About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox & Friends' Kilmeade revises economic history to defend Bush

January 28, 2010 8:21 am ET — 8 Comments

Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade falsely claimed that when president Obama took office, he found "50 plus months of economic growth" and "between 5 and 7 percent unemployment." In fact, the unemployment rate was 7.7 percent in January 2009 and both employment and GDP had been falling for months prior to Obama's inauguration.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Kilmeade claimed Obama inherited "50 plus months of economic growth," "between 5 and 7 percent unemployment"

From the January 28 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

KILMEADE: I did not think the President was going to do this. He said, let's just remember what I got when I walked in the door. What I had is after eight years of tax cuts, unfunded prescription drug plans and two wars without financing, I found myself in a mountain of debt essentially. But what he also found was 50 plus months of economic growth going into that. He also found between 5 and 7 percent unemployment. President Bush had it under 5 percent during those times.

In fact, both economic growth and employment were dropping when Obama took office

NBER: Economic activity began decline in December 2007. The National Bureau of Economic Research announced on December 1, 2008, that the recession began in December 2007, based on "economy-wide measures of economic activity," including domestic production and employment.

Economic growth was falling when Obama took office. Contrary to Kilmeade's claim that when Obama took office he found "50 plus months of economic growth," real GDP (Gross Domestic Product) had been decreasing for several months prior to January 2009. From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:

BLS graph

Unemployment rate was 7.7 percent in January 2009. Contrary to Kilmeade's claim that when Obama entered office, he "found between 5 and 7 percent unemployment," the unemployment rate was 7.7 percent in January 2009 and had been increasing for several months prior to his inauguration. From BLS data (accessed January 28):

cps graph

A National Public Radio chart of monthly change in nonfarm payroll employment based on BLS data indicates that Obama took office during the peak of monthly payroll job losses:

payroll chart

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by papajohn (January 28, 2010 9:57 am ET)
      2  
      In the past year or so, Mediamatters has been spending entirely too much time on Fox News instead of the other networks that are packaging the same burning slop in a different colored flaming Halloween bag. You know, the networks that appeal to "smart people".

      I don't get it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (January 28, 2010 10:32 am ET)
        1  
        They do take tips on items. Send them some.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Lizinbklyn (January 28, 2010 11:20 am ET)
           
        Well faux is always boasting about their HUGE RATINGS . .

        MM possibly wants to appeal to faux's huge base and correct the constant obfuscations and lies en masse, ya know, truthiness . .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rdelong23 (January 28, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
      1  
      I've never seen these charts - why aren't we seeing these on news segments EVERYDAY?
      I would love to see anyone on Faux show these charts - as well as all the msm.
      This is what the dems need to highlight - to show where the country was really heading under the voodoo economic policies during 14 years of right wing "Contract with America", Gingrich / Delay congressional control, including 8 years with GWB in the WH.
      That, is what americans need to be reminded of -now.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nullbull (January 28, 2010 6:49 pm ET)
           
        We wouldn't to treat our viewers like GROWN UPS, would we? Newspapers are written for 6th-8th graders. Both the grammar/vocab AND the concepts. Editorial boards will tell you that if you bring real information in, and attempt nuance, you lose 90%+ of readers.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Terry_Santiago (January 28, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
         
      Of Course you will never see anything of this sort on Faux and Friends because it would cause their argument to fall apart. That's what happens when you try to back up a lie with truth. Faux news case is a joke. I have to say this, Americans are falling for this crap again. The same BS they fell for during the Bush Administration they are falling for again. When you see polls that say Americans see Fox as the most trustworthy News station. It speaks to the stupidity of this country. When we become the stupid bimbo who's boyfriend constantly lies to her so much that she begans to believe their crap.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Publius39 (January 28, 2010 4:48 pm ET)
         
      Now that was a flat out lie. Not revision, not spin, simple lying. And he did it with a straight face. SMH
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.