About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Wash. Times falsely equated emergency contraception with abortion

January 26, 2010 10:39 am ET — 5 Comments

In recent days, The Washington Times has repeatedly falsely equated emergency contraception with abortion. In fact, health experts have noted that emergency contraception does not terminate pregnancies; rather, emergency contraception is used to prevent pregnancies.

Wash. Times repeatedly equated emergency contraception, abortion

Wash. Times article claimed, "Planned Parenthood offered free emergency contraception" after Hurricane Katrina "to terminate pregnancies." A January 22 Times article titled, "Haiti appeal from Planned Parenthood hit," quoted Family Research Council (FRC) president Tony Perkins' criticism of Planned Parenthood's relief efforts in Haiti and stated: "[Perkins] said that Planned Parenthood has a history of using natural disasters to promote its agenda. After Hurricane Katrina devastated New Orleans in 2005, Planned Parenthood offered free emergency contraception, better known as 'morning-after' pills, to terminate pregnancies."

Fox Nation advanced Times article. The Fox Nation on January 26 linked to the Times article under the headline, "Haiti Appeal From Planned Parenthood Hit." From the Fox Nation:

fn-plannedparenthood

Wash. Times published assertion that "number of abortions" in FY 2008 could rise "[i]f we include emergency contraception kits." In a January 26 Times op-ed, FRC's Jeanne Monahan wrote: "By far the most staggering number listed in Planned Parenthood's annual report isn't about money (at least not to pro-life Americans, who make up a slim majority). The report notes that the number of abortions that occurred during fiscal 2008 was a whopping 305,000. If we include emergency contraception kits, that number could rise to more than 1.4 million."

But health experts say that emergency contraception prevents -- not terminates -- pregnancy

HHS: "Emergency contraception works before pregnancy begins" and "will not work if a woman is already pregnant." On a "Frequently Asked Questions" page of its website, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' Office on Women's Health stated:

Are emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) the same thing as the abortion pill?

No. Emergency contraception works before pregnancy begins. It will not work if a woman is already pregnant. Abortion takes place after a fertilized egg has attached to the uterus.

Guttmacher Institute: "[E]mergency contraception ... has no effect once a pregnancy has been established." An October 2002 Guttmacher Institute "Special Analysis" noted that "[e]mergency contraception is no more a 'do-it-yourself abortion kit' than are regular birth control pills; it has no effect once a pregnancy has been established." From the analysis:

Emergency contraception prevents pregnancy in the same way as other hormonal contraceptive methods, such as the pill, the injectable (Depo-Provera) and even breastfeeding: by delaying or inhibiting ovulation, inhibiting fertilization or inhibiting implantation of a fertilized egg, depending on when during the menstrual cycle a woman initiates the method. (According to the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), pregnancy begins when a fertilized egg implants in the lining of the uterus.) Thus, emergency contraception is no more a "do-it-yourself abortion kit" than are regular birth control pills; it has no effect once a pregnancy has been established.

WHO: Evidence "suggests" emergency contraception "will not harm either the mother or her fetus" if taken by an already pregnant woman. A World Health Organization "Fact sheet on emergency contraception" noted: "Emergency contraceptive pills prevent pregnancy. They should not be given to a woman who already has a confirmed pregnancy. However, if a woman inadvertently takes the pills after she became pregnant, the limited available evidence suggests that the pills will not harm either the mother or her fetus."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by peace4all (January 26, 2010 11:00 am ET)
      4  
      ok, look, we can't just have planned parenthood handing out contraception in haiti. think of all the potential children that will never be born if we do that. and if we don't allow them to be born we will soon run out of people of color to kill in our quest to be the biggest empire ever. remember, if we let them die when their young, we can't slaughter them when they grow up.

      and remember, if your knuckles don't drag the ground, your not a REAL american.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (January 26, 2010 12:36 pm ET)
      5  
      This demonstrates how the "every sperm is sacred" mentality has come to define the debate. I wonder how many potential lives I have killed by striking out in the singles bar?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (January 27, 2010 12:20 am ET)
           
        Says the Bible.

        http://stuffgodhates.wordpress.com/2008/08/15/god-on-the-bible-genesis-386-10/

        God on The Bible – Genesis 38:6-10 (Wasted Sperm)

        6 For his first son Er, Judah got a wife whose name was Tamar.

        7 Er’s conduct was evil, and it displeased the LORD, so the LORD killed him.

        8 Then Judah said to Er’s brother Onan, “Go and sleep with your brother’s widow. Fulfill your obligation to her as her husband’s brother, so that your brother may have descendants.”

        9 But Onan knew that the children would not belong to him, so when he had intercourse with his brother’s widow, he let the semen spill on the ground, so that there would be no children for his brother.

        10 What he did displeased the LORD, and the LORD killed him also.*
        Report Abuse
    • Author by GreenLantern (January 26, 2010 11:33 pm ET)
         
      Why do you think the repugs didn't get RoeVWade before the activist supreme court when they controlled everything while they were ruining the country? It's a great wedge issue.
      "I am for outlawing abortion!" Which of course does nothing at all to stop any abortion. They want to really stop abortions? Support unwed mothers, teach birth control in schools, help any poor (or person not capable of taking care of them) person so that there would be far fewer, make adoptions much easier and cheaper! As a Christian I am against abortions but morally I have to say what is more moral, stopping as many abortions as possible by support and help like the bible says we ought to treat people, or just make criminals out of them and make them hide and kill many more people. Right wing nuts cause more abortions by their policies just to have their God "repug party" favor them while they vote against their own self interest. (sorry for the rant!)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mcdeltatjg (January 27, 2010 11:06 am ET)
         
      Ummm... I believe it's y'all hwho are mistaken. Life begins at conception, not implantation. Once the egg has been fertilized, life has already begun and the only way EC can do anything by that point is to prevent implantation (hwhen the fertilized egg is attached to the uterus). If the woman was actually likely to get pregnant in the first place, then it must mean that the egg is in the uterus. At that point, how would you stop the sperm from fertilizing it? Send the egg back up the fallopian tube? If the egg was not in the uterus, she prolly wouldn't get pregnant anyway, even without EC. So, if there was actually a chance she could get pregnant in the first place, then, yes, EC prolly does cause abortion.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.