About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Bolling falsely claims only 595,000 jobs have been created by the stimulus

February 16, 2010 9:23 am ET — 22 Comments

On the February 16 edition of Fox News' Fox and Friends, guest host Eric Bolling claimed of stimulus money: "$272 billion has been spent," but only "595,000 jobs [have been] created," adding, "that's $450,000 per job." In fact, the Recovery.gov employment numbers Bolling cited only represents jobs funded from October 1-December 31, 2009, which make up a small part of the total number of jobs that the White House and other economists estimate have been funded by the stimulus.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Bolling misrepresented number of jobs created by the economic stimulus

Bolling: "$272 billion has been spent, jobs created, 595,000 jobs created." On the February 16 edition of Fox News' Fox and Friends, Bolling falsely claimed that in total, "595,000 jobs" were "created" by the stimulus:

DOOCY: Now people are saying wait a minute, this whole stimulus thing was to create jobs here in the United States of America, but you're telling us that you're spending $11 million of our taxpayer money on a company from Canada? You got to be kidding me.

BOLLING: There's -- there is a group in New Hampshire and they turned away stimulus money because there were so many restrictions attached to some of the things. They did the right thing, clearly this company in Colorado didn't vet who they were going to hire to do some of the water work. Bad idea, bad idea.

DOOCY: Well, it's just going to leave people saying hey, isn't anybody paying attention? Why are we -- it's like the Cash for Clunkers thing. Why are we creating so many cars --

BOLLING:  Real quickly. If you go  to the government's web site on this exact topic, the Recovery.gov, $272 billion has been spent, jobs created, 595,000 jobs created, two hundred and seventy two. That's $450,000 per job. That's their web site. So there's a lot of money slipping through the cracks.

DOOCY: Each job about half a million dollars. We must be loaded.

However, Recovery.gov's 595,000 figure only represents jobs funded in the fourth quarter

Recovery.gov specifically states that the number of jobs funded directly from the stimulus is from "October 1-December 31."  The number cited by Bolling are "recovery funded jobs reported by [stimulus] recipients" from October 1-December 31. From Recovery.gov:

recovery.gov screengrab

Estimate reportedly only represents "the final three months of 2009." The Washington Post reported in a February 1 article that "[t]he Obama administration's economic stimulus program created nearly 600,000 jobs in the final three months of 2009, a figure in line with the administration's goals for job creation through the end of 2010, the White House reported Saturday night." It continued: "The new total was down from the totals reported for the previous quarter, partly because the administration decided in December to count only the jobs paid for with stimulus funding instead of estimating the number of jobs 'created or saved' with the money." Reuters and CNNMoney.com articles about the report also noted that the figure represents the fourth quarter.

White House: 595,000 jobs "represents just a portion of the job impact in the fourth quarter." In a blog post on WhiteHouse.gov, White House adviser Ed DeSeve wrote that the latest figure "represents just a portion of the job impact in the fourth quarter" but noted that "[t]he Council of Economic Advisers recently released analysis that found the Recovery Act is already responsible for about 2 million jobs." DeSeve also wrote that the 600,000 job figure "is right in line with our goal to create or save 3.5 million jobs through the Recovery Act by the end of 2010."

Orszag: Fourth quarter reporting "only applied to about a fifth of the recovery act funding." On the February 1 Fox & Friends broadcast, guest host Alyson Camerota asked Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag about the Recovery.gov report, and he replied: "Well, remember, that reporting only applied to about a fifth of the recovery act funding, so when you scale it up, you're talking about one and a half to 2 million jobs created or saved as a result of the recovery act. So that's, you know, 2 million people who would be unemployed today were it not for the recovery act." Additionally, Orszag explained that the Recovery.gov job figures only "apply to a certain subset of the recovery act funding. It doesn't include things like the jobs created from the tax cuts that were provided under the recovery act or from other components that were part of the recovery act but were not direct discretionary spending that the recipient reporting requirements applied to."

Additionally, the White House's stimulus job numbers are "within the range of other projections," including Moody's, CBO

White House economic advisers: "the ARRA has raised employment relative to what it otherwise would have been by 1½ to 2 million." In a quarterly report issued January 13, the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) estimated: "As of the fourth quarter of 2009, the CEA estimates that the ARRA has raised employment relative to the baseline by between 1½ and 2 million. The CEA estimates for both the effects on GDP and employment are similar to those of respected private forecasters and government agencies." The report also stated, "For the third quarter of 2009, we now have direct reports on jobs created or saved from a subset of recipients of ARRA funds. These reports identify 640,000 jobs that would not have existed but for the Recovery Act."

CEA: Our estimates are within the range of other projections, including Moody's and CBO. Discussing its projection, CEA noted, "[O]ur estimates are within the range of other projections, though somewhat above the median." In its quarterly report, CEA cited figures from Moody's Economy.com and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office as evidence that its "estimates are within" the range of other economists':

CEA job table

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (February 16, 2010 9:49 am ET)
      8 2
      WHAT!?!?

      Fox & the GOP have been telling me for entire YEAR that NO JOBS have been created by the stimulus bill!!

      Now they claim 1/2 a million jobs have been created??? WTF??

      This means I'm going to have to redo my Tea Bagger yard signs from "Porkulus = NO JOBS" to "Porkulus = 595,000 jobs"!

      That just doesn't have the same catchy ring ...

      Geez, Fox, get your talking points straight already, would ya?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by The_Cat (February 16, 2010 10:17 am ET)
        6 2
        It's actually worse than that, mk3872. Not only have they flipped and now admit half a million jobs created by the stimulus spending, they have tunnel vision. Why do I say that? Because they have totally failed to hit the talking point that some jobs were created by TAX CUTS! Yep, left that bit of Faux Con talking point wisdom far behind in their rush to claim that the federal government only got one job for every $450,000 spent.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by politeradical (February 16, 2010 2:59 pm ET)
           
        OMG, you mean the highways in my state DIDN'T REPAVE THEMSELVES??!! You mean actual living, breathing people were hired with stimulus money for infrastructure jobs like the President said?

        Why oh why Rush?? Why did you lie to me?

        This has warped my fragile little mind.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by angels4light (February 16, 2010 9:51 am ET)
         
      So, while the 450K/job number was inflated, if I am reading this right it is only inflated by a factor of 5, making the number 90K/job? As the "Enterprise" ad says, "sounds expensive".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (February 16, 2010 11:44 am ET)
      4 1
      But but but.... I thought the stimulus spent $787 billion (or a Trillion as the wingnuts like to round it up to) already and it was declared a failure?

      More dumbed down math for the wingnuts.

      Either way Bolling is a lying sack.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (February 16, 2010 11:50 am ET)
      3 11
      Create 1 mil jobs but loose 4 mil.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 16, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
        4 4
        Yes, overall the economy has lost jobs because of the greatest recession since the Great Depression.

        But, because of the Obama Administration's efforts, we've got a lot more people employed than we would have otherwise.

        I guess when a kid who is struggling in school with D's and F's gets some tutoring and brings their grades up to C's and B's, you would recommend that we not pay the tutor because they didn't make the struggling kid turn into a straight A student.

        Whenever anyone faces any problem, if they can't solve it completely, I guess you mock them too, huh?

        What a troll. It's a fallacious argument to suggest that the fact that there's still high unemployment is the fault of the Obama Administration or that it shows that their efforts to reduce unemployment have been flawed. Please don't feed this troll.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Max Credits (February 16, 2010 12:05 pm ET)
        5 1
        How did the federal gov't loose 4 million jobs?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (February 16, 2010 11:59 am ET)
      6 3
      How incompetent can he be that he supposedly is educating his listeners and he doesn't even know that those numbers are from one quarter only?

      I mean, really, how incompetent must this guy be in daily life if he can't get this right?

      Or, is it his blind partisanship that got him here? Did he think that the job creation numbers can't be all that high, and so when he saw these numbers, it satisfied his preconceived notion and so he didn't go any further?

      Neither is an attractive personality flaw - so politically partisan that he makes a huge error, or so incompetent that he can't even read simple data where it's explicitly said that it's only from one fiscal quarter!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (February 16, 2010 12:37 pm ET)
      6 8
      Didn't Sen Bayh just say "Congress hasn't created 1 job in the last 6 months"?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 16, 2010 2:07 pm ET)
        7 5
        "But if I could create one job in the private sector by helping to grow a business, that would be one more than Congress has created in the last six months."

        And he's right. The lack of bipartisan effort coming from the Republicans has stymied many Democratic initiatives, including jobs bills.

        Thanks for providing evidence that it's the Republicans in Congress he's railing against.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by seahawks123 (February 16, 2010 2:19 pm ET)
          6 7
          You libs had 60 votes in the Senate. The Republicans couldn't stop ANYTHING. No, it's the Dems that couldn't get their act together and agree on something that actually works.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by politeradical (February 16, 2010 2:56 pm ET)
               
            Unlike reps, dems actually think for themselves instead of mindlessly voting on something lock-step. It's a bigger tent with more ideas, hence opinions will differ from time to time.

            And I wouldn't call Lieberman a democrat. More like a stealth republican.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (February 16, 2010 4:32 pm ET)
            4 1
            They did, it was called the stimulus bill. You know the bill that publikuns voted against, but are going back to their districts and states and saying the fought to get money for their districts or states to help the economy.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by seahawks123 (February 16, 2010 5:01 pm ET)
              3 7
              You mean the porkulous bill. It HAD to get passed at the time, and still 1 year later only 1/3 of the money has been spent. Obama said unemployment wouldn't get above 8% now it's 10%. If it was such a great deal why has all the money not been spent?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (February 16, 2010 5:04 pm ET)
                4 2
                It's a good thing that not all the money was spent right away. That was the plan - to continue priming the economy. That's a great way to have done it.

                You fool filled with talking points and no actual knowledge.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (February 16, 2010 5:10 pm ET)
                3 2
                SEABAGS, OBAMA said that he hoped that unemployment wouldn't go over 8% but he did say that things would get WORSE before they got better.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by John Paradox (February 16, 2010 1:10 pm ET)
      3 3
      DOOCY: Each job about half a million dollars.

      Well, gee, that's not bad, after all: $250,000 in income is "not wealthy"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wwjbd (February 16, 2010 3:57 pm ET)
        4 1
        go to recovery.gov
        click on any random zip code and it will tell you
        zip: 45040 money: $8,169,423 jobs: 0.23
        zip: 45056 money: $21,543,206 jobs: 43.85

        Remember, these are busy work one-time jobs. Once the project is done and the money is spent, those employeed are back on the street.

        It is real easy to justify spending $491k per job when its not your money.

        That is not a solution.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by politeradical (February 16, 2010 3:08 pm ET)
         
      How much of the stimulus money has actually been spent? Through 2009, I believe the figure was somewhere around 20%.

      Doocy's idiotic "half million dollars for each job created" remark only works if the entire $787 billion was spent, which in the last quarter of 2009, it clearly was not.

      Gee Fox News fails again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Space-Pedestrian (February 16, 2010 5:01 pm ET)
      2 2
      Not to mention the legions of jobs saved by this bill. Thank god.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.