About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly falsely equates waterboarding of detainees, training for U.S. military

January 26, 2010 12:03 am ET — 21 Comments

On January 25, Bill O'Reilly falsely equated the waterboarding of detainees by U.S. interrogators with the training U.S. soldiers undergo. In fact, officials familiar with both the techniques used in harsh interrogations and those used in military training programs have said that such a comparison is false; those who undergo certain interrogation techniques in such training programs are aware that there are safeguards and know they can stop the training immediately if necessary.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

O'Reilly: "[S]ome American special forces candidates were waterboarded in training with no permanent damage"

From the January 25 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: "Back of the Book" segment tonight: "Reality Check" where we clear things up so that even I can understand them. Check one: Very divisive issue in America is coerced interrogation of captured terrorist suspects. Generally speaking, liberals oppose it, conservatives support it. The hot button is waterboardings; and once again, it was debated by former Bush speechwriter Marc Thiessen, author of the book, Courting Disaster: How the CIA Kept America Safe and How Barack Obama is Inviting the Next Attack, and CNN correspondent Christiane Amanpour.

[begin video clip]

AMANPOUR Do you support torture? I know you do not call --

THIESSEN: It's not torture.

AMANPOUR: I know you don't call it torture --

THIESSEN: It isn't torture.

AMANPOUR: -- but the extreme pain, the enhanced --

THIESSEN: There's no extreme pain.

AMANPOUR: -- interrogation techniques --

THIESSEN: There is no -- the techniques -- there have been so many misstatements told about the enhanced interrogation techniques, comparing them to the Spanish Inquisition to the Khmer Rouge. And I have to tell you, Christiane, you're one of the people who have spread these mistruths. You --

AMANPOUR: Excuse me?

[end video clip]

O'REILLY: Hmm. Now Mr. Thiessen went on to point out some American special forces candidates were waterboarded in training with no permanent damage. However, the debate will never end, and the president has outlawed all waterboarding by American authorities.

FACT: Bush DOJ, Senate committee agree interrogations, training are not comparable

Bush DOJ memo: Individuals undergoing military's SERE training are "obviously in a very different situation from detainees undergoing interrogation." In a May 30, 2005, Office of Legal Counsel memo, Steven G. Bradbury, the Bush administration's principal deputy assistant attorney general at the time, wrote that individuals undergoing the military's Survival, Evasion, Resistance, and Escape (SERE) training are "obviously in a very different situation from detainees undergoing interrogation; SERE trainees know it is part of a training program, not a real-life interrogation regime, they presumably know it will last only a short time, and they presumably have assurances that they will not be significantly harmed by the training."

Senate Armed Services Committee: "There are fundamental differences between a SERE school exercise and a real world interrogation." From an April 22, 2009, Senate Armed Services Committee report:

(U) SERE school techniques are designed to simulate abusive tactics used by our enemies. There are fundamental differences between a SERE school exercise and a real world interrogation. At SERE school, students are subject to an extensive medical and psychological pre-screening prior to being subjected to physical and psychological pressures. The schools impose strict limits on the frequency, duration, and/or intensity of certain techniques. Psychologists are present throughout SERE training to intervene should the need arise and to help students cope with associated stress. And SERE school is voluntary; students are even given a special phrase they can use to immediately stop the techniques from being used against them.

Factor has frequently downplayed waterboarding, other techniques

On Factor, Fox's Angle said: "We've done it to thousands of our own people." On the April 20, 2009, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Fox News chief Washington correspondent Jim Angle stated: "[T]he odd thing ... is that President Obama has decided that waterboarding, which we have done, by the way, to thousands of our own people in the military -- pilots and Special Forces are often trained by being waterboarded. We've done it to thousands of our own people. He has decided it is too harsh to use on terrorists."

O'Reilly downplayed torture allegations at Guantánamo. Before and after a trip to Guantánamo Bay, O'Reilly mocked and downplayed concerns about torture allegation.

O'Reilly repeatedly jokes about waterboarding. O'Reilly has joked about waterboarding George Soros, Alan Colmes, Fox News contributor Ellis Hennican, and Janeane Garofalo.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by fairliberal (January 26, 2010 12:12 am ET)
      3 11
      O'Reilly didn't "falsely equate " anything, he merely quoted Thiessen. The gnats at media matters are lying again.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (January 26, 2010 1:50 am ET)
        7 2
        There was no reason to go on to further quote Theissen unless he either agreed with the sentiment expressed by Theissen or he was going to refute Theissen's statement.

        He didn't point out that the two things aren't comparable, and since he didn't, that means he falsely equated the two things.

        You are a dishonest hack.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by usp (January 26, 2010 1:59 am ET)
          4 1
          i think this troll gets paid by the post. "WORK AT HOME! THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS! ONLY COMPUTER NEEDED!"

          sound about right?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TomJoad (January 26, 2010 7:00 am ET)
            4 2
            spot on.

            its a ridiculous argument. CLEARLY O'Reilly's point is, 'our troops our waterboarded in training and there is no permanent damage.' We know O'Reilly is a despicable hawk; we know he agrees with the concept of 'enhanced interrogation.' It's a disgusting way of thinking...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mari2jj (January 26, 2010 11:32 pm ET)
              1  
              It is one thing to be "trained" to withstand waterboarding when you know that if the guy kills you he would be in deep trouble. No comparison to an enemy being in the hands of our military and being waterboarded. Remember, there were some deaths from waterboarding in GITMO and every POW knew that some never came back from waterboarding. Unless Bill O'Reiley wants to submit to waterboarding himself while not knowing if the guy is going to stop in time, I suggest he just shut up because he knows nothing about it. Obviously, he is nothing but an apologist for the Bush administration and when I say the Bush administration, I definitely mean G. W. and not his fine father.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (January 26, 2010 11:18 am ET)
            3 2
            Oh, I think her posts are done out of an obsessive attraction to Bill O'Reilly. It's creepy.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (January 26, 2010 12:13 am ET)
      5 2
      Have we not been over this all before? In training, you know you can make it stop any time that you want it to stop, all you got to do is say the safe word, and, it stops. No such thing when you're torturing someone with waterboarding.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by fairliberal (January 26, 2010 12:18 am ET)
        2 7
        Is there a safe word I can use to keep you from torturing us with your posts?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by usp (January 26, 2010 2:00 am ET)
          3  
          and now you let your dark sexual world come leaking onto the board? try to keep a lid on it would you?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by TomJoad (January 26, 2010 3:51 am ET)
            4 1
            If you want to know whether it's torture fairliberal, check out the video of the uber-hawk Christopher Hitchens being water-boarded on YouTube. He supports both wars (for obscure reasons; and he's wrong) but he last all of 10 seconds. Having experienced the method, he is stone-cold certain it's torture. As for your post about O'Reilly's 'false' comparison, O'Reilly concedes Thiessen's point, by saying he 'pointed it out.' If he didn't accept the point Theissen was making, he wouldn't phrase it like that. You can parse word's if you like. But "Now Mr. Thiessen went on to point out some American special forces candidates were waterboarded in training with no permanent damage" i pretty clearly equating the waterboarding of troops in training with the torture committed by US forces on often innocent detainees.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (January 26, 2010 11:20 am ET)
          2  
          UGH! Is there one for us to keep you from posting your creepy, "Oh, Bill, you are SUCH a manly man, I'll protect you from those "pinhead, dweeby, gnats" at MMFA" posts?????
          Report Abuse
        • Author by John Paradox (January 26, 2010 8:24 pm ET)
          1  
          logoff
          Report Abuse
          • Author by John Paradox (January 27, 2010 2:12 am ET)
            1  
            Clarification: response to

            by fairliberal (January 26, 2010 12:18 am ET)

            Is there a safe word I can use to keep you from torturing us with your posts?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by theOCHO33 (January 26, 2010 12:26 am ET)
         
      What is the point of calling this a "reality check?" It's just BO giving an (very bad) argument in favor of his own view on something. How does this help anyone understand anything?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (January 26, 2010 1:46 am ET)
      4 1
      How does O'Reilly NOT know this by now? The difference between willingly volunteering to be waterboarded by friends who you trust and by the enemy in a war setting is so vast it's not possible that someone with half a brain couldn't understand it!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by stevensm (January 26, 2010 8:03 am ET)
        3  
        I think that O'Reilly does know it but the facts in this matter work against his agenda so he purposely ignores them. He ignores what the Bush DOJ and Armed Services committee have said in favor of pushing his point of view. What makes him even more messed up is that just basic common sense should tell him that SERES trainees undergoing voluntary waterboarding by colleagues (and with a safe phrase) is hardly the same as when detainees experience it.

        Besides, if O'Reilly were to admit the facts of the matter, it might get in the way of a good waterboarding joke (cause everyone knows his waterboarding jokes are just hi-larious!

        Note to Hannity: When are you going to honor the waterboarding bet you lost with Olbermann?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by clams casino (January 26, 2010 2:36 am ET)
      7 1
      The hot button is waterboardings


      The hot button is torture. Conservatives only want to talk about waterboarding because it's the easiest form of torture to dismiss. The fact remains that prisoners have died because of our mistreatment and abuse. They can't deny that, so instead they make weak arguments about why waterboarding shouldn't be considered torture.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Goat Locker (January 26, 2010 12:44 pm ET)
         
      Here are a couple questions for all of those so high up on that moral horse. Why do we train our soliders to be waterboarded? What is exceptable to save innocent American lives?

      The terrorist international criminal enemy combattants that were subjected to these measures have information on groups that want to kill you, your family and freinds. As long as they do not physically harm them, I am not particularly interested in their mental well being. News flash, they were already pretty messed up in the head before we captured them. Suicide bombing is not a health mental thought process.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ccdiane (January 27, 2010 9:58 am ET)
         
      From the Armed Services Report:
      "SERE school techniques are designed to simulate abusive tactics used by our enemies."


        Simulate abusive tactics.
        Used by our enemies.


      Now if it said that SERE school trained people to use these tactics on our enemies, O'Reilly would have something to defend.

      Interrogators and military police are not on the list for SERE training (at least they weren't as of a few years ago).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by watkinsjr966 (January 27, 2010 1:59 pm ET)
         
      May I suggest a very simple way Bill O'Reilly can either put up or shut up on the subject of waterboarding. If it's really as routine and harmless as O'Reilly claims, let him prove it.All he has to do is agree to be waterboarded(in exactly the manner it's been done at Gitmo) once a day for a week LIVE on his TV show.If, after this, he's still willing to state that this practice is no big deal I'll be inclined to take him at his word.

      Come on Bill, put your money where your mouth is. If waterboading is as benign as you claim, going through it won't be too tough.And, you'll get the highest rating for your show that week that you've ever had.We're talking Super Bowl type ratings here Jack. EVERYBODY, and I do mean EVERYBODY, in the country will want to watch. This would be "Must See TV" if there was ever such a thing.And, you'd have the chance to settle the question of whether waterboarding really is torture once & for all.

      Of course pigs will fly before Bill O'Reilly would ever agree to do such a thing. And,if he did have the guts to try this, I'd bet big money that one session of waterboarding would turn him into a whimpering baby begging for his life.

      Of course, you do always have the power to prove me wrong Bill. Let us all see what a tough guy you REALLY are.But, I won't hold my breath waiting-cause it ain't gonna happen.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.