About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

"Bolshevik plot": Right-wing media declare Obama a radical who threatens America

January 30, 2010 3:03 pm ET — 60 Comments

Urging that "we've got to close the gap a little bit between the rhetoric and the reality," President Obama stated during his January 29 question and answer session with House Republicans that "if you were to listen to the debate" over health care reform "you'd think that this thing was some Bolshevik plot." Throughout Obama's administration thus far, conservative media have embraced such rhetoric, routinely attacking Obama's agenda as socialist, communist or fascist and telling audiences that Obama and health care reform are a threat to America itself.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Obama calls out GOP for outrageous rhetoric in health care debate

During the January 29 Q&A session with House Republicans, Obama stated, "You've given yourselves very little room to work in a bipartisan fashion because what you've been telling your constituents is, this guy is doing all kinds of crazy stuff that's going to destroy America":

OBAMA: And so we were in the process of scrubbing this and making sure that it's tight.  But at its core, if you look at the basic proposal that we've put forward:  it has an exchange so that businesses and the self-employed can buy into a pool and can get bargaining power the same way big companies do; the insurance reforms that I've already discussed, making sure that there's choice and competition for those who don't have health insurance.  The component parts of this thing are pretty similar to what Howard Baker, Bob Dole, and Tom Daschle proposed at the beginning of this debate last year.

Now, you may not agree with Bob Dole and Howard Baker, and, certainly you don't agree with Tom Daschle on much, but that's not a radical bunch.  But if you were to listen to the debate and, frankly, how some of you went after this bill, you'd think that this thing was some Bolshevik plot.  No, I mean, that's how you guys -- (applause) -- that's how you guys presented it.

And so I'm thinking to myself, well, how is it that a plan that is pretty centrist -- no, look, I mean, I'm just saying, I know you guys disagree, but if you look at the facts of this bill, most independent observers would say this is actually what many Republicans -- is similar to what many Republicans proposed to Bill Clinton when he was doing his debate on health care.

So all I'm saying is, we've got to close the gap a little bit between the rhetoric and the reality.  I'm not suggesting that we're going to agree on everything, whether it's on health care or energy or what have you, but if the way these issues are being presented by the Republicans is that this is some wild-eyed plot to impose huge government in every aspect of our lives, what happens is you guys then don't have a lot of room to negotiate with me.

I mean, the fact of the matter is, is that many of you, if you voted with the administration on something, are politically vulnerable in your own base, in your own party.  You've given yourselves very little room to work in a bipartisan fashion because what you've been telling your constituents is, this guy is doing all kinds of crazy stuff that's going to destroy America.

Conservative media frequently invoke socialism, communism, fascism to attack Obama's agenda

Media Matters for America has documented numerous instances in which conservative media invoked socialism, communism and fascism to vilify health care reform, president Obama and congressional Democrats. For example:

Conservative media assert that Obama, health care reform threaten America

Media Matters has also complied examples of conservative media asserting that Democrats and health care reform could destroy the United States"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by jbraskin4786 (January 30, 2010 3:12 pm ET)
      31 1
      And the language is only going to get more strident, more vicious, and more racist between now and 2012.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mustardman (January 30, 2010 3:18 pm ET)
        21  
        I'll be cancelling my cable soon. Life is just too short. Reality in the media and politics died a long time ago.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by all your eyes (January 30, 2010 3:24 pm ET)
          17  
          An enthusiastic thumbs up! If not for baseball, I'd have canceled cable a long time ago...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Seismedia (January 30, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
           
        America has a real problem - the divide is getting wider and both left and right are getting unhinged. You can hear it in the hate-speech that is moving from the fringes into the mainstream. If Media really Matters, this site would expose the controversy whether it comes from left or right. For example, Obama is the one who made the "Bolshevist Plot" reference while conferencing with/to the Republicans. Tit for tat, he played into their game of name calling and now his hands are just as dirty.

        Fact is, both the far right and far left have gotten so loud and rancorous that they've sucked the air out of rational debate in this country. Congress, first under the Republicans (pre 2007) and then under Democrats (2007 to present) have crossed every conceivable line of petty power mongering and now we're at the point that nothing gets passed, or it only gets passed through closed door session, literally being jammed through in the dark of night (and on weekends!?), bills not read, votes being bought, nothing but special interests being represented.

        Left and right, conservative and liberal, can disagree philosophically, but when we start dismantling the structure of our Constitutional Republic just to get our way, every side, every party, every institution, every special interest, and yes, every individual loses. It's not that Obama is a Socialist, and Bush wasn't a Fascist, what threatens the fabric of our society is the deterioration in trust and the rising generation is losing faith in the process. God help this country!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by papa bear3 (January 31, 2010 4:55 am ET)
        2  
        their target is 2010 and they seem to be on track!!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by News Corpse (January 30, 2010 3:24 pm ET)
      28  
      Obama's remarks at the Republican retreat were warranted and long overdue. Republicans DID portray the President and his policies as socialist and dangerous.

      But these remarks were just an extension of those at the State of Union where he said that...

      "TV pundits reduce serious debates into silly arguments, and big issues into sound bites."
      And the TV pundits work hand in hand with the Republicans to make public discourse more hostile and less substantive.

      We need more of this kind of honesty in politics and media.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cmanptown02 (January 30, 2010 3:34 pm ET)
           
        The Q&A was great. But the right wasn't even listening. Right ater the session they went right back to what they were doing. Hopefully enough voters were listening
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Conchobhar (January 30, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
        12  
        It's very clear that a significant proportion of those overmatched baseturds either think that way, or feel the wild accusation is politically advantageous for them.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by temphandle tearfully55timetable (January 30, 2010 4:08 pm ET)
        16  
        After the Q&A Cornyn went on TeeVee and said no one in the Republican Party has ever referred to President Obama as a socialist ....
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (January 30, 2010 6:16 pm ET)
          12  
          Shameless and stupid. Cornyn, through and through.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by txthinker (February 01, 2010 10:53 am ET)
             
          And no one has ever referred to Cornyn as a great thinker. He's a disgrace to the Lone Star State.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (January 30, 2010 8:52 pm ET)
        9  
        Obama gave the pugs a taste of their own medicine.The pugs ruled on the basis of fear and that horse is getting lame.They can no longer longer play the bully role.Our great POTUS is giving the right a chance at atonement through bipartisanship and if the right can't help,it'll become the teabagger party,the party of morans.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by egb (January 31, 2010 2:06 pm ET)
        1 11
        That's because Obama's desire to have "single payer" heath IS socialist. Obama believes the government can solve health care issues. He has no evidence that can be done anywhere in the government. Government takeover of HC is socialism plain and simple. He and Pelosi ("are you serious") believe your constitution is flexible and should be bent to whatever needs he perceives. Today, he believes HC is a need that can be found in the constitution. Tomorrow, who knows what? As a "Constitutional Law Professor" he should be able to explain why it is in the constitution. He hasn't because he can't. It's not there.

        Obama is professing socialist ideas -- where government control of your life is paramount to individual freedom.

        MSM seems confused and uncertain what's going on. They'll get it eventually.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (January 31, 2010 3:39 pm ET)
          9 1
          Ok we get it you don't think gobermint can do anything and the private sector is the answer to everything. The present heathcare reform is not government takeover(I wish it were). Ever heard of the concept public good in it's in the constitution. You reduce things to abstractions without pointing out concrete things in the bill ,which tells me you don't have anything to stand on but your ideology. If the bills are socialistic(whewwwwww be scared) where are your examples,you screaming socialism don't make it so.

          1. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - DEFICIT NEUTRAL BILL: "Do the American people believe that this almost 2,000 page bill won't add to the deficit?" [Rep. Eric Cantor, 10/29/2009]
          HOUSE BILL - DEFICIT NEUTRAL BILL: According to the Congressional Budget Office, the House bill costs $894 billion over 10 years and actually reduces the deficit by $30 billion and continues to reduce the deficit over the second 10 years.

          2. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - REDUCE COSTS OVER LONG TERM: "Nevertheless, House Republicans recognize the need to lower health care costs." [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), 9/9/09]

          HOUSE BILL - REDUCES COSTS OVER LONG TERM: Encourages payment reforms that can help lower costs. Requires the Department of Health and Human Services to establish specific benchmarks for expansion of the Accountable Care Organization, Payment Bundling, and Medical Home pilot programs. The bill will also slow the rate of growth of the Medicare program from 6.6% annually to 5.3%.

          3. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - POLICIES ACROSS STATE LINES: "Interstate competition allowing people to buy insurance across state lines." [Sen. John Thune (R-SD), 9/8/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - POLICIES ACROSS STATE LINES: Allows for the creation of State Health Insurance Compacts - permits states to enter into agreements to allow for the sale of insurance across state lines.

          4. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM: "Why not bring about reasonable restrictions and limits on medical malpractice claims to end the era of defensive medicine?" [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IA), 9/9/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - ENCOURAGES MALPRACTICE REFORM: The bill establishes a voluntary state incentives grant program to encourage states to implement "certificate of merit" and "early offer" alternatives to traditional medical malpractice litigation.

          5. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - HIGH RISK POOLS: "Senator McCain has a proposal sometimes called high-risk pools at the state level...These are efforts I think we can have bipartisan agreement on and deal with the question of pre-existing conditions." [Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), 9/10/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - HIGH RISK POOLS: To fill the gap before the Exchange becomes available in 2013, the bill creates an insurance program with financial assistance for those uninsured for several months or denied policy due to preexisting conditions.

          6. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - ALLOW YOUNG PEOPLE TO STAY ON PARENTS' POLICIES: "Recognizes that not all high school and college graduates are able to find a job that offers health care coverage after graduation. By allowing dependents to remain on their parents' health policies up to the age of 25, the number of uninsured Americans could be reduced by up to 7 million." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - ALLOW YOUNG PEOPLE TO STAY ON PARENTS' POLICIES: The bill requires health plans to allow young people to remain on their parents' insurance policy until they turn 27.

          7. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - NO PUBLIC MONEY FOR ABORTION: "The American people will not stand for government-run insurance that uses taxpayer money to fund abortions in this country." [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), 10/16/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - NO PUBLIC MONEY FOR ABORTION: The bill prohibits abortion services from being made part of essential benefits package and prohibits federal funds from being used to pay for abortion (except in cases of rape, incest, and to save life of the woman).

          8. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - PROTECT SMALL BUSINESSES: "Helps employers offer health care coverage to their workers by reducing their administrative costs through a new small business tax credit." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - PROTECTS SMALL BUSINESSES: The bill exempts 86% of businesses from the requirement to provide coverage. Businesses with payrolls below $500,000 are exempt while firms with payrolls between $500,000 and $750,000 would pay a graduated penalty. Small businesses would also receive a tax credit that helps cover 50% of their health care expenses.

          9. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - PROMOTE JOB WELLNESS PROGRAMS: "Promotes prevention and wellness by giving employers and insurers greater flexibility to financially reward employees who seek to achieve or maintain a healthy weight, quit smoking, and manage chronic illnesses like diabetes." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - PROMOTE JOB WELLNESS PROGRAMS: The bill establishes a grant program to help small employers create or strengthen workplace wellness programs.

          10. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM: "Uses new and innovative treatment programs to better coordinate care between health
          care providers, ensuring that those with chronic disease receive the care they need and do not continue to fall through the cracks." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM: The bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to establish specific benchmarks for the expansion of the Accountable Care Organization, Payment Bundling, and Medical Home pilot programs.

          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/tv-soundoff-sunday-talkin_n_443488.html

          Feel free to point out the government takeover and socialism.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 01, 2010 12:36 pm ET)
          6  
          EGB, nothing wrong with socialism. if you hate it so much, give up your Social Security, Medicare, and Medicade and see how you like the result.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
            1  
            While you're at it EGB, give up the sociaist police, the socialist fire department, the socialist electrical grid, the socialist press, the socialist communications infrastructure, the socialist court system (by which businesses may enforce contract law or are businesses socialist too?), the socialist highway system, the socialist rail system; in fact lets cut to the chase here... the entire "social contract" through which citizens prosper and enjoy the privileges of "The Commons" (see, founding fathers & original intent!!) in exchange for loyalty to their country (see "patriotism") and all for which it stands!!! Give it up!! Or how about thinkers like yourself (see hyperbolic hypocrites) LEAVE and create your own, fascist nirvana?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Indy (February 01, 2010 1:33 pm ET)
          4  
          "single payer" was trying to address the 350 billion wasted on administrative cost dealing with the over 1300 different payment plans now being used. In other words what if you had to learn new traffic laws for each state you entered. Why not let private companies determine what green and red mean independent of any common grounds. Imagine how much it would cost to send a package across the country. That's what republicans want to keep in place and the democrats have already conceded. So lets do away with the socialist traffic laws.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (February 02, 2010 1:02 pm ET)
            1
          Actually, that is the problem with the adult debate (or lack thereof) in this country, egb. Most adults fail to understand the terms they use. And the right (such as yourself) fail to even offer any other alternatives.

          Socialism is when the government controls the means of production. England has socialized medicine. The VA is socialized medicine. This is when the doctors and nurses all work for the state. Single payer and socialized medicine are very different. Single payer is more like Medicare - the doctors do not work for the state, the coverage of the individual is paid for by the state. Do you see this difference?

          I am sorry your school failed to provide you with even the basic of civics lessons in order to grasp these concepts. They are simple. You seem confused and uncertain about what's going on. I fear you will not eventually understand. But, let me make it very simple for you. The options are to find a larger pool of people under one plan (whether that be a single-payer, government funded, or a hybrid) in order to bring down costs or to deny care to those without coverage. Which do you choose? Right now, we cover those without health insurance at the most costly level possible to the rest of us. We cover them through ERs, etc. This is the worst possible way to pay for the uninsured. The free market would dictate that we deny care to those who cannot afford it. Is this your alternative? Do you have any alternatives? Do you even understand the debate?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 01, 2010 12:23 am ET)
        6 1
        news corpse, i'm afraid that you are correct. ibelieve that as we approach NOV 2010 the shrill from the REPUBLICANS and their allies will get worse and worse before it gets better(if ever).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by woodymcbreairty8457 (January 30, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
         
      Crazy people like fatsos Morris & Limbaugh, who are among the same undignified and deranged mionority as Beck, should from this point forward be ignored by sane people and by the legitimate news media. They are like circus side show freaks, doing whatever they can to cause a scene,and, in their case, cause trouble . They don't have enough sanity & simple common decency to be respectful and tolerant of people who have different opinions. They are willing to lie, cheat, distort and in any other way the can, deceive people into believing their propaganda. They are a disgrace, and I don't understand why decent upstanding people are willing to get their hands and minds dirtied by the likes of Limbaugh, Morris & Beck, although I tend to think their "followers" are uneducated, ignorant, gullible misfits, unlike most of America.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Les Philling (January 30, 2010 4:30 pm ET)
      14 3
      Quite the catalog of audacity, audacity of nope.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by sambo (January 30, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
      13 6
      The audacity of right-wing media for calling someone
      a radical, they should be in jail along with Bush, Chaney and the rest of that cartel
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (January 30, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
      28 3
      Obama's election has proved as polarizing as the Bush SCOTUS appointment. I can prove. The Right would rather back an undereducated woman who cannot recall basic facts under the pressure of an interview with a TV personality than a highly educated articulate black man who was the head of the Harvard Law Review, Harvard being a school that Bush attended as well. Bush is an archetype elitist born into wealth and power. Obama was born poor an had to WORK every step of the way to become president. Horatio Alger lives! But of course, the Right calls Obama an elitist, while Bush was "one of us," unsubtle code words for racial identity.

      It all circles back to skin color, doesn't it?

      The Right has abandoned the issues (the benefits of healthcare reform vs. the drawbacks and costs) for hyperbole and character assassination (Obama is a Communist). Even Clinton got a fairer shake from the Right, and they impeached him. That is damn well saying something.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
      • Author by egb (January 31, 2010 2:15 pm ET)
        2 11
        Clinton was impeached for breaking the law -- perjury.

        Right hasn't abandoned the HC issues. They have submitted a number of bills all rejected by Reid and Pelosi. O refuses to consider the two biggest issues that would benefit people immediately: tort reform and interstate insurance purchase. In 4000 pages of bills, Obamacare has a Secretary who can make people's lives miserable and no one here cares about that. All the people a mmfa want is any HC bill irrespective of how it is implemented. Read the bills and defend the contents.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by congero6189599 (January 31, 2010 3:46 pm ET)
          4 2
          Thats the problem with debating an ideologue ,they don't produce facts they just repeat taliking points. me thinks you need to look up what high crimes and misdemeanors are. Anyway I posted this too you above it's also fitting here:
          http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/31/tv-soundoff-sunday-talkin_n_443488.html

          1. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - DEFICIT NEUTRAL BILL: "Do the American people believe that this almost 2,000 page bill won't add to the deficit?" [Rep. Eric Cantor, 10/29/2009]
          HOUSE BILL - DEFICIT NEUTRAL BILL: According to the Congressional Budget Office, the House bill costs $894 billion over 10 years and actually reduces the deficit by $30 billion and continues to reduce the deficit over the second 10 years.

          2. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - REDUCE COSTS OVER LONG TERM: "Nevertheless, House Republicans recognize the need to lower health care costs." [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), 9/9/09]

          HOUSE BILL - REDUCES COSTS OVER LONG TERM: Encourages payment reforms that can help lower costs. Requires the Department of Health and Human Services to establish specific benchmarks for expansion of the Accountable Care Organization, Payment Bundling, and Medical Home pilot programs. The bill will also slow the rate of growth of the Medicare program from 6.6% annually to 5.3%.

          3. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - POLICIES ACROSS STATE LINES: "Interstate competition allowing people to buy insurance across state lines." [Sen. John Thune (R-SD), 9/8/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - POLICIES ACROSS STATE LINES: Allows for the creation of State Health Insurance Compacts - permits states to enter into agreements to allow for the sale of insurance across state lines.

          4. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE REFORM: "Why not bring about reasonable restrictions and limits on medical malpractice claims to end the era of defensive medicine?" [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IA), 9/9/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - ENCOURAGES MALPRACTICE REFORM: The bill establishes a voluntary state incentives grant program to encourage states to implement "certificate of merit" and "early offer" alternatives to traditional medical malpractice litigation.

          5. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - HIGH RISK POOLS: "Senator McCain has a proposal sometimes called high-risk pools at the state level...These are efforts I think we can have bipartisan agreement on and deal with the question of pre-existing conditions." [Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA), 9/10/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - HIGH RISK POOLS: To fill the gap before the Exchange becomes available in 2013, the bill creates an insurance program with financial assistance for those uninsured for several months or denied policy due to preexisting conditions.

          6. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - ALLOW YOUNG PEOPLE TO STAY ON PARENTS' POLICIES: "Recognizes that not all high school and college graduates are able to find a job that offers health care coverage after graduation. By allowing dependents to remain on their parents' health policies up to the age of 25, the number of uninsured Americans could be reduced by up to 7 million." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - ALLOW YOUNG PEOPLE TO STAY ON PARENTS' POLICIES: The bill requires health plans to allow young people to remain on their parents' insurance policy until they turn 27.

          7. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - NO PUBLIC MONEY FOR ABORTION: "The American people will not stand for government-run insurance that uses taxpayer money to fund abortions in this country." [Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN), 10/16/2009]

          HOUSE BILL - NO PUBLIC MONEY FOR ABORTION: The bill prohibits abortion services from being made part of essential benefits package and prohibits federal funds from being used to pay for abortion (except in cases of rape, incest, and to save life of the woman).

          8. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - PROTECT SMALL BUSINESSES: "Helps employers offer health care coverage to their workers by reducing their administrative costs through a new small business tax credit." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - PROTECTS SMALL BUSINESSES: The bill exempts 86% of businesses from the requirement to provide coverage. Businesses with payrolls below $500,000 are exempt while firms with payrolls between $500,000 and $750,000 would pay a graduated penalty. Small businesses would also receive a tax credit that helps cover 50% of their health care expenses.

          9. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - PROMOTE JOB WELLNESS PROGRAMS: "Promotes prevention and wellness by giving employers and insurers greater flexibility to financially reward employees who seek to achieve or maintain a healthy weight, quit smoking, and manage chronic illnesses like diabetes." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - PROMOTE JOB WELLNESS PROGRAMS: The bill establishes a grant program to help small employers create or strengthen workplace wellness programs.

          10. REPUBLICANS ASKED FOR - DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM: "Uses new and innovative treatment programs to better coordinate care between health
          care providers, ensuring that those with chronic disease receive the care they need and do not continue to fall through the cracks." [Republican Health Solutions Group]

          HOUSE BILL - DELIVERY SYSTEM REFORM: The bill requires the Department of Health and Human Services to establish specific benchmarks for the expansion of the Accountable Care Organization, Payment Bundling, and Medical Home pilot programs.

          Report Abuse
        • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 01, 2010 12:27 am ET)
          5  
          egb,what planet are you living on? not this one if you really believe that cr@p.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (February 01, 2010 10:36 am ET)
          4 2
          Yes, Clinton was "impeached," which means "accused" or "indicted" by the House on the charges of perjury and obstruction of justice. He was not removed by the Senate which is the equivalent of a not guilty verdict on both charges. So, what's your point in mentioning that?

          The rest of your post is full of talking points, but very little facts to support them. Fail.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by CrashGordon (February 01, 2010 11:03 am ET)
          6 1
          I get so tired of hearing the same nonsense.

          As to tort reform, every credible study I've seen has concluded that its impact would be minimal. And to further the point, look at my home state of Texas. We've had tort reform since Bush was governor here and it's had no effect on health care costs here. None. What's more, as a medical professional I've seen my malpractice rates rise at the same steady rate as before tort reform.

          As to lifting interstate restrictions--that's just laughable. The same insurance companies operate in all fifty states. The only thing we could expect to see if interstate insurance purchases were allowed would be an increase in premiums. Like the credit card industry, when the insurance industry no longer has to comply with individual state regulations, they'll "headquarter" in whatever state will allow them the biggest loopholes, the weakest regulation and the highest rates.

          And Clinton was impeached for the cause. The Republicans knew it would come down to a party line vote and that they didn't have the votes, but they chose to tie up the Senate anyway. All at the urging of Tom Delay. What every happened to ole' Tom, anyway? Oh, right.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (February 01, 2010 11:55 am ET)
            6  
            And, as someone who works in insurance defense in Texas, I know that what you are saying is completely correct. Tort reform in Texas was for the insurance companies, not the doctors or the patients.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:32 pm ET)
          1  
          Sorry EGB you cannot simultaneously stand atop THAT argument while denying the crimes committed, both nationally and internationally, by the Bush/Cheney syndicate. Pick a path. Law and order prevails? Or your private form of anarchy?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wmg (January 30, 2010 4:53 pm ET)
         
      I saved the complete film of Obama's Q&A with the GOP. I want to revisit it again and again. It should be taught in every school in the land as an example of clear and concise debate. He looked like the only adult in the room. Petulant? Look in the mirror fox.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by elmo (January 30, 2010 4:53 pm ET)
         
      I hope they double down on this ridiculous rhetoric, it'll help that house of cards they built come down all that much faster...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by juliajayne1 (January 30, 2010 5:17 pm ET)
      12  
      For anybody who didn't see Obama at the Republican Q&A, this is the video. Quiet compelling stuff. You'll enjoy it, even though it's and hour and 7 minutes long.

      http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/obamagopqa/
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (January 30, 2010 6:11 pm ET)
        12 1
        It was quite the "teachable" moment for the nutjobs to have their lies, distortions, and talking points rebutted with logic, reason and facts.

        I might have to watch it again.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (January 30, 2010 6:20 pm ET)
          11 1
          All of those who responded to the poll that they trusted Fox more than any other outlet should be forced to sit and watch that whole thing, with a little box showing them how Fox (mis)handled covering it.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by juliajayne1 (January 30, 2010 7:25 pm ET)
          14  
          I have to say that I have renewed faith in the O man after watching that. And it is worth watching again. And besides bein entertained with him kicking a little butt and literally taking names, it was informative to our side too. He did a great job.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
          1  
          Agreed. Yet remember the words of Goethe: "A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still." This Repubic party will never change its collective mind, much less hear reasoned arguments. Their only focus is short-term political gain, destruction of the sitting President (= conspiracy to treason), and gaining personal power and enrichment!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by jannymassa31 (January 31, 2010 12:06 am ET)
         

      You can get full medical coverage at the lowest price from http://bit.ly/atGzeD
      Report Abuse
    • Author by TJ_rex (January 31, 2010 12:18 am ET)
      14 1
      Anyone who came away from that Q&A session thinking the Republicans have the slightest clue about what's going on in America should have their head examined.
      It's surrealistic to watch these incompetent and very confused individuals trying to respond to Obamas responses. I mean it was one lie after another. I hope this shows the 80% of people in this Country who haven't been brainwashed by the wing-nut party that they can't give these parasites another chance until they come to their senses.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dorkydan (January 31, 2010 2:00 pm ET)
          1
        ... and of course, you didn't mention ANY of Obama's continued lies. Saving 2 million jobs, in a time when we LOST 4 million jobs. And the Stimulus Package is working? Yeah, with 17.3% real unemployment in this country. Yeah ... working REAL WELL. And 140 banks CLOSED last year,
        and 14 MORE closed THIS YEAR ALREADY!! Yeah ... working REAL WELL!! Of
        course, his friends over at Goldman Sachs ...yeah, they're doing REAL well, with bonuses higher than almost ANYBODY in this country makes in a LIFETIME!! Yeah ... working real well ... for SOME people!!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Indy (February 01, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
        4  
        It's probably the same people that thought Steven Colbert would be an ideal host for President Bush's press dinner.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:45 pm ET)
          1  
          An exquisitely beautiful moment of satire in American politics. Pearls cast before swine: served as the blissfully, mindless, pigs ate crow!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
        1  
        My take away was the Repubic parties dedicated adherance to a unified, ideological, mis-information campaign. Awesome. Intractable. Treasonous.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ryansmash23 (January 31, 2010 1:46 am ET)
         
      You wanna know the truly scary thing is. This rebuttal will only make them come back even harder and say more crazy things. You need to understand one thing that sets Democrats and Republicans apart, the ability to feel shame...

      Don't be surprised if you hear Obama killed Jesus Christ as a headline on Fox
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jazzloversinc@yahoo.com (January 31, 2010 12:26 pm ET)
         
      I totally agree with Glenn Beck. The only thing I don't agree with him on is the wars and he's getting closer to being on the right track. If you notice, which I'm sure you do, he has been talking about the Fabian Socialists lately , George Bernard Shaw, the Webbs, HG Wells, although Wells wasn't a member for long. This is actually the elite brand of socialism that Obama is involved in, but there are also "upper crust" republicans that are Fabian Socialists ...Rockefellers, McCains etc...so...it's another example of the globalist agenda, and the False Left/ Right Paradigm.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (February 01, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
      1 6
      Lets see... the government is trying to MAKE people buy health insurance just to breath air. Huh, which one does that sound like, freedom or socialism?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ConstanceRifleII (February 01, 2010 2:57 pm ET)
        4 1
        Wow, dude, just quit now. I don't think you can top that. But I know you'll try.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
        1  
        Sorry seaweed; I truly am. You continue to be incapable of making a cogent point. But you keep swinging slugger; maybe one of these days the ball will accidentally strike the bat? Who knows... it could happen.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (February 02, 2010 1:05 pm ET)
        2 1
        "Lets see... the government is trying to MAKE people buy health insurance just to breath air." - seahawk

        See, this is why very little gets done in this country. Simple minds can actually be convinced of anything. Posters like seahawks never bring any facts or any relevance to any of their posts. They do not offer any insight or anything of substance. They just regurgitate what they have been spoonfed from Fox News and hate radio. And they think they have made an excellent point and walk away smiling. This is the failure of an educational system that does not teach even the most basic of civics to its young people.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by hamroad (February 01, 2010 3:13 pm ET)
      1  
      The overwhelming bulk of this rhetoric is classic, neo-con, projection and transference. It is intended to be malicious and to further deny the legitimacy of the sitting President of the United States, specifically, and everyone seen as "other" than conservative in sufficient measure to be included among their perception of the true and rightful Human race, generally.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by QwertyPoiu (February 02, 2010 12:51 am ET)
        1
      Bush 44 is the largest threat to any form of peace and liberty in the world today. First he increases spending on nuclear weapons by $5 Billion, then has a record-breaking $3.8 Trillion budget.

      The Welfare/Warfare state is healthy and running under O-Bomb-A.

      And no one ever mentions the fact that the december 25 bomber tried to attack the US because Barack I-Bomb-U sent missle attacks into Yemen--nobel in hand--december 17.

      Barry W. Me-Bomb-U has made it very clear; the only difference between the different regimes is a blue or red cape over the militarist empire.
      Report Abuse