About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly digs in, falsely claims Coburn didn't have his facts in line

April 14, 2010 11:23 pm ET — 11 Comments

For the second night in a row, Bill O'Reilly denied Sen. Tom Coburn's (R-OK) accurate statement that Fox has pushed the falsehood that under the health care reform legislation individuals can be sent to jail for not having health insurance. Earlier in the day, Neil Cavuto contradicted O'Reilly, noting that "a number of Fox personalities had made that comment."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Even after Cavuto's comments, O'Reilly still falsely claiming Coburn was incorrect

O'Reilly: Coburn "didn't really have his facts in line." On the April 14 edition of his Fox News show, O'Reilly, falsely claimed that in his interview with Coburn the previous night, on his April 13 show, Coburn "didn't really have his facts in line," referring to O'Reilly's admonishment that Coburn doesn't "know anybody on Fox News -- because there hasn't been anyone -- that said people will go to jail if they don't buy mandatory insurance." O'Reilly also told Coburn on April 13: "[W]e researched to find out if anybody on Fox News had ever said you're going to jail if you don't buy health insurance. Nobody has ever said it. So it seems to me is what you did was you used Fox News as a whipping boy when we didn't qualify there. ... [Y]ou were wrong to do that, Senator, with all due respect."

Cavuto contradicted O'Reilly: "I've researched this, and a number of Fox personalities had made that comment." On the April 14 edition of Your World, Cavuto responded to Sen. Tom Coburn's criticism of Fox News by admitting to Coburn that regarding the jail-time falsehood: "You're quite right, I've researched this and a number of Fox personalities had made that comment."

Indeed, Fox has relentlessly pushed the jail-time falsehood. As Cavuto noted, several Fox News personalities made the claim. These personalities include Glenn Beck, Dick Morris, Sean Hannity, Andrew Napolitano, and Greta Van Susteren, as well as Fox News' website Fox Nation and a Fox & Friends on-screen caption.

Under reform law, no "criminal ... penalties" for failure to have health insurance coverage

JCT: "Non-compliance with" the insurance mandate "is not subject to criminal or civil penalties." The Joint Committee on Taxation stated in its analysis of the revenue provisions of the Senate health care reform bill and the health care reconciliation bill that "individuals who fail to maintain minimum essential [health insurance] coverage in 2016 are subject" to a fee, but that "[n]on-compliance" with that provision "is not subject to criminal or civil penalties."

Earlier versions of reform legislation provided for "criminal penalties" only for those who refused to pay the fee. Both the House and the Senate versions of health care reform required individuals to be covered by a minimum level of health insurance or pay a monetary penalty. A November 2009 letter from the Joint Committee on Taxation on the House health care bill stated that individuals who did not have such coverage and refused to pay the fine would be subject to "civil and criminal penalties for noncompliance." The committee's letter explains that the tax code provides penalties to prevent tax evasion of any sort: "The Code provides for both civil and criminal penalties to ensure complete and accurate reporting of tax liability and to discourage fraudulent attempts to defeat or evade tax." [Joint Committee on Taxation letter, 11/5/09]

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by dimes (April 14, 2010 11:34 pm ET)
      4  
      Evidently, Bill's research skills really suck.

      Or, he enjoys looking like an uninformed idiot.

      Either one.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Jeremy Danials (April 15, 2010 12:31 am ET)
        3  
        No, he's a lying liar of the Bullius Stupidus genus.

        Just trying to throw out the (true) third option.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (April 15, 2010 9:56 am ET)
        2  
        The research skills of Fox, in general, suck.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by dimes (April 14, 2010 11:34 pm ET)
      4  
      Evidently, Bill's research skills really suck.

      Or, he enjoys looking like an uninformed idiot.

      Either one.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by News Corpse (April 15, 2010 3:27 am ET)
      5  
      The quality of O'Reilly's reporting is best stated by O'Reilly himself:

      [http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2188/2087801556_7667d4598b.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by shelby73 (April 15, 2010 7:35 am ET)
      5  
      Yes, he needs a few days to figure out how to spin this, because Billo will NEVER admit he was ever wrong about anything. I think he'll go with, " Look, I ask the senator to name someone who had said people will go to jail for not buying health Ins. and he couldn't do it. If you come on my show, you better have your facts in line." Oh, and of course he'll blame the gutter snipes and loons for posting the clips.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (April 15, 2010 8:26 am ET)
      3  
      Former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating had a word for people like O'Reilly - scumbag.

      And he's a lying one as well!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (April 15, 2010 9:07 am ET)
      6  
      When it takes a douchbag like Cavuto to set the record strait, you know you've got problems.

      --------------------------------------------
      O'Rielly's such a clown.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mcnairbo6573 (April 15, 2010 10:57 am ET)
      3  
      It's a hoot that he calls it the "No Spin Room". With the facts staring him right in the face that dozens of people on Fox said there would be jail time he plots in his head how to spin the obvious to make himself look correct. Spin away Billo!
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.