About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

"Drill more": Fox News figures respond to environmental catastrophe by calling for more drilling

May 04, 2010 4:46 pm ET — 25 Comments

In the wake of the catastrophic oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, several Fox News hosts and contributors have responded by calling for a continuation -- and in some instances, an expansion -- of offshore drilling.

Fox hosts and contributors respond to drilling catastrophe by calling for drilling

Kristol suggests drilling "closer in, which is probably less dangerous." On the May 3 broadcast of Fox News Sunday Fox News contributor Bill Kristol said: "Look, it was a bad accident. But the fact is, I think we get something like one third of our domestic oil from the Gulf - from offshore drilling in the Gulf. We need it. We can't cut back on it. Incidentally, if we hadn't stopped closer in drilling after the Santa Barbara accident forty years ago and we've had these congressional restrictions until 2008 for forty years, we'd have a lot more drilling closer in which is probably less dangerous, less treacherous than trying to drill fifty miles from the coast." Kristol also suggested "on-shore drilling" in ANWR, and added, "I'm a drill, baby, drill, person."

Bolling: "Drill here, drill now ...drill, baby, drill" On the April 30 broadcast of Fox News Channel's The O'Reilly Factor, Fox Business host and Fox News contributor Eric Bolling suggested that the "six dollar, seven dollar diesel fuel" is "more harmful" for fishermen than the oil spill and said: "We need to drill here, drill now, and hey, drill, baby, drill."

Asman says "the answer" is we need to "drill more," tells environmental "hypocrites" to "shut up." On the April 30 edition of Fox Business' America's Nightly Scoreboard, host David Asman announced he was "sick" of "environmentalists living the good life while lecturing the rest of us about how we're all a bunch of selfish oil little piggies." He added: "The bottom line is we need oil. And we will for some time, and the only way to prevent us from getting stuck on foreign oil is to drill more domestically. It's a messy business, but it beats most of the alternatives for now. And until someone comes up with something better, the answer is now as it was before the awful spill in Louisiana: drill more."

Perino suggests continuing "very safe" offshore drilling. On the May 3 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Fox News contributor Dana Perino said that we have "very safe offshore oil drilling," adding, "look how much is down there, if it was safe and we were able to harness it."

Palin posts Facebook note titled "Domestic Drilling: Why We Can Still Believe." In a note posted to her Facebook page on April 30th, Fox News contributor Sarah Palin wrote: "I repeat the slogan 'drill here, drill now' not out of naiveté or disregard for the tragic consequences of oil spills -- my family and my state and I know firsthand those consequences. How could I still believe in drilling America's domestic supply of energy after having seen the devastation of the Exxon-Valdez spill? I continue to believe in it because increased domestic oil production will make us a more secure, prosperous, and peaceful nation."

Fox News has long history of aggressively advocating for offshore drilling

As Media Matters has noted, Fox News has fervently advocated for offshore drilling. Its activism has includled promoting Sarah Palin's "drill, baby, drill" mantra and pushing myths suggesting that drilling is environmentally safe. Notably, Glenn Beck has repeatedly touted offshore drilling, including claiming that "if you really cared about the environment, you would let us drill for our own oil," and Newt Gingrich is the author of Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less: A handbook for slashing gas prices and solving our energy crisis (Regnery Press, 2008).

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by einreb (May 04, 2010 5:10 pm ET)
      11  
      Here's how it works with Fox News. They advocate a position, but there is no accountability. And really, no expertise. Find ANY oil drilling or oceanographic expertise among Cavuto's, Kilmeades, Hannity's or Kristol's resumes. They just "think" it would be a good idea to drill for oil.

      Earlier this week, William Kristol's BRILLIANT observation: "offshore drilling is quite safe, “and very environmentally clean, except where there is a disaster like this" should earn him a Master's Degree in the obvious.

      When something goes wrong, this same group of "experts" unleash a nonstop torrent of blame on the Obama administration before moving on to their next half-baked "idea."
      Report Abuse
      • Author by FGFM (May 04, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
        6  
        And of course, the "very environmentally clean" process ultimately results in the bulk of that oil being burned in automobile engines, producing not-so-clean exhaust.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by afriend (May 04, 2010 5:46 pm ET)
        10  
        Find ANY oil drilling or oceanographic expertise among Cavuto's, Kilmeades, Hannity's or Kristol's resumes. They just "think" it would be a good idea to drill for oil.

        Maybe its time Fox put their money where their collective mouth is...Fox, I challenge you to underwrite insurance for all these rigs...if they are safe and the Oil companies are honest, no problem. If there's a disaster, Fox picks up the tab. What do you say, Mr. "We're balanced"?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by dwbat (May 05, 2010 2:36 am ET)
           
        if their ideas were half-baked, nay, even totaly-baked, they would better ideas than what they're spewing out at present. make it a point to call into your local neocon radio shows. im in idaho and believe me, there are tons of them, and if i can spark a rational thought each morning into any one of the tea-party members listening the talking heads, i consider it a huge half-baked victory
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Tbone Slickens (May 05, 2010 12:22 pm ET)
        2 6
        Oh-oh...Somebody took MILLIONS in campaign funds from BP...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Tbone Slickens (May 05, 2010 2:16 pm ET)
          2 4
          And look what those campaign funds bought.

          Report Abuse
          • Author by Disputed Zone (May 05, 2010 4:44 pm ET)
            1  
            Arguing for campaign finance reform, Koko? Happy to have you.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (May 05, 2010 2:54 pm ET)
          4 1
          Liar. All one has to do is READ the article to see that what you're claiming is not true.

          And then, on top of that, there's the confusion that your side seems to have that money given to different people has an equal impact with those different people, and it doesn't.

          Republicans lean towards supporting big business, and money from those companies make them lean even MORE in that direction.

          Democrats lean AWAY from supporting big business, and money from those companies stop them from leaning even MORE away from their direction!
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Tbone Slickens (May 05, 2010 11:40 pm ET)
              1
            Wasn't it just a mere four weeks ago that Barry greenlighted more drilling? Didn't he say "gulf drilling was safe?" Did I miss something here?

            You're lying to yourself if you think BP didn't have influence in this administration. To add fuel to the fire, Barry said "Wall street is just like main street". This guy is cozing up to big business faster than any president I've ever seen.

            Keep your head in the sand. We're counting on it come November.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by JustAJoe (May 07, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
           
        No, "Here's how it works with Fox News" and all Murdock news media. He he could make a fortune buying newspapers all around the world and increasing their circulation by printing tabloid news - "The Baby with two heads" stories.

        Fox News is no different. The more outrageous and controversial they are, the more views and people like us giving them free publicity. The rest of world considers Murdock's media about as credible as we consider the National Inquirer.

        Glenn Beck is even on record in Forbes that he is only in it for the money, doesn't "give a flip about politics" and anybody that ":takes what he says at face value is an idiot."
        Report Abuse
    • Author by FGFM (May 04, 2010 5:28 pm ET)
      7  
      Kristol suggests drilling "closer in, which is probably less dangerous."

      Sheer genius. So, he thinks that oil companies skipped over the low handing fruit to drill 50 miles off shore just for the heck of it?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (May 04, 2010 6:06 pm ET)
        3  
        Apparently. And its not the kiddie end of the swimming pool. It still requires the same equipment.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (May 04, 2010 6:07 pm ET)
        3  
        Bill just doesn't care. Ah well, he sez, spring came oily this year. Off he goes to have another latte. Fishermen suffering? He can just eat something else.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by einreb (May 04, 2010 7:41 pm ET)
        1  
        It's part of the "Kristol effect." You know, William the bloody utters a 'thought' which is 100% wrong, every time.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (May 05, 2010 12:52 am ET)
        2 1
        Well, drilling in shallower water IS less troublesome, so it likely IS less dangerous in some ways.

        However, this well was being drilled to tap a new field, a field that wasn't available in shallower water!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© (May 04, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
      3  
      This fits along with their continued advocacy of disasterous wars of choice. Drop the ball in Afghanistan for Shrub's Excellent Iraqi Adventure?

      Sure! And since that worked so well, let's invade Iran and Yemen and who knows what else. It's not like Rupert's puppets will be putting their own behinds on the line.
      ~
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (May 04, 2010 9:27 pm ET)
      3  
      There was a guy on CNBC this afternoon saying that if the well in question isn't capped, which he didn't sound very confident of, then the entire billion-barrel reservoir might deplete itself. In my layman's understanding, I don't know how that much oil doesn't get into the Gulf stream and threaten the entire Eastern seaboard. Hopefully it doesn't come to that, but it's not hard to imagine what that would do to the economy. This is the potential risk to the world as we know it that Fox advocates taking.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by my4cents (May 04, 2010 9:52 pm ET)
        3  
        It's like you leave your faucet on and hope that at some point in time, it just runs out.
        Unless action is taken, it does not.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (May 05, 2010 12:55 am ET)
        6 1
        Which is why the drilling companies complaining about the cost of the $500,000 acoustic remote shut-off valve doesn't seem so very expensive NOW that we've had a catastrophic accident.

        Too bad the greedy oil companies and drilling companies and the Bush Administration didn't understand this in the early part of this decade when they were looking into whether or not to mandate the use of that redundant shut-off valve!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (May 05, 2010 8:31 am ET)
      6 1
      You gotta love Kristol's repsonse. Yeah, that's what we really need - the inevitable spill happening CLOSER to the shore.

      ----------------------------------------------------
      I say,
      Solar, Wind and Geothermal NOW,
      Solar, Wind and Geothermal TOMORROW,
      Solar, Wind and Geothermal FOREVER.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by toombsie (May 05, 2010 1:07 pm ET)
        2  
        "It's probably safer closer to shore" - he is just saying this. He has no idea, doesn't know what the experts think - yet people actually care for this guy's opinion. Considering the problem seems to have started with the broken cementing of the wellhead located at rig level - what difference would it have made if the well was closer to the shore? It still would have blown up - we'd still have a leak, only maybe the efforts to cap the leak would have been less taxing in shallower water. It still would have been an environmental catastrophe.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Rodrian Roadeye (May 05, 2010 8:57 am ET)
      1  
      If you're headed to the shore this summer you might want to go now.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by YouTubeJEFF9K (May 05, 2010 11:58 am ET)
      1  
      There used to be a drilling procedure that was considered appropriate for the likes of the commentators at Fox News. It was called the lobotomy.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by temphandle prep15essex (May 06, 2010 9:49 am ET)
      1  
      FOX NEWS is faux news. So what's they say is merely a conversation between two or perhaps three people on their show. It is called talk show, it is not news. They'll say anthing for "shock value" in order to keep people entertained. That's the word, "entertained"! If you believe anything from Faux News, you are totally bewitched by them and not thinking for yourself.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.