About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox & Friends funnels Exxon-funded NCPPR press release claiming CIA is "spying on icebergs instead of terrorists"

January 07, 2010 10:01 am ET — 7 Comments

Attacking a CIA program providing climate data to scientists, Fox & Friends accused the Obama administration of "[s]pying on icebergs instead of terrorists" and "[t]racking climate change instead of Al-Qaeda," which echoes a press release from the conservative and ExxonMobil-funded National Center for Public Policy Research that claimed the program "diverts intelligence assets to climate research." In fact, federal officials have reportedly said that the program, which allows the scientific community to gather data from CIA equipment, "has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Industry-funded NCPPR pushes press release: "Spying on Icebergs instead of Terrorists?"

A January 5 press release from the National Center for Public Policy Research (NCPPR) asserted that the CIA program designed to provide climate data from CIA equipment to scientists is "divert[ing] intelligence assets" from counterterrorism:

ncppr1

NCPPR funded annually by ExxonMobil. The National Center for Public Policy Research, which "advocates private, free market solutions to today's environmental challenges," has received significant contributions from ExxonMobil Corp., including $55,000 per year in 2008, 2007, and 2006, as well as $30,000 in 2002. NCPPR also received $55,000 per year from the ExxonMobil Foundation in 2005 and 2004, $23,000 in 2003, $15,000 in 2002, and $30,000 in 2001.

NCPPR funneled money for convicted felon Jack Abramoff. The Washington Post reported on June 25, 2006, that documents released in the investigation of former Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff revealed that "[a]s far back as 1996, Abramoff was using [Amy Moritz] Ridenour's National Center for Public Policy Research to hide the source of funding for trips and other ventures intended to boost the interests of his lobbying clients, e-mails show." The article further stated that Ridenour "acknowledged that her organization had accepted grants lined up by Abramoff and disbursed funds at his suggestion" and that "[e]-mails suggest Ridenour was well aware that Abramoff viewed her organization as a convenient pass-through." On October 13, 2006, the Post noted that a Senate report stated that five nonprofit groups including NCPPR "probably violated their tax-exempt status 'by laundering payments and then disbursing funds at Mr. Abramoff's direction; taking payments in exchange for writing newspaper columns or press releases that put Mr. Abramoff's clients in a favorable light; introducing Mr. Abramoff's clients to government officials in exchange for payment; and agreeing to act as a front organization for congressional trips paid for by Mr. Abramoff's clients.' "

Fox & Friends reproduces NCPPR press release

Doocy: "Tracking climate change instead of Al Qaeda? ... Not making it up." Teasing a segment on the CIA climate program, Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy stated, "Tracking climate change instead of Al Qaeda? Why the government thinks it's a good idea to divert our intel resources from terror to looking at clouds and global warming. Not making it up. We'll be right back."

Carlson: "Spying on icebergs instead of terrorists?" Teasing the segment, co-host Gretchen Carlson evidently read from the NCPPR press release, which was titled, "Spying on Icebergs Instead of Terrorists?" Carlson stated, "Spying on icebergs instead of terrorists? You won't believe what the Obama administration has the CIA using its resources for. That's next."

Kilmeade: Climate monitoring program "would task valuable intel resources to study climate change." During the segment on the CIA program, co-host Brian Kilmeade stated that it "would task valuable intel resources to study climate change." He later added, "Here the CIA with it's hands full, from the border of Pakistan, Afghanistan, ears and eyes everywhere, especially throughout the Middle East and Africa. Now they're forced to study glaciers and global warming?" Kilmeade suggested the CIA is assessing the impacts of global warming "as opposed to what terrorists can do to the country."

Fox & Friends interviewed NCPPR representative. The segment on the CIA program consisted of an interview with Deneen Borelli, who asserted that the CIA program is "ridiculous" and "outrageous" and claimed that the Obama administration doesn't think terrorism "is a priority." Borelli also stated that "our enemies have got to be laughing at us." In the NCPPR press release, Borelli, a fellow with NCPPR's "Project 21 black leadership network," is quoted as stating of the climate monitoring program, "This is another example of President Obama not taking terrorism seriously. Our enemies must be laughing at the Obama administration's incompetence." Fox & Friends stated that Borelli "is with the national black leadership network" and did not mention NCPPR or its ties to the oil industry.

Fox & Friends on-screen text: "Spying on Icebergs," "Icebergs, not terrorists?" During the interview with Borelli, Fox & Friends aired the following on-screen text:

ncppr2

ncppr3

In fact, federal officials said climate program "has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering"

NY Times: Officials said climate program has "little or no impact" on intelligence gathering. The NCPPR press release cited a January 5 New York Times report stating that "[t]he nation's top scientists and spies are collaborating on an effort to use the federal government's intelligence assets -- including spy satellites and other classified sensors -- to assess the hidden complexities of environmental change." The Times further reported that federal officials said the program "has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering":

The monitoring program has little or no impact on regular intelligence gathering, federal officials said, but instead releases secret information already collected or takes advantage of opportunities to record environmental data when classified sensors are otherwise idle or passing over wilderness.

CIA: Climate efforts assist scientists "without a large commitment of resources." In a September 25 press release announcing the establishment of the Center on Climate Change and National Security, the CIA stated, "The Center will assume responsibility for coordinating with Intelligence Community partners on the review and declassification of imagery and other data that could be of use to scientists in their own climate-related research. This effort draws on imagery and other information that is collected in any event, assisting the US scientific community without a large commitment of resources."

Climate change seen by defense, intelligence experts as relevant to national security

Bush NIC chair testified on "wide ranging implications for US national security." In June 25, 2008, testimony, Dr. Thomas Fingar, then-chairman of the National Intelligence Council, stated that "global climate change will have wide ranging implications for US national security interests over the next 20 years," citing the possible worsening of "existing problems -- such as poverty, social tensions, environment degradation, ineffectual leadership, and weak political institutions" abroad, as well as the likelihood that "economic migrants will perceive additional reasons to migrate." The NIC's 2025 Global Trends Report, published in November 2008, further stated that "[c]limate change is likely to exacerbate resource scarcities, particularly water scarcities."

NY Times: Military, intelligence experts considering security impacts of climate change. An August 8, 2009, New York Times report stated that "military and intelligence analysts" have said that climate change "will pose profound strategic challenges to the United States in coming decades":

The changing global climate will pose profound strategic challenges to the United States in coming decades, raising the prospect of military intervention to deal with the effects of violent storms, drought, mass migration and pandemics, military and intelligence analysts say.

Such climate-induced crises could topple governments, feed terrorist movements or destabilize entire regions, say the analysts, experts at the Pentagon and intelligence agencies who for the first time are taking a serious look at the national security implications of climate change.

Recent war games and intelligence studies conclude that over the next 20 to 30 years, vulnerable regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East and South and Southeast Asia, will face the prospect of food shortages, water crises and catastrophic flooding driven by climate change that could demand an American humanitarian relief or military response.

Bipartisan report identified global warming as potential "threat to our security." On October 28, 2009, the Associated Press reported that the American Security Project, "an advisory group of high-powered Republicans and Democrats," affirmed that global warming is relevant to national security:

A recent report by the American Security Project, an advisory group of high-powered Republicans and Democrats, called global warming "not simply about saving polar bears or preserving beautiful mountain glaciers ... (but) a threat to our security." The group has on its board Republicans such as former Sen. Warren Rudman as well as Democrats including Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the chief author of the Senate climate bill.

Across the globe there exist conflicts and security challenges including ethnic conflicts and emerging radicalism and often "these are also the parts of the world where we will see the most severe consequences from climate change," Bernard Finel, a co-author of the American Security Project report, said in an interview. "The intelligence community, CIA, (military) commanders, they're all looking at these issues."

Former Republican Sen. John Warner, a longtime chairman of the Armed Services Committee and a close ally of the military, has been touring the country to talk about climate change and national security.

"We are talking about energy insecurity, water and food shortages, and climate-driven social instability," says Warner. "We ignore these threats at the peril of our national security and at great risk to those in uniform."

Fox News, bloggers previously claimed CIA resources have been "diverted to climate change"

Hannity: "CIA director redirects manpower ... at the cost of our security, your security, your family's security?" Sean Hannity stated on his Fox News program that "the CIA director redirects manpower to monitor climate change, but is it all the cost -- at the cost of our security, your security, your family's security?" Hannity later added: "[I]n the wake of the attempted Christmas Day terror attack, you would think the spies at the CIA, that they would have their hands full securing America. But, believe it or not, assets at Langley are being used for other projects." Citing the NCPPR press release, Fox Nation, Gateway Pundit, and SayAnythingBlog also falsely claimed the CIA program sacrifices resources needed for national security, with Fox Nation including a photo of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the Nigerian man who attempted to bomb Northwest Airlines Flight 253 on Christmas Day.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by The_Cat (January 07, 2010 10:18 am ET)
      1  
      And this is why they are rightly called 'wingers. 'Cause they're nuts. A tiny fraction of CIA money is used to keep up on a national security threat like global climate change, and once word of this gets out, here come the wingnuts. They slaver and drool and grunt, demanding every last penny be spent on more guns and more trigger fingers! Why? Because they see everything, EVERYTHING, through the paradigm of war. They have no other strategy. They have no other thought. If it is not physical confrontation, they are lost. A few of them have sufficient intellect for abstract thought, and those few are on the air, where it is still warfare, but a war of ideas. Peace, to these people, is the scariest possible idea that there is. Who will they fear, who will they hate, who will they fight if there is peace? They can't conceive of such a world, and so they refuse to be a part of bringing it about.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (January 07, 2010 10:22 am ET)
         
      Do they think cameras can only take pictures of one thing?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (January 07, 2010 2:57 pm ET)
           
        The wingnuts believe that we have to send someone up to replace those glass slides they use to take pictures (for those vaguely familiar with early photography).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 07, 2010 10:43 am ET)
      1  
      I'll say it again:
      The most depressing part is that, Long-term, climate change represents the far greater threat; by several orders of magnitude.

      So they lie DOUBLY: The both exagerate the cost and diminish the threat.

      ---------------------------------------------------------------
      Left unaddressed, climate change will eventually reak havoc and death on an order that Bin Laden would be humbled by, and embarrased to even dream about.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (January 07, 2010 1:25 pm ET)
           
        Eddie -

        Perhaps the climate scientists should adopt a color scheme for climate alerts, like the terror alerts: green, yellow, orange & red.

        Maybe the conservatards only understand pretty colors. All that sciency stuff is probably too complicated for their feeble minds.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by egb (January 08, 2010 2:42 am ET)
           
        Long term climate change is going to happen just like the sun rising. The sun will also die and that is an even greater threat than global cooling. The cheapest way to deal with climate change is to learn to live with it because nothing 0 does will forestall climate change. Look at it this way, Alaska will become the California of olden days -- beach front property, the greatest coastline in the world, and the midnight sun. Sounds exciting.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TheSarge (January 07, 2010 9:21 pm ET)
      1  
      In other news, it was revealed to day that the Internet is made entirely out of tubes.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cZC67wXUTs
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.