Is Coulter accusing Fox News of "blatantly lying" about racial profiling concerns in AZ law?
On The O'Reilly Factor, Ann Coulter stated that "everyone is blatantly lying" when saying the new Arizona immigration law could lead to racial profiling. However, several Fox News personalities have said that the law may lead to racial profiling.
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Coulter: "[E]veryone is blatantly lying about what this law does" ... "except Fox"
From the April 30 edition of Fox News Channel's The O'Reilly Factor:
WILLIAMS: Ann, what do you think of this law? Is it about racial profiling as we are hearing from the pop stars?
COULTER: No, though I like that listening to air-headed celebrities, is almost identical to listening to news broadcasters on every station except Fox. No, everyone is blatantly lying about what this law does. Specifically racial profiling is prohibited by the law. Cops, by the way, cannot initiate contact with anyone under the law whom they could not initiate contact with before. It's when they are in the process of stopping someone or arresting someone if there is a reasonable suspicion that the person is here illegally, not based on race, not based on a suspicion of the person's national origin, but, you know, other reasons. If a cop stops a van that's speeding and 20 people get out and run in 20 different directions, that would cause reasonable suspicion. And it's not like Arizona is inventing this legal principle. There are decades of law interpreting reasonable suspicion.
Fox News personalities have expressed concerns about AZ law leading to racial profiling
Huckabee: "[T]here is no such thing" as "American looking." During the April 24 broadcast of Fox & Friends Saturday, Fox News host Mike Huckabee stated, "They're going to get sued. I predict they're going to lose. Because if you stop somebody and say, you know, he just doesn't look American to me, what does that mean? Walk the streets of New York and tell me, how do you know who's the American-looking, because there is no such thing."
Krauthammer: "[I]t could lead to a lot of civil rights abuses." Fox News contributor Charles Krauthammer stated on the April 21 edition of Fox News' Special Report with Bret Baier that states are "trying to pass laws where you catch somebody already in the U.S. and it's really hard to discern who is and who is not illegal. Look, if you're at the border and somebody is climbing over the fence, you have a pretty high certainty it's an illegal. Now if somebody is standing outside a Home Depot who doesn't speak English, well he could be or he could not be. So it could lead to a lot of civil rights abuses. But the problem is ultimately that the feds haven't acted."
Andrew Napolitano: "The law has to have standards in it" or "there would be a different standard for each police officer." During the April 27 edition of Fox & Friends, Fox News legal analyst Andrew Napolitano stated, "Think about it. The police are going to stop somebody on the basis of where they look and say I think you're here illegally, give me your papers." He added, "The problem with the law is that it's subjective. What's reasonable suspicion to you might be unreasonable suspicion to me. The law has to have standards in it. Otherwise police could stop people for any reason they wanted and there would be a different standard for each police officer. That's the importance of that question to the governor. Can you tell and illegal alien from a legal alien by looking at them? She said of course I can't. Neither can the police."
Other Fox News figures have defended racial profiling
Crowder: Nothing wrong with law's racial profiling. During the April 23 edition of Fox News' Hannity, Fox News contributor Steven Crowder said that there's racial profiling in the law and "I don't think there's really anything wrong as far as racial profiling, stopping people who are coming in illegally. I mean, you're not looking for a blond haired, blue eyed Swede most of the time."
Gutfeld: "A lot of the critics are saying this is racial profiling. Duh!" On the April 21 edition of Fox News' Hannity, Red Eye host Greg Gutfeld said of the law: "A lot of the critics are saying this is racial profiling. Duh! They're coming from another country. That's what you do. You have to look at them and see who they are before you know they're legal or illegal. I don't think that's a fair criticism."
Gallagher doesn't care about racial profiling concerns. On the April 23 edition of his Salem Radio program, radio host and Fox News contributor Mike Gallagher told Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace, "Sign it, baby, sign it" and that the Arizona legislature is his "new hero." After Wallace noted concerns about civil liberties, Gallagher said that "it's racial profiling, to be sure, cops know if there's a van full of dark-skinned men with lawnmowers packed into the back of a pick-up truck...that's what they're talking about."
Malkin: "Arizona: Doing the job the feds won't do." Fox News contributor Michelle Malkin praised the law in an April 23 post on her blog, writing: "GOP Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer has signed the nation's toughest immigration enforcement bill. They're doing the job the feds won't do - taking the law and our borders seriously to protect the health, safety, and welfare of our citizens first. Cue the ACLU lawyers, the open-borders lobby, and the race-card players. And watch the Left show you what intolerance is really all about." Malkin, who wrote the book In Defense of Internment: The Case for Racial Profiling in World War II and the War on Terror, also wrote that some are "whining about Arizona becoming a 'police state.'"
Hume: "Some people are going to have to endure inconvenience as opposed to everybody." On the April 19 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, Fox News senior political analyst Brit Hume appeared to dismiss concerns about racial profiling, stating that "if it's an effective law enforcement technique done in good faith, people may have to endure some inconvenience. What we're saying here is that some people are going to have endure inconvenience as opposed to everybody having to endure it."

















Wow. You conservatives really love the Constitution, as long as you're the only ones who enjoy its protections.
So why don't YOU work it out, get a life and stop complaining....
I do love the constitution and believe anyone here LEGALLY deserves the protection of the constitution.... BUT ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS should be returned to their countries of origin. Russia, Jordan, Ireland, Israel.... and yes, Mexico.... ILLEGAL ALIENS are ILLEGAL ALIENS regardless of their countries of origin, race OR ethnicity.... Show me where the AZ law says Mexican ILLEGAL ALIENS?
Why is it you LIBERALS think the only ILLEGAL ALIENS are Hispanic? Which by the way is an ethnicity, not a race....
Perhaps you should read and understand the Constitution before you jump to conclusions regarding conservatives.... All I hear from you is HATE speech
I had these two Mexican kids who worked for me a couple of years ago. They were both born and raised in America, citizens. They were routinely pulled over and hassled by police. Now, as a white citizen, I've never experienced this. It's anathema to my whole American experience, and I told them about a good lawyer, thinking they would want to do something about what seemed clearly to be harassment. Both of them just sort of withdrew from the idea. Being one of the pampered privelidged, I pressed my case.
You know what one of them told me? He said, "There ain't no courts for DWM."
Driving. While. Mexican.
I'm just going to leave this thread with that. You're a duffer, so beating you up wouldn't really offer the kind of satisfaction I generally get from making so-called conservatives eat crow. Hasta luego, guey.
second of all YOU are a true blue racist.... how can you possibly assert that ILLEGAL ALIEN refers only to hispanics? ILLEGAL ALIENS come in all races and ethnicity's....
BUT the funniest hing is that you "make conservatives "eat crow"" hilarious..... You can't even address the comments without name calling and deflection.... AND you presume to know or think you know what I AM SAYING when I said NOTHING of the sort.
You are the duffer duff. Here try the realities again.
[b]Mexican, Hispanic, Latino are NOT a race, the race is Caucasian.... my point.... Well you actually have three choices for race.... [b]
Why is it you LIBERALS think the only ILLEGAL ALIENS are Hispanic? Which by the way is an ethnicity, not a race....
see ya later duff....
Nice try, OTP, but you just looked foolish.
But using a perfectly acceptable and legitimate alternative definition, there are MANY races, and the Hispanic/Latino race is one of them.
This law will cause/allow law enforcement personnel to discriminate based upon race.
Seriously, who do you think the rednecks in Arizona will be going after?
rednecks huh? Hit your bong and die hippie!
Secondly, In Arizona 90% of the illegal alien population is Mexican (which is considered a kind of Hispanic or Latino demographically). It should be noted that when people are talking about the immigration problem in Arizona, most of those illegal aliens by far are going to be Hispanic/Latino and Mexican.
Not real bright, are you?
Stop holding a mirror in front of your face when you're posting, doofus.
And is it "dumb ass" or "dumbass"?
I would NEVER throw out the RACIST, RACISM, or race card to make my point, BUT to mock the liberals that INSIST the law is RACIST, and would promote "RACIAL" profiling..... You folks want it BOTH ways.... to suit your "frame"....
1. Employers that hire ILLEGAL ALIENS (regardless of race or ethnicity) should be dealt with. (Of course them you LIBERALS would complain about that).
2. I find it interesting that I am REQUIRED to carry my passport and "entry papers" to ALL other countries I visit, AND I am required to produce them on demand for NO REASON....hmmm.
3. It's IMPOSSIBLE to use "racial profiling" as ILLEGAL ALIENS come from all races and ethnicity's. BUT behavior profiling should most definitely be used. BTW - hispanic is NOT a race....
4. The Constitution REQUIRES the government to protect the rights of all LEGAL residence and LEGAL visitors of the US.
5. We do need comprehensive immigration reform. Sealed borders (all borders) and immigrants should return to their countries of origin and apply for residence and/or citizenship like many others have.
I have a question - Why do liberals act as if all ILLEGAL ALIENS are hispanic? what about the illegal Canadians, Australians, Irish, Israelis, Jordanians.... on and on and on..... You folks MUST be racist to assume that hipanics are the only ILLEGAL ALIEN issue? duh?
I use the language you use to MOCK you fool!
I have been pulled over and asked for my papers, not blue eyes but GREEN....
DON'T presume to tell me what I believe.... It's true people are profiled and discriminated against for a variety of reasons..... fools
Liar.
That's what these people are being asked for. Being asked for your driver's license is NOT being asked for your 'papers'. 'Papers' prove citizenship.
And the problem with the law is that it's unconstitutional for US Citizens to be asked to prove their citizenship, and so the first time they error and ask a citizen to prove that they're a citizen, they've violated the Constitution - states don't have that right!
Listen, I don't think it's the right way to enforce our immigration laws, actually I think our immigration laws are just plain bad.... BUT the federal government has repeatedly failed to secure the borders and provide the constitutionally guaranteed rights all citizens and LEGAL residence deserve.... and just to show you how ignorant you are, states DO have the right to protect citizens living and working in the state.... fool
So if it's unconstitutional in YOUR lame opinion, so be it, then it'll be struck down....
2. Were you asked for your passport in the USA by a law enforcement officer? If so, which state and what was the situation? (The only time I have had to show my passport in the US has been to voluntarily board transportation for an international destination and voluntarily as ID for my standard I-9 form.)
That's not the same as cops in any individual state pulling someone over and asking for 'papers' that prove citizenship!
What a doofus that you don't understand this!
Reading is fundamental.
You claimed that you had been pulled over and then asked to provide papers after you had been pulled over. But that's not true - it's a lie. You've never been pulled over in any state and been asked to provide proof of citizenship (papers). You're lying when you say that you have had that experience.
You're wrong once again, or lying, about what the bill says and requires.
You said that you'd been pulled over and you'd been forced to provide your "papers" after being pulled over.
And that's a LIE!
Cops don't ask you to provide your citizenship. Federal agents ask you to provide 'papers' when you enter the country, but that's not when one is "pulled over", which is what you claimed. They can't. This new state law attempts to give them the right to do it, but they can't. It'll be found unconstitutional.
You're a liar. You got caught lying, trying to say that a passport is the same as a driver's license and that being pulled over is the same as being stopped at a border, and you don't like that. Too bad, so sad.
PROVE IT dumb c - oh never mind, not polite even if it is accurate...
When crossing the border, you aren't "pulled over". State or local police "pull you over". Not INS people. The INS works at the border, and THEY don't "pull you over".
So it doesn't matter that you didn't say "who", you doofus. The issue was that you said you'd been pulled over and asked for your papers, and you haven't been. A driver's license is NOT papers, and you aren't pulled over at the border!
You're a liar. It's been proven.
You're also a troll - that's also been documented here and on many previous threads.
FoxNews has blatantly lied on this topic. So have you.
HOW exactly would YOU know my life experiences to twit.... back to you stinky hole.....
troll, here we go again with the name calling. Can't do anything but call names like "LIAR", "TROLL"... come up with some substance, stupid ....
By the way, the Arizona law does not require probable cause to ask for someone's proof of citizenship. It is written as during lawful contact between the authorities and the individual. Could be a traffic stop, could be a witness to an accident, could be a visit to the DMV, could be a social conversation with a law enforcement official.
So, to sum up--I believe you're lying about being stopped, and you're wrong on the law. Although the law doesn't specifically single out Hispanics, no reasonable person believes that this Arizona law is targeting any other ethnicities (please note the spelling for future foaming-at-the-mouth posts).
But that's a strawman argument. It's not NECESSARY for me to KNOW your personal history in order to know that you were NOT asked for your "papers" (proof of citizenship) when you were "pulled over", which is WHAT YOU LIED ABOUT! It's not necessary for me to know your personal history to definitively prove that you're a liar!!!
One is not "pulled over" at the border.
And no cop has asked you to prove that you're a US citizen for a traffic violation when you've been pulled over.
And no, it's not namecalling to call a troll a troll, just like it's not namecalling to label Son of Sam a murderer or a liar a liar!
You should get that cognitive dissonance checked.
It's not "unconstitutional" and you're argument is weak. How do Federal agents determine if someone is here legally? Think about it.
It. Is. Unconstitutional. To execute a search of the person, house, papers, or effects of a person, the police officer must first establish probable cause. Without probable cause, which is defined as the facts and evidence in possession of the officer that amount to a reasonable conclusion that a crime has been committed, any search by police is unconstitutional. This is opposed to what the Arizona law now condones, which is the search of persons upon the suspicion that they may be an undocumented immigrant. Searching a person on the suspicion of the committance of a crime is not probable cause, it's conjecture, it's inference. It's unconstitutional.
Get a clue.
2. we are talking about when you are in the US not when you go abroad, if you are the passenger in a car here in the US you don't need to have any papers on you.
3. Who do you think will get singled out, the white guy from the UK who has been here illegally for 5 years or the US citizen who happens to be of Mexican decent?
4. Your point is?
5. Totally agree and the native Americans get to decide who stays and who goes.
And apparently if an illegal immigrant is abused in some way by someone in the U.S, Though luck you shouldn't have been here in the first place, right?
And no one should be abused... get a off the lame arguments... lame.....
Wait is that you bruce tinsley? i can recognize those four elypsis anywhere. If it is you, oyur comic sucks and you have no sense of humor.
I don't care what you use to refer to ILLEGAL ALIENS, go ahead be as inaccurate as you like.... AGAIN, immigrants are here LEGALLY.... ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT is not proper use of the english language.... not does undocumented worker describe the issue.... ILLEGAL ALIENS describes ANYONE in this country without permission, regardless of color, creed or ethnicity.... This includes those criminals locked up that are here illegally as well as those who have no interest in IMMIGRATION (that is being here legally)....
This is not rocket science.
And whenever a cop asks someone who he suspects of not being a US citizen for that proof, the cop is violating the Constitutionally-protected rights of that citizen!
You really are not aware of the difference between traveling between countries and traveling within countries? I have never been stopped in another state in the US and been forced to prove I was a US citizen. Not ever. Don't know where you are from.
You are either being disingenuous or stupid. Of course it is possible to use "racial profiling", but not in a way that is consistent with the Constitution. Of course "ILLEGAL ALIENS" (strange that you feel you need to yell that) are constituted from many different ethnicities and national origins, but we are talking about Arizona. The vast majority of "ILLEGAL ALIENS" are going to be from the nearest border (hint: it isn't Kazakhstan). I don't mind using behavioral profiling so long as there are common, reasonably identifiable behaviors shared by all "ILLEGAL ALIENS". I don't care if you call Hispanic a race, culture or ethnicity. I know what is meant by it and it is all pretty much the same thing to me. Personally I prefer "ethnicity" above the rest, but I'm not such a NAZI to tell everybody what to say to make me happy. I don't get hung-up on fairly minor semantic differences.
Huh? Where does it say that? You must have some version of the Constitution that is translated into Wingnutese.
I don't mind "sealing the borders" (which is probably impossible, but we can do better than we do currently), but expecting "ILLEGAL ALIENS" to go back to their home country to apply for residence is naively setting yourself up for failure. That would NEVER happen and you would only be encouraging "ILLEGAL ALIENS" to not do anything, but hope that they won't get caught (which is exactly what they are doing right now).
Well that's a pretty obvious strawman. Nobody has said that. Now with regards to Arizona, which borders a country with lots of hispanics in it, the vast majority of "ILLEGAL ALIENS" are going to be from there.
As I said, that is just a strawman. Nobody says anything like that outside of your apparently fevered imagination. Duh?
The issue isn't whether or not there is an illegal immigration problem. The issue is, amongst several others, the inherent racism of the law, and the Constitutional matter of unreasonable search and seizure.
And I have a right to comment about any damn thing I want. That's in the Constitution, too.
Anthropology and evolution lesson aside, perhaps you should do your homework before asserting such nonsense in a public forum.
Good day sir.
I need no lessons, tell your racist, race bating friends how ignorant they are.... thanks again for proving my exact point.....
Officially, genetically, there is only one race.
Less formally, there are many races, and Hispanic is one of them. One can be racist against Hispanics.
man, do you just come here to haress people or what? you have no valid points to make, lots of straw men and about the only thing you are any good at is name calling. i feel bad you don't have a better life than making yourself feel better by name calling and ignoring facts. maybe you'll do better next life.
On thing I know for sure is that I'm not too old to learn new things.... I do enjoy a REASONABLE and good discussion regarding topics such as immigration, taxation etc....
It's true that I am fairly conservative....
It's not namecalling to have your behavior publicly and accurately identified.
It IS whining to claim that you ARE being wrongly attacked!
You are NOT a victim here. We continually see that bogus claim of victimhood here, and I refute it all the time. A criminal is NOT a victim of the D.A. who prosecutes him, and you aren't a victim of me, pointing out YOUR bad behavior!
Just a thought, could you be projecting by chance? your post seems awfully hateful to me....!!!!
Get a clue. Get a life!
a.any of the traditional divisions of humankind, the commonest being the Caucasian, Mongoloid, and Negro, characterized by supposedly distinctive and universal physical characteristics: no longer in technical use.
b.an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, esp. formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.
c.a human population partially isolated reproductively from other populations, whose members share a greater degree of physical and genetic similarity with one another than with other humans.
4.a group of tribes or peoples forming an ethnic stock: the Slavic race.
5.any people united by common history, language, cultural traits, etc.: the Dutch race.
You claimed that it was inaccurate to claim that Latinos could be considered a race. But they can.
Further evidence that you can't even READ a dictionary definition and absorb it!
Thanks for exposing YOURSELF as a doofus multiple times!
Anyone who believes that immigration law isn't racist should note that nobody is talking about the estimated 65,000-75,000 undocumented Canadian immigrants, or the swelling numbers of Eastern Europeans smuggled into the country. I'm just glad those of us of Irish descent were never put through this....
5.any people united by common history, language, cultural traits, etc.: the Dutch race.
See, I DID look in the dictionary.
And I posted that info in the post above.
And YOU'RE the one who totally MISSED that info in the post above!
So, it's YOU who, like said, can't even read a dictionary definition and absorb it!
If the Dutch can be called a race, or the Slavs can be called a race, then so can Hispanics/Latinos be a race!
This is not debatable - it's fact. There is one human race, but there are also many divisions that are ALSO called races within that human family.
This is a political maneuver by the Democrats as it was by Bush to gain voting support. It has little to do with protecting our borders or protecting rights. Arizona has the right to protect its state from unauthorized access and crime.
As far as I'm concerned, a bigot is a bigot irrespective of the basis of their bigotry and the election of Barack Obama has certainly flushed a load of assorted bigots out from the undergrowth - political bigots, colour bigots, religious bigots, nationalist bigots, bigots for all prejudices and occasions.
The subject of immigration (as fundamental to the human condition as procreation) has simply provided another basis for bigots to spout their venom.
Immigration is a real problem, but I've heard no bigotry (doesn't mean it hasn't happened) with regard to immigration....
The problem is actually ILLEGAL ALIENS, those in this country without permission, regardless of the countries of origin.... I know some that read these postings are SO ISOLATED in their daily lives that they don't know that ILLEGAL ALIENS come in all colors, and all ethnicity's.... Even Australian and Canadian....
A good comprehensive immigration policy should be put into practice.... Believe me there are a lot of unanswered questions, like what happens to the person that was smuggled into the country as a four month old child and lived here his or her entire life.... This country is all they know.... scary.... and I'm sure there are even more horror stories....
Perhaps if more protests would be held in Mexico and other exporters of ILLEGAL ALIENS, regarding the liberal millionaires and billionaires that control the Mexican economy, the "need" to illegally enter the US would subside.....
The entire leftwingnut objective is to deflect, divert spin and lie about the realities of situation. I have nothing to prove to prove to any of you, except perhaps one thing... your diversion, deflection, spin and lies are only hurting your cause.... It's about time to frame the discussion in REALITY, leave the racism, racial profiling and other trash at the door....
The most glaring is referring to ILLEGAL ALIENS as "immigrants". If they were immigrants, they'd certainly be legal.... Oh then we start throwing the word RACIST around until that too is debunked....
BIGOTRY is accurate and there are all sorts of bigots as you've pointed out.... It's not a one way street aimed at hispanics, just listen to "la raza".... bigots (not all but many).... Yes and there are white bigots too, just look at harry reid. "he only talks in a negro dialect when he wants to", referring to President Obama, that's a bigot most leftwingnuts prefer to ignore.... but a bigot all the same....
BTW - The very President Obama that PROMISED something would be done regarding IMMIGRATION REFORM is still waffling and posturing about his future re-election possibilities....
Fundamentally I agree that the AZ law MAY lead to things that should NOT occur, bigotry for one.... BUT something has to be tried, this at LEAST opens the dialog to IMMIGRATION REFORM....
They share a border with Mexico, and they want to stop Mexicans and other Latin Americans from crossing that border. That's it. This law will only be applied to Hispanics, and someone will eventually ask a Hispanic for ID for no reason other than his looks, and that's a violation of the Constitution, which applies to everyone in the US, legal or illegal.
And name calling makes you sound immature, no matter what side you're on.
Couple bigotted quotes from La Raza, full quotes.
A private conversation somehow became a public statement. Apology (uneeded in some quarters opinion) given, accepted, but go ahead and chew on it for a while.
The term "la raza" is bigoted, of course you won't be able to see that... how about this....
"For The Race everything. Outside The Race, nothing." hmmm.... sounds pretty bigoted to me... besides I thought all you leftwingnuts don't want to talk about RACE....
oh that is if it doesn't suit your purpose, deflect, divert, spin and lie....
I asked for a complete quote or three, who, where, context. Sadly all missing from your post.
You come on appartently loaded for bear. Really you have little but a set of opinions. Give them some real support sometime.
Undocumented migration is a problem caused by artificial laws imposed by simpletons who believe that simply legislating something will make it so - a bit like when Idi Amin passed a law making it illegal to be unemployed or passing laws making certain intoxicants illegal.
We hear so much spouted about "free markets" yet a free labour market that allows people to shift according to labour demands through an area that they have traditionally (we're talking long before the U.S. was settled by undocumented European immigrants!) roamed unhindered.
The nativist bigotry currently poisoning U.S. politics is reminiscent of the Know Nothings of around 150 years ago, and by the way, the crime problem in Mexico is a direct result of the U.S. imposed "War on Drugs" and the dopey (pun intended) belief that making something you don't like illegal will make it disappear.
You believe that laws are not necessary? hmmmm.... figures....
Why is it that the most recent arrivals seem to think that they have the exclusive right to run things? Manifest destiny is a particularly poisonous form of bigotry - an imperialism that debases "the other".
As I've already stated, migration is fundamental to the human condition. The history of humankind is a history of migration. Migration law should be designed to accommodate this natural behaviour. Management is the solution. Attempts to control through punitive legislation are doomed to failure and have the added consequence of creating antagonistic divisions within the community.
Try again.
This is not dissimilar to the way 'entropy' means something different in physics than it means in sociology.
So, now that we are all (hopefully) using the words in the same way, perhaps we can get back to discussing the fact that the AZ law cause de facto profiling, whether it is officially recognized as such or not.
This is not dissimilar to the way 'entropy' means something different in physics than it means in sociology.
So, now that we are all (hopefully) using the words in the same way, perhaps we can get back to discussing the fact that the AZ law cause de facto profiling, whether it is officially recognized as such or not.
I agree that profiling individuals based on any of the above is WRONG....
BUT, the profiling ALREADY happens, it's NOT something that's going to be created by the AZ law.... The profiling should be dealt with as an issue unto itself without regard for the AZ law.... I know, it's a difficult concept for some, but not EVERYONE is as prone to bigotry as most of you APPEAR to be.... Go back through this site and read the posts.... I've been called every name one can imagine while you claim to be "ANTI-BIGOTRY".... to make matters worse NONE of you have any idea who I am, what ethnicity, what culture, NOTHING... all you know is that I say things that don't necessarily agree with you so you choose to be bigots.... Just to be clear, I am NOT above responding to bigoted hatemongers with name calling.... The key word RESPONDING....
He is donig a show in which the audience is Hispanic people who are here LEGALLY (OK, she's not technically HISpanic, but I guess she qualifies.
Glenn has found people of Latin heritage who support the AZ law. Just llok for the hottest woman in the audience - that will be her.
After all, it sums up the over-riding emotion of the Right Whinge.