About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Hours after Fox corrected the record, Beck perpetuates falsehood about doctor "survey"

March 17, 2010 9:43 pm ET — 18 Comments

On his Fox News show, Glenn Beck falsely claimed that The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) said that 46 percent of primary care physicians would consider leaving their profession if the Democrats' health care reform bill passes. In fact, as Fox News' Megyn Kelly had noted three hours earlier, the NEJM did not conduct the "survey" -- which was "not a scientific poll."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Beck falsely attributed survey to NEJM

Beck falsely claimed NEJM "says ... nearly one-third of doctors will quit" if bill passes. On the March 17 edition of his Fox News show, Beck falsely claimed that "The New England Journal of Medicine says that if this bill is passed nearly one-third of doctors will quit practice medicine -- quit practicing medicine."

As Fox's Kelly noted, "survey" was not conducted by NEJM and was "not a scientific poll"

Kelly: Survey, which was "not a scientific poll," "was conducted by the Medicus Firm ... a national physician search firm." On the March 17 edition of Fox News' America Live, host Kelly noted that the survey "was conducted by the Medicus Firm, which is a national physician search firm." She added: "The New England Journal of Medicine, which was originally responsible for posting, not publishing, but -- not conducting the survey, but for posting it on its website -- later removed it. It's not a scientific poll; it's a survey."

Spokeswoman confirmed survey has nothing to do with NEJM's "original research" and "was not published" by Journal. Media Matters for America contacted NEJM and received confirmation from spokeswoman Jennifer Zeis that the study had "nothing to do with the New England Journal of Medicine's original research." Zeis also made clear that the study "was not published by the New England Journal of Medicine." In fact, the Medicus Firm conducted the survey in December 2009. Medicus, a Dallas- and Atlanta-based firm that recruits and places physicians in jobs was responsible for conducting the survey. It issued a press release about the results on December 17, 2009. The report then appeared in Recruiting Physicians Today, an employment newsletter produced by the Massachusetts Medical Society, "the publishers of the New England Journal of Medicine."

Other Fox personalities have perpetuated the falsehood

Several Fox News personalities have made the false claim about the survey. Before correcting the record, Kelly herself had previously falsely attributed the survey to the NEJM. Others who have made the claim include:

  • Host Bill O'Reilly, who claimed on March 16 that the survey was "published by The New England Journal of Medicine, a prestigious magazine."
  • Fox & Friends co-host Brian Kilmeade, who said on March 17 that the NEJM "published a report and did a survey" that found doctors "feel reform will force them out."
  • Host Sean Hannity, who, on the March 16 edition of his show, asked Milton Wolf, a radiologist who says he is President Obama's second cousin, "Will this plan that they're now pushing, and I think in a very corrupt way, do you believe this will harm and -- if you believe so, how greatly will it harm our health care system?" Wolf replied: "We just learned from The New England Journal of Medicine that a significant percentage of doctors would consider leaving -- seriously consider leaving the profession if this went through."
  • Fox News contributor Dr. Marc Siegel, who, on the March 16 edition of Fox News' Your World, stated: "First of all, the [American Medical Association] is a bureaucratic organization that doesn't represent practicing doctors. A new study in The New England Journal of Medicine says that one-third of physicians would consider quitting or retiring early if this goes through."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by DellDolly (March 17, 2010 10:47 pm ET)
      6  
      No legit news organization would run a poll/survey like this without vetting it first - finding out what the methodology was, those kinds of things.

      Had they done that, they wouldn't have classified it as they did.

      What's clear is that they didn't vet it.

      Why not?

      Because they're not a legit news organization, that's why.

      BTW, did anyone catch Bret Baier's interview of President Obama? He was SO rude, interrupting him, and even after Obama made it clear that he wasn't done and made it even MORE clear that he was NOT going to stop talking, Baier just kept on. It was disgusting.

      It was FoxNews.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by At_odds (March 17, 2010 11:20 pm ET)
        4  
        This reminds me of when Fox news "debunked" the science of global warming by quote-mining those climatologists and misconstruing the meanings. They must look for sources that sound vague and/or complex and assign stories to them (like the manatees on that South Park episode).

        And yes, I chuckled while watching that interview because Baier must have thought that it looked good from his point of view or something. He just wanted Obama to look bad, and he failed miserably. He would ask a loaded question, Obama would start to explain an answer and then Baier would ask another loaded question (practically yelling over Obama). I thought journalists were supposed to ask questions to find answers, not just to try to make the interviewee look bad. Hey, at least Obama maintained his composure and showed candor even though Baier couldn't reciprocate.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by snewkirk (March 17, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
        2  
        they know what they're doing, that's why it's such a shame
        Report Abuse
        • Author by TheDayV (March 18, 2010 12:53 pm ET)
          2  
          Agreed. For all the idiocy that some of the contributors here attribute to FN personalities, I think most of the people at FOX know exactly what they're doing. O'Reilly would be the only exception just because he embodies ignorance unlike, say, Hannity who just appeals to it. Beck's kind of in the middle. He crafts bigger illusions than O'Reilly but he doesn't have the agenda that Hannity does.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by At_odds (March 19, 2010 12:29 am ET)
            3  
            O'Reilly knows what he is doing too. He is just a little more clever about hiding it. He plays dumb and occasionally makes a minor liberal point in order to make himself seem legitimate.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mmfa.fan (March 18, 2010 10:16 am ET)
        1  
        Is there a link for that Baier interview anywhere? I didn't catch it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Unreality (March 18, 2010 1:15 am ET)
      2  
      Setting aside the NEJM attribution, I recall reading the Medicus press release at the time wondering what the devil they had asked.

      It was obvious the readers had NO CLUE what the public option meant or perhaps more to the point, the survey did not define what Public Option meant. The Public Option makes not one whit of difference in the practice of medicine nor one's compensation.

      Our company makes medical devices. We work with surgeons in US, Canada and Europe. The typical comments we hear are amazement from Europeans about the disinformation concerning their highly effective health care systems. (Most of our R&D is from Europe.) Americans who travel to conferences are quick to complain about complicated and unpredictable US insurance reimbursement.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (March 18, 2010 1:40 am ET)
        3  
        Yes, the right's disinformation campaign has been a great success for them and a horrific wound to our nation.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Leftylib (March 18, 2010 8:20 am ET)
             
          What cracks me up about the interview is hearing so many right wing nutjobs sobbing that Obama was "disrespectful" to his interviewer. When Bush was president, he was the one deserving of "respect". I guess when a Democrat is president, the burden of "showing respect" somehow reverses.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by whatIthink (March 18, 2010 8:31 am ET)
      1  
      I think this just proves that even people who work at FOX can't stand watching FOX, hence the reptition of false stories from one show to another. (At least that's by semi-positive spin on it...of course they could (especially Beck) all just be a bunch of blathering idiots).
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jediknight65 (March 18, 2010 9:07 am ET)
      1  
      Ed Wood has the memory of a roomba
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rumpleteasermom (March 18, 2010 9:42 am ET)
      3  
      What I want to know is why the NEJM doesn't sue Fox for libel? In fact, I think that might be the best way to get people to wake up to Fox's nonsense - if they start facing libel suit after libel suit.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by motorcity (March 18, 2010 10:30 am ET)
           
        Don't think it fits the criteria for libel, NEJM would have to prove damages. Doesn't mean they can't file a suit though, be a thorn in FNC's side if nothing else. Might even generate some bad publicity for FNC, if the "liberal" media would bother to report on it.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by zydeco (March 18, 2010 10:16 am ET)
         
      Fascinating how all Fox News staffers made the exact same mistake. It really exposes the fact that there is a central voice and a central research department to the organization.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by zxbe (March 18, 2010 11:02 am ET)
         
      Beck has clearly demonstrated that facts have no place in his monologue.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MAJMark (March 18, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
         
      Life News actually reported this first.

      “A new poll that should cause significant concerns for backers of the pro-abortion Senate health care bill finds nearly half the nation's physicians would consider quitting if the bill becomes law. The survey, appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine, indicates 46 percent of doctors would consider leaving their practice.”
      http://www.lifenews.com/nat6137.html

      Is Media Matters going to go after Life News, also? Or just attack Fox News?
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.