it up with any facts. I saw another article in The Washington Post that did the same thing. [Glenn Beck, 1/4/10]
Media Matters provided numerous factual rebuttals to Beck's claims throughout 2009
Beck falsely claimed "[o]nly 3 percent" of stimulus plan would be "spent in the next 12 months." During the January 27 broadcast of his Fox News program, Beck falsely claimed that "[o]nly 3 percent" of the Democratic economic stimulus plan would be "spent in the next 12 months." Beck's figures were based on a partial Congressional Budget Office cost estimate that excluded faster-moving provisions in the bill. According to the CBO's full cost estimate of the bill, 11.2 percent of the $816 billion bill would be spent in the first seven and a half months after the bill was enacted, and, when including the bill's tax cut provisions, $169 billion -- or 20.7 percent of the bill's total cost -- were estimated to take effect in the first seven and a half months, or before the end of the last fiscal year.
Beck aired false claim that a union needs only 30 percent support from employees to be "established." On February 12, Beck aired an on-screen graphic with the headline, "THEN ... WAGNER ACT," which falsely asserted that if 30 percent of employees want a union, "it gets established." In fact, the Wagner Act, which was passed in the 1930s, required that for union representation to be established, a majority of employees in a bargaining unit within a company had to "designate or select" a union to represent them.
Beck falsely claimed average UAW worker makes $154 per hour. On February 18, Beck falsely claimed that "the average UAW [United Auto Workers] worker" earns "[a] hundred and fifty-four dollars an hour if you look at -- you know, if you add in all of the benefits." In fact, a Barclays Capital analysis reportedly found that U.S. automakers "pay an average of $55 an hour in wages and benefits to hourly workers."
Beck falsely asserted that U.S. does not fingerprint foreign visitors or collect rapists' DNA. On March 16, Beck asserted that "[w]e can't fingerprint anybody who's coming into this country because that would be offensive" and that "[w]e can't take DNA samples from killers or rapists, but you can have your fingerprint taken if you want to sell your house." In fact, the Department of Homeland Security does take fingerprints from "aliens seeking admission to the United States" at U.S. entry points, and according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, "All 50 states require that convicted sex offenders provide a DNA sample."
Beck falsely claimed Iowa marriage ruling "is actually about going into churches." On April 13, Beck falsely asserted that the Iowa Supreme Court's decision striking down the state's ban on same-sex marriage "is actually about going into churches ... and saying you can't teach anything else." In fact, the ruling does not affect religious institutions' definitions of marriage.
Beck echoed falsehood that ACORN received stimulus funds. On May 6, Beck echoed a false Republican talking point by stating, "By including ACORN, or groups like them, in the stimulus package, we have guaranteed them billions of dollars to buy more votes for the party that helps them the most." In fact, the stimulus bill does not mention ACORN or otherwise single it out for funding.
Beck falsely claimed $1.4 million in stimulus spent on doors, which actually cost $246,100 to repair. On July 20, Beck falsely claimed that the government spent $1.4 million of economic stimulus funds "to repair a door" at Dyess Air Force Base. In fact, the doors repaired were hangar doors and did not cost that much money. Recovery.gov actually states that the government awarded AFCO Technologies nearly $1.2 million to replace gas mains on the base, and $246,100 to repair the hangar doors in Building 5112.
Beck falsely claimed Obama said he doesn't want health reform protesters to "do a lot of talking." On August 10, Beck falsely claimed that President Obama was "reacti[ng] to the health care protests" when he said, "I don't want the folks who created the mess to do a lot of talking." In fact, Obama was not talking about public protests or even health care reform; he was discussing "folks on the other side of the aisle pointing at the federal budget and somehow trying to put that at our feet."
Beck reported fake murder story from ACORN video as fact. On September 15, after Andrew Breitbart posted a video of an ACORN employee in San Bernardino, California, claiming that she had killed her ex-husband, Beck joined Fox News colleagues Karl Rove, Greta Van Susteren, and Sean Hannity in promoting it without fact-checking it or indicating that they had contacted ACORN for a response to the claim. In fact, ACORN stated that the employee made up the story because she recognized that the actors in the video "were clearly playing with" her so she "matched their false scenario with her own false scenarios," and, indeed, the San Bernardino Police Department has said her claim is false.
Beck, falsely claimed IPCC's Latif has "pulled the rug out" from under climate change consensus. On September 22, Beck joined Hannity in seizing on a World Climate Conference presentation on short-term natural climate variability by Mojib Latif, a prominent climate modeler, to suggest that, in Beck's words, Latif has "backed out now and said, 'We were wrong,' " about global warming because, according to Hannity, Latif stated that global temperatures are actually "cooling." In fact, Latif asserted that contrary to common "media" misperceptions of global warming as a "monotonic process" in which "each year is warmer than the preceding year," there are significant natural climate variations within the decadal timescale that do not change the "long-term warming trend."
Beck falsely claimed Anita Dunn "worships" "her hero" Mao Zedong. Throughout most of his October 15 Fox News program, Beck falsely claimed that White House communications director Anita Dunn "worships" and "idolizes" "her hero" Mao Zedong. In fact, in the video that Beck aired as evidence to support his claims, Dunn offered no endorsement of Mao's ideology or atrocities -- rather, she commented that Mao and Mother Teresa were two of her "favorite political philosophers," and based on short quotes from them, she offered the advice that "you don't have to follow other people's choices and paths" or "let external definition define how good you are internally."
Beck falsely accused Reid of lying about support for public option. Following reports that Senate leaders planned to include a public option in health care legislation, on the October 27 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Beck falsely suggested that only "35 percent of the population" supported a public option and accused Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of lying when he said, in co-host Gretchen Carlson's words, that "the public wants this." In fact, polling consistently showed broad support for the public option, and the Fox News poll Beck presumably was referencing did not ask specifically about a public option.
Beck falsely claimed that under the Senate health care bill, "You don't get a single benefit until 2014." On November 19, Beck falsely claimed that under the Senate health care bill, "All of the benefits of this bill don't kick in until when? You don't get a single benefit until 2014." According to a document released by Senate Democrats summarizing the "Immediate Benefits" of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the bill included numerous benefits that would "be available in the first year after enactment" of the bill. Indeed, Washington Post writer Ezra Klein published a list of benefits that the Senate bill would provide "before 2014."
Reviving "born alive" falsehood, Beck claimed Obama suggested it's OK to "put a spike in the baby's head." On November 25, Beck falsely claimed that Obama "suggested that [it] was OK" to "go into those pregnant women and pull the babies out of them and put a spike in the baby's head," echoing the oft-repeated right-wing falsehood that Obama did not support protecting babies who survived botched abortions. In fact, while serving in the state Senate, Obama opposed legislation to amend the Illinois Abortion Law because the amendment threatened abortion rights and was unnecessary since existing law already required doctors to provide medical care for babies who survived abortions.
Beck falsely claimed that no jobs are being "saved or created" by recovery legislation. On December 2, Beck falsely claimed that "jobs are not being saved or created" by the economic recovery legislation and that the Obama administration is "creating the make-believe 'saved or created' category" for jobs. In fact, the CBO had recently estimated that the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act of 2009, which was heavily promoted by Obama, created 1.6 million jobs, and the Bush administration repeatedly stated that its economic initiatives had "saved or created" jobs.
Beck falsely claimed Robert Creamer "stole" $2 million from banks. On December 8, Beck falsely claimed that progressive activist Robert Creamer "stole" $2 million from banks while serving as executive director of the Illinois Public Action Fund. In fact, Creamer was never accused of stealing any money, and the judge in the case reportedly gave Creamer a lighter sentence because no one suffered any "out of pocket losses."
Beck led charge advancing "Lie of the Year" contender that Holdren supported forced abortions and sterilizations. Throughout 2009, Beck repeatedly advanced the false claim that White House science and technology adviser John Holdren -- whom Beck called "our science czar" -- supported forced abortions and putting sterilants in drinking water. PolitiFact.com declared his claim "pants on fire" false and nominated it for "Lie of the Year," stating that Holdren and his co-authors "make clear that they did not support coercive means of population control." Beck's claim was PolitiFact's runner-up for Lie of the Year.
Beck's defense rests on misrepresentations and falsehoods
Beck claim: Death panels "discovered by The New York Times." On his January 4 show, Beck claimed, "Last summer during the health care debate, we told you that the administration's math didn't add up. It was a very reasonable explanation on the program. I appealed to your reason. I said it would be impossible to add 30 million people to health care onto the rolls and at the same time add no additional doctors or nurses. And then not have rationing. You can't do that. Because some bureaucracy would have to decide whether you would receive, or they would receive rationed health care, the terms 'death panels' was applied. Well, here is the fact." After showing archive footage of himself discussing rationing and death panels, he stated:
BECK: But instead of telling you the Lie of the Year, how about I just tell you the truth, as discovered by The New York Times in a front-page article about our mushrooming unsustainable debt? Here is the truth from the Times. Quote: "The competing demands could deepen political battles over the size and the role of government. The tradeoffs between taxes and spending. The choices between helping older generations versus younger ones, and the bottom line questions about who should ultimately shoulder the burden."
That was The New York Times. Hmmm. That also sounds reasonable, doesn't it, when there's a shortage of money? So The New York Times says it, but SEIU named me the fearmonger of the year. That's weird. I wonder if The New York Times will share that award with me.
Fact: Times article cited by Beck makes no mention of health care reform or "death panels." The November 22 New York Times article cited by Beck, headlined, "Wave of debt payments facing U.S. government," did not address health care reform and made no mention of death panels or health care rationing. From The New York Times:
Americans now have to climb out of two deep holes: as debt-loaded consumers, whose personal wealth sank along with housing and stock prices; and as taxpayers, whose government debt has almost doubled in the last two years alone, just as costs tied to benefits for retiring baby boomers are set to explode.
The competing demands could deepen political battles over the size and role of the government, the trade-offs between taxes and spending, the choices between helping older generations versus younger ones, and the bottom-line questions about who should ultimately shoulder the burden.
"The government is on teaser rates," said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group that advocates lower deficits. "We're taking out a huge mortgage right now, but we won't feel the pain until later."
Beck: "I didn't want [Van Jones] to be fired." During his discussion of Van Jones, Beck stated, "I didn't want the man to be fired. I wanted a debate on the issue of a communist being an adviser to the president of the United States."
Fact: Beck said, "Removing Van Jones is not enough," and called on listeners to ask, "Why is this man in [Obama's] administration?" Discussing Van Jones on the September 3 edition of his radio show, Beck asked, "Is it time yet that you demand an answer from the president of the United States, 'Why is this man in your administration?' " Beck went on to claim, "And it's not about Van Jones. Removing Van Jones is not enough."
A section on Beck claiming that Van Jones was "the only person, by the way, we have ever accused of being a communist" has been removed from this item.

















Glenn Beck Tells His Biggest Lie Yet
This is a lie that lies about the context of his lying. It’s a lie that doubles back on itself as its own exculpation.
Bravo Mr. Beck. You are the Master Prevaricator.
Big deal! Anybody could make those eighteen mistakes!
Were you upset and outraged as the Saddam Hussein's Information Minister consistently claimed that the US forces invading Iraq were taking heavy casualties and suffering repeated defeats? He was just making a few mistakes, after all, just as Mr.Beck has been.
You'll have to get used to mrherbert's style. He's making fun of Beck and those who would minimize the significance of those "eighteen mistakes."
I take offense at your defense of those who would defer to ad hominem ridicule. Hitler likewise discriminately persecuted a group of people because of their beliefs, and degraded their standing as human beings. Would you also defend Hitler's "style"? I... I fear the Nazification of this website, and the... *sniff*... the enslavement of it's people under a totalitarian... *sniff*... regime.
I'm sorry. I just... I just love this site so much...
But I try to save that for the ones who are actually being stupid. (Or who do sarcasm so well that I really can't tell!)
But don't always react to just the first line of the post. He's being sarcastic.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't feel too bad though... I was "this close" to doing the same thing!
I watched this episode thinking this idiot can't help himself, nor does he want too. The words integrity and credibility is not in his vocabulary.
Even "AFTER' doing some "research" Beck continues to misrepresent the facts. Why did Beck waste time doing research? His Tea-brain audience could care less. They love him just the way he is, liar and all.
Why would Beck respond to a "false accusation" claim using falsehoods and lie to prove a point?
That is exactly what this stupid racist buffoon did on his show.
This is much more satisfying.
-------------------------------------------------------------
And who knows? Could he become the first two-time MOY winner?
Glenn Beck is a text book example of a person with a personality disorder with paranoid features. People are always out to "get him", they're out to "destroy him", and in his mind-he alone is the suffering voice in the wilderness. No doubt, he has utilized this disorder to great financial benefit, which only further supports the narcissisitic/paranoid personality disorder he suffers from.
Not all the time, but usually, folks like Glen Beck implode. They are their own worst enemy. He has explicitly demonstrated self destructive behavior in the past with his drug and alcohol addiction. Now, he simply has another outlet in which he is doing 100 mph toward a brick wall with no seatbelt. Just a matter of time folks. Entities like MMA only hasten his next downfall. I must admit that when it happens, I won't be able to help myself from being happy at the misfortune of another.
Paragraph 2: Text book, huh? Err... Isn't this entire website out to get him? Sounds like a reasonable "paranoia." Zomg, he is rich!?! Of course you guys know your attempts at "destroying" him are only further expanding his wealth.
Paragraph 3: Self destructive behavior that he has since recovered from. He has turned his life around considerably. You will notice the majority of Right Wing leaders are self made people. They had some mistakes throughout their lives, and then they overcame their obstacles and rose to the top. Limbaugh is rich beyond all belief. And only a few decades ago he was just another local guy with a temporary grasp at the microphone while his station was trying to find someone good.
Can you imagine living in the house of someone who must control all things around them? Beck is simply one step away from being a sociopath, if he's not already there.
His theories come from the political ideas of Jefferson, Madison, et al. What are logical rebuttals to those theories?
Well that's your opinion but it's simply wrong. How is he a sociopath?
Really? Please show us how.
I am a dedicated student of American history, and if Jefferson came back and saw how Beck uses his ideas, he'd throttle him on the spot.
What is it about Beck's belief system that lines up more with the founders than Obama's. This is like pulling teeth. Like all Beckers, you defend this man's indefensible nonsense (the character he plays on television) to the end, but you are completely baffled when asked to provide any sound reasoning or facts to back up these beliefs. You just begin flailing about. It is quite odd to watch.
Anyone with even the most basic grasp on civics or politics can see the glaring differences between the corporatist Beck and the pro-government (gasp!) Founding Fathers.
Hell, Jefferson founded the Democratic-Republican Party (which went on to become the modern Democratic Party) and supported the FRENCH in the Jay Treaty of 1794. He also opposed a standing army. How in God's name could you use him to compare Beck to? They are polar opposites.
Education is the divide here. Educated people tend to study topics they are interested in and don't just watch one opinion on one network spewed over and over again. That's what idiots do... They just trust one person (or group of people) to tell them what to think and it's a shame so many choose Beck / Fox.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Whew!!!!!
thank you, i really needed that laugh today
If by that you mean his sociopolitical understanding and consciousness is equivalent to someone from the 18th century, then yes, I agree. Although his logic and "theories" seem closer to the thinking of Descartes than to Locke, Jefferson and believers in the social contract...
But then he never really did explain why he said President Obama is a racist? Why President Obama doesn't understand 'the white culture'?
Any theories as to why Stoooopid would make such racist, ignorant remarks?
He did a better job explaining it on his radio program but I can't find that clip right now. Notice at the end he makes a very salient point about if Bush had attended a Reverend Wright-like church. Katie Couric is dumbfounded trying to think of a response.
Nevermind, I found the link where he explains why he called Obama a racist. Give it a listen if you dare.
http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/09/glenn-beck-refuses-to-define-white-culture-video.html
and then there this:
Does Glenn Beck support the slave trade or is he just an "idiot"?
September 23, 2009 8:16 pm ET — 234 Comments
In a chapter in his new book purporting to explain to "idiots" what "our Founding Fathers really intended," Glenn Beck praises an obsolete provision of the U.S. Constitution that prohibited Congress from outlawing the slave trade before 1808 and capped taxes on the slave trade at $10 per slave. In his explanation of the provision, Beck does not mention slavery, saying instead that the provision means that the Founders apparently "felt like there was a value to being able to live here" and lamenting: "Not
http://mediamatters.org/research/200909230042
I stand by my comment you are a buffon if you believe this guy:
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/glenn-becks-sobbing-secrets-revealed
From Dreams of My Father : 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense
of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'
From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political
winds shift in an ugly direction.'
Obama is a racist. If you defend that kind of talk, let alone the Wright Church, you are too.
I rest my case.
As for your second quote, the fact that you use it as proof of racism indicates the only racism is coming from you. His quote says that if the politics of the day become extremist against the Muslim faith, he would stand with them. Not that he would stand with only Black Muslims (or perhaps you think there ARE only Black Muslims) but that he would stand with Muslims against a McCarthy-type political attack. Doesn't your hero Glenn Beck constantly quote the old, "They came for the rich, but I did not stand because I was not rich ..." story? Because that is exactly what this is.
To address your third "point", I will assume you also think anyone who defends the Catholic Church must be a pedophile, anyone who defends the Mormon Church must be racist, anyone who defends the Muslim Church must be a terrorist, and anyone who defends the Baptist Church must be a sexist, right?
Exactly. However, even a point as obvious and clear as that will not get through to the Beckers. They believe only what Beck tells them. These are the same people that think his inane drawings on the chalkboard are uncovering conspiracies.
Beck ,Savage,Limbaugh and others say racist things and are defended even by elected officials,media "stars" etc..who have never heard them say anything racist and have never seen any racist signs or behavior from Teabaggers!!But any minority from the POTUS,The 1st Lady ,to Dr Gates/Rev wright /Judge Sotomayor are racist for out of context comments.Even Rupert Murdoch could never explain Beck's comment in calling the Pres a racist!!!
Typical.
Don't even know what you're talking about... just like this poor website.
This should be entertaining. Probably moreso than Glenn's little screed I had to sit through.
Hey you News Corp. toadies, don't turn to Beck and Gutfeld if you want to shut this site down.
Just practice some ethical journalism. Start being responsible and there will be no need for a place like this.
Let's see ... I'm going to guess you have not actually read his books, since you have no idea what you are talking about. A good portion of "Dreams" talks about how he got past feeling the way you've quoted. You know (or maybe not), how he had to grow up, open up and get past hard feelings he developed from growing up as a half-Black, half-White child and teen.
As for your second quote, the fact that you use it as proof of racism indicates the only racism is coming from you. His quote says that if the politics of the day become extremist against the Muslim faith, he would stand with them. Not that he would stand with only Black Muslims (or perhaps you think there ARE only Black Muslims) but that he would stand with Muslims against a McCarthy-type political attack. Doesn't your hero Glenn Beck constantly quote the old, "They came for the rich, but I did not stand because I was not rich ..." story? Because that is exactly what this is.
To address your third "point", I will assume you also think anyone who defends the Catholic Church must be a pedophile, anyone who defends the Mormon Church must be racist, anyone who defends the Muslim Church must be a terrorist, and anyone who defends the Baptist Church must be a sexist, right?
Limbaugh,Beck,Hannity,Savage,Boortz etc. get to blast racist stuff almost every day but they are defended!!!!An ex-marine/ medical technician,a constitutional lawyer/POTUS ,a Harvard professor/researcher, experienced Circuit judge/Supreme court Justice get exoriated as racists for out of context comments ..not their actual record or actions.. by these..uncredentialed media haters.
CONTEXT Is everything in discerning meaning and intent from the words of others..to ignore that in attacking someone while defending another who has said/done worse is hypocritical!!!
Most Americans do not have family members that hate them because of their race.The sexual abuse of slave women by slave owners(and situations like Strom Thurmond)plus more recent biracial offspring (like Pres Obama) has created this unique situation for (usually) minority citizens.Those who have not experienced that ambivalence should restrain from such strong criticism(he's a racist) especially if they on use one out of context sentence!!!At least use a couple paragraphs (to absorb meaning) if you intend to use it to make a case..!!
WildcatProgressive has done an excellent job below in capturing the actual context of these comments from the book..Hope this can be a learning moment!
Remember the guy who killed 3 cops because he was certain they were from Obama's "gun confiscation squad"?
Where do you think he got that idea?
All the liars at Fox (plus their fat sweaty racist drug addict ally Rush) have blood on their hands.
Let's try it this way:
1. How is a theory that Rockefeller Plaza's art conveys hidden communist symbols, which in turn infest NBC, derived from Jefferson and/or Madison?
2. How is Beck's support of a "One Word Government" theory derived from Jefferson and/or Madison?
3. HOw is Beck's theory that the "progressive movement" is a unknown secret cabal of leaders who with all intent and purposes want America to become Communist derived from Jefferson and/or Madison?
4. How is Beck's theory on "cash for clunkers" is merely windon dressing for the government wanting to “[seize] all of your personal and private information.” derived from Jefferson and/or Madison?
I could go on and on with a littany of Becks' wild theories, but I can assure you of one thing; they have no basis in the writings of Jefferson and or Madison.
For example:
"Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between man and his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legislative powers of government reach actions only, and not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State."
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Danbury Baptist Association, CT., Jan. 1, 1802
Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814
Madison quotes:
“And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in showing that religion and Government will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together”
“The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe with blood for centuries.”
I'm sorry slugger, I just can't fathom Glenn Beck garnering the respect of Jefferson or Madison. As you can see above, they shared no common thoughts in regards to Becks self proclaimed basis for all of his worry, angst, and fear which is that America has moved from the founders desire for America to be a Christian nation.
Lastly, regarding my assertion that he is one step away from being a sociopath, I stand by that and will not waiver. You're right, it is my opinion, but unlike you, I base my opinion on objective reasoning. Such as his obvious fitting of a profile regarding these characteristics of a sociopath:
Glibness and Superficial Charm- Do I really have to support this feature?
Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.- Yep, that's Beck alright, check out his history as a radio jock. The fact that he constantly utilizes antoganism and humiliation towards those he disagrees with tells us much. There is simply too many examples of Beck's nasty personal attacks to list here.
Grandiose Sense of Self
Feels entitled to certain things as "their right."- Are you really going to disagree with this? Let us no forget howhe complained that CNN never gave him what he deserved, he constantly brags about being the "3rd most listened to show in America." Again, the list goes on and on.
Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and convinced that his own lies are true- I think MMA covered this quite well already. Disprove these examples if you can.
Shallow Emotions
When they show what seems to be warmth, joy, love and compassion it is more feigned than experienced and serves an ulterior motive. Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person. Since they are not genuine, neither are their promises.- We've all seen how Beck can use vapor rub to make himself cry. Shall I go on?
I watched this episode thinking this idiot can't help himself, nor does he want too. The words integrity and credibility is not in his vocabulary.
Even "AFTER' doing some "research" Beck continues to misrepresent the facts. Why did Beck waste time doing research? His Tea-brain audience could care less. They love him just the way he is, liar and all.
Why would Beck respond to a "false accusation" claim using falsehoods and lie to prove it's not true?
That is exactly what this stupid racist buffoon did on his show.
"This President has exposed himself as a man who hateS white people or the white culture over and over. This President (I believe) is a racist" Glen Beck
That's not only a lie, it is stupid.
You either can't read or you don't understand what you read. The
article above clearly spells out the many falsehoods Beck engages in. I just gave you an example.
We are talking about a notorious liar here not someone who may have been mistaken.
What good would it do to try to satisfy you with more evidence to show that this nutcase is lying (when he has exposed himself over and over that he is a liar)?
If you ask a stupid question like "where is the Proof" from a great liar, it is obvious you are blind beyond comtempt.
All the people Beck lied about on his show would eat him up alive if given a chance, that's why he doesn't engage them in person (or on his show).
If you are foolish enough to defend a great liar, that mean you are easily led or better yet MISLED.
Four.
The rest of them involve either Glenn using a different source than the ones you use, or he just has an opinion you don't share.
The guy is on the air four hours a day, 250 days a year and you found FOUR factual errors.
HOW many people work for MMFA?
You know, George could really save a lot of money. All he needs is one employee at MMFA to post rotating names in headlines, "GLENN BECK!" "SARAH PALIN!" and then just let the trolls rant away in a comment section.
Without the Public Option, there is already a rationing of health care that is based on personal finances and debt load.
I guess Glenn's real fear is that, no matter how much money he makes, he could be denied health care because he's a pompous jerk and propaganda doom and gloom merchant.
http://www.nlrb.gov/Workplace_Rights/i_am_new_to_this_website/how_do_i_file_a_petition_to_start_or_remove_a_union.aspx
He's showing them speaking their own words. I don't know how that's lying.. do you?
You are such a rube.
Beck reported fake murder story from ACORN video as fact. Umm... Ya. Right... He just showed the video, which still proved ACORN to be as corrupt an agency as has previously been shown. I find it odd that whats-her-name's story changed. She said she felt intimidated right after the video was released... Did she misspeak, just like a lot of Obama's administration?
Technically Glen Beck indeed did NOT call for Van Jones to be removed. He asked why he was there. Why was he selected over everyone else? Instead of firing him, the administration could have just... Answered the question?
Beck falsely claimed that no jobs are being "saved or created" by recovery legislation. Uh-huh... Because CBO is a reliable source. Got anything else to support it? Maybe if you can get CATO or the Heritage Foundation to support you as well, that way it can be taken as credible?
Beck falsely claimed Anita Dunn "worships" "her hero" Mao Zedong. How do we know Anita Dunn's true intentions? There is no way in heck she would ever admit to it, if she did mean it. You cannot solidly claim this is a total lie.
Beck echoed falsehood that ACORN received stimulus funds. I dont know how true what he said is, but your facts against him are weak. So what if they didn't specify any specific groups? They dont have to be specified to receive a little bit of the money. It all depends upon the language used.
Why?
Sorry you people look the fools as usual.
If you don't want people to know you are scumfilth communists, then WHY DO YOU OPENLY ADMIT IT???
If you weren't gullible you wouldn't display your ignorance, instead you would simply say 'people can call my idol a liar all they want, but I don't believe them'.
No, you would rather show us how much you support the misguided "Birthers" and "tea-baggers" dummy(ing) down America movement.
Mag- you got spanked. Try again.