About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox hosts GOP candidate who assaulted detainee to criticize Obama's handling of bombing suspect

February 08, 2010 10:36 am ET — 43 Comments

Fox & Friends' Brian Kilmeade hosted Lt. Col. Allen West, a Republican congressional candidate in Florida, to criticize the Obama administration for its handling of Northwest Airlines bombing suspect Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab without noting that West is a Republican candidate. Moreover, despite noting that West's "personal enhanced interrogation tactic" got him "essentially a forced retirement" from the Army, Kilmeade did not report that West's resignation came after he admitted that he "threatened to kill" an Iraqi detainee in his custody, that "four of his soldiers from the 220th Field Artillery Battalion beat the detainee on the head and body," and that, according to military prosecutors, he "followed up on that threat" to kill the detainee by shooting a pistol near his head.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Fox & Friends hosts West to criticize Obama administration without noting he's a GOP congressional candidate

Kilmeade introduced West as a congressional candidate in Florida, did not note he is a Republican.Introducing West, Kilmeade said that West is "running for Congress in the 22nd congressional district here in Florida." At no point during the segment did Kilmeade note that West is a Republican congressional candidate

West criticized Obama administration's handling of Christmas Day bombing attempt. During the segment, West said, "When I look at what's going on right now with the Nigerian terrorist, it's almost like a Greek tragedy of epic proportion." West further stated that the Obama administration has "established a very dangerous paradigm with this Mirandizing" of terror suspects, "because now they're going to continue to come with more and more attacks, because we're -- they're coming here, and we're giving them lawyers." 

Kilmeade did not note that West reportedly resigned from the Army "after pleading guilty to assaulting an Iraqi detainee during interrogation"

Kilmeade did not note circumstances of West's "forced retirement." Introducing the segment, Kilmeade said of West: "One of the reasons you're such a great guest is because your personal enhanced interrogation tactic got you essentially a forced retirement and saved a lot of lives in Iraq." 

West reportedly resigned "after pleading guilty to assaulting an Iraqi detainee during interrogation."According to a December 13, 2003, CNN.com report, West admitted that he "threatened to kill" an Iraqi detainee in his custody, that he watched as "four of his soldiers from the 220th Field Artillery Battalion beat the detainee on the head and body," and that, according to military prosecutors, he "followed up on that threat" to kill the detainee by shooting a pistol near his head. A December 14, 2003, Boston Globe article further noted that a "disciplinary proceeding found that the actions by ... West were serious enough to 'merit a court-martial.' " From the Globe article:

An American officer has been stripped of his command after pleading guilty to assaulting an Iraqi detainee during interrogation, the military announced yesterday. A disciplinary proceeding found that the actions by Lieutenant Colonel Allen West were serious enough to "merit a court-martial." But the military said in a statement that mitigating circumstances -- specifically, the "stressful environment" of combat -- and West's distinguished service record prompted the Army to instead relieve West of his command, fine him $5,000, and order him back to the United States, where he will be allowed to retire.

"Frustration and anger overcame his professional ethics and personal values, and he performed what he knew to be illegal and immoral acts," said the statement issued by the Army's Fourth Infantry Division.

During a closed-door tribunal Friday in the town of Tikrit, West was found guilty of three counts of aggravated assault and a single count of communicating a threat. The ruling was issued after West pleaded guilty to misconduct.

He is the most senior officer to receive disciplinary action since the start of the war. West served as a battalion commander with the Fourth Infantry Division and was in charge of about 800 soldiers operating in one of the most dangerous regions in Iraq. For the past few months, he has been confined to the division's base in Tikrit.

The military said that during an interrogation of an Iraqi police officer Aug. 20 near the village of Taji, north of Baghdad, West fired his pistol near the head of the prisoner, threatened to kill him, and allowed his troops to beat the man. The detainee, Yahya Jhodri Hamoodi, was suspected of having knowledge of a planned attack on US troops in the Sunni Triangle, the region north and west of Baghdad that has been a hotbed of anti-US resistance. Scores of soldiers have been killed or wounded in bomb, rocket, and small-arms ambushes in the area.

West acknowledged last month before a military tribunal that his actions were wrong, but said that at the time of the incident he believed he was protecting the lives of his troops. "If it's about the lives of my men and their safety, I'd go through hell with a gasoline can," West said during the earlier proceeding.

The disciplinary action against West was ordered by General Raymond Odierno, commander of the Fourth Infantry Division.
The military said that through his actions against the detainee, West "disobeyed laws, ignored orders ... and mortgaged future discipline in his unit. Without discipline, there is no trust, no cohesion, and no higher purpose for which we fight."

But the military also stated, "while his crimes merit a court-martial, mitigating factors were considered, including the stressful environment  ...  and Lieutenant Colonel West's record as an officer and commander."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Midnight Kevin (February 08, 2010 11:18 am ET)
      5 2
      Of course they had this guy on... they want to beat prisoners.
      ----------------------------------
      The Midnight Review
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Tavadon777 (February 08, 2010 11:22 am ET)
      6 1
      While i was in Iraq, I was a prison guard and I went through all these briefings about not abusing the detainees, we were told stories of past offenses and I remember hearing this story. We all were stressed and frustrated we worked 12 hours a day 6 days a week, guarding men who wanted to kill us and outnumbered us 10-1, but we never ever abused them. This man deserves jail time not a congressional seat.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by everettbme (February 08, 2010 11:23 am ET)
      4 1
      Isn't it pretty much a given that if a candidate is on Fox, said candidate is a republican?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jediknight65 (February 08, 2010 11:26 am ET)
      6 3
      and now fox is home to torturers'. well done boys and girls
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captain_mike (February 08, 2010 11:43 am ET)
      6 1
      "Frustration and anger overcame his professional ethics and personal values, and he performed what he knew to be illegal and immoral acts," said the statement issued by the Army's Fourth Infantry Division.


      Yeah, right. This is a guy who should be given a job in Congress. He'll fit right in, I suppose.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (February 08, 2010 12:51 pm ET)
      1 2
      I don't think they need to go into all the details. If they disclosed that his own techniques got him forced out of the military that good enough for me. I do wonder though why they would bring such a person on to comment on detainee treatment.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 08, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
        2  
        Saying he was forced to retire and that he saved a lot of lives isn't equivalent to

        "Frustration and anger overcame his professional ethics and personal values, and he performed what he knew to be illegal and immoral acts."

        One says he was fired for politically correct reasons. The other says that he was fired for good cause, and barely escaped being court-martialed!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by overmars jr. (February 08, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
      3 1
      Unbelievable. Seriously, right up there among the worst journalistic breaches they've ever committed. Holy sweet Moses on a schooner, the nerve of these people! The utter contempt they have for the public good! AGH!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bilbo_dies (February 08, 2010 8:18 pm ET)
        2  
        But; you just don't understand.

        This is the kind of guy that Fox wants to be elected to congress.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MiG (February 08, 2010 1:07 pm ET)
      2 1
      West further stated that the Obama administration has "established a very dangerous paradigm with this Mirandizing" of terror suspects, "because now they're going to continue to come with more and more attacks, because we're -- they're coming here, and we're giving them lawyers."

      That doesn't make sense. West is claiming that someone would be more likely to attempt a suicide attack because he/she would have the right to remain silent, should their terror attempt fail? Can someone explain that?
      But the military also stated, "while his crimes merit a court-martial, mitigating factors were considered, including the stressful environment ... and Lieutenant Colonel West's record as an officer and commander."

      I would think that any war zone is a stressful environment so that is an incredibly lame excuse for dismissing a court-martial prosecution. West should have been prosecuted and should have received the proper sentencing.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (February 08, 2010 5:20 pm ET)
        3 1
        He was spared a court-martial because he was a senior officer and nothing more.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 08, 2010 5:58 pm ET)
        2  
        Detainees in military custody can refuse to talk.

        Alleged terrorists can refuse to talk both before and after they're given Miranda warnings. As did Abdulmutallab.

        The Lt Col was punished, pretty severely, by being forced to retire. I wouldn't object to him being punished more, but he was punished, including a financial penalty.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (February 08, 2010 1:15 pm ET)
      6 2
      So, this guy tortured a detainee, and was forced out of the military because his offense was so egregious, and FoxNews thinks that he's a qualified person to comment on how to interrogate someone? Wow.

      Further evidence they're not a legit news organization.

      And for them to attempt to further this guy's political career is even worse. That's not the role of the media. They have a responsibility to acknowledge this guy's campaign, just like they need to tell us when someone might have a conflict of interest!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jonpin (February 08, 2010 1:55 pm ET)
      3 2
      I also like how it's just assumed without justification that these actions "saved a lot of lives in Iraq."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fire111 (February 08, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
      2 14
      Lt Col Allen West is an inspiring American hero and exactly the type of leader we need in Congress, and indeed the type of leader we need in the Whitehouse....instead of the naive, noodle-spined, pacifist cowards running this country now. And THAT assumes that they're "only" naive cowards and not arrogant, subversive treasoners. In the wake of the 911 trial process and the idiotic handling of the crotch-bomber, I'm beginning to wonder which is the case.

      Sorry....was that too harsh? Tough.

      The fact that islamic terrorists and their state sponsors hate us and Israel, and have done so since the rightful re-establishment of Israel as a nation, shouldn't be too darn difficult to figure out. Our so-called "friends" among islamic states are, in many cases, playing both sides of the street, and anyone who can't see that is blind. Lt Col West has it very well figured out, and knows EXACTLY...from the issues of Israel's security to energy independence to national security to the war on terror...what the approach of the United States should be to challenges in that region.

      The sooner this reality of islamic hatred toward Israel and the US sinks into the heads of liberals...the sooner America can engage nations in that region for ALL the right reasons. And from a position of full energy independence. I am all for diplomatic engagement and humanitarian assistance to islamic nations, to the extent they are willing to accept it. But Israel's security ABSOLUTELY comes first and should never, ever be abandoned. Lt Col West gets it, Barack Obama and his cast of sophmoric ametuers (or worse) don't.

      Now....had Obama perhaps proposed some kind of energy independence "Marshall Plan", one that also created domestic "green jobs", which I also am happy to support, instead of that convoluted joke of a healthcare plan he outsourced to connivers like Reid and Pelosi...then he'd only have to fire the stunningly incompetant Eric Holder to reclaim the "centrist, post-partisan" position he fraudulently campaigned on, courtesy of his "finger in the wind" czar, David Axelrod.

      But he is now digging in his heels and has clearly shown his hand. Us "evil" Conservatives spotted it two years ago.

      As it stands, I will happily and energetically support Lt Col Allen West in his run for Congress, and I live 3000 miles away from his district. In addition to his stellar positions on the above mentioned issues, he is ardently opposed to Roe v Wade and the slaughter of the unborn...now totaling 45 million since 1973. That number is equal to a 911 attack, occuring daily, for 41 years straight. Equal to over 7 times the lives lost in Nazi concentration camps. And WE'RE the extremists??? Unbelievable.

      As for Media Matters?

      Please enjoy the freedom of the press you have, thanks largely to the sacrifices of men and women like Lt Col Allen West. The mullahs in Teheran and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would offer you nor their own citizens any such freedom.

      And by all means, continue your liberal rants and your whining. It will cement the absolute steam-rolling about to take place in November.

      Okay liberals....this is my first and last post, so fire at will with your water pistols. Assuming your moderator doesn't mind an opposing view. You know...for fairness & balance? :-)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by calijohn (February 08, 2010 4:17 pm ET)
        8 3
        and i shall exercise my freedom to comment that you represent all that is wrong with this country - the cowboy mentality of george bush and all the other evangelical/corporatist nutcases out there.
        you didn't, by chance, graduate from regent university did you? that would certainly be the icing on the cake.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (February 08, 2010 4:23 pm ET)
        5 3
        i will speak for myself on this one.....

        while i applaud the col. service....i cannot applaud him threatening to kill a prisoner and then allow his to get beaten to death while the col stand by and watch.

        his behavior in that instance is indefensible and unexcusable. you are condoning torture and vigilante justice in its extreme.

        i hope you don't have any enemies that would see what you have written because you just gave them a perfect excuse to have you beaten and killed for any reason they want.

        idk what country you were raised in......but enhanced interrogation no matter how you slice it, is torture. and it is illegal. try to pass it off, it wont work.

        our soldiers die to defend our laws and our constitution. that includes no torture, in any form.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (February 08, 2010 4:28 pm ET)
        2 2
        and its nice to see that you have the stones to actually try and debate people here instead of throwing bricks.

        real classy
        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (February 08, 2010 5:00 pm ET)
        7 2
        Lt Col Allen West is an inspiring American hero and exactly the type of leader we need in Congress, and indeed the type of leader we need in the Whitehouse....instead of the naive, noodle-spined, pacifist cowards running this country now. And THAT assumes that they're "only" naive cowards and not arrogant, subversive treasoners. In the wake of the 911 trial process and the idiotic handling of the crotch-bomber, I'm beginning to wonder which is the case.
        Well I will counter that opinion with my own. Lt. Col Allen West is the naive coward here. His theories have been disproven. You cannot beat people into confessions. His dubious claim that his actions "saved lives" is not backed up by any evidence other than his mere assertion. Sorry, but that's not enough. Lt. Col. West disgraced the uniform he wore by his actions and I am glad he was unceremoniously kicked out of the military.

        Sorry....was that too harsh? Tough.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bobklahn (February 09, 2010 12:23 pm ET)
             
          He didn't make the claim that he saved lives, Kilmeade did. Saying that stress caused him to do what he did is an admission it was wrong, whether he realizes it or not.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Tavadon777 (February 09, 2010 12:48 pm ET)
               
            By not correcting Kilmeade he also makes the claim he saved lives, If somehow told the world that I saved lives by doing something I thought was wrong then I would correct them.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (February 09, 2010 6:15 pm ET)
                 
              That is true. Thank you for mentioning that. I also remember at the time this happened people tried to defend West's actions by making the claim that the intelligence gathered saved lives. As I also remember it, I looked up to see if that could be substantiated, but to no avail. I have never seen West attempt to rebut that claim at any point - and after being given many opportunities to do so.

              I will amend my wording in the future as I do not specifically recall West making the claim, but I will note the circumstances more accurately.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (February 08, 2010 5:04 pm ET)
        8 2
        First of all LTC West is not a hero, but a war criminal and a disgrace to the uniform which he wore. If he had been a junior officer or an enlisted soldier, he would have been given a court martial and thrown in military prison. The 9/11 trial process and the "crotch-bomber" were and are being treated in accordance with our laws and customs and therefore are honorable.

        The FACT is there was no "rightful re-establishment" of Israel as a country. Israel had NEVER existed as a country before 1948 and was established through terrorism and was established against UN resolution. Isreal has illegally occupied Palestinian and Arab lands for over 40 years, again against UN resolutions. What gives Israel the right to have a country and deny the Palestinians the same right? Most of the hatred from the Islamic community comes not from a hate of our way of life, but from the perceived double standard we have established when it comes to Israel and the Arab communities.

        Energy policy and Healthcare policy are two different issues and I have no idea why you are trying to compare the two. Eric Holder has not shown any incompetance, but rather has done what the DOJ should do and that is to follow the law and not be the legal advisor to the President. David Axelrod is the political advisor to the President like Karl Rove was to President Bush and is not a "czar"

        Your devisive statements is what is wrong with our country today. It was not so long ago when ANY criticism of President Bush was treated as almost being treasonous. You need to get over the fact that the majority of the population rejected your limited world view and "conservatism" and will reject it again.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (February 08, 2010 5:06 pm ET)
        4 3
        The fact that islamic terrorists and their state sponsors hate us and Israel,
        Who do you think is Al-Qaeda's "state sponsor"? Do you have any evidence this time, or are you so naive as to advocate going to war again without any credible evidence?
        ...and have done so since the rightful re-establishment of Israel as a nation, shouldn't be too darn difficult to figure out.
        Whether it is "rightful" is still open for debate. Glad to see you've put the issue to bed with your assertion.
        Our so-called "friends" among islamic states are, in many cases, playing both sides of the street, and anyone who can't see that is blind.
        You seem to presume our President does not know this...
        Lt Col West has it very well figured out, and knows EXACTLY...from the issues of Israel's security to energy independence to national security to the war on terror...what the approach of the United States should be to challenges in that region.
        Again, you are welcome to your opinion, but I would prefer someone who knows what they are talking about and West ain't it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bobklahn (February 09, 2010 12:27 pm ET)
             
          " The fact that islamic terrorists and their state sponsors hate us and Israel,

          Who do you think is Al-Qaeda's "state sponsor"? Do you have any evidence this time, or are you so naive as to advocate going to war again without any credible evidence?"

          Saudi Arabia. Didn't you know?

          There is no Islamic Terrorism, there is Wahabi Terrorism. Until the people of this country learn to say that word we will never advance against terror.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Tavadon777 (February 09, 2010 12:51 pm ET)
               
            Hey I like you, people dont seem to want to do thier research. Wahabism is an extreme form of Islam, but to be fair not all Wahabis are terroists. and not all terroists are wahabis. the US military uses the term Takfiri to represent Wahabis who are also terrorists.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (February 09, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
               
            You failed to povide any evidence of Saudi Arabia's state sponsorship of Al Qaeda, but in fairness, I wasn't expecting you to.

            Not all terrorists are Wahabi as pointed out above. The problem we have are with Muslim extremist terrorists. Let's not get into some word parsing nitpicking here.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (February 08, 2010 5:29 pm ET)
        5 2
        Now....had Obama perhaps proposed some kind of energy independence "Marshall Plan", one that also created domestic "green jobs", which I also am happy to support, instead of that convoluted joke of a healthcare plan he outsourced to connivers like Reid and Pelosi...then he'd only have to fire the stunningly incompetant Eric Holder to reclaim the "centrist, post-partisan" position he fraudulently campaigned on, courtesy of his "finger in the wind" czar, David Axelrod.
        Lol. I think conservatives have mistaken "post-partisanship" to mean even though conservatives lost, unless we get everything we want, our vote is always nyet!
        But he is now digging in his heels and has clearly shown his hand. Us "evil" Conservatives spotted it two years ago.
        Keep dreaming. I keep waiting for you guys to be right about something. You would think the law of averages would have to kick in sometime soon here.
        As it stands, I will happily and energetically support Lt Col Allen West in his run for Congress, and I live 3000 miles away from his district. In addition to his stellar positions on the above mentioned issues, he is ardently opposed to Roe v Wade and the slaughter of the unborn...now totaling 45 million since 1973. That number is equal to a 911 attack, occuring daily, for 41 years straight. Equal to over 7 times the lives lost in Nazi concentration camps. And WE'RE the extremists??? Unbelievable.
        You are an extremist because the topic of this thread is Allen West's remarks and somehow you end up on an anti-abortion rant (proving Godwin's Law along the way). Obsess much?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (February 08, 2010 5:39 pm ET)
        5 2
        As for Media Matters?

        Please enjoy the freedom of the press you have, thanks largely to the sacrifices of men and women like Lt Col Allen West. The mullahs in Teheran and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would offer you nor their own citizens any such freedom.
        Actually, the religious extremists and theocrats in Iran would be more comfortable with your ilk. You both are ultra-conservatives. You both think that women are second class citizens, the state should support religion and that it is okay to torture your enemies. I would argue that Middle East theocracies are a religious conservative's Utopia - just switch the religion it's based on.
        And by all means, continue your liberal rants and your whining. It will cement the absolute steam-rolling about to take place in November.
        And you keep up the conservative whining. You're doing a heckuva job at it. Personally, I think a big loss in November would help the President in the long run like it did for Bill Clinton. Good luck.
        Okay liberals....this is my first and last post, so fire at will with your water pistols. Assuming your moderator doesn't mind an opposing view. You know...for fairness & balance? :-)
        Thanks for stopping by. Maybe next time, you won't cut and run, but have the guts it takes to actually carry on a real conversation. :)
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rangerphil (February 08, 2010 8:38 pm ET)
        3  
        Wow! Jack Nicholson commenting on MMFA. Who would'a thunk it?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by smartperson (February 09, 2010 3:41 am ET)
          1
        I agree with you 100%. Lt. Col Allen West is what we need now. Also to support Israel. Here is the solution in the Middle East:

        Here is the solution. The Arabian countries are so rich from producing and selling oil. They should take some of that money and buy or build land for their brothers. Or they could absorb the Palestinians into their own countries and there would finally be peace. But here is the problem. The Muslim countries do not want peace, they want Israel destroyed and are using the Palestinians as a tool to accomplish this.

        Several years ago around Israel there was a very large sea turtle that was washed up on the sand. The Palestinians caught this turtle, then tortured it to get its blood hot and then drank its blood thinking it would make them potent. And these are the people who want to live "peacefully" with the Israelis? Give me a break.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by scanlontodd9871 (February 09, 2010 9:33 am ET)
        1  
        So this incident happened in 2003 if I read the dates right. So now he is a "patriot"? So during this time of the Bush administration the Military handled there own and not the Justice department. Since the Fort Hood shooting the Military is not allowed to handle there own. Now they have this disgraced officer on to say he is running for congress and not bring up the fact that he was forced to retire form the Army because of assaulting a prisoner. What a joke.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bobklahn (February 09, 2010 12:46 pm ET)
        1  
        " Author by fire111 (February 08, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
        2 12
        Lt Col Allen West is an inspiring American hero and exactly the type of leader we need in Congress, and indeed the type of leader we need in the Whitehouse....instead of the naive, noodle-spined, pacifist cowards running this country now. And THAT assumes that they're "only" naive cowards and not arrogant, subversive treasoners. In the wake of the 911 trial process and the idiotic handling of the crotch-bomber, I'm beginning to wonder which is the case.

        Sorry....was that too harsh? Tough."

        The only thing tough about your msg was the smell of BS.

        The cowards were Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, and the rest of the Neo-con cable who got us into a war against a country that was no threat to us.

        The blood of 4000+ Americans in Iraq is on their hands. As is the blood of all the Americans who died in Afghanistan who would not have had they finished the job there.

        "The fact that islamic terrorists and their state sponsors hate us and Israel,"

        Israel has nothing to do with Iraq, that was purely the Neo-con plan for the oil. See Greg Palast's writings.

        "The sooner this reality of islamic hatred toward Israel and the US sinks into the heads of liberals...the sooner America can engage nations in that region for ALL the right reasons."

        There is no Islamic hatred of the US, there is Wahabi hatred of anything that isn't Wahabi. I would bet the vast majority of Muslims don't give a damn about Israel or the Palestinians. That conflict is played up as a means for Islamic dictators to distract their populations. The Wahabi are the only major Islamic group who really care, and that is because of their hate for anything not Wahabi.

        " And from a position of full energy independence. "

        It is the republicans, and esp the Neo-cons, who have been sabotaging out attempts for energy independence. Remember, Big Oil, and their hero Dick Cheney, do not want cheap oil, they want expensive oil.

        "But Israel's security ABSOLUTELY comes first "

        To an American military officer America's security is supposed to come first. We have put spies for Israel in prison for that reason.

        "Now....had Obama perhaps proposed some kind of energy independence "Marshall Plan", one that also created domestic "green jobs", which I also am happy to support,"

        He has. Pay attention.

        "instead of that convoluted joke of a healthcare plan he outsourced to connivers like Reid and Pelosi...

        National Health care is a desperate necessity to create jobs and save our economy, and our health care system. Health care is not sucking up 17% of our economy, and is projected to take 20%, that's $1 out of every $5, by 2020. That is a horrendous burden on our economy. How do we compete with countries like Switzerland where the burden is 12%? How do we compete with Japan and Taiwan where the burden is 8%?

        ...

        "But he is now digging in his heels and has clearly shown his hand. Us "evil" Conservatives spotted it two years ago."

        Well, you got one thing right, you are evil. However, you are not conservatives, you are far right wingers.

        ...

        "Please enjoy the freedom of the press you have, thanks largely to the sacrifices of men and women like Lt Col Allen West."

        Please enjoy the freedom of speech you enjoy thanks to every one of us who served, but mostly to men like the Iraq and Afghanistan war vets who are running for congress as democrats.

        "The mullahs in Teheran and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad would offer you nor their own citizens any such freedom."

        Iran is zero threat to the US. And the people of Iran have more freedom, even now, than the people of Iraq or, and especially, Saudi Arabia.

        Oh, and the Wahabi, who are the real threat to us, also hate Iran even more than they hate us. Al Qaeda is a Wahabi construct, and they hate Iran also.

        Iran was the only Middle Eastern Islamic state to support the US invasion of Afghanistan, and the democratization attempt in Iraq.

        Note that, our only supporters among Middle Easter Islamic nations.

        "And by all means, continue your liberal rants and your whining. It will cement the absolute steam-rolling about to take place in November."

        What a disaster that would be for America.

        ...
        Report Abuse
      • Author by rsinebada7366 (February 09, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
        1  
        I will pray for your immortan soul. Someone has to worry about it. You sure don't.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (February 08, 2010 4:46 pm ET)
      3 9
      At least he didn't cut off the terrorists head like what would have happened if the roles were reversed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by peace4all (February 08, 2010 4:56 pm ET)
        6 2
        so, we can do whatever we like as long as we don't cut off their heads? really? so i assume the rules you apply would be universal. and say that they released video of an american P.O.W. getting waterboarded and beaten would be ok with you? would it be ok to show our troops stacked up naked and being threatened by dogs? i mean if it's ok for us then it must be within the rule of law for them as well right?

        i beg you please, try not to be such an idiot.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (February 08, 2010 5:15 pm ET)
          6 2
          Not to mention, we have developed an entirely self-serving legal "argument" that torture is not torture. Assuming we kept such a policy, what is the basis for some future enemy to come up with a similarly bogus and self-serving legal rationale in order to justify torturing our own troops? What recourse would we have? There are no two ways around it. One cannot seriously decry how our troops are tortured by the enemy at the same time we torture them.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by eweston8542983 (February 08, 2010 4:59 pm ET)
        3  
        Give him time. He might consider it.

        If you want to see our military become more terroristic operationally, write your congressman.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by open_mind (February 08, 2010 5:09 pm ET)
        6 2
        Here we are talking about interrogation strategy and you go talking about how we don't chop off guys heads. Is there something I am missing, because that seems like that is the worst interrogation technique imaginable. How are we supposed to get information from these guys if we chopped off their heads?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiG (February 08, 2010 5:25 pm ET)
          3 1
          Well, the stay-on-topic mantra is lost on Seahawks. The other day, he revealed that an alleged friend(!) might be looking for a male prostitute. Seriously!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by cdylans (February 09, 2010 1:36 pm ET)
      2  
      A couple thoughts from a recently retired 26 year vet. It is within the realm of the spectrum of human behavior that the good LTC may have done what he did when he did for the reasons he did. However, that doesn't excuse the actions, and when such things are done, the individual should expect and accept the investigations and sanctions that may follow (including court-martial or forced retirement.) Part of military pride is the fact that we are held to a high standard of bearing and behavior when we choose to don the uniform of our country.

      I worked for a command that investigated alleged abuse of some Iraqi detainees, and if some of our own servicemembers were sanctioned as a result of our part of the process, it isn't a happy occurrence but I an damn proud our military (and by extension the U.S.A.) took the high road and sanctioned those who violated military law.

      Also, as anyone who has studied criminal justice learns, Miranda procedures lead to more solid cases because it compels investigators to ensure whatever they do will stand up in court. Interrogations under the auspices of Miranda ensure constitutionality and lessen the chance that any conviction will be thrown out on a technicality. I bet the LTC was read his rights at some point, even though he broke the law.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.