About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Drudge, Fox Nation dubiously suggest DHS is to blame for alleged bomber boarding plane

May 05, 2010 3:34 pm ET — 12 Comments

Conservative media have suggested that the Department of Homeland Security is to blame for alleged Times Square bomber Faisal Shahzad boarding a plane. However, administration officials have stated the airline failed to review the updated no-fly list after Shahzad's addition, and that sending the passenger manifest to Customs and Border Protection successfully prevented Shahzad's escape.

Drudge, Fox Nation suggest Shahzad getting on plane was DHS' fault

Drudge: "Security let suspect on plane." The top headline on the Drudge Report, accessed May 5, stated: "Security let suspect on plane," under a photo of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano:

Fox Nation: "No explanation why NYC bomb suspect boarded airliner." A Fox Nation post, accessed May 5, stated there was "no explanation why NYC bomb suspect boarded airliner" under a photo of Napolitano:

FN-20100505-nofly.JPG

Admin: Airline failed to check no-fly list, built-in redundancy of CBP check resulted in arrest

NY Times: Admin says airline failed to act on notification of Shahzad's addition to the no-fly list. The New York Times reported on May 4 that "the airline he was flying, Emirates, failed to act on an electronic message at midday on Monday notifying all carriers to check the no-fly list for an important added name, the officials said. That meant lost opportunities to flag him when he made a reservation and paid for his ticket in cash several hours before departure."

Admin. official: Built-in redundancy from CBP review of passenger list resulted in arrest. On May 4, ABC's Jake Tapper reported an administration official's statement that "there was a breakdown at the Emirates level" but that "redundancy is built in" via sending locked-in passenger manifests to the Customs and Border Protection Agency. It was a CBP official who caught Shahzad's name and stopped the plane from taking off. From Tapper's report:

So how was he able to board the Emirates Airlines flight to Dubai?

"It takes a few hours for the airlines system to catch up," a senior administration official tells ABC news.

Another senior administration official adds that Emirates refreshes their system to update with US intelligence information periodically - but not frequently.

In any case, the first official says that airlines were "within minutes" of Shahzad being put on the no-fly list told to "look at a web-board" and manually check its passenger manifest against the news on the web board.

"That appears to not have happened" the official says. "For whatever reason there was a breakdown at the Emirates level."

Emirates Airlines provided its locked-in passenger manifest to the Customs and Border Protection agency. The plane at that point can leave. But a CBP official caught Shahzad's name on the manifest and the plane never left the gate.

"That redundancy is built in," the official says. "It's not luck it's design. It was good work by CBP."

Bush official:  Airlines to blame for U.S. not checking documents upon exiting country. Tapper also reported on May 4 that a Bush official blamed the airline industry for opposing efforts to require outgoing passengers to present identification before getting on international flights:

A former Bush administration official tells ABC news that after 9/11, the counterterrorism community proposed a new requirement for all those leaving the U.S. to present their papers and documentation, "but the airlines went ballistic."

The former Bush administration official recalls airline executives and their representatives complaining that this added layer would "cause delay and would be expensive."

And ultimately that argument won the day.

Since leaving office, the official has noticed that many other Western nations require such a step.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by seahawks123 (May 05, 2010 3:35 pm ET)
      1 5
      Actually it was lack of security that let him on the plane.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (May 05, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
        4 1
        But NOT the Dept of Homeland Security or Janet Napolitano, which is what the photo of her displayed prominently on those pages would imply!

        It was the failure of Emirates Airlines that let him get on that plane.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (May 05, 2010 4:19 pm ET)
        3 1
        Actually it was lack of security that let him on the plane.
        A lack of security on the part of that airline, Seabiscuit. Our government - the one you seem to love to hate - did its job.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rtejon (May 05, 2010 3:40 pm ET)
      1  
      I have an explanation: despite his inept bombmaking skills, the guy isn't completely stupid. He had become a naturalized citizen, he'd flown internationally from the US before and he wasn't carrying anything dangerous on his person when he boarded.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by n'est-ce pas (May 05, 2010 3:44 pm ET)
      3  
      You know, as this is an issue that affects all Americans, you'd think that FNC would take a break from the campaign trail to help deal with these issues in a straight and sober fashion. I mean, the logic is fairly straightforward. The CBP held the plane at the gate after a CBP official spotted Shahzad's name on the locked in passenger list. CBP falls under the purview of the DHS. Hence, if follows that Napolitano deserves congratulations for a job well done, not sly, sidelong comments to the contrary. This is just disgusting.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rtejon (May 05, 2010 3:50 pm ET)
        3 1
        And if the plane had taken off, we'd have had 8 hours to notify our friends in Dubai to wait for him at their airport.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by southerngal (May 05, 2010 3:52 pm ET)
        2  
        I tend to agree. We should all be grateful this bomber did not succeed in what he attempted. And equally as thankful that we captured him. This could have been disastrous to say the least. Are there missteps or signs we missed? Perhaps. But we have a chance to go over it all and tighten everything up so the next time we can hopefully thwart another attack.

        We live in a free country, people can drive their SUVs into publicly crowded areas and there is a chance a bomb could be in one of them and go off, successfully. This did not happen last weekend, it was diffused, nobody was injured, and the alleged terrorist is being questioned. It was a good ending. And I am sure it will be a valuable tool for lessons learned and future prevention.

        There are always questions to be asked and improvements to be made. But we could be investigating a major bomb explosion in one of the busiest tourist spots in this country, with god knows how many casualties as a result, with the person responsible in Dubai right now.

        We need to take a deep breath of relief.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (May 05, 2010 4:12 pm ET)
      3 1
      I happen to think that the USA DID fail, in a minor way, here, to do all that they could do.

      I think that as soon as they had ANY names, those names should have gone onto the no-fly list.

      What they did was wait until they were pretty sure that this guy was their guy before they added him to the no-fly list. I think that they should error on the side of over-reacting rather than under-reacting, and this guy should have been on that list as soon as they found out he had bought the car. If he's not a bad guy, then after a few days, after they verify that he's not a threat, then they take him OFF that list. Until that time, he shouldn't be leaving the country.

      But given that one issue above, they weren't to blame for the failure of the specific airline to fail to update their database or react to an urgent update.

      And it's good to know that the Customs people have a redundant system to protect us from just this kind of thing.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by newzhound (May 05, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
      1  
      Why is it that private enterprise is the greatest thing in the world except when it doesn't work, and then the conservatives blame the Federal government for the failings of private enterprise?

      Granting that the Emirates is probably state-owned, but my point is the same. BP fails but it's the government's fault. Emirates can't check the No-Fly List, but it's the government's fault. Wall Street lays an egg - but it's the government's fault.

      Is this a great country we have here, or what? Our system is unique - the people are the government, as our President just pointed out. A government of the people, by the people, and for the people, as a previous President mentioned.

      These reactionaries hate Americans because they hate our Federal government.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by CrashGordon (May 05, 2010 5:51 pm ET)
        2  
        They're not blaming the federal government because they think they're at fault. They blaming the federal government because that's the politically savvy thing to do. Most people will look through this smoke and see no fire, but some will add it to the list of things they believe their government is failing at--all because the Democrats are allowing/wanting it to fail.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (May 05, 2010 5:57 pm ET)
            1
          I think it's more about partisanship than a reflexive blame of government. For the Fox Nation and some of these other disreputable outlets, if Bush were in charge they would steer clear of blaming some agency under his watch. Since it's Obama, of course it's his fault.

          It's all about scoring political points in their endless game. Find out which end to run the ball towards and which one to defend against, and play accordingly.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by logicaplus (May 06, 2010 2:01 pm ET)
         
      Not an Obama basher, but still trying to figure out why the Transportation "Security" Administration should get a pass, or Homeland "Security" for that matter. We spend an obscene amount of taxpayer dollars on TSA. Exactly what the hell were the people that terminal doing that day or did they not get word from their superiors. In either event, that's a more egregious failure to perform than the airline's. And, yes, Napolitano is equally accountable.
      Report Abuse
The Fox Effect
Media Matters Connect

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.