About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: Palin repeats falsehood that Alaska produces "20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy"

February 07, 2010 4:55 pm ET — 18 Comments

During an interview with Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace, Fox News contributor Sarah Palin falsely claimed that "20 percent of the US domestic supply of energy" comes from Alaska. In fact, according to the most recent data available from the Energy Information Administration, Alaska accounts for no more than 2.9 percent of total domestic energy production.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the February 7 edition of Fox News Sunday:

CHRIS WALLACE (HOST): Would you say you're more knowledgeable about domestic and foreign affairs now than you were two years ago?

PALIN: Well, I would hope so. Yes, I am. Two years ago, my engagement was on the state of Alaska, largest, most diverse state in the union. 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy coming from our state, desiring to and working towards ramping up that domestic energy production. That was my focus and now of course my focus has been enlarged. So I sure as heck better be more astute on these current events, national issues than I was two years ago.

Fact: In 2005, Alaska produced only 3.5 percent of U.S. domestic energy production

Responding to Palin's September 2008 statement that Alaska "produces nearly 20 percent of the U.S. domestic supply of energy," FactCheck.org wrote:

It's simply untrue that Alaska produces anything close to 20 percent of the U.S. "energy supply," a term that is generally defined as energy consumed. That category includes power produced in the U.S. by nuclear, coal, hydroelectric dams and other means - as well as all the oil imported into the country.

Palin would have been correct to say that Alaska produces just over 14 percent of all the oil produced in the U.S., leaving out imports and leaving out other forms of power. According to the federal government's Energy Information Administration, Alaskan wells produced 263.6 million barrels of oil in 2007, or 14.3 percent of the total U.S. production of 1.8 billion barrels.

But Alaskan production accounts for only 4.8 percent of all the crude oil and petroleum products supplied to the U.S. in 2007, counting both domestic production and imports from other nations. According to EIA, the total supply was just over 5.5 billion barrels in 2007.

Furthermore, Palin said "energy," not "oil," so she was actually much further off the mark. According to EIA, Alaska actually produced 2,417.1 trillion BTUs [British Thermal Units] of energy in 2005, the last year for which full state numbers are available. That's equal to just 3.5 percent of the country's domestic energy production.

And according to EIA analyst Paul Hess, that would calculate to only "2.4 percent of the 100,368.6 trillion BTUs the U.S. consumes."

Palin didn't make clear whether she was talking about Alaska's share of all the energy produced in the U.S. or all the energy consumed here. Either way, she was wrong.

Fact: As of 2007, Alaska's share of U.S. energy production declined to 2.9 percent

According to the Energy Information Administration, the state of Alaska produced 2,052 trillion BTUs of energy in 2007, 2.9 percent of total U.S. production. Further, the EIA calculated that Alaska ranked 11th in the country in total energy production.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by scanlontodd9871 (February 07, 2010 5:17 pm ET)
      9 1
      I guess with all the fuzzy math that the reich wingers are trying to justify the budget and anything else. 3.5 is actually real close to that number.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (February 07, 2010 5:22 pm ET)
      9  
      But how long was that pearl necklace she wearing? That's really all I care about because I get all my news from WaPo ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (February 07, 2010 8:44 pm ET)
      5  
      "I reject your reality, and substitute my own."
      -Adam Savage
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (February 07, 2010 9:10 pm ET)
        3  
        Yes, but those guys just like to blow things up. They have no illusions about "leading the country". They're smarter that that. :)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (February 07, 2010 10:00 pm ET)
      3  
      You can't expect to know very much about anything if you were in the habit of sending your aides to meetings with your state's legislators. Even the republican legislators in AK were peeved at Palin for skipping meetings and send her aides in her place.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (February 07, 2010 11:33 pm ET)
        6
      I hope you all can forgive me if I say I don't give a flying F**K
      what Sarah Palin says. My SAINTS won the Super Bowl, 31-17! We
      kicked A**S! For the next few days or even weeks I will be riding on a cloud of pride for these wonderful guys. In the midst of all this SWILL I have to read, I take comfort that there ARE decent and hard-working people in the world. NONE of them are in politics.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Onyxcat (February 08, 2010 8:08 am ET)
        2  
        AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! The Saints. Cool win. But the real world seeps into the conversation. And former Governor Palin apparently puts her foot in her mouth more times than possible. Just love them fact checkers. Wish they were promoted more often on all new networks.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (February 08, 2010 10:00 am ET)
            2
          "The REAL world"? You must be kidding! The world now is like "Lost".
          Science-Fiction here, mystical spirituality there, changing loyalties, jumps into complete nonsense, and unbelievable characters. Palin is the leader of "The Others".
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MiG (February 07, 2010 11:36 pm ET)
         
      Well, according to the University of Oh-I-Forgot-Where, Alaska provides about 140% of the total energy consumption. This means that Sarah Palin is 700% correct.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by big2xrube6146 (February 08, 2010 9:57 am ET)
         
      Just shows that she is dummer than a pile of rocks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (February 08, 2010 10:19 am ET)
         
      I love Palin/O'Reilly/Teabagger math!

      Makes it a tad more difficult to scream against the teachers unions and to argue for the elimination of the Department of Education.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Rodrian Roadeye (February 08, 2010 12:08 pm ET)
        4
      Liar, liar, pants on fire...er...skirts on fire...damn she's hot though ain't she? LOL
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bobklahn (February 08, 2010 1:06 pm ET)
        1  
        No, she really isn't.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 08, 2010 1:31 pm ET)
        3  
        Her looks shouldn't be something we talk about like you did here.

        It's not funny. We should talk about her behavior, not things she (or anyone else) don't control, like her beauty (or lack of same).
        Report Abuse
    • Author by faithfuldem (February 08, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
         
      she should know the truth, should'nt she?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MassachusettsLiberalinDC (February 08, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
         
      I don't think she is lying, I think she is once again proving that she has no grasp of the simple facts. Alaska has had about 20% of proven oil reserves over the last decade or so. She once heard that fact but didn't write it on her palm so she got the wording wrong. Correct wording has never been her strong suit.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by only_myschly3567 (February 09, 2010 8:35 am ET)
         
      Well, if Alaska only supplied 2% then 20% would be quite a big lie. But 2.9% to 20% is along the lines of "accepted/mandatory lie" among the 21st century conservative movement in the US.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.