About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Glenn Beck promotes book rife with anti-Semitism and racism

June 07, 2010 5:33 pm ET — 73 Comments

Glenn Beck promoted The Red Network: A "Who's Who" and Handbook of Radicalism for Patriots, stating that the book is "from people who were doing what we're doing now. We now are documenting who all of these people are." However, the book's author, Elizabeth Dilling, was a virulent anti-Semite, and The Red Network itself contains numerous passages that espouse anti-Semitism and racism.

Beck praises The Red Network

On the June 4 edition of Premiere Radio Networks' The Glenn Beck Program, Beck said:

BECK: This is a book, The Red Network. This came in from 1936. People -- McCarthy was absolutely right. Now he may not -- he may have used bad tactics or whatever, but he was absolutely right. This is a book -- and I'm a getting a ton of these -- from people who were doing what we're doing now. We now are documenting who all of these people are. Well, there were Americans in the first 50 years of this nation that took this seriously, and they documented it. And this is from 1936, and in it, it talks about -- it's the who's who and handbook for radicalism for patriots. This is "Who are the communists in America?" The overwhelming number of communists -- labor unions. The other thing that they talked about was, in this book that I was reading last night, they said, you know, there's this teachers union thing, but you really want to know who the real radical communists are? The NEA. That's 1936. And they're talking about this new organization that is really nasty, that you really have to look out for. The NEA. But everything this book has talked about they have mainstreamed.

The Red Network is rife with racism, anti-Semitism, and religious bigotry

"Un-Christianized" "colored people" are "savages" who owe success to Christian whites. As part of a chapter alleging communist and socialist infiltration of religious institutions, Dilling wrote:

The colored people are a sincerely religious race. As long as they stayed in Africa un-Christianized, they remained, as did pagan white men, savages. Their pagan brothers in Africa today are savages, while in a comparatively few years, under the opportunities of the American government and the inspiration of Christianity, the American Negroes have acquired professions, property, banks, homes, and produced a rising class of refined, home loving people. This is far more remarkable than that many Negroes are still backward. The Reds play upon the Negroes' love of their own people and represent them as persecuted in order to inflame them against the very white people who have in reality given the colored race far greater opportunities than their fellow negroes would give them in Africa today. [Pages 35-36]

Dilling reprised some of this language later in the book:

It is interesting to note in Communist literature that criminal violence is always promoted and excused under a cloak of supposed martyrdom. Negroes are urged to fight their white "oppressors," who actually have freed them and given them better jobs and opportunities than exist in Africa. [Page 55]

"God created separate races, but Communism insists upon racial inter-mixture." Dilling also wrote:

The time was, when Methodism in its zeal for personal purity frowned upon dancing. Some Methodists nowadays who are little opposed to dancing even in a church were a bit surprised, however, when several colored men were introduced into circle dances at a dance given in the parish house of Tittle's church and were thus forced upon the young white girls as partners. An M. E. Guild member whose daughter attended this dance reported that when she phoned the assistant pastor about this he said that these colored men had been invited by Dr. Tittle himself (one of them being the son of a classmate of his at college), who felt that it was now time that the young people learned to mingle with other races. (God created separate races, but Communism insists upon racial inter-mixture and inter-marriage.)

The great American colored man, Booker T. Washington, voiced the sentiment of the best elements in both races when he said the races should be as separate and distinct as the fingers of a hand and as united for the service of all humanity. Why should either race wish to lose its distinctive characteristics? Neither the races nor the sexes can ever be equal. They will always be different and have distinctive functions to perform in life. [Page 37]

Being "fair" to Nazi Germany's "anti-Jewish activities." Dilling attacked an organization called Committees for Human Rights Against Naziism that boycotted Germany over its anti-Semitic policies. As part of her attack, Dilling wrote that "it is only fair to note" that Germany's Jewish population contained "Russian Jews" who "had made themselves prominent in the Red movement," and if Germany "has discriminated against the innocent also, it has been with no such ferocity and loss of life as the planned and imminent Communist revolution would have wreaked upon the German population":

National movement for boycotting Germany, supposedly because of its anti-Jewish activities, organized by Samuel Untermyer of N.Y. City. No one who treasures American freedom wants fascism or Hitlerism for America, but it is only fair to note that Germany had 6,000,000 Communists bent on Red terrorist revolution and that Russian Jews had made themselves prominent in the Red movement, and that Naziism has directed its attacks more against conspiring, revolutionary Communist Jews, than against nationalist German Jews who aided Germany during the war; if it has discriminated against the innocent also, it has been with no such ferocity and loss of life as the planned and imminent Communist revolution would have wreaked upon the German population, had it been successful as in Russia. Those making altruistic appeals for human rights for Jews in Germany, should at the same time raise their voices urging boycott of atheist Russia in behalf of its persecuted Christians and millions of "liquidated" starved Ukrainians, in order to escape the suspicion that they are protesting for Communist rather than "human" rights. [Page 138]

Dilling would later become a full-throated supporter of Nazism who reportedly attended Nazi party meetings in Germany and pro-Nazi rallies in the United States.

Blamed "revolutionary Russian Jews" for German anti-Semitism. Dilling attributed the anti-Semitic nature of German fascism in part to "the large number of revolutionary Russian Jews in Germany":

Fascism, the bitterest enemy of Socialism-Communism, resembles Socialism in the respect that it gives great power to the State and dictatorship over all industry, employment, education, freedom of the press, etc. The points of difference which make it violently hated by the Reds are: its opposition to the "class struggle" and the subjugation of the bourgeoisie by the dictatorship of the proletariat. Rather, it seeks a harmony between all classes and concedes to industrialists, white collar, professional, as well as laboring workers, a place in the social order as necessary parts, not "class enemies," of the whole, but under State control. It defends some property rights and religion. It opposes Marxist philosophy and the Communist and Socialist Marxian parties. Fascism in Italy is not anti-Semitic. The problem of the large number of revolutionary Russian Jews in Germany doubtless contributed toward making Fascist Germany anti-Semitic. [Page 99]

Hinduism and Islam are "debasing and degrading"; Judaism and Hinduism  spread "propaganda." In her list of allegedly communist organizations in the United States, Dilling attacked the Fellowship of Faiths:

Like the Reconciliation Trips (see) of the Fell. Recon., it seeks to propagandize the anti-national internationalism and "reconciliation" of all races and creeds into one, or none, that is part of the program of Communism and Socialism. "How Expand Patriotism into World Consciousness" is a typical program subject. Speakers for the debasing and degrading Hindu, Mohammedan, Pagan, and Agnostic Cults are placed in "fellowship" and on an equal footing with speakers for Jesus Christ. The audiences chant a mixture of prayers and ritual from all of these. The savage Mohammedan call of the muezzin as heard in darkest Asia is mingled with the propaganda of the Hindu, Jew and agnostic. Negro choirs and performers give an interracial touch to the meetings. This jumbling of contradictory beliefs leads only to confusion and unbelief, and robs Jesus Christ of His rightful place as the Light of this World. [Page 152]

Dilling's long record of anti-Semitic extremism

Dilling authored many anti-Semitic books. Dilling was the author of several wildly anti-Semitic works in addition to The Red Network. One polemic titled The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today (originally titled "The Plot Against Christianity") was highlighted by the Anti-Defamation League for its claims that Jews consider non-Jews to be sub-human, and that Jews have a hatred for Christians that is expressed in code in the Talmud. The Jewish Religion also made clear that anti-Semitism was a key component to Dilling's ant-communist philosophy; Dilling wrote: "Marxism, Socialism, or Communism in practice are nothing but state-capitalism and rule by a privileged minority, exercising despotic and total control over a majority having virtually no property or legal rights. As is discussed elsewhere herein, Talmudic Judaism is the progenitor of modem Communism and Marxist collectivism as it is now applied to a billion or more of the world's population."

Another of Dilling's books, The Octopus, which she wrote under a pseudonym, was described by Life magazine in 1942 as "a yellow-covered compilation of anti-Jewish slanders."

"Ike the kike" and the "Jew frontier." The Encyclopedia of White Power: A Sourcebook on the Radical Racist Right devotes several pages to Dilling, describing her as "the grandmotherly, blue-haired old lady who could always be counted on to respond to a mail solicitation with a few dollars for a variety of anti-Semitic causes." The book notes that Dilling was "the author of several of the most scurrilous attacks on Franklin Roosevelt," and that her hatred of Roosevelt was inspired by her belief that he "was in all likelihood a Jew and his administration a Trojan horse for international communism."

Dilling features prominently in Professor Glen Jeansonne's Women of the Far Right: The Mother's Movement and World War II. Jeansonne noted that Dilling referred to Dwight Eisenhower as "Ike the kike," attacked Richard Nixon for his alleged "service to the synagogue," and smeared John F. Kennedy's New Frontier program as the "Jew frontier."

Nazi supporter who reportedly attended German Nazi party meetings. Media Matters noted that, according to Jeansonne and writer David Luhrssen, Dilling was an ardent supporter of Nazi Germany who incorporated German Nazi propaganda into her writings. Dilling also traveled to Germany in 1938, where she reportedly attended Nazi party meetings and praised Adolf Hitler's leadership.

Dilling's writings and philosophy have made her a popular figure among Aryan and white supremacist groups.

Historian slams Beck for promoting Dilling. Professor Jeansonne, in an interview with Media Matters, criticized Beck's "ludicrous" promotion of Dilling's The Red Network, saying that she was considered a "crackpot" in her own day who "appealed to the lunatic fringe." Jeansonne characterized Dilling as probably the "most bigoted woman anti-Semite of the period around World War II," and said she "did the cause of anti-Communism a disservice."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by bintx (June 07, 2010 5:42 pm ET)
      10  
      This is a book -- and I'm a getting a ton of these -- from people who were doing what we're doing now


      And he compares himself to this woman.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by lipreader (June 07, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
        6  
        Maybe now he'll be forced to retire.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by bintx (June 07, 2010 5:57 pm ET)
          7  
          I doubt it. Seems like it's okay for folks like Beck, Rush and the rest of the hate talkers to say whatever bigoted crap they want.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Floyd (June 09, 2010 9:10 am ET)
              3
            Well, you need to add Helen Thomas to your list of bigots. Now, it will need to read; folks like Beck, Rush, Thomas and the rest of the hate talkers to say whatever bigoted crap they want.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (June 09, 2010 12:34 pm ET)
              2  
              Helen Thomas didn't get away with her comments, she "retired" The difference here Floyd is no one is promoting a book by Helen Thomas and saying that Thomas was doing the same things that they are doing now.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 8:32 am ET)
                  3
                There is NO difference here. Thomas is a Jew-hater and Beck is promoting a book by a Jew-hater. Thomas gets front page news every time she asks the president a question. She demands full and complete attention and you liberal sheeple give it to her. She's a Jew-hater that liberals (fully and unconditionally) support while whining about support a conservative is giving a Jew-hater.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:25 am ET)
                  2  
                  Yawn. You can repeat your lines over and over. You are welcome to your opinion, but your argument/analogy is just not at all convincing. Better luck next time.
                  Report Abuse
        • Author by Tunasafeart (June 07, 2010 6:34 pm ET)
          10 2
          And that's the issue, isn't it. Helen Thomas is actually a journalist and has personal integrity. I believe her statement was off the mark, though I understand the underlying idea of what she meant. Beck, on the other hand, is accountable to no one and can get away with promoting anti-semetic crap scott free. He just continues to make crap up and gets paid millions to do so.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by poproxx77 (June 07, 2010 6:59 pm ET)
            4 28
            We should just burn the book instead right. Don't read it, burn it, we don't really believe in free speech here at MMFA anyway..

            [http://www.uncp.edu/home/rwb/book_burning33.jpg]
            Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (June 07, 2010 7:32 pm ET)
              18 1
              You are the only one I see advocating burning any book. Why do you fools always confuse criticism with censorship? Is this kind of buffoonery on purpose or are you just that dense?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Tunasafeart (June 07, 2010 9:34 pm ET)
                15  
                Err, sorry but you have that reversed. It's been the right's claim as of late (especially Beck) that any and all criticism they receive is just the left trying to silence their voices. Apparently free speech to them is being able to say whatever you want without anyone being able to disagree with you, cause if they do then they're just jackboot thugs.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by Floyd (June 09, 2010 8:50 am ET)
                  5
                ope-- Why do you fools always confuse criticism with censorship?

                Why do you hypocrites always confuse a right-wing anti-semite as a vial hater, while excusing left-wing anti-semite as having personal integrity? Seems to me, they would be equal to each other; vial haters. But, unlike you, I think for myself.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by congero6189599 (June 09, 2010 2:19 pm ET)
                  2  
                  You flatter yourself floyd. Being a kook is different but has no association with critical thought.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by pilotx (June 09, 2010 2:32 pm ET)
                  1  
                  Helen Thomas was rightly criticized by many on the left and right while conservatives are silent when Beck pushes a book by a known racist and Limbaugh regularly makes bigoted statements and crickets from the right. False equivalency. Stick with the topic at hand, do you think it's alright for beck to promote a book by a Nazi sympathizer or are we going to play tit for tat?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 2:00 am ET)
                      3
                    pil-- Helen Thomas was rightly criticized by many on the left

                    You lie! She was NEVER criticized by anyone from the left for her anti-semite remarks and feelings. Bring one instance where someone from the left criticized her for her anti-semite remarks before this latest one.

                    pil-- Stick with the topic at hand

                    An anti-semite being excused by their respective political leaning group IS the topic. Helen Thomas was allowed total esclusion for her Jew-hating mentallity from the left and Beck is lambasted for promoting a book by one.

                    Defending a Jew-hater will not gather you any points from anyone except from liberals who seem to agree with her comments since none are overly distressed she made them. In fact, bashing Beck for promoting a Jew-hater while supporting another Jew-hater is quite hypocritical of any liberal who participates in that activity. Which means ALL of you.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:13 am ET)
                      3  
                      Bring one instance where someone from the left criticized her for her anti-semite remarks before this latest one.
                      You have yet to provide an example of Thomas' previous, supposed, "anti-semitic" remarks. How do we even know they exist beyond your mere assertions?

                      You are working real hard here to make Helen Thomas an equivalent to the woman who called Eisenhower a "kike" among many examples given on this site. You are just apparently stuck with a lame analogy. Sucks to be you.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by internet soldier (June 09, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Why do you hypocrites always confuse a right-wing anti-semite as a vial hater, while excusing left-wing anti-semite as having personal integrity? Seems to me, they would be equal to each other; vial haters.


                  I wasn't aware Helen Thomas had any particular feelings one way or another about these things:

                  [http://www.microlabinfo.com/images/sensor/180/pic.jpg]
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (June 09, 2010 10:18 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Can you quote exactly what Thomas said that you think was "anti-semitic"? I am willing to compare apples to apples here if you care to provide any apples (instead of your usual oranges). From what I have seen Thomas wants Israelis to leave occupied Palestine and go home. Since when is criticizing Israeli policy "anti-semitic". Just calling something "anti-semitic" does not necessarily make it so.

                  Keep thinking for yourself, Floyd. One of these days it's due to pay off for ya.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 2:04 am ET)
                      4
                    Keep supporting a Jew-hater. You make yourself look like the anti-semite (liberal) you are.

                    Keep being the sheeple you are. One day (but only for one day) it will pay off for you too. Hitler felt the same way about Jews as you and Helen Thomas does.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:08 am ET)
                      3  
                      Keep supporting a Jew-hater. You make yourself look like the anti-semite (liberal) you are.
                      Hahaha. You have not adequately shown Thomas to be an actual "Jew-Hater".
                      Hitler felt the same way about Jews as you and Helen Thomas does.
                      Hitler wanted Jews to leave occupied Palestine? Really? You must have learned your all your history from Glenn Beck.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 10, 2010 1:50 pm ET)
                        2  
                        Let's not forget, Floyd also advocates the raping of underage women. Now, we know he hates Jews. You get a little sicker each day, Floyd.

                        Have you figured out how a progressive tax system works yet? Or why Americans would not be impressed with Exxon paying taxes internationally while using Caribbean tax shelters to avoid paying any US taxes? Remember how stupid thinking for yourself made you look on those topics?
                        Report Abuse
            • Author by mhughen (June 07, 2010 8:08 pm ET)
              13  
              Strawman much? None said burn the book. FAIL
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Dradeeus (June 08, 2010 1:28 am ET)
                11  
                Seems to be a theme lately. You know, just like Sarah Palin saying that fact-checking her lies are an assault on her first amendment rights, fact-checking books is apparently tantamount to censorship.

                Strawman indeed.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by KLM (June 08, 2010 2:06 am ET)
              10  
              No one is saying to burn the book, everyone is simply pointing out the double standard between normal people, and Glenn Beck. No normal self-respecting accountable tv personality wannabe journalist would ever even almost get away with this. Some people would get fired for even almost thinking about promoting that book. Beck get's off scott-free and not only that his fans praise him ignorantly. It's kind of sad really.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by nerzog (June 08, 2010 8:36 am ET)
              9  
              [http://drvee.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/strawman.jpg]
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (June 08, 2010 9:08 am ET)
              10  
              nice try jackass. no one called for book burning....thats you guys' territory and always has been......catcher in the rye........

              but once again you and your kind have shown that its ok to call your enemies nazis and such but when you actually defend a hitler supporter you get all twisted in knots.

              how does it feel to be a nazi defender?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Floyd (June 09, 2010 8:52 am ET)
                  5
                jed-- how does it feel to be a nazi defender?

                Are you talking about Helen Thomas now? She's the Jew hater who you love to love.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:51 am ET)
                  2  
                  ...And you love Diller, which makes you no better in your own eyes.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by dalebssr (June 08, 2010 9:41 am ET)
              8  
              Hahahaha... yes lets burn all the books people are critical of. OORRR, we point out the obsurdity of the people who write them and expose their true beliefs... or the fact that they don't know what they are talking about. I would give Beck the benefit of the doubt and say he hasn't read The Red Network and that someone threw it on his desk and said "use it in your show as a prop". However given Beck's years of unhinged rambling about the evil left Socialism/Fascism/Social Justice/MY GOD JESUS WAS A JEW!?!?! montage Beck has earned the label as an idiot and a bigot.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by bintx (June 08, 2010 10:24 am ET)
              12  
              Who said to "burn the book"? Nobody, except you. That's very telling.

              Beck promoted a book by an anti-Semitic, Nazi sympathizer who he said was "doing what we're doing." He was comparing himself to this woman. You are supporting and defending him and posting pictures of Nazis burning books. So, I guess the inference here is that you are also an anti-Semitic Nazi sympathizer.

              LOL! Great response there, poproxx.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Floyd (June 09, 2010 8:59 am ET)
                  6
                bintx-- Beck promoted a book by an anti-Semitic,

                You say that as if it's a bad thing. I thought you sheeple loved Helen Thomas. Since you fully support anti-semitism, you should stop referring to it as if it's a bad thing. However, since being an anti-semite equates to being a nazi supporter, you too promote writings by an anti-semitic, nazi sympathizer. So the inference must be as you say.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:29 am ET)
                     
                  You whole-heartedly support Glenn Beck's raging anti-semite author, Diller, so even supposing your idea that Thomas was an actual anti-semite, why would you have a problem with that?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 9:37 am ET)
                      2
                    Only you don't have any evidence I support any anti-semite Jew-hater, like you support Helen Jew-hater Thomas. You simply rant about insufficient this or inadequate that.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:51 am ET)
                      1  
                      You have no evidence that everybody here "fully support anti-semitism", but you made that claim right above my post. I suppose if you are entitled to your baseless opinions then so am I or do you have some special permission or right to do that I don't have?
                      Report Abuse
            • Author by Litwiz (June 08, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
              5  
              In case you couldn't figure out the simple logic here: You posted here...this IS free speech. The book needs to be read like we read the history of the Dark Ages...as an example of how ignorant, racist, backward people were in the past--and that some continue to be now. Witness Glen Beck's promotion of the book. Keep all books extant, just place them in context and expose their ideas. Liberals don't burn books. We build and support libraries and schools to teach reading, so that these ideas can be exposed! It's those on the Far Right who burn and ban.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by Litwiz (June 08, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
              6  
              Oh, look! A picture of the Teabaggers 65 years ago!
              Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (June 07, 2010 6:56 pm ET)
          11  
          Maybe now he'll be forced to retire.
          No chance. Beck's listeners are really too stupid and brainwashed at this point to even notice. It's like a freaking George Romero movie. Beck is able to keep his job despite losing large advertisers. Fox is pretty obviously determined to back that gasbag to the bitter end. My guess is Beck's last episode will involve him marrying his cousin and committing Harry Carey.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mari2jj (June 08, 2010 12:02 am ET)
          5  
          I doubt that the hue and cry from the folks who villified Helen Thomas will even heard nt wilol any commenton this racist endorsemnt of anti-Semitism. Amazing the double standard of this click of "talkers". They say any or endorse any dreadful thing and there is a vast conspiracy of silence from their comrads. But, let an older woman with a long history of good relationships with minority communites slip in some disgusting statement that she did say, and they are out for her blood. But the reason they do not hold Beck to the same standard is because he is not a librul. Just a racist and not a librul. And not being a librul covers every dastardly statement he mkes. Double standard for sure. No peeps about Beck's racism from Fox, you know BillO, Hannity, Rush, etc. No honesty i the lot of hem.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Floyd (June 09, 2010 9:04 am ET)
              4
            mar-- But, let an older woman with a long history of good relationships with minority communites slip in some disgusting statement that she did say

            Helen Thomas has a LONG history of anti-semitism. She often made remarks about her feelings of the Jews. For you to say she made 'one' mistake proves you are nothing but another member of the hypocrite left-wing sheeple organization. Otherwise known as mmfa.

            mar-- But the reason they do not hold Beck to the same standard is because he is not a librul.

            And just WHAT standard are you holding Thomas to? Or are you saying it's OK to be a Jew hater as long as you're a "librul"?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by open_mind (June 09, 2010 10:29 pm ET)
              3  
              If Thomas has a supposedly long history of "antisemitism" beyond your meager assertion, why not either give us a legitimate link or provide us some of her "antisemitic" quotes so we can judge for ourselves? You brag about thinking for yourself, but you are so oddly stingy with providing us with the information you used to come to your conclusion.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 2:20 am ET)
                  4
                You've got to be kidding, right? Isn't the liberal method of doing this is to make a claim then I've got to prove the claim incorrect? Well, the shoe is on the other foot now. I've made a claim, now it's YOUR responsibility to prove me wrong. But to help you out with a couple of the statements she's made, go here. While wiki is quite liberal, they do have a couple examples of her hatred of Jews in the article.

                Good luck trying to prove me wrong.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:03 am ET)
                  3  
                  Isn't the liberal method of doing this is to make a claim then I've got to prove the claim incorrect? --Floyd
                  No. That is a well-known logical fallacy (called reversing the burden of proof) that is obviously not limited to supposed liberals as you are the only one I see embracing it at this moment. It is your argument and the burden is on you to prove it. You must be a child if you think you can get away with such blatant rhetorical dishonesty.

                  That said. I do not see the quotes in the wiki article showing Thomas' alleged "hatred of Jews". Can you quote what you are referencing in that article?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 9:48 am ET)
                      3
                    No, the burden is on you to prove me incorrect. She made the Jew-hating statements and you don't just suddenly determine that you hate Jews, so she's been that way for years and years and years.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:54 am ET)
                      1  
                      Well you can say all of that, but it does not mean anything and it isn't convincing. You are either too lazy or too stupid to support your own feeble assertions. It's just kind of sad at this point.
                      Report Abuse
                • Author by mikehuck1976 (June 10, 2010 2:12 pm ET)
                  3  
                  I've made a claim, now it's YOUR responsibility to prove me wrong. - Floyd

                  Awesome. That may be the best example of your complete lack of basic intelligence that I have ever seen. You are hilarious Floyd. I claim that Floyd has abducted 15 underaged, Jewish women over the last 10 years. I have made this claim and it is now Floyd's responsibility to prove me wrong. Good luck trying to prove me wrong.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by cst (June 07, 2010 7:26 pm ET)
        9  
        "This is a book -- and I'm a getting a ton of these -- from people who were doing what we're doing now"
        He's "getting a ton of these". This is what his fans send him, seeking his approval.
        And he's giving it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (June 08, 2010 8:40 am ET)
        4  
        And why not? She sounds exactly like a 1940's version of Beck.

        I wonder if she was given as much attention and taken as seriously by as many as Beck is. I mean... Yeah: they're both kooks. But... how many these days refuse to acknowlegde that Beck's a kook? Was it the same for her? Or did we have better bull$#!+ detectors as a coutnry back then?

        I'd never even heard of her until MMFA/Beck brought her up. How was she viewed at the time?

        ---------------------------------------------------------
        ???
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (June 08, 2010 4:39 pm ET)
        2  
        The difference in the far right's standards for Beck and Helen Thomas is astounding. No honesty from our party at all the way they support Beck and the anti-Semite crap in this book he has recommended and yet they condemn what Helen said. Talk about double speak and dshoesty.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Floyd (June 09, 2010 9:08 am ET)
            4
          Talking about that "double speak and dishoesty" (SIC), how much do you support Thomas? Was that a 'completely' that I just heard you say? Typical liberal hypocrisy
          Report Abuse
          • Author by pilotx (June 09, 2010 2:35 pm ET)
            1  
            How much do you support Beck's promotion of this book?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 2:23 am ET)
              1 2
              Not at all.

              Back to the question I asked; how much do you support Helen Thomas? Or, you can avoid it like all other liberals will.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:32 am ET)
                1  
                You have not yet demonstrated that it is a proper analogy. Besides one can argue that there is no evidence showing Thomas is an "anti-semite" without necessarily "supporting" her.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 9:44 am ET)
                    2
                  One can argue that? How? Explain how YOU support her yet find her jew-hating rhetoric acceptable? Explain how anyone could. Then explain how it isn't acceptable for Beck to promote a book by a Jew-hater, using the context of your explanation for Thomas's excuse.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:46 am ET)
                    2  
                    Again. It is your claim. You back it up. I simply do not find your evidence compelling.
                    Report Abuse
    • Author by Space-Pedestrian (June 07, 2010 7:39 pm ET)
      3 18
      Beck should hang with Helen Thomas.







      From the gallows.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by leftofwhat (June 08, 2010 1:03 am ET)
        9  
        Totally pedestrian.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (June 08, 2010 9:10 am ET)
        5  
        how nice.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 8:18 am ET)
          2
        space-- Beck should hang with Helen Thomas

        If you'd said that about Beck only, you would have gotten 17 "thumbs up". But, since you mentioned the Jew-hating, yet friend of liberals, Helen Thomas, you got the 17 "thumbs down". Please try to remember; Jew-haters who are liberal are good people, but conservatives who promote a Jew-hater from WWII are evil people.

        Liberals will even befriend racist KKK attendees (and members) if it means they get the deadly medical procedure they want. But, should a conservative promote a book by a Jew-hater, you would think the world is coming to an end with all the outrage (FAKE) that you hear from the left.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:45 am ET)
             
          I will admit that the outrage is probably mostly fake. I think it is more of MMFA showing how stupid Beckian logic is. The idea that you can tar and feather people supporting someone else that is far from perfect. Beck does this kind of thing all the time on his witch hunts. The difference is that Beck is sincere in his stupidity and MMfA is probably fake in making fun of Beck.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (June 08, 2010 7:41 am ET)
      5  
      "from people who were doing what we're doing now. We now are documenting who all of these people are."


      McCarthy much? But then again, the right (or some on the right) are very pro McCarthy these days, such as Mr. Beck. He doesn't see what Joseph did wrong.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wizbor4654 (June 08, 2010 10:20 am ET)
      1 11
      wow thanks for the heads up MM,sounds like a good read, I'ma pick it up. I dont watch Glen Beck so I'd of missed this title..

      -------------
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (June 08, 2010 10:27 am ET)
        5 3
        So, you're admitting to being an anti-Semitic Nazi sympathizer just to support your faux conservative cause and support for the hate talkers? That's sad, dude.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 8:23 am ET)
            2
          Beats the heck out of continually supporting an anti-semite Jew-hating 'reporter' who whines until she gets the front row....like a typical liberal would do. People who support anti-semite, Jew-haters just because they are liberals are phony and hypocrites.

          THAT is truly sad, dude
          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:36 am ET)
            3  
            Blah, blah, blah, Helen Thomas blah, blah Jew-hating, blah, blah, blah...phony and hypocrites.

            You are like a right-wing brainwashed Holden Caulfield. It gets a little old after the first hundred times you repeat it. It would sure be nice for you if repetition made things true. You are a true student of Goebbels.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (June 08, 2010 11:24 am ET)
        4 1
        nice to know your admitting you are a racist and anti semite......thanks for iding yourself
        Report Abuse
      • Author by MidnightWriter (June 08, 2010 12:15 pm ET)
        6  
        Ladies and Gentlemen, we have a brand new category of Beckerhead. One who admits to not watching his show, but who is still so enraptured with the man he'll turn to us to get his precious little injection of Glenn.

        And here I was thinking the Beck bar couldn't get any lower.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Floyd (June 10, 2010 8:26 am ET)
            2
          Helen Thomas is speaking, you better go run off and listen to what that Jew-hating anti-semite has to say. You've been doing that for the last 20 years, why stop now?

          The difference is, I know the bar can't go low enough for liberals. They don't care WHO they befriend if it means they get their way. They befriend racists, KKK members, Jew-haters ... the list goes on and on.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by open_mind (June 10, 2010 9:41 am ET)
            3  
            I wouln't be so quick to judge there, sport. You are a demonstrated follower of Diller and Beck, so it is clear you love Nazi's and hate the Jews yourself. I don't see why you would object to anybody who you think is no different than yourself - or do you expect people to be better than you? Isn't that the most basic form of hypocrisy?
            Report Abuse
    • Author by jmh (June 08, 2010 11:54 am ET)
      2  
      Beck is an ignorant buffoon.

      I don't go to bars but if I did
      I'd want to be "takin' it outside"
      Him _and_ Hannity... bring it on punks!

      ok, that was weird... well, we all have our low points. LOL
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.