About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Campaign Arm: Fox promotes GOP campaign video, which suggests Becerra laughed at the Pledge

February 24, 2010 1:44 pm ET — 35 Comments

Fox News has repeatedly promoted a video shot by Republican Congressional candidate Ari David's campaign of what they claim is Representative Xavier Becerra (D-CA) laughing at the recommendation that a meeting he was attending begin with the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Fox News has frequently promoted other campaign videos by Republican candidates, and in some cases, let them raise funds on-air.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Fox repeatedly promotes David's campaign video and website

Fox Nation: "Congressman Laughs at Pledge?" Fox Nation posted David's video under the headline "Congressman Laughs at Pledge?" The article linked to a February 22 Gateway Pundit post on the video.

FoxNews.com: "Congressman Derided for Laughing at Suggestion to Recite the Pledge of Allegiance." A February 23 FoxNews.com article accused Becerra of being "caught on a YouTube video laughing at a suggestion that the Pledge of Allegiance be recited prior to a union meeting in Los Angeles." According to the article, "[i]f the Pledge of Allegiance is a laughing matter, then the joke may be on" Becerra.  The article linked to the YouTube video and included comments by David, who is running against Rep. Henry Waxman in 2012. David "was stunned as an American that one of our members of Congress would act that way." The article also included the Becerra's response, which stated, in part, "[t]he meeting was already under way and the question was unexpected. It took us all by surprise. When the speaker explained that he was serious and asked me specifically if we could say the pledge, I said yes and gestured to the moderator, who then led the entire gathering in reciting the pledge."

Fox Nation and FoxNews.com link to a video with Ari David fundraising pitch. Both the Fox Nation and FoxNews.com articles linked to a YouTube video of the meeting. In the video's description was fundraising information for David's campaign. From YouTube:

David you tube screen grab

Carlson: "Let's talk a little bit about whether or not the Pledge of Allegiance should be a laughing matter." On the February 24 edition of Fox News' Fox and Friends, co-host Gretchen Carlson introduced the video by saying, "[L]et's talk a little bit about whether or not the Pledge of Allegiance should be a laughing matter...well it was suggested at a meeting out in California, I believe, recently, and one of the Democratic Representatives Xavier Bacerra, apparently laughed at the suggestion that they should recite the Pledge of Allegiance before they started a union meeting." Steve Doocy called the reaction "pretty extraordinary, from mainly the union members."  Doocy later reported that "Congressman Becerra says, 'as soon as I realized that they were asking for the Pledge, I said to the woman who was at the podium, let's go ahead and do it,' and they did it." Despite the fact that the video showed that the Pledge was recited, Carlson wondered if "maybe they needed a teleprompter for it because since we don't allow the Pledge to be said in very many places anymore, maybe people don't know the words anymore."

America's Newsroom host Bill Hemmer tweets link to David video, which included David's fundraising information. On February 24, Hemmer wrote on his Twitter account: "Have u seen this video? Did a Congressman laughed at pledge request? He defends @ 9:45am ET." Hemmer also included a link to the YouTube video, which included David's fundraising information. From Twitter:

Hemmer tweet

Hemmer allows David "last word" which he uses to promote his website. On the February 24 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, host Bill Hemmer hosted Becerra and David to debate the incident. Hemmer allowed David the "last word," which David used as an opportunity to plug his website, saying "if people want to see more footage of [the video] please go to my website, Ari David for Congress.com."

Fox has previously campaigned for GOP and conservative candidates

On Fox, Brown encouraged viewers to visit his campaign website to find out "how to help with donating and volunteering." As Media Matters has documented, in several Fox News appearances during his campaign in the special election for the Massachusetts U.S. Senate seat, Scott Brown pointed viewers to his campaign website, solicited funds for his campaign, and also cited RedInvadesBlue.com, where, he said, "we have a money bomb right now that's hitting ... and you can help me fight back against the machine."

"Political analyst" Morris: "Please, please help" Brown. During the January 11 edition of Hannity, Fox News contributor Dick Morris urged viewers to "go to DickMorris.com ... to help elect Brown," because if "we win this fight, then there will never be another victory for Obama." DickMorris.com included a fundraising plea "to help us raise $300,000 for a last minute media buy to push Brown and the Republicans to victory"; Fox News executives allowed Morris to solicit funds for Republican efforts despite reportedly telling colleague Mike Huckabee to cease conflict-of-interest promotions that help his political action committee.

Fox plays GOP ad attacking Kirk's opponent, compares Kirk favorably to Brown. During its February 3 coverage of the Senate primary in Illinois, Fox News repeatedly aired a National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC) "attack ad" targeting Republican candidate Mark Kirk's Democratic opponent, Illinois State Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias. Fox News also provided Kirk a platform to attack Giannoulias, and repeatedly offered favorable comparisons between Kirk and Brown.

Conservative candidates stump on Fox during lead-up to elections. In the two weeks leading up to the November 3, 2009, elections, Conservative Party congressional candidate Doug Hoffman, New Jersey Republican gubernatorial candidate Chris Christie, and Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Bob McDonnell appeared on Fox News and its personalities' radio shows at least 16 times for live interviews lasting a total of 114 minutes and 36 seconds. Christie made at least five appearances totaling almost 37 minutes on Fox News and its personalities' radio shows; McDonnell made at least three appearances totaling 18 minutes; and Hoffman made at least seven appearances totaling almost 60 minutes.

Fox News hosts, political analysts spend Election Day celebrating and shilling for conservatives and GOPers. On November 4, 2009, numerous Fox News hosts and political analysts encouraged voters to donate to, as well as volunteer and vote for GOP and conservative candidates, including Christie, McDonnell, and Hoffman. The Fox News personalities included Mike Huckabee, Sean Hannity, Karl Rove, Newt Gingrich, Tammy Bruce, and Eric Bolling.

Leading up to elections, Fox personalities promoted conservative and GOP candidates and helped fundraise for them. Fox News hosts and analysts offered support for McDonnell, Christie, and Hoffman and their fundraising efforts leading up to the elections. For example, on his November 2, 2009, Fox News show, Hannity told Hoffman, "I hope I'm on the air this time tomorrow night and I'll be able to declare you the winner." On November 3, 2009, on Twitter, Fox News contributor Karl Rove encouraged his followers to donate to the Republican Governors Association in order to help Christie's campaign. On two Fox News shows in October 2009, Huckabee directed viewers to "go to balancecutsave.com," urging them to sign a petition telling Congress to "balance the budget," "cut their spending," and "save American families"; however, balancecutsave.com redirected visitors to Huckabee's political action committee, which financially supports Republican candidates. Subsequently, Huck PAC apparently emailed petition signers -- who were required to provide an email address in order to sign the "balancecutsave" petition -- a "newsletter" urging political action on behalf of Republican-backed candidates Bob McDonnell, David Harmer, and Doug Hoffman.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by SLRTX (February 24, 2010 1:56 pm ET)
      3 1
      The Pledge of Allegiance IS a laughing matter!

      Why should anyone feel compelled to say such nonsense?

      Oh, it's unpatriotic to NOT say it? Who says?

      TPOA is a completely bogus load of nonsense.

      You can train a monkey to hold their hand over their heart & make mouth motions to the pledge. Would that make the monkey patriotic?

      BTW conservatards, TPOA was written by [gasp!!] a socialist!
      http://www.ushistory.org/documents/pledge.htm
      Report Abuse
      • Author by southerngal (February 24, 2010 1:59 pm ET)
        2 4
        I've never been compelled to say it, if you have and its bogus load of nonsense made you uneasy, I am sorry.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by southerngal (February 24, 2010 1:57 pm ET)
        10
      This is about as stupid a gotcha moment as I have seen in a long time, but it's only rivaled by MMfA using words like "suggests" and "claim" instead of just outright saying the Congressman laughed.

      I laughed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bigbee (February 24, 2010 2:37 pm ET)
        3  
        From the video, you cannot tell what the Congressman was doing. Period. Your assertions to the contrary are entirely baseless.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (February 24, 2010 2:42 pm ET)
          1 8
          He laughs immediately after the question was asked, unless you think the video is lying. So what if he laughed, it's no big deal. But to try and say there isn't enough evidence or some such nonsense is ridiculous. Sometimes liberals tie themselves up so unnecessarily.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by wesley (February 24, 2010 3:17 pm ET)
              8
            -- He laughs immediately -- RO

            Of course he laughed...it's not a claim, suggestion or anything else...it's a fact.

            And I'm with you...no big deal....except in the senseless, 24 hour blather by partisans...prompting more blather by the other side.

            Doocey and crew is nothing more than an adult "Romper Room".
            Report Abuse
          • Author by SLRTX (February 24, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
            2 1
            right -

            "Sometimes liberals tie themselves up so unnecessarily."

            Yes, they do. But so do the conservatards.

            The fact that Fox even ran this "story" makes me wonder what compelled them to run it?

            What's the point, other than to tie the conservatards up so unnecessarily about something that's a non-issue?

            That's pretty much what Fox does all the time anyway. And the ignorant conservatard masses just lap it up, like a dog eating it's own vomit.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (February 24, 2010 4:11 pm ET)
              1 6
              Because Fox sticks it to liberals and their media watchdog sites who eat up nonsense like this as if it were a hot dog at a family picnic. Petty for Fox, petty for MMfA.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by SLRTX (February 24, 2010 4:21 pm ET)
                4 2
                right -

                Well, you spend a lot of time here. I guess you're just as petty as the rest of us petty folks. :-)

                Not petty for Fox. They know what they're doing.

                There's a lot of drooling conservatards out there ready to ingest any crap coming from Fox - even if it's fabricated - which they often do.

                Then I take it you agree - the POA is just a load of crap, and Fox was wasting everyone's time by running that non-story. Just be sure to mention this to your buddies, when it comes up in conversation.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (February 24, 2010 4:24 pm ET)
                  1 5
                  I can be petty if I want. I don't run a news network or a media watchdog internet site.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by wesley (February 24, 2010 4:42 pm ET)
                    2 6
                    Speaking of petty...how 'bout the use of the word "conservatard"? After barrels of outrage were poured out on this site over the term "effen retards"...wonder how they'll come down on this one?

                    Mutating the term "conservative retards" into "conservatards" reminds me of the following from George Carlin's language archive:

                    -- You can't shiiit me...the word shoot is just shiiit spelled with two O's. --
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (February 24, 2010 4:44 pm ET)
                      1 6
                      Ha! Good point. Frankly, I like RepubliKKKans too. That always gets a few thumbs up around here.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by SLRTX (February 24, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
                      4 2
                      wesley --

                      I don't have a problem with the word "retard". It's freedom of speech, baby!

                      Apparently, sister Sarah didn't either, no matter how much she feigned her righteous indignation. She uses her downs-syndrome kid like a political tool. And to think, she's trying to act all politically correct!

                      She should be ashamed of herself, if she's capable of that.

                      By the way the trolls post here, yes, they ARE conservatards. I think that label fits them perfectly. They're brainless twits who can't tell the difference between reality and made-up crap like whatever comes out of Fox - as demonstrated by Fox's "coverage" about the POA. Conservatards swallow anything their heros Beck or Limburger throw at them. They're complete wastes of skin.

                      I can also be petty if I want. You and "right" will just have to deal with it.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by wesley (February 24, 2010 5:44 pm ET)
                        1 4
                        -- I don't have a problem with the word "retard"...They're brainless twits who can't tell the difference between reality and made-up crap -- SLRTX

                        I'm sure the mentally handicapped will appreciate your definition of their mental capacities.

                        But I'll give you a big atta boy for honesty.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by OOzinEvil (February 24, 2010 7:07 pm ET)
                          2
                        SLRTX, that string around your finger is there to remind you to take your medication before you say anything.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by SLRTX (February 24, 2010 8:51 pm ET)
                          1  
                          Oh well, at least I'm not jumping into a pit of vipers then whining about how I'm getting bit.

                          You're here. Deal with us.
                          Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 24, 2010 5:49 pm ET)
        3  
        It's not a "gotcha moment" though.

        Becerra has said that the meeting was already underway for about an hour, and that's why everyone thought the guy who requested it was joking. And the guy who asked it was an aide for the Republican candidate.

        The candidate laughed because it seemed like a ridiculous request an hour into a meeting!
        Report Abuse
        • Author by fantagor (February 24, 2010 5:54 pm ET)
          2  
          Hush, you'll confuse the trolls and troglodytes with FACTS, LOGIC and SENSIBILITY.

          Randy
          Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (February 24, 2010 6:36 pm ET)
        1  
        He laughed at the suggestion that something should happen at the beginning of the meeting when it was NOT the beginning of the meeting.

        He didn't laugh at the Pledge. That's why MMFA used the words they did.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (February 24, 2010 2:16 pm ET)
      10  
      Flashback: Tea partiers skip prayer and Pledge of Allegiance at opening of national convention.

      Did this make Tea Party headlines on Fox Propaganda? Didn't think so.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Panic Man (February 24, 2010 2:22 pm ET)
      2  
      But remember, they're "fair and balanced".
      Report Abuse
    • Author by whatIthink (February 24, 2010 2:56 pm ET)
      2  
      Next thing you know, conservatives will accuse people who don't wear a flag lapel pin unpatriotic...oh, wait, that's happened...

      Well, at least we had the Republicans lead us in their brave charge against those anti-american French by renaming french fries...See? That there are sum tru murkans!!!

      /snark
      Report Abuse
    • Author by angels4light (February 24, 2010 3:14 pm ET)
      2  
      Sounds like the same contextual respect that was given when the heavily edited Rev. Wright video was posted.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mos11338040 (February 24, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
         
      where can i get vid of today's fox and friends?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by markslp7013 (February 24, 2010 4:39 pm ET)
      3  
      These people (Fox and Friends, Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly, Rush, etc.) define patriotism by doing things like wearing a flag lapel pin, saying the pledge, putting your hand over your heart during the anthem, etc. However, they appear to believe that providing suspected terrorists with Miranda rights, providing them with a lawyer, speaking out against torture, speaking out against the Patriot Act and the invasion of privacy--things that go to the core of what we believe as citizens of the United States of America-are un-American and unpatriotic. Bizarre.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Dradeeus (February 24, 2010 5:22 pm ET)
        2  
        Yeah, exactly. It's much, much, much easier to wear a trinket or colors, or lipservice some words, rather than uphold American values.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (February 24, 2010 6:39 pm ET)
      1  
      No legitimate news organization should be promoting any candidate, nor airing campaign video like this.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by inbow (February 24, 2010 7:05 pm ET)
           
        Hey, we need to go back to the good ole days. Like, McCarthy-ism, Un-American Activities Committee, the Black List. Yes, we need a Becky, or a Limpball to be the Patriotic Czar. Ahh, the good ole days are here again.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by SLRTX (February 24, 2010 9:34 pm ET)
          1
        DellDolly --

        Well, in Fox's defense, there weren't promoting Becerra. ;-)
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.