About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Perino claims the public "rejected" the public option; polling shows otherwise

February 22, 2010 1:12 pm ET — 35 Comments

On Fox & Friends, Fox News contributor Dana Perino claimed that "the public itself rejected resoundedly [sic]" the inclusion of a public health insurance option in health care reform efforts. In fact, numerous polls taken in 2010 have found that a majority or plurality support the creation of a public option.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Perino: "The public option is the thing that the public itself rejected"

From the February 22 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends:

PERINO: All year long, we talked about the public option. The public option is the thing that the public itself rejected resoundedly, which is why the Democrats are now coming up with this health care summit.

Polls show support for public option

Recent polls show majority support. Contrary to Perino's claim, numerous polls taken in 2010 have found that more Americans support a public option than oppose it, including some showing majority support:

  • A February 17-18 Newsweek poll found that 50 percent of respondents supported "[c]reating a government-administered public health insurance option to compete with private plans," while 42 percent opposed it.
  • A January 28-31 Ipsos/McClatchy poll found that 49 percent supported the "creation of a public entity to directly compete with existing health insurance companies," while 42 percent opposed it.
  • A January 7-12 Kaiser Family Foundation Health Tracking Poll found that 53 percent of respondents said they were more likely to support health care legislation if it "[c]reate[s] a government-administered public health insurance option to compete with private health insurance plans." Thirty-one percent of respondents said they would be less likely to support such legislation, while 13 percent said it made no difference.
  • A CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll, conducted January 8-10, found that "[f]ifty-four percent of people questioned ... support a government-run option, with 46 percent opposed."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by gg (February 22, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
      10 1
      Why is anyone even asking her opinion on anything? She is giving little Billy Kristol some real competition on being consistently wrong every time she opens her mouth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by raddave43 (February 22, 2010 1:31 pm ET)
      10  
      She is using publikun math to show that most of the people oppose the public option. Kind of like the publikuns think 41 seats out of 100 is a majority.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MadRiver Jack (February 22, 2010 2:24 pm ET)
        4  
        the publikuns think 41 seats out of 100 is a majority.

        [http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_olhMzt_rwyo/S3hu3olzUVI/AAAAAAAAB3A/DUje35q-tZw/s1600-h/USAsenate.jpg]
        Report Abuse
      • Author by AfricanLived (February 22, 2010 2:42 pm ET)
        4  
        Wouldn't it be nice to live in your own make believe world in which all of the facts are fitted to make your own beliefs real?

        To be a Republican these days...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by coldteablues19577325 (February 23, 2010 11:36 am ET)
          2  
          "Wouldn't it be nice to live in your own make believe world in which all of the facts are fitted to make your own beliefs real?"

          Isn't that called 'Neverland?'
          Report Abuse
      • Author by JohnnyAppleseed (February 22, 2010 4:58 pm ET)
        1 3
        If 51% would truly be a majority rule, then partisan politics would run rampant. You'd still be going against 49% of the people. Personally, I think we need to go back to 67 votes to pass anything, and therefore hold both parties accountable for all actions, and it would help ensure that everyone has something in it for them that they like, and compromise on the things they dont.

        I still haven't made up my mind on the public option itself, and even if a slim majority do favor it - I think the problem is the rest of the crap in the bill turned everyone off to the thought of this particular congress (both parties) reforming health care at all.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Unreality (February 23, 2010 1:22 am ET)
          3  
          There's just one problem with your concept of making both parties accountable for all actions.

          Who is responsible for inaction? Inaction, too, is a choice, but to date few seem to comprehend that inaction is literally our worst choice. Those particularly aware are the self-employed in California who already knows that 30-40% per year increase is the result of inaction.

          Do you even know what the Public Option provides?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by albertsenj (February 23, 2010 2:12 am ET)
          2  
          Effective NOW, or are you willing to go back and reverse all of the legislation passed in the previous administration by fewer than 67 votes?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Refresh (February 22, 2010 1:44 pm ET)
      3  
      Women lie, men lie, numbers don't lie. Sad that even a crazy rapper could've gotten this one right

      It is amazing how much conservatives out right lie on national television. The misinformation and distortion of facts is bad enough, but to just blatantly tell a bold lie with a straight face happens more times than I would think the mainstream media would allow without getting all over these people.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Invent a Scandal (February 22, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
      3  
      Well,
      I think if the cons block the health care reform bill, the Dems should just go ahead and put in a Public Option using reconciliation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (February 22, 2010 2:26 pm ET)
      5  
      I guess 54%-46% in favor means it was rejected in the same way that 41-59 means the Reps control the Senate.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mrhebert74 (February 22, 2010 2:35 pm ET)
        2  
        Well, shaggles, every time I hear any news of the Senate, I start cussing and tearing my hair out because they do seem to control it. So maybe Perino's got something after all.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by foghornleghorn (February 22, 2010 2:58 pm ET)
      3  
      Perino must be limiting her definition of "public" as the teabaggers.

      "Get the government out of my health care!!" screeched the woman on Medicare.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by poproxx77 (February 22, 2010 3:20 pm ET)
        1
      Interesting that in the CNN poll, 54 percent of people polled support the public option, yet only 40 percent of the same peoeple support the healthcare bills passed by the senate and the house.

      What does that mean, Americans think you can serperate the two ideas, a government run healthcare system and the public option. It says to me that at least 14 percent of those people polled(and most liberals) think you can have a public option not controlled by the government......obviously they are confused.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by angels4light (February 22, 2010 10:30 pm ET)
           
        What? 54% support a public option - which is clearly government managed health insurance. It does not describe a government run health CARE system, it defines an insurance option other than the full public market that has served us, those who pay for the insurance, SO well. WE enter into an agreement to pay a certain amount on the chance that we will need to use medical services some time in the future, but when we actually DO need to use those services for which we entered into a contract with those same private insurance companies to pay for, they change the terms of the contract. But I digress. There IS a huge difference between a government managed health insurance system, and a government run health CARE system. One is government hospitals, the other is a government run competitor for insurance dollars to PAY the providers.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by poproxx77 (February 23, 2010 6:21 pm ET)
             
          There certainly is a difference between government run health care, and a government halth insurance option, but its still run by the government. So the scope might be different but the end result is the still the same.

          I say make tobacco companies foot the bill!!! :)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by angels4light (February 22, 2010 10:57 pm ET)
           
        Is it possible that people no LONGER support the current plan BECAUSE it does not have a public option? To me, the plan is a government subsidy of the health insurance industry - something of a sellout. With the public option, however, the plan regains its teeth.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jediknight65 (February 22, 2010 3:42 pm ET)
         
      bush barbie at it again
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dradeeus (February 22, 2010 4:03 pm ET)
      1  
      This could all be cleared up with a qualifier. People dislike Health Care Reform without a public option.

      Every poll I've seen shows "massive support, massive support... don't like it." And, wow, look at that. It happens right about the time that the Public Option is gone, and private health care becomes mandatory.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bluhawk7398 (February 22, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
        3
      Polls are inherently useless since pollsters can always choose their demographic to make the poll say whatever they want regardless of political leanings......
      Report Abuse
      • Author by John Paradox (February 22, 2010 7:24 pm ET)
        1  
        That's why serious (non Rassmussen) pollsters work on the randomization factors and weighting according to factors that influence the outcome in predictable ways.

        A good course in statistics and polling would be helpful... I only had the one in college.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (February 22, 2010 5:48 pm ET)
         
      all of the bushies', that can't find employment end up, on fixed news..............too bad they get any benifits!!!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ztitans1 (February 22, 2010 6:22 pm ET)
        1
      The facts are being misrepresented here. As the public recognizes the health care debate they are strongly opposed to the President's plan or any version of the Congressional plans that have been voted on. Call it a public option, government plan, or choice...Call it what you will. The margins are widening with disfavor, yet they continue to plot to pass what the majority of citizens do not want.

      http://www.pollster.com/polls/us/healthplan.php

      If Massachusetts was not a wake up call then election day in November is going to be a very sad day for the democrats.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (February 22, 2010 7:14 pm ET)
        1 1
        Massachusetts has public option.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by inbow (February 22, 2010 8:00 pm ET)
          1  
          Murdoch owns Faux. He hires the most right wing people he can find. They lie, cheat, stretch the truth. Anything that will give him more Money, and more Power. He has a plan. He has a "Final Solution".
          Report Abuse
      • Author by angels4light (February 22, 2010 10:31 pm ET)
           
        I guess Hawaii is also a wake-up call, showing us another state where a public option clearly does not work.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (February 23, 2010 1:27 am ET)
        2  
        Can you describe your understanding of what is the Public Option?

        It is my assertion you don't know.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (February 23, 2010 9:13 am ET)
        2  
        you are right the facts are being misrepresented.....but wrong in that people don't want a public options.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by brady (February 22, 2010 8:11 pm ET)
      2  
      How credible is Ms. Perino? Of the 20 press secretaries who have held that position since 1964, only one had no clue what the Cuban Missile Crisis was all about.

      Congratulations, Ms. Perino, you have resoundedly (sic) demonstrated your value in speaking rationally about anything.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by coachslife3331 (February 22, 2010 10:58 pm ET)
      2  
      Perino did not know about the "Bay of Pigs" or about North and South Korea.....why would anyone listen to anything she has to say!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ingemar (February 22, 2010 11:21 pm ET)
        3
      The reliance MMFA has on these polls is quite telling.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 23, 2010 1:03 am ET)
        2 1
        Yet another troll post from the latest screen name, huh?

        If Dana Perino hadn't lied about what the polls showed, then MMFA wouldn't be saying word one about what the polls really show!

        This isn't rocket science.

        The only way someone can say "the public believes ..." is by actually measuring the public's opinion by polls. Perino said that the public believes something that's not in evidence by polls.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by ingemar (February 23, 2010 1:16 am ET)
            2
          My point is that I would not cite those polls in particular as evidence. Not that the polls are necessarily wrong.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (February 23, 2010 9:32 am ET)
         
      Rule number one for decent healthcare - remove the financial impediment. This also includes the administrative complications which create problems organising payments no matter what the circumstances.

      A universal system run through taxation and/or levies works quite well and people can get on with living their lives without getting tied up in the minutiae of shopping for commercial insurance that disappears as soon as you need it.

      Rule number two - ensure universal access to and utilisation of primary healthcare. What's the old saying about "an ounce of prevention"?

      Once the financial and administrative impediments are removed policy can properly focus on the delivery of health services to all of its people.

      The rest of the world understands this. What's wrong with the conservatives in the US? Why do they deny the overwhelming evidence of the rest of the developed world?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by OGFrostbite (February 24, 2010 6:18 am ET)
         
      come on!!! people love it when theirs insurance increase by over 30%
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.