About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Obama's prayer breakfast comments follow years of right-wing media "question[ing]" his faith, citizenship

February 04, 2010 2:12 pm ET — 44 Comments

During his February 4 speech at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Obama stated, "you can question my policies, but don't question my faith, or, for that matter, my citizenship." For years, conservative media have asked such questions, often falsely claiming or suggesting that Obama is a Muslim, smearing him over his church attendance and his relationship with Rev. Jeremiah Wright, and advancing various versions of the discredited myth that Obama has not produced a valid birth certificate, is not a natural-born U.S. citizen, and is not eligible to be president.

Obama calls out those who "question" his faith and citizenship rather than his policies

During his National Prayer Breakfast speech, Obama discussed how the "erosion of civility in the public square sows division and distrust among our citizen." He stated that "Civility also requires relearning how to disagree without being disagreeable," adding: "I am the first to confess I am not always right. Michelle will testify to that. But surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith, or, for that matter, my citizenship":

OBAMA: At times, it seems like we're unable to listen to one another; to have at once a serious and civil debate. And this erosion of civility in the public square sows division and distrust among our citizens. It poisons the well of public opinion. It leaves each side little room to negotiate with the other. It makes politics an all-or-nothing sport, where one side is either always right or always wrong when, in reality, neither side has a monopoly on truth. And then we lose sight of the children without food and the men without shelter and the families without health care.

Empowered by faith, consistently, prayerfully, we need to find our way back to civility. That begins with stepping out of our comfort zones in an effort to bridge divisions. We see that in many conservative pastors who are helping lead the way to fix our broken immigration system. It's not what would be expected from them, and yet they recognize, in those immigrant families, the face of God. We see that in the evangelical leaders who are rallying their congregations to protect our planet. We see it in the increasing recognition among progressives that government can't solve all of our problems, and that talking about values like responsible fatherhood and healthy marriage are integral to any anti-poverty agenda. Stretching out of our dogmas, our prescribed roles along the political spectrum, that can help us regain a sense of civility.

Civility also requires relearning how to disagree without being disagreeable; understanding, as President [Kennedy] said, that "civility is not a sign of weakness." Now, I am the first to confess I am not always right. Michelle will testify to that. But surely you can question my policies without questioning my faith, or, for that matter, my citizenship.

Right-wing media frequently push falsehood that Obama may not be a citizen

Media Matters for America has documented numerous instances in which conservative media have advanced the falsehood that Obama was not born in the United States or claimed that he has failed to sufficiently prove his citizenship. In fact, Obama posted his birth certificate on the Obama campaign's Fight the Smears website; the Hawaii Department of Health has confirmed that the birth certificate posted online by the Obama campaign is "a valid Hawaii state birth certificate"; FactCheck.org reported that they had "seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate" and determined that it is authentic; and Obama's birth was announced in contemporaneous editions of two Hawaii newspapers.

Examples of right-wing media advancing citizenship conspiracy theories include:

Right-wing media attack Obama over his faith

Numerous right-wing media figures have repeatedly falsely claimed or suggested that Obama is a Muslim or attended a madrassa as a child:

Several conservative media figures have also criticized Obama for his church attendance:

The conservative media - particularly Fox News' Sean Hannity - have frequently used Obama's relationship with Wright or his attendance at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, where Wright previously was the pastor, to attack Obama:

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 2:25 pm ET)
      16 2
      A valiant noble effort President Obama. You are absolutely correct, your personal faith is none of our business. And the questions regarding your citizenship have already been resolved.

      However, those who continue these lines of attacks will not let up. They will just dig in their heels and turn it around and play the victim, whining that you should worry about governing and not pick on poor talk show hosts. They live for this kind of stuff for it just gives them more material, sadly.

      But you are correct, perhaps some of your words will resonate to the public, the fair minded public. I hope so.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Max Credits (February 04, 2010 2:31 pm ET)
        14 1
        Sadly, a clear majority of Republicans disagree with you.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 2:34 pm ET)
          11 1
          I am sure there are millions of people in this country who disagree with me, based on the numbers who support the people who engage in these attacks against Obama.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Max Credits (February 04, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
            12 1
            Actually, Obama won in a landslide, so we can rest easy regarding the overall electorate's view. But, again, it's really disturbing to know that a majority of Republicans question the President's citizenship, showing a complete and total disregard for the facts.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 2:46 pm ET)
              10 2
              No argument. It's disturbing when anyone shows a complete disregard for the facts and opts for pure partisan contempt towards someone they don't like or agree with politically.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Max Credits (February 04, 2010 2:50 pm ET)
                4 6
                Your implication appears to be that I am somehow showing a complete disregard for the facts. If so, how have I done this?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 2:57 pm ET)
                  3 6
                  Are you trying to start some ridiculous argument based solely on your paranoia, because I am not interested.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 3:00 pm ET)
                  2 6
                  Oh, and just so you know, I don't hide behind whimpering implications, if I thought you were disregarding some fact here I would say it outright.

                  So yes, you're paranoid, and that is no implication. It appears to be a fact.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Max Credits (February 04, 2010 3:34 pm ET)
                    3 3
                    Relax, it was your poorly constructed sentence in which incorrectly use the "and" that led to my question. I'm happy to agree with you on this item and I'm glad you hold this minority view within the GOP.

                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 3:38 pm ET)
                      3 5
                      I will gladly take full responsibility for your inability to comprehend a compound sentence, it was completely my fault, not yours in any way. Forgive me, based on our previous conversations, I should have known better.

                      See Spot run. No promises or anything, but I will try and dumb down sentence structure just for you in the future.

                      Once again, I apologize.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Max Credits (February 04, 2010 3:49 pm ET)
                        3 2
                        Hey, your inability to man up and tell me directly that you think I'm somehow showing a complete disregard for the facts by pointing to the FACT that this is majority view of the GOP and not an overriding view of the American electorate.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 3:51 pm ET)
                          1 7
                          You go with whatever those pesky little voices inside your head are telling you.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by Max Credits (February 04, 2010 3:55 pm ET)
                            4  
                            You keep on with the 'ah shucks, too bad there's nothing we can do about it' shoulder shrugging. That's sure to get your GOP in order.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by Tbone Slickens (February 05, 2010 8:31 am ET)
                                3
                              Don't if you've been paying attention since the last few rounds of elections...

                              I think the GOP has turned the ship and is full steam ahead for Nov mid terms. We'll see what the American electorate has to say then.

                              PS
                              It ain't look'n good for your side. I would "rest easy" if I were you though.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by Max Credits (February 05, 2010 10:08 am ET)
                                2  
                                I don't have a side. Frankly, if righting the GOP's ship entails successful fear mongering of the populous, we all lose.
                                Report Abuse
          • Author by BISHAMON (February 05, 2010 12:32 am ET)
            2  
            An embarrassingly large number of Republicans believe President Obama is a Muslim. A sizable number even think he is "the devil" -- and of course there is nothing he can do or say to persuade them otherwise. The silence of the Roman Catholic hierarchy on these false beliefs among Catholics is very striking, I think. (Then again, they have not exactly covered themselves in glory for quite some time now, have they?)
            Report Abuse
      • Author by the Grey Path (February 04, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
        11  
        There shall be no religious test to hold public office.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (February 04, 2010 2:29 pm ET)
      12 3
      As I've repeatedly said, I totally agree with what Obama said.

      The nonsense that comes from the right, the personal attacks that have nothing to do with his actual behavior, the distortions and lies and omission of relevant fact, they all poison our national discourse. Smearing him based upon false stories about his citizenship or his faith is toxic to the debate we should be having on topics important to our nation. We waste too much time debunking these myths and fail to then address the very important issues.

      And this IS the fault of those on the right. They don't want to discuss the issues and the potential solutions to our nation's problems, because they don't have solutions, because their previous attempts to solve problems failed, because they believe (wrongly) that government is the problem! They would rather do anything other than try to resolve issues our country is facing. They don't care about the fact that it not only saves them from having their shortcomings exposed, but it also harms our nation. If it's a good result for them, that's all they seem to care about!

      That's why we have trolls who post to derail threads too. They don't want us to actually discuss the actual topic - they want to deter us because no good (for them) will come from us focusing in on the problem areas.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 04, 2010 2:51 pm ET)
        8 1
        I wish I could rec your post 1,000 times.

        I often ask myself, why would someone who believes government is the problem want to make laws and/or live in a country in which they think that government is the problem and not be willing to offer workable solutions to the problem(s)?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by foghornleghorn (February 04, 2010 3:52 pm ET)
          1  
          Or, why would someone believe government is the problem when the government is us?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
            1 3
            "Us" as in us, who are held accountable for our own finances, spend our own money and are forced to cut expenses when our revenues can't support them. Or "Us" as in them, who are held to very little accountability for our country's finances, spend somebody else's money and refuse to cut expenses when revenues can't support them.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by scubcap647 (February 04, 2010 4:09 pm ET)
            5  
            If they feel as if government is the problem, then why are they always seeking re-election. Why would they want to work in a place that they believe causes more problems than it solves? And if that's the case then why are they so opposed to any changes to the status quo? If they don't have a viable solution, then what do they expect to happen? Do they expect everyone to just wait for the mythical "free market" to work everything out?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 4:13 pm ET)
              4 2
              I will agree with you that for Republicans to just sit around and obstruct and complain is weak and pathetic. We deserve to hear specifics. If they want to cut spending, which they should, then they should tell us exactly the how, what and where. Not just bumpersticker it for their party loyalists. So if they're not willing to do that, then get out of the way and let Obama and the Democrats do it their way. Problem with that is they can't seem to get anything accomplished either. An entire year with a super majority and no health care bill, their number one priority. Ineffectiveness seems to be the path for all of them lately.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by scubcap647 (February 04, 2010 5:47 pm ET)
                2 1
                I agree with you on all points except for the super majority part. With Lieberman letting it be known that he would openly oppose the Democrats and a few conservative Dems following his lead, the super majority wasn't truly there. But every other point is well taken. If the GOP wants to propose spending cuts then they should do just that and support their proposals with numbers. Maybe then a real discussion on how to proceed can happen and real change can take place.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by angels4light (February 05, 2010 1:52 pm ET)
                   
                It would have required 60 Senators who were of the Democratic party to make a supermajority. As it was, there were only I think 58 identified as Democratic, 2 as "independent" and at the time 40 Republicans.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (February 04, 2010 3:54 pm ET)
          5 8
          Thanks, but notice that I have two stalkers who downrated me.

          I wonder who ONE of them is - we certainly know who the other one is. One is someone who hates that I pointed out that troll posts on this site that derail threads are similar to the very things that Obama objects to! It's clear I hit too close to the bone for some posters. Too bad, so sad. It's clear that Obama is really problematic for those on the right too, which is why they attack him so vociferously.

          The Republicans who want to starve the beast realize that the only way to change any organization is from the inside. That's why they participate in an entity that they think is heading in the wrong direction - the only way to change that is to be inside and grab the steering wheel. They have been working to wound the government for decades. That's why they do stuff like pass the Medicare drug bill after misleading everyone about the cost, without ever making any plans to pay for it!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 4:22 pm ET)
            3 4
            Apparently you have four stalkers.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
            2 4
            6 and counting. I'd get a guard dog.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by southerngal (February 04, 2010 6:37 pm ET)
            2 4
            7 and going strong. I'd get a BIG guard dog.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (February 05, 2010 2:08 pm ET)
              1  
              So, what is that? 3 different posters, each with 3 different sockpuppet identities?

              And you think that's significant?

              No one else does. But it does show the powerful hold your personal animus towards me has on you!
              Report Abuse
    • Author by Dem02020 (February 04, 2010 3:10 pm ET)
      2 10

      I'm sorry, but being sensitive to criticism and insults (however untrue and ridiculous) and being defensive, are not personal virtues or political strengths, but are just the opposite.

      And in our political leaders, they are even worse, they are distractions and play right into the plans of those who hurl personal and political insults in these type of matters, plans that intend to bedevil and distract and make the person defensive, even intimidate them.

      Consider President Lincoln for a moment, and what must have been a level of hateful comments and personal and political insults that would make today's noise sound almost congenial, and what was a political mood that wasn't merely "uncivil" or impolite, it was murderous and led to war...

      What quotes do we have of President Lincoln responding to insults or "incivility", to being defensive about the things said against him personally and against his policies, to being sensitive about criticism however ridiculous or crazy?

      Is that our impression of President Lincoln, now or even back then, as a man who whined and complained about "incivility", and wasted his time responding to such noise, and was distracted from the all-important work of administering our government?

      Of course not, the man was far more solid and substantial than that, and he was not distracted by such stuff, and he didn't take his eye off the ball or was intimidated from his job in the least, and is forever remembered by us and the world as perhaps our most effective and greatest President.

      He knew, as I said, that being defensive and sensitive to criticism, and complaining about "incivility", are not personal virtues or political strengths, and are instead just the opposite and even worse.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by vhw28672478 (February 04, 2010 3:41 pm ET)
        3 2
        Gop is a joke
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (February 04, 2010 4:25 pm ET)
        6 2
        A few remarks at the prayer breakfast means Obama is "distracted" and has his "eye off the ball?" Alrighty.

        Another thing to keep in mind... TV, radio and internet didn't exist in Lincoln's time. You have no idea whatsoever how Lincoln would have responded to a far-reaching, instantaneous, 24-hour-a-day smear machine that was determined to bring him down.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by dogbreath (February 04, 2010 7:44 pm ET)
          4  
          Lincoln never have been a member of the the Republican party today. He was far to thoughtful, considerate and even-tempered for the modern-day Republican party. His ideas couldn't have been brought down into 15 second sound bites. He certainly took his share of abuse, but he, himself, always remained civil and even-tempered (despite his private battle with depression). Beck would have undoubtedly called Lincoln a socialist for trying to take down those capitalists slave-holders in the South. Hannity would have blasted him for going against his military commanders. Rush would have called him the "original gorilla," and his followers would just have blindly accepted it at truth.

          In regards to Bush, I think that he never really commented on the uncivility that surrounded him because, in all honesty, I don't think he was ever really aware of it. He lived in a bubble, even more so than most presidents. Think of the "town hall meetings" during the administration - full of Bush supporters. The questions planted in the White House by Jeff Gannon and the like and the basic muzzling of journalists like Helen Thomas who might ask "hard" questions. When did Bush really ever get out amoung the people? It was always control, always contrived.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by NoNothing (February 04, 2010 4:28 pm ET)
        4 5
        I totally agree. How much hatred and crap did GWB take without whimpering about it?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Marker (February 04, 2010 5:53 pm ET)
          2 2
          Bush didn't take any, he was too stupid to realize everyone was laughing at him.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by tman418 (February 04, 2010 7:38 pm ET)
        3  
        I don't think calling out someone based on saying things that are untrue is a vice.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by The New Pilgrims (February 05, 2010 4:03 pm ET)
          1  
          Exactly. Folks are entitled to their own opinions, not to their own facts. Pointing this out is not a sign of weakness.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (February 04, 2010 4:05 pm ET)
      7  
      Obama's tone was appropriate to the event, but I was still glad to see him basically say to all the sociopathic Christianists on Fox News and talk radio, "STFU about my faith for once, and start worrying about your own."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MRF (February 04, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
      3 2
      When you wear your faith on your sleeve al la Bush it becomes a cheap commodity. It's nice to finally have a Prez who is secure in his personal faith.

      What did Bush do for 8 yrs when God told him to invade Iraq and Jesus is my favorite philosopher.

      BTW Just look at Hannity and O'Reilly's own scandle ridden diocese, yet they both go on about Wright who is chump change compared to this.

      http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/movable_type/2003_archives/000020.html
      Report Abuse