About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Quick Fact: Beck again distorts Wallis' remarks on "redistribution of wealth" to attack him as a "Marxist"

April 06, 2010 8:41 pm ET — 5 Comments

Glenn Beck again distorted comments made by Rev. Jim Wallis to claim Wallis is a "Marxist." In fact, in the interview Beck selectively clipped, Wallis actually discussed individuals who "transformed" their lives to focus on charity, highlighting how Bill and Melinda Gates have been "doing a redistribution of wealth" through their philanthropy.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

From the April 6 edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck:

BECK: Now that we've discussed his radical Marxist communist parents, his communist mentor, where's his communist mentor? His Marxist professors, his Marxist pastor, along with the takeover of the auto industry, the banking industry, the healthcare system, insurance, student loans, now we have no doubt come to the end of the case for why Barack Obama might be considered a socialist. Right? No, no. We've introduced you on the program to his new spiritual advisor. You gotta love this guy. New spiritual advisor is Jim Wallis. Jim Wallis, who like his last spiritual advisor, Jeremiah Wright, is a Marxist. Now, he is not going to call himself a communist anymore. No, no, no. He's very, very clever. He is advising the president of the United States, but listen to his words:

(BEGIN AUDIO)

MAUREEN FIELDER (host): Are you then calling for redistribution of wealth in society?

WALLIS: Absolutely. Without any hesitation. That's what the gospel is about.

(END AUDIO)


BECK: He goes on to talk about the forced redistribution of wealth. Because when you just give, it's just not enough.

Fact: Wallis actually discussed how individuals have "transformed" their lives to focus on charity

Wallis highlights people "changing their lifestyle and their priorities" and a "redistribution of wealth" through Bill and Melinda Gates' philanthropy. In the portion of the interview selectively clipped by Beck, Wallis did not discuss the "forced redistribution of wealth." Responding to Fielder's question, "Are you then calling for the redistribution of wealth in society?" Wallis stated, "Absolutely. Without any hesitation. That's what the Gospel is all about," and explained, "It's about the rich moving into solidarity and a relationship with people who have been left out and left behind." Wallis added, "I see it all the time where people from middle-class backgrounds are having their lives transformed by their encounter with the poor in their neighborhoods or across the world and changing their lifestyle and their priorities because of that."

From Wallis' interview on Interfaith Voices with Fiedler:

FIEDLER: So are some church congregations literally too affluent, do you think?

WALLIS: I think an affluent church in a world where half of God's children live on less than $2 a day is an affront to the Gospel. The Bible doesn't mind prosperity as long as it is shared. But what the Bible doesn't like is these tremendous gaps and chasms between the top and the bottom.

FIEDLER: Are you then calling for the redistribution of wealth in society?

WALLIS: Absolutely. Without any hesitation. That's what the Gospel is all about. It's about the rich moving into solidarity and a relationship with people who have been left out and left behind. The whole early church was those who were wealthy and those who were poor finding a new community. So, I see it all the time where people from middle-class backgrounds are having their lives transformed by their encounter with the poor in their neighborhoods or across the world and changing their lifestyle and their priorities because of that.

Fact: Wallis later used the philanthropy of Bill and Melinda Gates as an example of "a redistribution of wealth"

From Wallis' interview:

WALLIS: I have a family, I have kids. I want them to be secure. I want them to have enough. And I want them to have all the good things of life. One of the things is a generous spirit. One of the things is to be in a relationship to people who have been left out. It changes us in all kinds of ways. On that cover of Time magazine also were Bill and Melinda Gates, who have made all this money and now are giving it away in very smart, strategic ways about world health and global poverty. So, Bill Gates has decided that he doesn't just want to give all his money to his children. For him, the good life now, for he and his wife, means being a part of a process of changing things in the world. So they're doing a redistribution of wealth.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (April 06, 2010 9:51 pm ET)
      6 3
      Sometimes Beck is simply insane. Sometimes he actually believes the stupidity he's shoveling.

      And then other times, like this one, Beck is just pure evil...a lying sack of excrement.

      Watching Beck makes me wish there is a God...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by NoNothing (April 07, 2010 3:02 am ET)
          5
        But, then again, you still watch him. Funny that.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (April 07, 2010 8:35 am ET)
          2 2
          I don't watch him and I agree with Irony 100%. I have watched him and I have listened to him in the past.

          Beck is dangerous and apparently, because you seem to support him, so are you.

          Personally, I hope he keeps up this line of thought. He's turning REAL Christians away from Fox in DROVES!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NoNothing (April 07, 2010 8:57 pm ET)
              1
            I don't watch him, but I find it funny that those who say how awful he is seem to watch him but then claim they don't. As to who is dangerous it could just be REAl Christians like you.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (April 07, 2010 2:19 am ET)
      4  
      Don't worry, Becky. We'll see to it that YOUR wealth will not be "redistributed". In fact, we can make sure that only money from the MIDDLE CLASS will "trickle down" to the poor, like it usually is, and NOT from the protected upper one percent. After all, isn't that one percent "entitled" to keep every damn cent that it accumulated? Wait, that has to be written in stone somewhere, so don't be too concerned.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.