About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

They Live: Mattera's Obama Zombies reanimates old GOP falsehoods, smears

March 30, 2010 3:02 pm ET — 17 Comments

In his new book Obama Zombies, Jason Mattera uses selective editing to repeat conservative attacks on President Obama, smearing the president by claiming that "he fancies himself the 'apologizer in chief.' " Mattera also falsely claims that "[e]ight days after 9/11, Obama wrote an op-ed ... in which he argued that Americans needed to have compassion for those who had just slaughtered our brethren."

Mattera smears Obama: "[H]e fancies himself the 'apologizer in chief'"

Mattera: Obama's "moral equivocating" is "downright dangerous." In a chapter of Obama Zombies titled "The Peacenik Phantom," Mattera writes:

It's as if Obama wants to say to North Korea and Iran, "Now, fellas, I know you say you want to destroy Western civilization, but I think you're just misunderstood. I know you really don't mean what you say."

[...]

Obama seems not to care. After all, he fancies himself the "apologizer in chief." Such moral equivocating is insane and morally loathsome. Worse, it's downright dangerous. Buy why should this surprise us? If Obama Zombies would have taken their earbuds out of their ears long enough to actually research and listen to this man, they would have known just how radical he truly is. [p.69]

Mattera falsely claims Obama "argued that Americans needed to have compassion" for 9-11 perpetrators

Mattera: In op-ed, Obama "argued that Americans needed to have compassion for those who had just slaughtered our brethren." In Obama Zombies, Mattera writes:

Eight days after 9/11, Obama wrote an op-ed for Chicago's Hyde Park Herald in which he argued that Americans needed to have compassion for those who had just slaughtered our brethren:

The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others. Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity. It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.

In fact, Obama writes that "we must be resolute in identifying the perpetrators of these heinous acts and dismantling their organizations of destruction." In the editorial, Obama does not argue that Americans "needed to have compassion" for the 9-11 perpetrators, as the passage Mattera provides makes clear. Further, in comments omitted by Mattera, Obama states that "we must be resolute in identifying the perpetrators of these heinous acts and dismantling their organizations of destruction."

From Obama's September 19, 2001 editorial, with the portion Mattera excerpted in bold:

Even as I hope for some measure of peace and comfort to the bereaved families, I must also hope that we as a nation draw some measure of wisdom from this tragedy. Certain immediate lessons are clear, and we must act upon those lessons decisively. We need to step up security at our airports. We must reexamine the effectiveness of our intelligence networks. And we must be resolute in identifying the perpetrators of these heinous acts and dismantling their organizations of destruction.

We must also engage, however, in the more difficult task of understanding the sources of such madness. The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others. Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity. It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair.

We will have to make sure, despite our rage, that any U.S. military action takes into account the lives of innocent civilians abroad. We will have to be unwavering in opposing bigotry or discrimination directed against neighbors and friends of Middle Eastern descent. Finally, we will have to devote far more attention to the monumental task of raising the hopes and prospects of embittered children across the globe -- children not just in the Middle East, but also in Africa, Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and within our own shores.

Mattera uses selective editing to repeat tired Obama as apologizer-in-chief talking point

Mattera: "Obama apologized to the French for haughtiness!" In Obama Zombies, Mattera uses selective editing to misrepresent comments Obama made during an April 3, 2009 speech in Strasbourg, France.

Where do you think Obama delivered this whopper? "In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive." In Strasbourg, France, last April. Yes, yes: Obama apologized to the French for haughtiness! The French!

In fact, Mattera -- like Sean Hannity and other conservatives -- distorted Obama's comments. Immediately after making the comments highlighted by Mattera and others, Obama stated: "But in Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans choose to blame America for much of what's bad."

From Obama's speech: 

Such an effort is never easy. It's always harder to forge true partnerships and sturdy alliances than to act alone, or to wait for the action of somebody else. It's more difficult to break down walls of division than to simply allow our differences to build and our resentments to fester. So we must be honest with ourselves. In recent years we've allowed our Alliance to drift. I know that there have been honest disagreements over policy, but we also know that there's something more that has crept into our relationship. In America, there's a failure to appreciate Europe's leading role in the world. Instead of celebrating your dynamic union and seeking to partner with you to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.

But in Europe, there is an anti-Americanism that is at once casual but can also be insidious. Instead of recognizing the good that America so often does in the world, there have been times where Europeans choose to blame America for much of what's bad.

On both sides of the Atlantic, these attitudes have become all too common. They are not wise. They do not represent the truth. They threaten to widen the divide across the Atlantic and leave us both more isolated. They fail to acknowledge the fundamental truth that America cannot confront the challenges of this century alone, but that Europe cannot confront them without America.

So I've come to Europe this week to renew our partnership, one in which America listens and learns from our friends and allies, but where our friends and allies bear their share of the burden. Together, we must forge common solutions to our common problems.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by magnolialover (March 30, 2010 3:22 pm ET)
      7  
      How do I get a book deal by using what others have said or written to essentially, write my book?

      This sounds like a good gig. I wonder if I could start out as a right wing blogger, make some scurilous charges against democrats, and see if FoxNews picks me up. Actually, that could be a good experiment. See how far you can take it, and see who starts to pay attention to you, then come out later as being a hard core liberal, who just wanted to get PAID.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Andy Kreiss (March 31, 2010 12:31 am ET)
        2  
        Looks like a pretty sweet deal, Magnolialover, being a teabagger "author". Mostly copy & pasting and repeating.

        I think this is the idiot (Mattera ) that I heard Boss Hogg Limbaugh playing a clip of recently. He was asking some Dem how he "had the stones" to work on tax policy when considering ( some Dem politician with tax problems). Rush was just swooning at the extreme journalism, that he was asking the questions that the media should be asking.

        The message was that if one member of a political party has a scandal or a problem in any area, the entire party should be forbidden from having anything to do with that subject. And they're calling other people zombies.

        Report Abuse
      • Author by rcoplen (March 31, 2010 2:52 pm ET)
           
        Magnolia: I have been reading and enjoying your posts for a long time now and I think you could write a great book on just about anything. Write on!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by pros2pros2940 (March 30, 2010 3:35 pm ET)
      5  
      These books are how these jerks mainstream this stuff via wingnut radio and TV appearances and clicks from wingnut websites
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (March 30, 2010 3:39 pm ET)
      12 1
      The Obama Zombies are going to starve if all they have to feed on is Republican brains.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (March 30, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
      11  
      Wait a second. I thought Beck had already decreed we were all Progressive Vampires.

      *Sigh* I wish the right could get their monsters straight. I'm spending a fortune on the costumes and make up.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by night-n-day (March 30, 2010 3:59 pm ET)
      8  
      Was Iran made significantly stronger or significantly weaker after 8 years of Republican foriegn policy?

      Is Iran still being kept in check by Iraq the way it was when Dick Cheney/Bush took over in 2000 or does Iran now call the shots throughout the region with Iraq as an ally?

      Did the decision to ignore Osama Bin Laden before, during, and after 9.11 by the Republican Party make America stronger or weaker on the world stage?

      Who had the last laugh after 9.11 - America or Bin Laden?

      Has US credibility in foriegn affairs become significantly weaker or significantly stronger after 8 years of the Republican Party in the White House?

      The clearest indication of how far to the right the national media is, is the fact that the party that presided over the 9.11 attacks IGNORED the dire warnings, FROZE like a deer in the headlights while America was under attack, then REFUSED TO GET THE PEOPLE RESPONSIBLE, are routinely treated as "strong on national security" despite the fact that THOUSANDS of Americans have died needlessly due to their incompetence (9.11, Iraq, NOLA, etc.) and their impotent, cowardly, inability to maintain even the most minimal national security of the United States!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (March 30, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
      4 2
      Yesterday I had someone crop one phrase out of a comment I made in order to dishonestly characterize the comment I made. I called them on it, and their reply was that they "quoted" my "exact words", and so how could they have possibly taken it out of context! They didn't even understand how stupid what they said was - that cropping one's comments does exactly that - it quotes only a portion of someone's words and then takes those words out of context!

      And Mattera, here, does the same thing, yet probably doesn't understand that it's what he's doing!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by seahawks123 (March 30, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
      2 14
      3 words for you libs. (With arms out and a lib look of stupidity) YYYEEESSS WWWEEE CCCAAANNN!!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (March 30, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
        14  
        Well, since you haven't been paying attention, yes we did.

        1. Passed health care even through an obstructionist republican minority.

        2. Passed a stimulus bill that brought our economy BACK from the brink of a large scale depression.

        3. Re-distributed troops to where the fight should have been in the first place, Afghanistan, and have killed or captured more Taliban and terrorist supporters than Bush did in 8 years.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Johaely (March 30, 2010 5:04 pm ET)
          5 1
          YYYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSS WWWWWEEEEEEEEEEE DDDDDDDDDDDIIIIIIDDDDDDD!!!!!!!!!!!!!
          Report Abuse
        • Author by shaggles (March 30, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
          5  
          Man you are so brainwashed. You think just because Obama is accomplishing the things he set out to accomplish that that actually means he's doing something? ;)
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mjh (March 31, 2010 2:44 pm ET)
        1  
        "3 words for you libs. (With arms out and a lib look of stupidity) YYYEEESSS WWWEEE CCCAAANNN!!!" -- seahags5-11


        Well seahags, at least you got the look of stupidity down (not that that's especially difficult for you)

        Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (March 31, 2010 7:06 am ET)
      3  
      Mattera's hackneyed, "selective" editing harkens back to the GOP's adamant death grip on the reanimation" of dead tissue...yet in their case it's their issue that's oozing forth--and smelly at that.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by bobklahn (March 31, 2010 12:12 pm ET)
        2

      As much as Mattera's commentary is fraudulent, I can't believe Obama wrote something this stupid.

      "The essence of this tragedy, it seems to me, derives from a fundamental absence of empathy on the part of the attackers: an inability to imagine, or connect with, the humanity and suffering of others."

      What does Obama know about the motivation for such actions? What he describes is a sociopath, but he does it with so many words he could put you to sleep. And their connection is to the suffering of their people, not ours. Though that connection is false, it is still there.

      "Such a failure of empathy, such numbness to the pain of a child or the desperation of a parent, is not innate; nor, history tells us, is it unique to a particular culture, religion, or ethnicity."

      When will Obama learn to speak English? And it may not be unique to a particular culture or religion, but it is endemic to some cultures and religions. In this case, Wahabi.

      "It may find expression in a particular brand of violence, and may be channeled by particular demagogues or fanatics. Most often, though, it grows out of a climate of poverty and ignorance, helplessness and despair."

      And just what are Obama's qualifications to say that? There are plenty of sociopaths and psychopaths who come from wealthy and well educated backgrounds.

      Just who were the 9-11 attackers? They were all but a few Saudis. Saudi Citizens. That means they were not from ignorance and poverty, but wealth and free education. They were not from helplessness and despair, but entitlement and influence.

      The 9-11 terrorists were not poor Arabs who grew up radicals in the Middle East, but well off successful professionals and workers in Europe. They were radicalized in Mosques in Europe, not the Middle East.

      They fell under the sway of Wahabi teaching, which they apparently avoided doing in Saudi Arabia. Until we can focus on the Wahabi extremism we cannot really understand the terrorists.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (March 31, 2010 10:01 pm ET)
      1  
      Mattera was on Bill O'Reilly tonight, and the very short snippet I saw had 2 outright lies from Mattera that weren't confronted by Bill O'Reilly.

      Look for a thread about that appearance tomorrow!
      Report Abuse