Fox & Friends off on proposed bank tax by a factor of 100
On January 15, Fox & Friends falsely reported that President Obama promoted "a 15 percent tax on the banks" for the purpose of recouping taxpayer losses resulting from Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) investments. In fact, the fee Obama proposed would be "assessed at approximately 15 basis points (0.15 percent) of covered liabilities per year" for financial companies with more than $50 billion in assets.
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Fox & Friends falsely reported Obama proposed "15 percent tax" on banks
Kilmeade: Obama "promoting a 15 percent tax on the banks." During the January 15 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, co-host Brian Kilmeade stated: "The big banks are set to pay out a record $145 billion in bonuses for 2009. Some Americans outraged by this. President Obama looking to ease some of that anger, promoting a 15 percent tax on the banks that remained or have remained or have returned to profitability."
Fox & Friends on-screen text: Obama "Wants 15% fee assessed against banks." During the segment, Fox & Friends aired the following on-screen text:

In fact, fee is set at 0.15 percent
White House: "Fee Assessed at Approximately 15 Basis Points (0.15 Percent)." A White House fact sheet on the "Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee" states, "Fee Assessed at Approximately 15 Basis Points (0.15 Percent) of Covered Liabilities Per Year."
Kilmeade falsely claimed fee is "only against the banks that have already paid back" TARP money
Kilmeade claimed fee is "only" for banks that have repaid TARP funds, "not the weak ones ... like for example, Citibank." Kilmeade stated: "The responsibility fee is what they're calling it. It's being assessed only against the banks that have already paid back with interest the TARP money they got. So essentially they're paying back for the banks, they're paying back for Fannie and Freddie, who are not paying -- paying back for the cars, rather. Not the weak ones still in the red which continue to be a drain on the Treasury, like for example, Citibank."
In fact, fee applies to "Largest and Most Highly Levered Firms," reportedly including Citibank
Fee "levied on the debts of financial firms with more than $50 billion in consolidated assets," regardless of TARP participation. The White House fact sheet states, "The fee the President is proposing would be levied on the debts of financial firms with more than $50 billion in consolidated assets, providing a deterrent against excessive leverage for the largest financial firms." Bloomberg reported that "[e]ven companies that didn't receive TARP funds would face the fee. The administration is using the argument that that every major financial firm in the U.S. is a beneficiary of government steps to bolster the industry."
WSJ: Citibank would be subject to tax. The Wall Street Journal reported, "The 10-year assessment on bank liabilities-dubbed the Financial Crisis Responsibility Fee-would fall most heavily on the nation's top six banking companies: Citigroup Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo & Co. Each would likely face an annual bill of $1 billion or more, with Citigroup and J.P. Morgan facing the largest liabilities, likely more than $2.4 billion apiece." The article further reported that "[a] provision inserted in the legislation authorizing the Troubled Asset Relief Program required the administration to come up with a way to recover money spent to save the financial system."

















Mr. News
This is part of my personal philopsophy.
Unfortunately, implying THIS LEVEL OF STUPIDITY in someone would constitute an act of malice on my part.
--------------------------------------------------------------
Conservtaives can only be either evil or stupid: Some lie, the rest buy.
Thanks for the excellent question. Does anybody have any answers?
why would banks that DID NOT take tarp money be taxed??
Why should we treat you like a baby?
Then you get this side deal for the Unions not having to pay a tax on a Cadillac plans for min till 2018, really so a company gives there employees a nice health plan but since they are not in a Union they get taxed, this government is out of control. How much more corruption will you except, side deals, under the table deals, no transparency.
2. It can be avoided by having less liabilities.
I was in the banking industry for eight years. I got out when the small, community bank I worked for began taking on some of the larger banks' tricks of taking money from their working class customers. "Free checking", "Free overdraft protection" that is required with any account. These were all scams to rip off the bank's own customers. When we instituted "free checking" with "free overdraft protection" our revenues climbed almost 9% because of all the fees we were piling on to our own customers.
This is not what banks should exist for. There is a service for them to provide. Finding tricky ways to levy fees against their own customers is not that service. Leveraging themselves at 35-1 in order to make money off of bogus monetary transactions is not that service.
Regulation has been sorely lacking in the banking industry since the early 90s. The entire thing imploded and it appears to me that we are still not going to give regulation any teeth. I have no love for these charlatans and if we are going to tax them, I will not feel bad. But, taxing them is not the answer. Regulating them is the answer. It was done correctly before and we can get there again.
Credit card companies need to be regulated more closely. Banks need to be regulated more closely. And payday loan companies need to be put out of business. Let the loan sharks handle that business, they were much more honest anyways.
Or would you like to see an even larger Exxon Corporation? How about Blue Cross/Blue Shield doubling in size? What might that do to your health insurance rates?
There was a time not long ago when limiting the colossal growth of businesses was considered good for consumers and for our economy.
This Fee (TAX) is simply saying these companies make too much money, they pay the top folks too much money and it is not fair. Well here is a bit if news to you all, life is not fair.
The banks are smart people - they knew they could drive up the short term profits, get paid, and let someone else pick up the tab. Deregulation was THE biggest contributing factor - only one of the top 25 subprime lenders was subject to the regulations in question. What about all those commercial real estate ventures - those were private deals and had nothing to do with lending to the poor.
So please, get your facts straight before posting. If a bank is deemed to big to fail (i.e - the tax), then they need to pony up the money to make sure it doesn't happen.
So all big banks will be taxed.
This is not rocket science.