About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Beck baselessly attacks Democratic senators for purported alcohol abuse

January 07, 2010 11:09 am ET — 11 Comments

In the past week, Glenn Beck has repeatedly attacked Democratic senators for their purported alcohol abuse, citing little or no evidence. Specifically, Beck echoed the right wing's discredited, baseless claim that Max Baucus had been "hammered" on the Senate floor, and claimed that Chris Dodd had decided not to run for re-election because "there are a few bars [he hasn't] hit in Connecticut."

Beck claims Baucus was "drunk," "hammered" on Senate floor 

"As a recovering alcoholic," Beck declares that Baucus was "hammered" on the Senate floor. On the January 4 edition of his radio show, said that he "saw" a YouTube video of Baucus speaking on the Senate floor that had been promoted by Internet gossip Matt Drudge and commented, "Do they have any explanation of him? Because as a recovering alcoholic, that man was drunk." Beck contributing editor Pat Gray replied, "It was late and he was tired, I think, was the best explanation I heard," then added, "he was clearly drunk, in my opinion." Beck later added, "I'm an expert in these things, and I think the guy was hammered.

Washington Independent's Weigel: "Baucus talks like this all the time." In a December 28, 2009, blog post, The Washington Independent's David Weigel stated of "the completely baseless, Drudge-driven 'Max Baucus was drunk' smear": "Baucus talks like this all the time. ... Baucus mumbles occasionally. OK, a lot. Accusing him of being drunk on the job, without evidence, is shameful, and I'm flabbergasted at the number of journalists who are doing it."

Baucus' office flatly denied "unfounded, untrue" allegation. In a statement issued to Politico, a Baucus spokesman stated: "When his friend of 30 years Ted Kennedy, with whom he had fought so hard to provide health care to children, was being used as a cheap foil to oppose health care reform, Senator Baucus gave a passionate defense. Unfortunately, those who want to kill any meaningful reform, turned it into an unfounded, untrue personal smear internet rumor. This is beyond the pale and this type of gutter politics has no place in the public sphere. It is this type of slander that makes Montanans, and Americans, disgusted with the politics as usual in Washington. And what is even more sad is that such a personal attack would be given any validity at all, let alone being elevated to the status of 'news'."

Beck: Dodd is retiring because "there are a few bars [he hasn't] hit in Connecticut."

On the January 6 edition of his Fox News show, Beck aired a clip of Dodd stating that he will not be running for re-election because "this is my moment to step aside" and commented:

BECK: Christopher Dodd. He's going to step aside after only three decades in the U.S. Senate. He's decided after a lot of thought to step down after his term and not seek re-election. Yeah. Yeah, I'm sure that's exactly what is happening. Yeah, Chris is there at home: "You know, it's been a good run. And after all, I think there are a few bars I haven't hit in Connecticut. You know, I haven't visited all of 'em yet. I'm gonna step aside and let somebody else have a shot. Ooh, a shot. I'll have a double." Surely, Christopher Dodd is not going bar-hopping anymore, and neither am I. But come on, really, Chris? It's time just to step aside and let somebody else have a shot?

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by ReasonAndResolve (January 07, 2010 11:45 am ET)
      9  
      When a "recovering alcoholic" starts making jokes about other people having drinking problems, it is time for him to call his sponsor and find a meeting.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (January 07, 2010 11:50 am ET)
        7  
        Exactly. Beck may or may not be dry, but he sure as hell isn't sober. Besides, how would he know if Dodd has hit all the bars in Connecticut if he hadn't been there with him? Recovering alcoholics don't belong in bars.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Max Credits (January 07, 2010 12:15 pm ET)
        5  
        He is a total fake. Nothing about him is genuine, especially his so-called alcoholism.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (January 07, 2010 11:40 pm ET)
        1  
        Not to mention the fact that Beck has a nice video out of the segment on his show when he pans pouring himself and Speaker Pelosi a drink and then adding poison to the drink. He then warns her after she and drunk some of the poisoned booze that he spiked it with poison and then giggles away. What a disgusting person who even claims to be a great church member. And further, the members of his church do not drink, probably not even in jest.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (January 07, 2010 11:44 pm ET)
             
          Ccorrection: warns her that she had drunk too. the site is http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200908060037
          Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (January 07, 2010 12:09 pm ET)
      4  
      "As a recovering alcoholic"

      Great. Will you one day refer to yourself as a "recovering hypocrite?"

      ------------------------------------------------------------
      Just sayin'
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (January 07, 2010 12:33 pm ET)
      5  
      The accusation against Senator Baucus is totally off base.

      Turns out that the YouTube video that makes it sound as though Baucus is slurring his words has editing issues, and both the video and audio are distorted. If you look at the direct C-SPAN video, there's no slurring of words. Baucus isn't the best public speaker, and he was incredibly irate and frustrated by the previous comments others had made that he was replying to. He repeated a few words, and stammered a little, but it was due to his anger and frustration, not his alcohol use.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.