About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

EXCLUSIVE: In new book, Rove says he "agreed" with Novak that Joe Wilson was an "asshole"

March 05, 2010 3:53 pm ET — 65 Comments

In his forthcoming book, Fox News' Karl Rove writes that during his infamous July 2003 conversation with the late Robert Novak, Rove "agreed with Novak's assessment" that Joe Wilson was "pompous, self-centered, egotistical, and 'an asshole.' "

In Courage and Consequence -- which Media Matters for America obtained in advance of its March 9 release date -- Rove writes that shortly after agreeing with Novak that Wilson was "an asshole," Rove confirmed that he had "heard" that Wilson's wife worked at the CIA. Days later, Novak published a syndicated column outing Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, as a CIA operative.

From Page 328 of Karl Rove's Courage and Consequence:

But Novak had turned our conversation to Joe Wilson's op-ed after discussing Townsend. He'd met Wilson in the green room at Meet the Press the previous Sunday morning and said he found Wilson pompous, self-centered, egotistical, and "an asshole." Having watched Wilson on Meet the Press, I agreed with Novak's assessment.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by draftedin68 (March 05, 2010 3:56 pm ET)
      15 1

      Pot.

      Kettle.

      Black.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bintx (March 05, 2010 4:06 pm ET)
      19  
      Of course, Wilson was an a**hole, he exposed your buddy's lies.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by foghornleghorn (March 05, 2010 4:18 pm ET)
        24 1
        Yep, he was such an a**hole that Rove and his cabal committed treason by outing his wife for revenge. Of all their criminal deeds, this is a solid #2 (behing the Iraq War, of course).
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 05, 2010 4:25 pm ET)
          9 1
          Exactly.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bludog1 (March 05, 2010 5:03 pm ET)
          2 22
          Excuse me, but please refresh my memory. Was Rove or anyone else tried for treason or anything remotely resembling it? That certainly is not my memory. In fact, my memory is that Rove was not charged with anything! Cheney's CoS I think was charged, prosecuted,convicted and served time for lying to federal authorities.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (March 05, 2010 5:11 pm ET)
            14 1
            While it was not treason, the prosecutor in the case was seriously considering bringing charges against Rove as well.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by neon desert (March 05, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
            15  
            Maybe Rove and Cheney can have OJ Simpson help them find the real leaker...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (March 05, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
              12  
              Hopefully Rove & Cheney can join OJ in his prison cell to have their strategy meetings...
              Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 05, 2010 5:24 pm ET)
            19 2
            Actually, Scooter Libby was convicted of lying to the FBI and for obstruction of justice. Libby's lies are what prevented prosecution of Rove. Your memory is, as usual, faulty and tainted by your adherence to the destructive political game I like to call the "us v. them" game. These idiots thumbed their noses at a law that George H.W. Bush had enacted because this sort of stupidity caused the unnecessary deaths of CIA agents. Why not join the side of your country for a change?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by spooky3 (March 05, 2010 9:31 pm ET)
              13  
              Without the obstruction, Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, might have been able to nail Rove:

              "And what we have when someone charges obstruction of justice, the umpire gets sand thrown in his eyes. He’s trying to figure what happened and somebody blocked their view.

              As you sit here now, if you’re asking me what his motives were, I can’t tell you; we haven’t charged it.

              So what you were saying is the harm in an obstruction investigation is it prevents us from making the fine judgments we want to make."

              http://firedoglake.com/2006/04/06/grifting-your-own-administration/
              Report Abuse
            • Author by FresnoSanity (March 07, 2010 2:03 pm ET)
              3  
              So since he just admitted to disclosing a CIA undercover agents identity in his book, can we go straight to the penalty phase of his trial?
              Report Abuse
          • Author by mefirst (March 05, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
            11  
            bludog, certainly you must agree that rove and libby engaged in a plan to out valerie plame to the press? there were half a dozen reporters who testified that it was rove and libby who told them about plame and her status, not the other way around which was rove's original claim. conveniently for good ol karl, the prosecuter let rove change his original grand jury testimony. rove and libby were under an obligation to not reveal any classified material, which her identity was, unless they knew for sure it was declassified. they should have had their security clearances removed immediately, but bush didn't care. ike or harry truman would have thrown the two of them into the street personally.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bludog1 (March 06, 2010 9:25 am ET)
              2 17
              Does the name Richard Armitage sound familiar folks? If memory serves, Novak identified Armitage as the source, or the leaker. The facts remain: the only charges arising from the sordid affair that I now of were those against the CofS for lying, which in my view is obstruction. Rove, despite numerous treks to the prosecutor and the grand jury, was never charged. What the prosecutor could have, would have, should have done ... carries no currency, given the facts.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mefirst (March 06, 2010 10:04 am ET)
                13 1
                want to talk facts? armitage was a source, but novak said that rove confirmed her identity, which he was not allowed to do, according to the security oath he took. see the link. a cia official, named in the link, also told novak not to publish her name. he ignored that warning. funny how all the conservatives have no problem with that. instead wilson and plame got attacked.

                and as i pointed out, those "numerous treks" to the grand jury involved rove changing his testimony to fit what the reporters said. which happened because a friendly reporter called rove's lawyer and gave him the details on what was being asked. libby had also met with judith miller of the new york times and given her plame's name and asked her to conceal his identity by saying he was a "hill staffer", which he had been but was not anymore. why the prosecutor did not indict both of them on charges of leaking her name is something only he can explain. i asked you if you agreed with the fact that rove and libby engaged in a plan to out plame to the press. Agree?
                Your text to link here...
                Report Abuse
                • Author by bludog1 (March 06, 2010 10:48 am ET)
                  2 15
                  If you will return to my response to the "treason" comment above, perhaps we can get back on track. That was what I was responding to. So far as I know, nothing has changed to alter the fact that Rove was not, has not, and likely will not be charged with treason or anything else. Did he speculate about Plame's employment? I would not be surprised. I think he has said as much. Did he conspire with the CofS to out Plame, I cannot say one way or the other because I know of no "facts" that came out at the CofS's trial to substantiate that the two of them actually conceived a plan. I suspect if that had come out at trial, and proved, Rove would be in prison or just about to get out. The rhetorical answer to your other question, I suspect is that the prosecutor did not press charges because he did not have a viable case. That is typically the situation with federal prosecutors in high profile cases.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by mefirst (March 06, 2010 11:26 am ET)
                    11 1
                    then perhaps you can comment on this, of which i made a brief mention above. see the link. judith miller of the new york times, who had previously been shown to be a conduit for bush administration misinformation on wmd in iraq, refused to testify to the grand jury and was jailed for awhile. when she did testify, she said that she and libbly had discussions twice before novak's column and libby had told her that plame worked for "winpac", the cia unit specializing in weapons intelligence. again, this is before novak's column. she also testified, and her testimony was backed up by a notebook she kept of the discussions, that the two of them had agreed that he would only be named as a "senior administration official". but then she testified that in the second discussion, he asked to be identified as a "former hill staffer". which technically he was, but that was a clear attempt to move suspicion away from the white house for the outing of plame. so you are asking why there were not more indictments and i don't know. rove clearly lied and then changed his story and libby clearly engaged in an effort to out someone he knew to be an agent.
                    Your text to link here...
                    Report Abuse
                  • Author by mefirst (March 06, 2010 11:48 am ET)
                    9 1
                    and you might also want to answer why the white house denied that rove and libby were involved in leaking her name. because the fact is that wilson said almost immediately that he thought rove was involved and the white house had denied any involvement, which was clearly not true. what happened there? bush didn't want to know, or he knew. because it had to be one or the other.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by bludog1 (March 06, 2010 2:23 pm ET)
                      2 14
                      It took Fitzgerald I don't know how many years to determine that he could not prsecute Rove for anything and that the only thing(s) he could prosecute Libby for was lying and/obstruction. All of the rest of it is conjecture, speculation, conspiracy or what have you. The prosecutor had access to everything you presented and more. He was no friend of the Bush Administration. He chose to more forward with only the two charges against Libby; none against Rove. Clearly not treason as alleged above. Novak said that Armitage was his source. As I said, whether others speculoated about Plame's employer or not would not surprise me. I remember reading that Wilson himself bragged about her working for the CIA, though I don't know it for certain. Remember the origninal assertion here was about treason, which was what I took exception to.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by foghornleghorn (March 06, 2010 2:36 pm ET)
                        8 1
                        Clearly not treason as alleged above.

                        Outing a CIA agent is treason. Rove participated in the outing of a CIA agent to reporters. Ergo, he committed treason. It's really quite simple.

                        And the reason Rove wasn't indicted was in part because all the players in this evil game lied to cover their collective a**es.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by bludog1 (March 07, 2010 8:32 am ET)
                          2 11
                          Dang. Conspiracy theories abound. No sale. The prosecutor didnt even indict Rove on anything. None. Nada. Give it up. Wrong choice of words. Her own husband was quoted as having "outed" her employment. But we are retilling the same soil so I will quit.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by vhw28672478 (March 07, 2010 12:30 pm ET)
                            3 1
                            You are wrong Rove is a joke
                            Report Abuse
                          • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 12:50 pm ET)
                            8 1
                            He COULDN'T, bludog. Libby's lies TAINTED any evidence that Fitzgerald had. Don't you understand what "obstruction of justice" means?

                            Wilson was never "quoted as having 'outed' her employment." Never. Whomever told you that is lying.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by bludog1 (March 08, 2010 1:36 pm ET)
                              1 4
                              What I said was that my recollection was the Wilson bragged about her employment at the Agency. That was confirmed, as I remember by a number of sources at the time.
                              A quick look at the WSJ archives turns up the following about her status being known:
                              Joe Wilson's 'Secret' Wife
                              As we noted yesterday, special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald's indictment of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby does not allege that Valerie Plame, the long-suffering wife of Bush-hating egomaniac Joe Wilson, was a covert CIA agent. It does, however, claim that Plame's "employment status was classified" and that before July 14, 2003, when her name appeared in a column by Robert Novak, her "affiliation with the CIA was not common knowledge outside the intelligence community."

                              We guess that depends what you mean by "common." It seems that at least two journalists knew that Plame worked for the CIA long before the kerfuffle that bears her name was a gleam in the eye of Angry Leftists. From the New York Sun, July 6, 2005:

                              Among the letters submitted by [Time's Matt] Cooper [to the judge considering whether to compel his testimony] was one from a former Time White House correspondent, Hugh Sidey. "In this case it seems to me the protection of a source transcends the other considerations,which do not seem to threaten national security," he wrote.

                              Mr. Sidey said in an interview that the identity of the CIA operative, Ms. Plame, was widely known--well before Mr. Cooper talked to his sources. "You know this game as well as I do," Mr. Sidey said. "That name was knocking around in the sub rosa world we live in for a long time."

                              And this is an exchange between host Alan Murray and guest Andrea Mitchell on CNBC's now-defunct "Capital Report," Oct. 3, 2003 (transcript not available publicly online):

                              Murray: Do we have any idea how widely known it was in Washington that Joe Wilson's wife worked for the CIA?

                              Mitchell: It was widely known among those of us who cover the intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger. So a number of us began to pick up on that. But frankly I wasn't aware of her actual role at the CIA and the fact that she had a covert role involving weapons of mass destruction, not until Bob Novak wrote it.

                              In fact, Novak did not report that she was covert; Fitzgerald did not allege it; and the factual assertions Joe Wilson makes in his own book, if accurate, prove that she was not. It's further evidence that this "scandal" is about nothing, and that Libby's indictment--even if he turns out to be guilty--is a tragedy.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by foghornleghorn (March 08, 2010 2:50 pm ET)
                                4 1
                                So now you're parsing "covert" and "classified". It makes no difference who inside the beltway knew or maybe knew she was covert/classified. She was outed to the general public by Rove and his minions. That's treason.

                                Especially since she was working on nuclear non-proliferation in Iran and her shell company had to be shut down and everyone else who worked for that company was put at risk.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by bludog1 (March 08, 2010 3:52 pm ET)
                                  1 3
                                  And going to the CIA headquarters every day. Get real my friend. Very difficult to be under cover when you go to work in the front door of CIA headquarters I should think. Anyway, I stand on theoriginal point. No indictment. No conviction. No treason. Case closed.
                                  Report Abuse
                          • Author by open_mind (March 07, 2010 6:40 pm ET)
                            4 1
                            [Valerie Plame's] own husband was quoted as having "outed" her employment.
                            As I remember it, the source for that claim was not credible. The Washington Times wrote a story on that where the source claimed Wilson had a big mouth and the whole neighborhood supposedly knew about Plame's employment at CIA, but when the Times interviewed actual neighbor's the Times could not find any of them that knew Plame's real occupation before the Bush Administration's actions.
                            Report Abuse
                      • Author by mefirst (March 06, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
                        8 2
                        whether they were indicted or not, it's not in dispute what they did. what you "remember reading" has nothing to do with this. i'm sure you're talking about some flake fox had on who claimed that wilson said she worked for the cia. there is zero evidence that happened. no one close to them knew, but he's going to tell some guy he's never met before? the prosecutor also got his original job by a bush appointment, so he can't have disliked him too much. i offered you grand jury testimony by the reporters who said that rove and libby told them, not the other way around, and they told them before novack's column. the reporters did not "speculate" because they had no idea his wife worked for the cia. novak also said his sources were "two senior administration officials", one of whom he later named as rove. and i noticed you did not answer my question as to why the white house denied that rove and libby were involved. scott mcclellan said they both lied to him, which is why he denied it to the press. there are two possibilities. bush never asked them, which is a dereliction of his duty to find out if members of his administration leaked classified material. or he knew. it's one or the other. so if nothing was wrong, why the lies?
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 12:48 pm ET)
                        7 2
                        You are repeating false talking points. There was NEVER any evidence presented which showed that Wilson had bragged about his wife working for the CIA.

                        You are incorrect about your assessment of what the prosecutor had access to . . . Scooter Libby's lies tainted any knowledge that the prosecutor may have had access to. That's why Libby was charged and was convicted of lying to federal agents and obstruction of justice. His LIES, probably instructed from the office of the VP, tainted the case.

                        You need to read up on this case from actual court documents instead of relying on your obviously biased and dishonest sources.
                        Report Abuse
                    • Author by mefirst (March 07, 2010 10:10 am ET)
                      7  
                      bludog, could you tell us who wilson was "quoted" as outing her employment to? name, please? funny how you just expect everyone to accept your unnamed assertions, but grand jury testimony is just "conspiracy theories" to you. or the fact that the white house insisted when the story came out that rove and libby had never given her name, which was classified, to reporters and they held to that for months, knowing it was flat out wrong. you claim it's "tilling the same soil", but you still haven't scratched the surface with a comment on that.
                      Report Abuse
              • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 12:44 pm ET)
                6  
                Armitage was A source for NOVAK. Other people, like Judith Miller, had already been told of Wilson's wife's identity by others.

                You might want to look at facts and not rely on talking points, so much. Makes you look uninformed.
                Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (March 05, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
        18  
        This whole thing is so dirty it makes Watergate look like amateur hour.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by neon desert (March 05, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
          11  
          There's never been any doubt about the intensity of Rove's ambition...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by MadamDeb (March 05, 2010 5:29 pm ET)
      2  
      That's right, Rove. Blame the dead.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gg (March 05, 2010 5:43 pm ET)
      17 1
      How anyone can use the words "pompous, self-centered, egotistical, and 'an a**hole.' " and Novak in the same sentence and yet not be referring to Novak himself, is beyond me.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by shaggles (March 05, 2010 6:01 pm ET)
        8  
        It was Rove speaking wasn't it? It reminds me of one of Oscar Wilde's famous quotes. To Whistler: "True we were talking about you but I was thinking about myself."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by oscar the grouch (March 05, 2010 7:56 pm ET)
        1 4
        Well, it generally takes onne (or in this case, two) to know one.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Hasa Diga Eebowai (March 05, 2010 7:33 pm ET)
      12  
      I agree with Rove. That jerk who yelled "You lie!" during Obama's speech certainly is an @ssh0le.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by phredicles (March 05, 2010 8:30 pm ET)
        7  
        Yeah, that's who I thought this thread was about. I am an American voter, and I have a short memory...

        But now that my memory is refreshed, what a load of self-serving cr@p. Clearly these dirtbags are still worried about being called to account for this crime. Here's hoping their worries come true before too long.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Unreality (March 06, 2010 1:36 pm ET)
        5  
        wink ;^)
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (March 05, 2010 10:19 pm ET)
      7  
      I'm sorry, grown men like Rove, pushing 60, shouldn't be talking about their "Spider Man senses tingling" and then go and call someone else an assh0le. Even if the guy he's calling an assh0le really is an assh0le. It makes Rove seem like, you guessed it, an assh0le.



      Report Abuse
      • Author by worrierking (March 05, 2010 10:23 pm ET)
        7  
        I'm sorry. I thought he was referring to the congressman from South Carolina named Addison Graves Wilson but called Joe Wilson. He is the assh0le.

        I should have known he was talking about the other Joe Wilson, who is not an assh0le.

        It's been a long day.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (March 05, 2010 11:55 pm ET)
      2  
      "You lie?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DAWUSS (March 05, 2010 11:55 pm ET)
         
      "You lie?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by captain jack sparrow (March 06, 2010 11:09 am ET)
      1  
      OMG! Stop the presses!! Breaking News!!

      Rove agreed with Novak that Wilson was an a-hole...

      Is this somehow shocking?

      I'm pretty sure that term is thrown around a lot in political circles. What's the big deal here?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (March 06, 2010 11:31 am ET)
      3 17
      Thank you, MMFA. I really needed to know that Karl Rove agrees with Bob Novak that Joe Wilson is an a$$hole. Quick! Can you spot the conservative misinformation in this posting? I can't.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (March 06, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
        7  
        Yes Willard Smith, the Ministry of Truth is out to get you.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (March 06, 2010 1:10 pm ET)
        7  
        There's more to it, Mag.

        In the pages above Rove is giving us the image of two guys sitting around, shooting the sh**. He then does a bit of wordplay gymnastics when he mentions Novak bringing up Valerie Plame that seems to be saying, oh sure, I sort of confirmed the information that outed her as a CIA operative, but I really didn't mean to.

        It's an all too familiar plot. "Yeah, I outed her, but I really didn't mean to. And hey, Wilson's an a$$hole anyway." A variation on the, "Yeah, we invaded Iraq for no justifiable reasons, but we really, really thought they had WMD. And hey, isn't the world a better place without that a$$hole Saddam?"

        Rove may think the locker room talk somehow defends his deeds. Many others might take issue with this.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (March 06, 2010 1:20 pm ET)
          10  
          Having seen "Bush's Brain",I take everything Rove says as a lie or propaganda.And Mag,grow up,everything isn't just left or right.There is a whole world of truth that begs exploration.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (March 06, 2010 1:21 pm ET)
          1 11
          Novak brought it up. Rove said he "heard" about the wife of a CIA operative. If what Rove wrote in his book is true, he never confirmed it. There's no substance to this at all. It's all "he said, she said".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Unreality (March 06, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
            10  
            ...if what Rove wrote in his book is true, ....

            And therefore if what Rove wrote is false, as are so many of his other assertions in this book, we will know .....?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by MidnightWriter (March 06, 2010 1:39 pm ET)
            10  
            That's kind of my point, Mag.

            After sharing their mutual venom concerning Wilson, Rove recalls Novak bringing up Plame's CIA status. Rove then quotes Novak as quoting Rove as saying, "Oh, you know that, too," (that's the wordplay gymnastics I was talking about). Rove then says he remembers himself saying, "I've heard that, too."

            Novak always said he only revealed Plame as being a CIA operative after he had confirmed it with two highly placed source. Rove is basically saying, yeah, I was one of those sources, but I really didn't mean to be.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bongo Fury (March 06, 2010 1:46 pm ET)
              6  
              Exactly.This story doesn't need Rona Barrett.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mefirst (March 08, 2010 7:25 am ET)
              4  
              and whatever novak claims, rove and libby told other reporters who had no idea she was a cia agent. those reporters all testified to that to the grand jury. it was after they testified, that rove suddenly remembered talking to them and changed his testimony.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 12:51 pm ET)
        4  
        Rove's entire book is, most likely, conservative misinformation. Keep up, Beck-clone.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mary59 (March 06, 2010 2:34 pm ET)
      7  
      Amazing that there are still people here trying to defend Rove. His actions are well known and anyone with any degree of honesty would admit that he deserves to be called t8rd blossom without the bloom.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MagCynic (March 06, 2010 2:48 pm ET)
        1 11
        I can see if you don't like his politics but why cheap shot the guy like that? What has he done that's so wrong?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bongo Fury (March 06, 2010 3:04 pm ET)
          7  
          See "Bush's Brain"..nuff said
          Report Abuse
        • Author by my4cents (March 06, 2010 10:39 pm ET)
          7  
          cheap shot? why is rove only on fx news unchallenged?
          Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
          10  
          My objections to Karl Rove have NOTHING to do with his politics. Karl Rove is an underhanded, lying ass who PRIDES himself in being dirty and having never really been caught. He has a 30+ year history of stuff like the Plame case. It started when he was in college. He used false identification and entered the campaign office of the democratic candidate for the treasurer of the state of Illinois. He stole 1000 pages of letterhead and printed up fliers advertising a beer bust at the campaign headquarters. Then he dropped out of college [do you see the Fox pattern of hiring uneducated folks for their programming?] and became Executive Director of the College Republicans . . . he advised the kids to dig through their opposing candidates' trash cans. He was investigated by George H.w. for his activities and had apparently been on the watch list of the Watergate prosecutors for the same thing. Then, you've got all of Rove's barely legal BS in Texas. Pretending that his office had been broken into and bugged the day before an important gubernatorial debate . . . There was no sign that the office had been broken into and it appeared as if the "bugs" were placed by someone working in the office. It goes on and on. Rove is a blight on the American political community. He's a liar and a crook who GLOATS over the fact that he's never been caught.

          The only "politics" that Karl Rove has are his own.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 1:38 pm ET)
            11  
            I might add that Bush 41 FIRED Rove from his re-election campaing for planting a slime story in Novak's column. He and Novak denied it, but Rove testified in the Plame investigation that he had, in fact, planted the Mosbacher story with Novak.

            Rove is slime, pure and simple. He cares nothing about this country, just Karl Rove.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (March 07, 2010 2:50 pm ET)
              3  
              "campaign" Sheesh!
              Report Abuse
              • Author by mary59 (March 07, 2010 5:34 pm ET)
                5  
                Bintx, thank you for taking the time to respond about Rove's slimy history. It should be obvious for anyone paying attention, but these thngs still must be pointed out. So much energy goes into muddying the waters.
                Report Abuse
    • Author by vonbargen9388 (March 08, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
      3  
      Anyone who knows what Bush's nickname for Rove was ("T... Blossom) understands why he would know a lot about the part of the anatomy he apparently used to describe Joe Wilson. (There - nor profanity.)
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.