About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Oil spill is only the latest crisis media have dubbed "Obama's Katrina"

April 30, 2010 4:45 pm ET — 13 Comments

Media figures have absurdly declared that the Gulf Coast oil spill is "Obama's Katrina" and have compared President Obama's response to the spill with President Bush's botched response to Hurricane Katrina. But this is just the latest in a long line of ridiculous comparisons in which media figures have referred to current events as "Obama's Katrina."

A wide (and frequently bizarre) range of previous versions of "Obama's Katrina"

Gulf oil spill: "Obama's Katrina"

Numerous media figures dub Gulf oil spill "Obama's Katrina." Media conservatives, including Rush Limbaugh, the Fox Nation, the Drudge Report and The Washington Times pushed the absurd claim that a catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico is "Obama's Katrina." This claim is undermined by a number of facts, including that British Petroleum reportedly led the Obama administration to believe that the spill was much less severe than it actually was.

H1N1 flu: "Obama's Katrina"

Numerous media figures suggested the H1N1 flu was "Obama's Katrina." On his November 3, 2009, radio show, Rush Limbaugh stated that the H1N1 vaccine shortage "ought to be Obama's Katrina," but won't because "they have to protect the little man-child." An August 25 op-ed by Martin Schram for the Scripps-Howard News Service was headlined, "Schram: Swine flu could be Obama's Katrina." Kansas City Star blogger Bill Dalton wrote an October 15, 2009, post under the headline, "H1N1: Obama's Katrina?" On the May 3, 2009 edition of Washington, D.C., television station WJLA's Inside Washington, host Gordon Peterson and Newsweek's Evan Thomas discussed whether the H1N1 flu was "Obama's Katrina. [accessed via Nexis]"  

Fort Hood shootings: "Obama's Katrina"

Human Events' Wooley: "Fort Hood Could Be Obama's Katrina." In a November 11, 2009, Human Events post titled "Fort Hood Could Be Obama's Katrina," radio host Lynn Wooley wrote: "As Hurricane Katrina zeroed in on New Orleans in 2005, government at all levels was lethargic, seemed unprepared, and to some, even uncaring. In the wake of last week's massacre at Fort Hood, we are learning that the United States Army knew quite a bit about Major Nadal Malik Hasan -- but did not act on the information. Fort Hood could become Barack Obama's Katrina." Wooley concluded: "The attitude of our Commander-in-Chief and others sworn to protect us is frighteningly reminiscent of what happened with Katrina.  All we need from Obama is a hearty, 'Gen. Casey, you're doing a heck of a job.'"

Kentucky Ice storms: "Obama's Katrina"

Confederate Yankee: "Obama's 'Katrina on Ice'" A February 1 Confederate Yankee post titled "Obama's 'Katrina on Ice'" asserted:

More than 700,000 homes are still without power in Kentucky due to a massive ice storm that struck the state six days ago, forcing Gov. Steve Beshear to mobilize his entire state's Army and Air National Guard, a total of 4,600 men and the largest call-out in Kentucky's history.

FEMA has apparently been a no-show.

Haiti earthquake: "Obama's Katrina"

WSJ op-ed: "Haiti: Obama's Katrina." In a January 25 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal titled "Hatiti: Obama's Katrina," Soumitra R. Eachempati, Dean Lorich, and David Helfet wrote: "Four years ago the initial medical response to Hurricane Katrina was ill equipped, understaffed, poorly coordinated and delayed. Criticism of the paltry federal efforts was immediate and fierce. Unfortunately, the response to the latest international disaster in Haiti has been no better, compounding the catastrophe."

Flopping Aces: "Does Obama Hate the People of Haiti?" In a January 17 post titled "Obama's Katrina," Flopping Aces mentioned the criticisms of Bush for his Katrina response and concluded: "Does Obama hate the people of Haiti?"

GM bankruptcy: "Obama's Katrina"

Politico: GOP hopes GM bailout is "Obama's Hurricane Katrina" A June 8 Politico article's headline read: "Republicans hope General Motors is President Obama's Hurricane Katrina."

Christmas Day Underwear Bomber: "Obama's Katrina"

Pajamas media: "Is the Undiebomber Obama's Katrina?" A December 29 Pajamas Media blog post titled "Is the Undiebomber Obama's Katrina?" asserted: "No doubt, Obama's poll numbers aren't going to be helped by this Jan-caused disaster. But I doubt if the fallout they'll face will be as severe as what the Bush administration went through due to Katrina, simply because the media will never gin up a news storm against the man they helped to elect that's anywhere near as powerful as the one they created to accompany Katrina."

Housing policies in Chicago: "Obama's Katrina"

Kaus: "Obama's Katrina." Slate blogger Mickey Kaus linked to a Boston Globe article about Obama's Chicago housing policies as a state senator, headlining his post "Obama's Katrina." Kaus later updated, concluding: After all, Obama's career has been unusually limited for a presidential contender. Housing and "community development" has been a big part of it. If the result has been a disaster in which Obama's friends made lots of money while his poor constituents lived in dangerous squalor, that seems like a big warning sign, no? At least an expectations-lowerer! George W. Bush, in contrast, hadn't dedicated a large chunk of his life to FEMA."

Congressional Committees criticized Bush's response to Katrina

Bush admininstration "failed to lead an effective response" to Katrina. The Senate report concluded that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) "failed to lead an effective federal response to Hurricane Katrina" and listed specific steps that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff failed to take both before and after the storm. The Special Report stated: "Secretary Chertoff failed to make ready the full range of federal assets pursuant to DHS's responsibilities under the National Response Plan (NRP)" and "failed to appoint a Principal Federal Official (PFO), the official charged with overseeing the federal response under the NRP, until 36 hours after landfall."

Mike Brown was "hostile" to response plan. The Special Report further concluded that Michael Brown, the Principal Federal Officer that Chertoff eventually chose, "was hostile to the federal government's agreed-upon response plan and therefore was unlikely to perform effectively in accordance with its principles."

Suffering "continued longer than it should have" due to "the failure of government at all levels." The Senate report further stated that "the suffering that continued in the days and weeks after the storm passed did not happen in a vacuum; instead, it continued longer than it should have because of -- and was in some cases exacerbated by -- the failure of government at all levels to plan, prepare for, and respond aggressively to the storm. These failures were not just conspicuous; they were pervasive."

Bush admininstration "not prepared to respond" to disaster. The House's Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina, which released its final report on February 15, 2006, found that "DHS was not prepared to respond to the catastrophic effects of Hurricane Katrina." The report also found that "critical elements of the National Response Plan," parts of which Chertoff was responsible for, "were executed late, ineffectively, or not at all," and that "[f]ederal agencies, including DHS, had varying degrees of unfamiliarity with their roles and responsibilities under the National Response Plan and National Incident Management System." The report concluded:

We are left scratching our heads at the range of inefficiency and ineffectiveness that characterized government behavior right before and after this storm. But passivity did the most damage. The failure of initiative cost lives, prolonged suffering, and left all Americans justifiably concerned our government is no better prepared to protect its people than it was before 9/11, even if we are.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by mk3872 (April 30, 2010 5:02 pm ET)
      4  
      Gee, I just cannot understand WHY this WH would have negative things to say about the state of out country's media, as Politico claims and MMFA reported on this week ...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Porkeater (April 30, 2010 5:25 pm ET)
      5  
      Can we take this as evidence for Obama's high level of competence? Bush II had one Katrina, and muffed it. From the above, BHO has had 8 or 9, all well managed.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Floyd (May 01, 2010 8:32 am ET)
          6
        Well managed? Yeah, we see how well managed the money going to Haiti was. We see how well managed the response to a major oil spill was. Obama's version of FEMA is as ineffective as Bush's. You must not read the newspaper or watch any tv? Yeah Bush-2 had one Katrina, Obama is having a Katrina moment every other month and fails each time. As pointed out in each article that mmfa printed related to each story.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (May 01, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
          2  
          Neither Katrina nor this oil spill nor any of the other things that MMFA mentions were CAUSED by the President, you doofus.

          And Obama has not failed each time. I have no idea why you think this site will let your lies stand unchallenged, but it won't.

          Please don't feed this troll anymore. He's not willing to have a reasonable and fair conversation on this topic as demonstrated by the contents of the post above.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Floyd (May 02, 2010 10:14 am ET)
              2
            dell-- He's not willing to have a reasonable and fair conversation on this topic

            Should I call other posters names during each post like you do? Would that qualify as reasonable and fair? Should I call your posts lies without having to offer counter points or proof in exchange?

            I think, as demonstrated by YOUR post, you aren't interested in "reasonable and fair conversation". You are interested in yelling your opinion and stooping to calling anyone who disagrees with you all kinds of names. You don't even show the capability of being able to carry on a conversation.

            For instance, show where I lied about the money going to Haiti. Show where I lied about Obama's version of FEMA being as ineffective as Bush's. Oh, you can't show I lied! So, in typical dell manner you say "don't feed this troll". If you got something to say, then say it. If all you're going to do is whine about me posting, then here's a quarter ...

            This site allows my statements to go unchallenged because someone needs to be ABLE to challenge them. It's too bad you aren't smart enough to challenge my arguments. If you were, then you could show I lied about the wasted money going to Haiti or the slow response to this current disaster by Obama's FEMA. But, since you can't (and aren't) then all you have to say is "you doofus" and "this troll". Maybe someone else can help you out, but it's obvious you aren't able to.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by Chyron HR (May 01, 2010 9:36 pm ET)
          1  
          Sorry, Floyd, but by your laughable definition of a "Katrina", Bush had several, starting with that unpleasant affair on 9/11.

          (Yes, I know, you Republicans consider 9/11 to be the Bush administration's moment of triumph, but real Americans like us weren't very happy about it.)
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Floyd (May 02, 2010 10:22 am ET)
              2
            But, you can't count 9/11. Don't you liberals accuse Bush of causing that event? How could that be considered an "unpleasant affair", if he intended for it to happen? Isn't that what all you conspiracy theorists claim? (someone cue the music to Twilight Zone for full effect of that question). How could something done on purpose be considered a 'katrina', which was an unplanned for disaster? Well, that's what you liberals think, right?

            The funny thing about your statement is you claim real Americans weren't happy about 9/11. Yet, the "real Americans" you refer to are the ones who complained the loudest that we retaliated. So, which is it? Are you unhappy with the attack or the response to the attack?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mary59 (May 02, 2010 7:04 pm ET)
              2  
              Frankly, I blame you for causing Hurricane Floyd. All us liberals do. We think the same things all the time. Now that I've given you proof--by having this opinion, please explain why you caused such major damage:

              "Hurricane Floyd struck eastern North Carolina on September 15, 1999. In it's wake the storm left polluted floodwaters and sediment-choked rivers."

              Now you'll probably claim that Hurricane Floyd is Clinton's fault, or that the jury is still out. But as you can plainly see by your own name, you are much more involved than you'd like to admit.
              Report Abuse
    • Author by thaneb (April 30, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
      2  
      There's what most of the nation will believe and there's what those like tea partiers will believe. The latter could believe the Deepwater Horizion catastrophe was engineered by Rahm Emanuel to distract from Obama's impeachable involvement with Blagojevich or his involvement with the malevolent aliens Steven Hawking warned about. {Perhaps they can be forgiven: Their frame of reference is the palette of that trickster, Carl Rove.}
      The rest of the nation will think, "Obama's Katrina? Are they nuts?"
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kyle b.c. (April 30, 2010 6:47 pm ET)
         
      My prediction: Obama will never have a Katrina. Ever. He is far more competent and capable than Bush EVER was.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (May 01, 2010 12:05 am ET)
      2  
      Obviously, the media, and various conservatives in the media, are terrible at predictions. They say all of these things, they never pan out and just keep making them hoping they will be right one day.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by steeve (May 02, 2010 10:04 am ET)
      3  
      How strange that conservative media figures are now saying that Katrina was a presidential failure. They weren't saying that when it happened.
      Report Abuse