Claims of Mass. Senate race as "referendum on President Obama" undermined by poll
Earlier today, CNN anchor Kyra Phillips claimed that the Massachusetts special U.S. Senate election "has become the first public referendum on President Obama." But election night polling by Rasmussen Reports showing that 53 percent of Massachusetts voters approve of Obama's job performance undermines this claim, and Scott Brown himself has stated that the race was "not a referendum on Obama."
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
From the January 19 edition of CNN Newsroom:
PHILLIPS: There's a much bigger picture here than Brown versus Coakley. This election has become the first public referendum on President Obama and health care reform.
Rasmussen poll of Mass. voters shows majority support for Obama
Fifty-three percent of Mass. voters approve of Obama job performance. In a January 19 post to his Twitter feed, referring to a Rasmussen Reports election night poll, Scott Rasmussen stated that "53% of Massachusetts voters approve of Obama performance." As Media Matters for America has documented, Rasmussen reportedly worked for President George W. Bush's re-election campaign and for the Republican National Committee in 2003 and 2004.
Even Brown himself stated that the election was "not a referendum on the president"
Brown's "Last Pitch": "It's not a referendum on the president. There are many issues." In his January 18 "Last Pitch" interview with Boston's ABC affiliate, Brown said of the race: "It's not a referendum on the president. There are many issues; you're talking about national security, taxes, spending -- the health care plan certainly is important."
Rasmussen poll also undermines Phillips' claim of election as referendum on health care
Numerous media figures have suggested that a Brown victory would indicate massive popular rejection of health care reform. But Rasmussen's polling indicates that a higher percentage of Coakley voters than Brown voters said that health care reform was the most important issue in determining their vote, with 52 percent of Brown voters calling it their top issue compared to 68 percent of Coakley voters.

















everything brown ran on was EXACTLY what sarah palin has been saying all along: putting government back on the side of the people, stop giving terrorists constitutional rights, lower taxes, no earmarks, cut government spending.
this was a victory for sarah palin!
If Brown's record had been exposed back in November, instead of as an 11th hour last ditch effort to show Brown for the liar he is, we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Randy
But look on the bright side! It's gonna be fun today watching failedlib gloat and make wildly grandiose claims of a new referendum on republican family values as she twists and turns to explain how a nude posing teabagger with the values of a cockroach valiantly represents those values. Heck, I'm sure she'll toss in an insult or two with it, because after all, those "values" means never having to practice what you preach!
Randy
How quaint. mmfa uses Rasmussen polling to support their position...but only when they agree with the results. Here's what mmfa has thought about Rasmussen polling lately:
-- Another awful Rasmussen poll
January 15, 2010 8:58 am ET filed under Blog
-- Another awful Rasmussen poll
January 06, 2010 1:44 pm ET filed under Blog
-- UPDATED: Another awful Rasmussen poll
January 05, 2010 11:11 am ET filed under Blog
-- Another awful Rasmussen poll
January 03, 2010 11:07 am ET filed under Blog
-- Another awful Rasmussen poll
December 31, 2009 3:10 pm ET filed under Blog
-- Another awful Rasmussen poll, cont'd
December 04, 2009 11:08 am ET filed under Blog
Laughable but expected...mmfa will sleep with anyone if it suits their partisan agenda.
This is the kind of hypocrisy and arrogance that got Dems their asses handed to them last night.
Trash Rasmussen polls for being awful when in the end they clearly showed an accurate trend in Brown's favor, then hold them up when info can be used to support Obama. Trash Brown when he's the candidate, then use something he said as an olive branch in his victory speech.
Low, even for this place.
Randy
Perhaps if they picked from the whole tree now and then the bitter ones would leave such an awful taste in the mouths of babes. just sayin'
:)