About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Memo to media: Timeline contradicts "Obama's Katrina" claim

April 30, 2010 7:05 pm ET — 17 Comments

A timeline of events following the catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil spill belies the absurd media claim that the spill represents "Obama's Katrina."

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

April 20 (10 p.m.): Oil rig explosion. An April 21 ABCNews.com article reported, "An overnight explosion in the Gulf of Mexico rocked the Deepwater Horizon oil rig off the Louisiana coast, sending spectacular bursts of flame into the sky. The fires were still raging today." The U.S. Coast Guard's National Oil and Hazardous Substances Response System assigns primary responsibility for cleaning up oil spills to the spiller as the responsible party.

April 21: Deputy Secretary of Interior, Coast Guard dispatched to region. An April 22 White House statement noted that following a briefing with President Obama, Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Coast Guard Commandant Adm. Thad Allen, Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, EPA Deputy Administrator Bob Perciasepe, and FEMA Administrator Craig Fugate, "Deputy Secretary of the Interior David Hayes was dispatched to the region yesterday to assist with coordination and response." The Coast Guard announced that four units were responding to the fire, with additional units en route.

  • Search and rescue efforts begin for 11 missing. An initial focus of the response was the search for 11 missing crewmembers. The search was called off April 23.
  • BP confirms U.S. Coast Guard was "leading the emergency response" In an April 21 press release, British Petroleum stated that it was "working closely with Transocean and the U.S. Coast Guard, which is leading the emergency response, and had been offering its help - including logistical support."
  • CNN.com: "The U.S. Coast Guard launched a major search effort." An April 22 CNN.com article reported:

The U.S. Coast Guard launched a major search effort Wednesday for 11 people missing after a "catastrophic" explosion aboard an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico engulfed the drilling platform in flames.

Another 17 people were injured -- three critically -- in the blast aboard the Deepwater Horizon, which occurred about 10 p.m. Tuesday. The rig was about 52 miles southeast of Venice, Louisiana, said Coast Guard Senior Chief Petty Officer Mike O'Berry. As of late afternoon Wednesday as many as six firefighting vessels were working to contain the massive fire caused by the explosion.

"It obviously was a catastrophic event," O'Berry said.

April 23: Coast Guard "focused on mitigating the impact of the product currently in the water." On April 23, the Coast Guard stated:

The Department of the Interior, MMS [the U.S. Minerals Management Service], and the Coast Guard continue to support the efforts of the responsible parties to secure all potential sources of pollution. Both federal agencies have technical teams in place overseeing the proposals by BP and Transocean to completely secure the well. Until that has occurred and all parties are confident the risk of additional spill is removed, a high readiness posture to respond will remain in place. 

Although the oil appears to have stopped flowing from the well head, Coast Guard, BP, Transocean, and MMS remain focused on mitigating the impact of the product currently in the water and preparing for a worst-case scenario in the event the seal does not hold. Visual feed from deployed remotely operated vehicles with sonar capability is continually monitored in an effort to look for any crude oil which still has the potential to emanate from the subsurface well.

"From what we have observed yesterday and through the night, we are not seeing any signs of release of crude in the subsurface area. However we remain in a 'ready to respond' mode and are working in a collaborative effort with BP, the responsible party, to prepare for a worst-case scenario," Landry stated early Friday morning.

April 25: Response team implements plan to contain oil spilling from source, weather delays cleanup.

  • Storms delay response efforts. An April 25 Associated Press article reported, "Stormy weather delayed weekend efforts to mop up leaking oil from a damaged well after the explosion and sinking of a massive rig off Louisiana's Gulf Coast that left 11 workers missing and presumed dead." AP further reported:

The bad weather began rolling in Friday as strong winds, clouds and rain interrupted efforts to contain the spill. Coast Guard Petty Officer John Edwards said he was uncertain when weather conditions would improve enough for cleanup to resume. So far, he said, crews have retrieved about 1,052 barrels of oily water.

  • Oil recovery and cleanup were to resume after adverse weather passed. On April 25, the unified command team responding to the spill stated:

The unified command is implementing intervention efforts in an attempt to contain the source of oil emanating from the wellhead at the Deepwater Horizon incident site Sunday.

The unified command has approved a plan that utilizes submersible remote operated vehicles in an effort to activate the blowout preventer on the sea floor and to stop the flow of oil that has been estimated at leaking up to 1,000 barrels/42,000 gallons a day.

Also, BP is mobilizing the DD3, a drilling rig that is expected to arrive Monday to prepare for relief well-drilling operations.

Additionally, the oil recovery and clean-up operations are expected to resume once adverse weather has passed. These efforts are part of the federally approved oil spill contingency plan that is in place to respond to environmental incidents.

April 26: Response crews "to resume skimming operations." On April 26, the response team stated, "Sunday, an aircrew from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service sighted five small whales during an over flight in the vicinity of the oil spill, which currently measures 48 miles by 39 miles at its widest points with varying levels of sheening, and is located 30 miles off the coast of Venice, La." The command team further stated, "Following adverse weather that went through the area, response crews are anticipated to resume skimming operations today," including 1,000 personnel, 10 offshore vessels, 7 skimming boats and more than 14,000 gallons of dispersant. At that point 48,384 gallons of oily water had been collected.

 

April 28: Federal officials realize spill was far more severe than BP led them to believe. An April 28 New York Times article reported, "Government officials said late Wednesday night that oil might be leaking from a well in the Gulf of Mexico at a rate five times that suggested by initial estimates." The Times further reported:

In a hastily called news conference, Rear Adm. Mary E. Landry of the Coast Guard said a scientist from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration had concluded that oil is leaking at the rate of 5,000 barrels a day, not 1,000 as had been estimated. While emphasizing that the estimates are rough given that the leak is at 5,000 feet below the surface, Admiral Landry said the new estimate came from observations made in flights over the slick, studying the trajectory of the spill and other variables.

An April 30 Associated Press article reported, "For days, as an oil spill spread in the Gulf of Mexico, BP assured the government the plume was manageable, not catastrophic. Federal authorities were content to let the company handle the mess while keeping an eye on the operation." The article continued:

But then government scientists realized the leak was five times larger than they had been led to believe, and days of lulling statistics and reassuring words gave way Thursday to an all-hands-on-deck emergency response. Now questions are sure to be raised about a self-policing system that trusted a commercial operator to take care of its own mishap even as it grew into a menace imperiling Gulf Coast nature and livelihoods from Florida to Texas.

April 29: Napolitano declares spill "of national significance"; BP insists its "plan can handle this spill." On April 29, BP official Doug Suttles appeared on ABC's Good Morning America and stated, "At this point, I believe our plan can handle this spill, and that's what we're doing." That day, Napolitano declared the spill "of national significance," explaining that "we can now draw down assets from across the country, other coastal areas, by way of example; that we will have a centralized communications because the spill is now crossing different regions."

  • EPA preparing for oil to hit shore. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lisa Jackson commented at an April 29 press briefing: "[A]s the oil does hit the shoreline, EPA will provide support to assess the impacts on the coastal shoreline and play a key role in implementing the cleanup. As a daughter of the Gulf Coast, I know that it is our job to ensure people that we will be eyes and ears working with the states who have valuable and vital resources to monitor air, water and land quality." Jackson also stated that the EPA has deployed air-monitoring aircraft "that is gathering information on the impact of the controlled burn on air quality, both in the area of the burn, and, of course, further away."
  • AP: "Air Force sends planes to help with Gulf oil spill." An April 30 Associated Press article reported: "Two Air Force planes have been sent to Mississippi and were awaiting orders to start dumping chemicals on the oil spill threatening the coast, as the government worked Friday to determine how large a role the military should play in the cleanup."
  • WSJ: Navy joins Obama's "robust response." An April 30 Wall Street Journal article reported that "The U.S. Navy said it will send more than 12 additional miles of inflatable oil booms to the Gulf, as well as seven towable skimming systems and 50 contractors with experience operating the equipment." The article continued: "The Navy is making two large facilities available to the Coast Guard personnel and BP-employed contractors who are currently taking the lead in fighting the spill. Military officials said the booms and skimmers were being sent to a Naval construction base in Gulfport, Miss. The Navy also opened its air base in Pensacola, Fla., to the effort."
Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by MMTVrocks (April 30, 2010 7:28 pm ET)
      10 2
      I'm putting this on digg.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mattcable250650 (May 02, 2010 6:05 pm ET)
        1  
        Ooh, good idea! I've got a Digg account (rummage, shuffle, click) okay, I've added my clicks. The count as of 6:00pm is a dozen.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (April 30, 2010 8:41 pm ET)
      16 4
      And this is the salient point - as soon as a need was known, the Obama Administration took action.

      On the other hand, Bush knew on Saturday that a Category 5 storm was almost certainly going to hit near New Orleans, and if it missed N.O., it would hit other populated areas, and if it wasn't a Cat 5, it'd still be a big storm with horrific damage inflicted.

      But they didn't do all that they should have done until after the damage was done. They didn't act as soon as they could. Obama DID!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (May 01, 2010 1:04 am ET)
        20 3
        President Obama has a score of 100 in responding to natural disasters and other emergencies. When North GA had a flood last September, Governor Perdue called the WH on a Tuesday, the president had FEMA on the job on Tuesday, and President Biden came on Thursday. Even Senators Chambliss and Isakson praised the president for his rapid response. This administration has been very good about responding to emergencies. The folks in North GA had been in DC protesting against the president that Saturday, the 12th, and the storm hit that Sunday. You cannot imagine who all of the tea partiers were expecting to help them after showing him their azzez, talking about socialism, and their disdain for "big government." Yep, President Obama. Governor Perdue went to Panama. He wasn't even in the state when VP Biden got here. The behavior of these North Georgians is despicable. They were blaming the president for their problems while the governor left the state. On the ajc.com blog about the flood, I couldn't restrain myself from asking them why they couldn't pull themselves up by their bootstraps and help themselves instead of depending on the government to do it since they hate it so much. It's different for them if they need the government's help, and they only oppose the govvernment when they think it is helping someone besides themselves. Hypocrites.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Moderate Man (May 01, 2010 9:35 pm ET)
             
          I say let these states foot the bills... they want little government, let them get little federal money and aid...
          Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 03, 2010 2:38 pm ET)
        2 1
        But they didn't do all that they should have done until after the damage was done.

        You're being generous. They didn't do ANYTHING AT ALL until a few days AFTER the damage was done. And even THEN they didn't do all they should have, let alone could have.

        Katrina served as the trigger for the public's loss of faith in Bush. It was the point at which it was no longer sacrilidge to openly quetsion the Iraq War, and it was at that point that the image of Bush as our fearless, stoic, post-9/11 leader begans to crumble. And as it also kicked of the ridiculously high gas prices that started the ball rolling on the recession (which came early in Michigan, where I live) it also led to the dismantling of the myth that these clown could run the economy any better as well.

        This will undoubtedly NOT be Obama's finest hour, especially coming a week or so after expandging offshore drilling! But the response thus far and the continued support that will undoubtedly come, has put and will continue to put Bush's Katrina responce to shame. This WILL have a net positive effect on Obama's approval rating in a regionof the country that is otherwose, arguably the most hostile. Could he win LA, MS or AL against a drill-baby-drill Republican in 2012? It's possible. We'll see...

        But in the meantime, I dare the Republicans to try and block ANY of the aid and services he sends to the region.

        This is not Obama's "Katirna." It's closer (not quite there, but closer) to Obama's "9/11."

        --------------------------------------------------------
        IMHO
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (May 03, 2010 4:31 pm ET)
          2  
          They DID actually have some things stockpiled and ready, kind of.

          Remember the trucks full of ice that they had staged all around the country?

          And Bush did so some stuff. It's an exaggeration to say that his administration did nothing.

          But I get your point, of course.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 03, 2010 6:25 pm ET)
            2  
            Yeah, "NOTHING" is kind of hard to back up. Like you said, "He did 'some stuff.'"

            But, as you pretty much admitted, you're setting the bar pretty low when you describe disaster preparedness as "doing some stuff." ;)

            ---------------------------------------------------------
            But I do get your point as well.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by ipawlzon (May 01, 2010 12:43 am ET)
      15 5
      This is a absolute beautiful article that has been well put together by the MMFA team. MediaMatters you have done a wonderful job again towards the fight against the Fox misinformation propaganda machine and their affiliates.

      Media Matters needs its own television network!!! If this ever happened a vast majority of misinformed Americans would finally get a real view of the TRUTH, and this country would be safer and a more unified public!!

      People we need to help MMFA and SPREAD THIS ARTICLE AND ALL OTHERS AROUND MORE!! Instead of just putting in our own opinions which 99% of people who visit this site agree on; we need to be linking this on all our social networking sites and submitting these articles to as many resources as we can to help. MMFA CAN and HAS been progressively making a difference, and WE CAN HELP!!!!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by punkin (May 01, 2010 8:14 am ET)
        11 2
        it's not just Fox noise. New York Times has a headline article about the "government showed delayed response" AND this NYT headline is at the top of the Huffington Post home page! The article itself is rather vague on the "delayed response" claim, I guess our Coast Guard was supposed to know by osmosis that the continuing spill was larger than BP claimed
        Report Abuse
        • Author by angels4light (May 02, 2010 12:14 pm ET)
          7 2
          I guess the USCG was somehow supposed to know ahead of time, through the special NSA predictive technologies group that has never failed to predict a disaster that nobody knew was coming, that this particular oil rig was going to explode precisely at this time on this day in this manner. That way, the USCG could be "magically" on hand right when the explosion happened so that their response time would be a whopping zero seconds. They could even have started the firefighting, timed to precisely when the explosion happened, having trained for it for weeks in advance using full-scale mockups of the incident.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by mhughen (May 01, 2010 11:19 am ET)
      11 2
      The new national narrative is forming that the "Obama admin was slow to react." Even as the Katrina comparisons are dropped, what remains is a climate that accepts that the administration should have done more. As MMFA has wonderfully pointed out, this narrative only serves to protect the corporation(s) who have actual responsibility for the dead employees, the environmental destruction and economic disruption for which they will certainly NOT pay their fair share.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Moderate Man (May 01, 2010 9:37 pm ET)
           
        The administration needs to come out swinging, put this garbage to rest, and then continue to do good...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by LibLieDestroyer (May 01, 2010 2:00 pm ET)
         
      Sending a coast guard search and rescue team is not the same as sending the fed resources in to deal with the effects of the spill.

      From the NY Times: "The Obama administration has publicly chastised BP America for its handling of the spreading oil gusher, yet a review of the response suggests it may be too simplistic to place all the blame for the unfolding environmental catastrophe on the oil company. The federal government also had opportunities to move more quickly, but did not do so while it waited for a resolution to the spreading spill from BP."

      Or is the NY Times also part of the "militant, fringe right" now?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by johnbrown (May 02, 2010 2:06 am ET)
         
      how can this be Obama's"Katrina" if this was a disaster caused by a private sector company?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by digdirt357 (May 02, 2010 11:36 am ET)
         
      but the goverenment is corrupt and incapable and can and has never done anything right, they shouldn't do anything it should all be left to the private sector the private sector does everything better because of the free market...oh
      Report Abuse
    • Author by alienofwar (May 03, 2010 12:34 pm ET)
      5 1
      The right-wing media is trying to deflect the problem away from BP and it's affiliates to the President himself, so as it make it seem it's his fault that potentially up to 1 million gallons of oil is leaking each day because the company wanted to save $500, 000 not installing a remote controlled safety valve.

      There is no comparisons to Katrina because it was an act of nature and the government was 100% responsible with responding to the crisis to protect it's citizens.

      In this crisis we have a company which is mainly responsible for this disaster and it is the governments job to make sure their doing the job of containing and stopping the leak, which is exactly what they did and are doing.

      Two completely different things.

      But nice try!
      Report Abuse