About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Right-wing media baselessly claim CIA has "diverted" resources to climate research

January 06, 2010 1:34 pm ET — 19 Comments

Echoing a press release from the conservative and ExxonMobil-funded National Center for Public Policy Research, several right-wing media figures, including Sean Hannity and the Fox Nation, have baselessly asserted that the CIA has "diverted" intelligence resources to climate change. In fact, federal officials have reportedly said that the program, which allows the scientific community to gather data from CIA equipment, "has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Fox News, bloggers claim CIA resources have been "diverted to climate change"

Hannity: "CIA director redirects manpower ... at the cost of our security, your security, your family's security?" Hannity stated during the January 5 edition of his Fox News program that "the CIA director redirects manpower to monitor climate change, but is it all the cost -- at the cost of our security, your security, your family's security?" Hannity later added: "[I]n the wake of the attempted Christmas Day terror attack, you would think the spies at the CIA, that they would have their hands full securing America. But, believe it or not, assets at Langley are being used for other projects" From the January 5 edition of Fox News' Hannity:

HANNITY: Now, in the wake of the attempted Christmas Day terror attack, you would think the spies at the CIA, that they would have their hands full securing America. But, believe it or not, assets at Langley are being used for other projects. A stunning report from The New York Times reveals that CIA manpower and satellites are actually monitoring -- get this -- climate change. Now, the secret program was scrapped by the Bush administration, but president Obama's CIA director -- you know, the guy with no intelligence experience at all, Leon Panetta -- well, he's decided to bring it back. Now, I think Wyoming's Senator John Barrasso -- I think he said it best when he said the CIA should be keeping Americans safe, not spying on sea lions.

Fox Nation: "CIA Resources Diverted to Climate Change." On January 5, Fox Nation linked to a press release from the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) which claimed, "As terrorists continue to infiltrate America, the Obama Administration is tasking some of our nation's most elite intelligence-gathering agencies to divert their resources to environmental scientists researching global warming." The headline posted on Fox Nation on January 6 also featured a photo of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Nigerian man who attempted to bomb Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas Day:

 

fncia

Gateway Pundit: "[T]he CIA will be syping on icebergs instead of terrorists." Citing the NCPPR press release, GatewayPundit blogger Jim Hoft wrote on January 5 that in response to the attempted Christmas Day airplane bombing, "Obama outlined changes to the security protocol. The latest changes implemented by the Obama Administration also mean that the CIA will be spying on icebergs instead of terrorists."

SayAnythingBlog: "They're going from spying on terrorist to spying on polar bears." On January 5, SayAnythingBlog claimed, "Obama Orders CIA to Re-Direct Intelligence Gathering Resources To...Climate Change." Citing the NCPPR press release, the blog post further stated, "They're going from spying on terrorists to spying on polar bears," and added, "Obama is promising that his administration is going to 'do more' to keep us safe, and then we learn that the CIA is now going to be used to combat...global warming? What a joke."

But federal officials said climate program "has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering"

NY Times: Officials said climate program has little impact on intelligence gathering. Hannity and the NCPPR press release cited a January 5 New York Times report stating that "[t]he nation's top scientists and spies are collaborating on an effort to use the federal government's intelligence assets -- including spy satellites and other classified sensors -- to assess the hidden complexities of environmental change." The Times further reported that federal officials said the program "has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering":

The monitoring program has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering, federal officials said, but instead releases secret information already collected or takes advantage of opportunities to record environmental data when classified sensors are otherwise idle or passing over wilderness.

CIA: Climate efforts assist scientists "without a large commitment of resources." In a September 25 press release announcing the establishment of the Center on Climate Change and National Security, the CIA stated, "The Center will assume responsibility for coordinating with Intelligence Community partners on the review and declassification of imagery and other data that could be of use to scientists in their own climate-related research. This effort draws on imagery and other information that is collected in any event, assisting the US scientific community without a large commitment of resources."

NCPPR funded annually by ExxonMobil

The National Center for Public Policy Research, which "advocates private, free market solutions to today's environmental challenges," has received significant contributions from ExxonMobil Corporation, including $55,000 per year in 2008, 2007, and 2006, as well as $30,000 in 2002. NCPPR also received $55,000 per year from the ExxonMobil Foundation in 2005 and 2004, $23,000 in 2003, $15,000 in 2002, and $30,000 in 2001.

Climate change seen by defense, intelligence experts as relevant to national security

Bush NIC chair testified on "wide ranging implications for US national security." In June 25, 2008, testimony, Dr. Thomas Fingar, then-chairman of the National Intelligence Council, stated that "global climate change will have wide ranging implications for US national security interests over the next 20 years," citing the possible worsening of "existing problems -- such as poverty, social tensions, environment degradation, ineffectual leadership, and weak political institutions" abroad, as well as the likelihood that "economic migrants will perceive additional reasons to migrate." The NIC's 2025 Global Trends Report, published November 2008, further stated that "Climate change is likely to exacerbate resource scarcities, particularly water scarcities."

NY Times: Military, intelligence experts considering security impacts of climate change. An August 8, 2009, New York Times report stated that "military and intelligence analysts" have said that climate change "will pose profound strategic challenges to the United States in coming decades":

The changing global climate will pose profound strategic challenges to the United States in coming decades, raising the prospect of military intervention to deal with the effects of violent storms, drought, mass migration and pandemics, military and intelligence analysts say.

Such climate-induced crises could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions, say the analysts, experts at the Pentagon and intelligence agencies who for the first time are taking a serious look at the national security implications of climate change.

Recent war games and intelligence studies conclude that over the next 20 to 30 years, vulnerable regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and South and Southeast Asia, will face the prospect of food shortages, water crises and catastrophic flooding driven by climate change that could demand an American humanitarian relief or military response.

Bipartisan report identified global warming as potential "threat to our security." On October 28, 2009, the Associated Press reported that the American Security Project, "an advisory group of high-powered Republicans and Democrats," affirmed that global warming is relevant to national security:

A recent report by the American Security Project, an advisory group of high-powered Republicans and Democrats, called global warming "not simply about saving polar bears or preserving beautiful mountain glaciers ... (but) a threat to our security." The group has on its board Republicans such as former Sen. Warren Rudman as well as Democrats including Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the chief author of the Senate climate bill.

Across the globe there exist conflicts and security challenges including ethnic conflicts and emerging radicalism and often "these are also the parts of the world where we will see the most severe consequences from climate change," Bernard Finel, a co-author of the American Security Project report, said in an interview. " The intelligence community, CIA, (military) commanders, they're all looking at these issues."

Former Republican Sen. John Warner, a longtime chairman of the Armed Services Committee and a close ally of the military, has been touring the country to talk about climate change and national security.

"We are talking about energy insecurity, water and food shortages, and climate-driven social instability," says Warner. "We ignore these threats at the peril of our national security and at great risk to those in uniform."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by nerzog (January 06, 2010 1:37 pm ET)
      2  
      Hey, this is pretty creative, even for the WingNut Masters of Propaganda.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IRONY 101 (January 06, 2010 1:43 pm ET)
      5  
      Is this moron seriously suggesting that all manpower at the CIA now and at any given time is exclusively directed towards terrorist attacks? Is he seriously suggesting that the use of any CIA assets on something other than the detection and/or prevention of terrorist attacks endangers you and your family. Who would believe such nonsense? How dumb would an audience have to be?

      Wait...this is FOX News. Nevermind...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (January 06, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
        2  
        Just the latest in a long list of fabricated controversies from the FOXbots.

        In essence, satellite time is being shared. I seriously doubt this is anything new.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (January 06, 2010 2:20 pm ET)
      4  
      Maybe this is an over simplification but here it goes.

      Satellite orbits earth.
      Satellite takes pictures.
      CIA gets pictures and says to a climate guy, you might want this picture.
      CIA guy sends picture to climate guy.

      How does this make me less safe?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (January 06, 2010 4:11 pm ET)
        1  
        It doesn't of course.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rrastro (January 07, 2010 7:51 am ET)
          1
        Satellite orbits earth.
        Satellite takes pictures.
        CIA gets pictures and says to obama, you might want this picture of an opponent breaking a minor or major law or having a mistress
        CIA guy sends picture to obama with notes

        in any case CIA is an unsafe pet
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wzwriter (January 07, 2010 11:28 am ET)
          3  
          Satellite orbits earth.
          Satellite takes pictures.
          CIA gets pictures and says to MMFA, you might want this picture of rrastro playing with himself while posting nonsense messages on your board
          MMFA says no, thanks - nothing rrastro does or says is of any significance.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rrastro (January 08, 2010 12:05 am ET)
              1
            ar ar. hard to take photos through a roof.

            Glad to know you trust a spy agency
            Report Abuse
    • Author by ScienceBuff (January 06, 2010 2:37 pm ET)
      2  
      I would think this would be an example of government being efficient. If the same resources can serve multiple purposes, it makes sense to do so.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wzwriter (January 06, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
      2  
      BASIC RULE OF THUMB:

      If Sean Hannity says it, it's a lie.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by The_Cat (January 06, 2010 9:46 pm ET)
      1  
      I had a thought. Could some of the data that CRU was unwilling to part with have come from these CIA sensor suites? It would explain why they weren't free to share it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by IndieJoan (January 07, 2010 12:04 am ET)
         
      "The Exxon Mobil funded WHAT???" rofl. I could care less what the Exxon Mobile funded group has to say. I just want the CIA to continue doing what they are doing here at home,stay out of other countries governments and economies, tend to their own back yard, and handle those bastards at Exxon Mobile the way they ought to be handled. In other words, just like I want the CIA to NEVER orchestrate or facilitate another coup of another country, I want Exxon Mobile out of my government. Plain and simple, and certainly not too much to ask.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rrastro (January 07, 2010 7:48 am ET)
        1
      central intelligence agency should be in intelligence period. If obama uses cia assets for weather, why not internal dissent? CIA like DOD needs a VERY short leash
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wzwriter (January 07, 2010 11:30 am ET)
        1  
        Anything the CIA can do to keep YOU in line would be greatly appreciated. :-)
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rrastro (January 08, 2010 12:06 am ET)
             
          I am not out of line except perhaps in terms of dissent. Do you really want non leftys jailed, and who do you want policing your politics?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by gadnynj (January 07, 2010 9:15 am ET)
         
      The best we can do with Fox Cable News, Hannity, Beck, etc, is take the information they provide, and either clarify it with the facts (there by revealing how wicket and foolish these people really are), or just tune off. I recommend the first, because we need active citizens monitoring and reporting to FCC, every time (and that seems to be all the time) Fox Cable News spews out misinformation. What Fox Cable News is really doing is providing distraction from real positive progress among the diverse groups of people already living in the United State.

      (Here is a message for Fox Cable News: America is no longer Black and White; Fools! Also, America is not that little square foot in the suburbs where you seem have your head buried in).

      The bottom line is that Fox Cable News is relying on their own (narrow) insight (or view) of their own community; which is ignorant and basically white European descent). Ignorant, because, when a person is unable to to discern (especially with today's available visual and information highway); that person lacks the basic component of progress. Obviously, the community that watches and relies on Fox Cable News (tea bags)are lacking progress. They are still on this "Black/White" issue when America is now multi-ethnic. Right there, it tells you that progress is lacking.

      Why is it, though? Because, these baggers are mostly isolated, boon dock and poor. Poor because although some seem to be living the American Dream, their sub-conscience is in a regressed state. How regressed? The Potato famine that lasted from the year 1845-1852 just left such an impression on these folk, that even with a "Full plate" before their eyes they are still seeing an empty plate!

      There is such a thing as a memory brain cell; and trauma is a factor in inprint of such phenomenas!

      Yo, Let's get on with the "Move on!" Vote Democratic in 2010.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Old55 (January 07, 2010 9:42 am ET)
         
      Hannity is one of the most disengenuous right wing personalities out there. He specializes in making 'mountains out of molehills" and putting words in people's mouths. What I like about MMFA is how you guys can use the people's own words against them. They can't stand it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 07, 2010 10:13 am ET)
      1 1
      The most depressing part? Long-term, climate change represents the greater threat anyway. By far. By several orders of magnitude.

      So they lie DOUBLY: The both exagerate the cost and diminish the threat.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------
      Left unaddressed, climate change will eventually reak havoc and death on an order that Bin Laden would be humbled by, and embarrased to even dream about.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.