About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox News erases 2006 Hawaii earthquake to attack Obama

March 18, 2010 9:20 am ET — 72 Comments

Responding to President Obama's March 17 statement that Hawaii "went through an earthquake" and could benefit from a health care reform provision that would help Louisiana cope with Medicaid shortfalls resulting from Hurricane Katrina, Steve Doocy asked, "What Hawaiian earthquake?" In fact, as Fox News reported at the time, President Bush declared a "major disaster" after Hawaii was hit by a magnitude 6.7 earthquake in October 2006.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Fox & Friends' Doocy: "What Hawaiian earthquake?"

On March 18, Fox & Friends aired Obama's statement that the health care reform provision that benefits Louisiana "also helps Hawaii, which went through an earthquake." Co-host Steve Doocy responded:

DOOCY: Hold it. What Hawaiian earthquake? There was an earthquake in 1868 that killed 77. There was an earthquake in 1975 that killed two. ABC is reporting that apparently on page 432 of the Reid bill, there's a section describing exactly how a state would qualify. It would have to be within the last seven fiscal years. Essentially it boils down to just one state, and that is Louisiana.

Bush declared "major disaster" after 2006 earthquake hit Hawaii

A magnitude 6.7 earthquake hit Hawaii on October 15, 2006. As Media Matters' Adam Shah noted in response to right-wing bloggers who claimed Obama was "making up" an earthquake, the U.S. Geological Survey states that Hawaii suffered a magnitude 6.7 earthquake on October 15, 2006.

Bush declared "major disaster" in "the State of Hawaii." On October 16, 2006, the White House stated:

The President today declared a major disaster exists in the State of Hawaii and ordered Federal aid to supplement State and local recovery efforts in the area struck by an earthquake that occurred on October 15, 2006, and related aftershocks.

Federal funding is available to State and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis in the counties of Hawaii, Honolulu, Kauai, and Maui and the City of Honolulu for debris removal and emergency protective measures, including direct Federal assistance.

Federal funding is also available on a cost-sharing basis for hazard mitigation measures statewide.

R. David Paulison, Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, named Michael L. Karl as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area.

The Agency said that more areas and additional forms of assistance may be designated after damage assessments are fully completed in the affected areas.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FEMA (202) 646-4600.

Fox & Friends reported on earthquake at the time

On the October 18, 2006, edition of Fox & Friends, correspondent Lauren Green reported:

GREEN: President Bush declares a federal disaster in Hawaii following a 6.7 magnitude earthquake, and this opens up the door to more federal recovery dollars and programs to fix damaged roadways and bridges and schools. Early damage estimates from the quake could be as high as $73 million.

Fox News' The Big Story also covered Hawaii earthquake. From the October 16, 2006, edition of Fox News' The Big Story with John Gibson: [transcript from Nexis]

GIBSON: Now for the big natural disaster story out there in paradise. The massive 6.6 magnitude earthquake strikes Hawaii. The strongest to hit the islands in over two decades. The quake sparked mudslides, blackouts, collapsed roads. Luckily no deaths have been reported. Inspectors are now out in the area checking for major structural damage. Fox's Anita Vogel live on the videophone now with an update from Honolulu.

Hi, Anita.

ANITA VOGEL, FOX NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Hi, John. I'm actually in Kona. We're on the Big Island now, not too far away from where the epicenter of this quake is. I can tell you one local woman we talked to probably put it the best when she said yesterday was a day that most Hawaiians will never forget. As you mentioned, this was one of the strongest earthquakes to hit the region in so many years. And it caused as many as 40 aftershocks.

Now the initial quake was centered not too far from where we are right now, about 10 miles of off the coast of the Big Island, off the coast of Kona. It was a 6.6 or 6.7 magnitude temblor. It caused widespread power outages, landslides and rockslides and structural damage to many buildings, including homes. In one case it led to a house fire that caused major smoke damage. Even people who consider themselves veterans of earthquakes say this was indeed a very big one.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I lived all my life on the San Andreas fault in California. I've never felt an earthquake like this before, ever.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What was it like? Describe it.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: It shook the house for so long, everything flew. Everything in the house fell, everything.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

VOGEL: Sixty seconds a long time for appear earthquake to be shaking. Yesterday the governor declared a state of emergency. She said she was relieved that despite the force of the earthquake, there were no serious injuries or fatalities. But there were plenty of close calls. At one extended care facility here on the Big Island, nearly 50 people had to be evacuated after the ceiling tiles fell town and the floor was flooded from a water main break.

Now, John, the work is hardly over here. There are plenty of teams out assessing the damage and we're learning this afternoon that FEMA is even sending a team of 75 people to go out and make sure that no one is trapped out there and in need of help. Back to you.

GIBSON: Fox's Anita Vogel in Kona, Hawaii.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 9:26 am ET)
      10  
      Simple explanation...Hawaii is not a state.

      It's just another one of those places far, far away from real America where foreigners come from. ;>)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 9:30 am ET)
        6 1
        Just ask Sarah Palin...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:41 am ET)
          15 1
          I want to see the original State Verification Certificate of Hawaii.

          I am a Stater. I want proof that this group of islands is a state. And don't try to give me any official documents of the US Government. They have all be altered since the Obama Administration took over. This will also benefit my Birther cousins. Hence, Hawaii is not a state, Obama was born in Hawaii, Obama is not an American.

          Do you think Drudge will pick this up. Or BrightBart?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 9:43 am ET)
            4  
            LOL...
            Report Abuse
          • Author by afriend (March 18, 2010 10:32 am ET)
            5  
            there's got to be something unconstitutional in here somewhere....the Constitution doesn't mention earthquakes...our Founding Fathers didn't whine about silly earthquakes...ahm, earthquakes cause abortions.....something..there's got to be something here....give me a chalkboard and I'll make the connections...
            Report Abuse
            • Author by papa bear3 (March 18, 2010 11:08 am ET)
              6  
              Acorn caused it, it was reported in a Kenyan newspaper next to Obama's birth announcement . . .how quickly we forget
              Report Abuse
    • Author by goesto11 (March 18, 2010 9:26 am ET)
      9  
      Anyone of a certain age is familiar with the old Soviet Union technique of revising the historical record for political purposes, even to the point of erasing certain people from photos.

      It's the classic definition of propaganda. Fox News is the best current example.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by MagCynic (March 18, 2010 9:39 am ET)
      1 17
      To be fair I'd bet money most people don't remember the great Hawaiian earthquake of 2006 that killed zero people. It was a response given off the top of his head. Was he even on Fox & Friend sin 2006?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 9:42 am ET)
        17  
        Exactly...who can expect a newsman on a national cable news show to know anything that's been in the news in the past four years? Liberals set unrealistically high standards for FOX News.

        <sarcasm>
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (March 18, 2010 9:45 am ET)
          1 17
          You really expect ANY newsman or woman to know EVERY SINGLE news story that happened in this country during the past four years? Especially a relatively minor story about an earthquake that didn't kill anybody?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:48 am ET)
            12 1
            Only good ones..who verify stories before reading them.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by political_left-religious_right (March 18, 2010 11:25 am ET)
              7 1
              Not only that, but by mentioning the 1975 quake, it is clear that Doofus did do some searching. He simply made a politically-based choice to not share the complete information. Why? Because he thought it would make the president look bad.

              And since Obama never said anything about people being killed in the 2006 quake (imagine how the right would suddenly discover the power of Google and jump all over the president if he had!), then MagCynic's repeated bringing the point up is not scoring him any points, anyway.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 9:49 am ET)
            13  
            I would expect a real newsman to check before making a sarcastic statement denying that something widely reported in the national news had occured.

            Problem is that FOX has a history of sloppy reporting devoid of fact checking. Some people say they're not even a legitimate news organization.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Bobfish217 (March 18, 2010 6:35 pm ET)
                 
              you mean like Dan rather and his false Bush story that got him canned.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2010 9:50 am ET)
            12  
            If he doesn't know, maybe he should be smart enough not to pop off and, in his ignorance, imply that Obama is lying.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by constitutionDOESmatter (March 18, 2010 7:19 pm ET)
                1
              Who besides the Liar in chief would compare damage to one hotel, a few houses, and a 4 inch tsunami to Katrina???
              Report Abuse
          • Author by wookie (March 18, 2010 10:21 am ET)
            13  
            He knew about the 1868 and 1975 earthquakes.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 10:25 am ET)
              3  
              Oooooh...good one.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by MidnightWriter (March 18, 2010 10:29 am ET)
              9  
              And he's reading the dates off a sheet of paper.

              Somebody there did some kind of research, and yet they missed the most recent earthquake.

              Lousy, lousy reporting. Who are they going to fire?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by mmharris438182 (March 18, 2010 11:09 am ET)
              7  
              This is the most relevant posting about this issue. Someone there at Fox went to the trouble to look up Hawaiian earthquakes and then gave Steve Doocy the 1868 and 1975 dates. Why didn't they include 2006? It's either sloppy or intentional. And it's indefensible that a slopppy or intentionally disingenous reporter would then use wrong information to suggest that the President is wrong. But Steve Doocy is not a reporter; he's just a talker. He's all talk, just like Fox "News."
              Report Abuse
          • Author by dirtdr (March 18, 2010 11:14 am ET)
               
            Hold on a second. He had a sheet of paper in front of him that he was reading off of mentioning the the early 1800's and 1970 earth quake. That wasn't a response off the top of his head. That was a "researched" response. So yes, I do expect him to be able to find information about a magnitude 6.5 earthquake that took place 4 years ago.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (March 18, 2010 12:30 pm ET)
            2  
            Yes, especially since this subject was debunked yesterday, someone at Faux and Fiends should have known about it.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 18, 2010 3:22 pm ET)
            2  
            When they are going to say that an event never happened, I would assume they would check their facts. I guess your standards are much lower than mine, but I already knew that. You're Beck's intern.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:46 am ET)
        11  
        Who cares if he was with Fox in 2006? Was he alive in 2006? He is reporting now, 2010. It isn't ancient history. Fox is a NEW CHANNEL...research should be part of it. Why can't you see that this is just another lie tossed out by Fox to get the loonies upset in the morning about Obama lying.
        And your use our the 'great Hawaiian earthquake that killed zero people' is typical of someone who wishes to standup for this talking head.

        By the way, maybe most people will now know the earthquake occurred...even Fox viewers learned something.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MagCynic (March 18, 2010 9:51 am ET)
          1 15
          Let me get this straight. One, do you believe most people in this country remember the earthquake in Hawaii? Two, what does FNC get from "lying" about the earthquake never happening? It doesn't prove anything. It doesn't mean anything. It doesn't advance their evil agenda one bit. Three, do you believe ANY person on ANY news network personality has every, single major and minor story memorized from the past four years? If you do, name them.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:54 am ET)
            12 1
            1. NO
            2. They call the Preisdent a liar. You seem to miss that point.
            3. NO

            There are my answers to you.

            My question now...In attempting to call the President a liar, shouldn't a real News person check their facts?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by MagCynic (March 18, 2010 10:12 am ET)
              1 13
              He didn't call him a liar. You're assuming that that's his intentions. Even the quote provided by MMFA asserts that he doesn't remember the earthquake and that it boils down to just Louisiana. Stop assuming.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 10:18 am ET)
                7  
                So when is Doocy going to tell his viewers that he gave them bad information?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by MidnightWriter (March 18, 2010 10:20 am ET)
                7  
                Mag, Fox has been telling their viewers that Sen Landrieu was doing something incredibly underhanded with her efforts to get some additional relief for her state. She was not and the efforts to assist Hawaii after their earthquake is proof of that.

                Now, perhaps he honestly didn't remember. That's fine. Stories like that, however, do not pop up suddenly. Fox has their producers and researchers. It they had time to edit the clip, they had time to check the facts. It's that simple.

                You know, Glenn Beck has been making a lot of noise lately about how Progressives should not be trusted because they've somehow rewritten history. How should we feel about a news network that creatively edits history?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 10:24 am ET)
                  5  
                  Errors in reporting can be corrected. Has FOX corrected itself...?
                  Report Abuse
              • Author by friedbergboy1422 (March 18, 2010 3:25 pm ET)
                2  
                Are you expecting a retraction then since he is obviously wrong here?

                If he doesn't retract or correct himself, will you call him out then? Put up or shut up, Mag.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by SFnomad (March 18, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
                1  
                Yes, Doofus did call President Obama a liar. All you have to do is read the top paragraph in this story to get that. Of course, it's just easier for you to put on your knee-pads for Fox and Liars.

                President Obama said .... Hawaii "went through an earthquake" and could benefit from a health care reform provision that would help Louisiana cope with Medicaid shortfalls resulting from Hurricane Katrina.

                Doofus said ... "What Hawaiian earthquake?"

                Now, if you can't figure it out, Doofus was replying to this with a rhetorical question, the answer being that one didn't happen and that President Obama is a liar.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2010 9:54 am ET)
            8  
            Actually, it does advance their evil agenda by planting the seed in the minds of their droolers that Obama might be lying.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 9:56 am ET)
            8  
            I remembered the earthquake in Hawaii after Obama mentioned it...but it's not my job to remember things like that. I'm not a professional news commentator.

            Doocy was suggesting that Barack Obama was lying about an earthquake having occurred in Hawaii...or at least that Obama was terribly mistaken. BTW, has FOX now issued a retraction of Doocy's dumb remarks?

            Lastly, FOX has a history of not checking facts and of continuing to perpetuate false stories after they have been debunked.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:58 am ET)
              6  
              Like Beck and the Journal of Medicine stuff..he reported on it after is was debunked. How Foxy of him
              Report Abuse
              • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 10:00 am ET)
                4  
                Exactly...like, did FOX ever tell their viewers that China was NOT drilling for oil off the coast of Cuba as they widely reported...but which was soon debunked?
                Report Abuse
              • Author by MagCynic (March 18, 2010 10:13 am ET)
                  12
                To be fair the original posting DID appear on the NEJM's website before they corrected it.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 10:20 am ET)
                  6  
                  So that's why Beck and others feel entitled to CONTINUE saying it was a NEJM survey? Despite the fact that we now know differently...?
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by bintx (March 18, 2010 10:26 am ET)
                  4  
                  How is that fair? Lousy research is lousy research. I guarantee you that they knew before they started running this lie that it was not an NEJM study. It was another "gotcha drop." Put the story out there, even though you know it is false. That's what they do.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by n'est-ce pas (March 18, 2010 11:42 am ET)
                  3  
                  It appeared on a free advertisement website that's the equivalent of an electronic Penny Saver. It had dire quotes from the CEO of the company that conducted the poll, for Christ's sake. It was an ad for a headhunter, and everyone involved, including Fox, knew it.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (March 18, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
                  2 1
                  No, it did NOT appear on the NEJM's website. It appeared on the website of the PUBLISHER of the NEJM.

                  It was ALWAYS an error of those who failed to vet the story before running with it! It was a non-scientific survey, totally biased with results from self-selected people who weren't a representative sampling of doctors. It wasn't a study, or even a poll.

                  This is what the media said about that that survey. And YOU "be fair"? Hah! Don't make us laugh. You lie like a rug. You're never honest and forthright. Never.

                  Bill O'Reilly: Survey was "published by The New England Journal of Medicine, a prestigious magazine."

                  Kilmeade: NEJM "published a report and did a survey" that found doctors "feel reform will force them out."

                  HotAir.com: NEJM "polled health-care providers."

                  Hannity guest attributes study to NEJM.

                  Marc Siegel: "A new study in The New England Journal of Medicine says that one-third of physicians would consider quitting or retiring early if this goes through."
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by overmars jr. (March 18, 2010 10:11 am ET)
            4  
            No. You quite clearly refuse to get anything straight. So why should we let you? Just continue your daily tapdance and we'll continue being astounded you won't grasp/admit simple, obvious concepts.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by wookie (March 18, 2010 10:18 am ET)
            3  
            Two, what does FNC get from "lying" about the earthquake never happening?


            Their culty viewers are even less likely to google things than they are. Fox can completely define reality for them. This is much the same as when they said that Clinton was lying about black churches in Arkansas being burned down.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (March 18, 2010 10:23 am ET)
            4  
            1) It doesn't matter if "most people in this country remember the earthquake in Hawaii," Doocy is an alleged reporter on an alleged "news" network. He should have knowledge of the information he puts forth on his program prior to putting it forth.

            2) Fox is notorious for these "gotcha drops." They drop un-sourced, factless nuggets of damaging information into their alleged "news" stories. They know that the majority of their viewers do not research these false stories. They rarely, if ever, come back and make a correction. It's called PROPAGANDA, Beck-clone. Your duplicate uses the device all the time.

            3) Has nothing to do with memorizing anything. REAL journalists or even most PRETEND journalists, who are not interested in propaganda like the folks on Fox, would make sure that the information which they are using to call the President of the United States a liar is FACTUAL before it is uttered.

            This is the gotcha drop of the day, Beck-clone.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by SMTDL (March 18, 2010 11:24 am ET)
            4 1
            Why are you defending sloppy journalism?They are either lazy or disingenuous! Their own network covered it and it was significant enough that the President(Bush) declared it a disaster area.Doocy attacks Obama while being totally wrong and he is defended? Amazing..He should be FIRED(Like Dan Rather!)!!!Most journalists would have checked further before throwing out such sarcasm.Why would he think the Presdient of the United States would make up something so easily verified?It shows he had no interest in respect,fairness or objectivity where Mr Obama is concerned.Why? Because Fox is only interested in partisan attacks not reporting the news.
            Shameful and pathetic as usual!!
            Report Abuse
          • Author by kyle b.c. (March 19, 2010 10:58 pm ET)
               
            you really are something else, mag, you know it?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by nerzog (March 18, 2010 9:53 am ET)
          10 1
          Maggie has invented a new category for FOX Apologetics: "How could they be expected to know any better? It happened four years ago!"
          Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:55 am ET)
            6 1
            Maybe Fox should hire MMFA to do fact checking for them....
            Report Abuse
          • Author by princeofwheels (March 18, 2010 9:59 am ET)
            6  
            Hell, I don't expect these three to remember anything from four days ago.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (March 18, 2010 10:17 am ET)
        2  
        Doocy has been on Fox & Friends since its inception. I used to watch it every morning until it became a propaganda mill. A person on a "news" network should know the background of his statements prior to making them. This is one of Fox's gotch drops . . . it's not true, but they know that the people who are listening and believing will not take the time to check the veracity of the statement. Fox will, in all probability, not air a correction.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 10:22 am ET)
          2  
          Fox will, in all probability, not air a correction.

          At least not to their viewers directly. On the rare occasion they do issue a retraction they trot out their VP in charge of programming (can't remember his name) who gives a statement to someone like the Washington Post. How many FOX viewers read the Washington Post?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by political_left-religious_right (March 18, 2010 11:36 am ET)
            3  
            How many FOX viewers read the Washington Post?

            Not many, surely. They believe, despite the mountains of evidence, that the Post is a liberal rag.

            I have to wonder--how many Fox viewers read at all? Fox would rather they read nothing beyond their own deceptive chyrons.

            Actually, for their fans that are actually literate, there's Fox Nation to do the dumbing down.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by IRONY 101 (March 18, 2010 12:31 pm ET)
              2  
              Have you ever read the readers' comments at FOX Nation? Most of us here make grammaticial and spelling mistakes...and I am the absolute worst for not proof reading. But the readers' comments at FOX Nation are embarrassingly bad...like a bunch of semi-literate hillbillies.
              Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (March 18, 2010 10:33 am ET)
           
        I'd buy that argument if he hadn't named two earthquakes "off the top of his head", complete with death tolls. He researched it so that he could make that sarcastic comment and either somehow missed an earthquake that was reported by his own media company or deliberately left it out in an attempt to mislead.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by pros2pros2940 (March 18, 2010 10:38 am ET)
        3  
        If a tree falls in the forest.....
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (March 18, 2010 1:45 pm ET)
          3  
          ...and no one's around to hear it, is it still the husband's fault?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by goesto11 (March 18, 2010 10:53 am ET)
        3  
        For the record...

        A Google search for "hawaii earthquake" took a grand total of .017 seconds to produce the relevant information.

        But I suppose the Right Wing pundits aren't familiar with this thing we call "the Internet."
        Report Abuse
      • Author by lodoss (March 18, 2010 3:47 pm ET)
           
        i bet the people that lost their homes and didnt have a place to stay remember it...i suggest anyone that try to debate the president get the facts themselves instead of listening to he said;she said...i luv the teabaggers they are so easily to get off the subject, just ask one how they feel about soc. security.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mmfa.fan (March 18, 2010 9:58 am ET)
      4 1
      MagCynic to the rescue again.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (March 18, 2010 10:39 am ET)
      5 1
      Doocy and the rest of his "friends" are reprehensible morons.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by thaneb (March 18, 2010 11:03 am ET)
      4  
      GWB has been disavowed as "not a true conservative", don't ya know. And the USGS, well "someone has to stand up to experts." (McLeroy)
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mikelartist (March 18, 2010 11:28 am ET)
      2  
      There is plenty of room left on Doocy's giant shovelface to pack on some more egg. It's a daily occurrence now. Just back that chicken's a** right up to the old kitchen witch-like face on Steve "sunny side up" Doocy and let 'em fly.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (March 18, 2010 11:35 am ET)
      3  
      There are Birthers, why not Chart-ers?

      I think Doofie needs to be the spark that ignites a movement of Chart-ers - after all, it's 'way past time for Obama to produce the seismograph chart strips proving this quake really happened.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by draftedin68 (March 18, 2010 12:52 pm ET)
        2  
        .

        Now that I've thought about this, would it be more accurate to call them Strippers?

        .
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Alexander Hamilton (March 18, 2010 1:26 pm ET)
         
      So difficult...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by gatemann (March 18, 2010 1:28 pm ET)
         
      http://earthquake.usgs.gov/eqcenter/eqinthenews/2006/ustwbh/

      It took me longer to write this post then it took for my wife to look it up and e-mail me the link.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Joplin Joe (March 19, 2010 11:10 am ET)
         
      If we're going to rail about how health care reform will save lives in areas that have suffered disasters in the past 5 years; why not mention the California wildfires in 2007 - 14 died; or the Super Tornado outbreak in 2008 - 59 died; or Huricane Rits - 120 died. Yes Hawaii was declared a "major disaster" in 2006, but nobody died, how can health care reform do anything there?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Joplin Joe (March 19, 2010 11:21 am ET)
         
      If health care reform is going to help "cope with medicade shortfalls" from the passed 5 years; why not mention the 2007 California wildfires - 14 lives lost; or the Super Tuesday tornados in 2008 - 59 died; or the 2005 Evansville tornado - 25 lives lost; or 2005 Huricane Rita - 120 died. How many died in the 2006 Hawaiin earthquake = 0. In fact while wikipedia says the earthquake caused over $200 million in damages, it says nothing about how many people were injured.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.