Easton baselessly suggests financial reform bill is going after "small community banks," not Wall Street
Nina Easton suggested that the recently passed financial reform bill "doesn't look like it's going after Wall Street" and that instead it "has got small community banks, farmers concerned." In fact, community bankers have expressed support for the bill and praised the distinction it draws between "Main Street community banks and Wall Street megabanks."
Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.
Easton claims reform bill "doesn't look like it's going after Wall Street"
Easton: "You've got this Wall Street reform, that ... doesn't look like it's going after Wall Street," but rather "small community banks." On the July 18 edition of Fox News Sunday, Fortune magazine's Nina Easton suggested that President Obama is seeing his poll numbers drop because of policies that have created "lots of uncertainty and lots of fear." She claimed that the financial reform bill "doesn't look like it's going after Wall Street," and that instead it's "got small community banks, farmers concerned." From the broadcast:
EASTON: It's fascinating, because this bill, which as you said was going to be the cracking down on fat cats of Wall Street, has got small community banks concerned, farmers concerned who deal in derivatives for their business. It's got something like 533 rule-making proceedings are going to be going in, which creates lots of uncertainty and lots of fear. It's interesting this week, the president in an interview said, look, I'm -- when he was talking about poll numbers -- look, I'm facing 9.5 percent unemployment. He's got an unpopular economy, the same way President Bush in 2006 had an unpopular war. We grant him that. But what's interesting is that these landmark pieces of legislation that the White House thought would help them in November are actually not -- possibly not going to help him. You've got stimulus that most people don't think helped. You've got a very divisive health care reform. And now, fascinating to us you've got this Wall Street reform, that doesn't really -- it's really -- it doesn't look like it's going after Wall Street.
Community bankers support financial reform bill
ICBA: "The Dodd/Frank Act does create an important precedent that recognizes two distinct sectors within the financial services spectrum." The Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) issued a statement on July 15 noting that "the Dodd/Frank Act does create an important precedent that recognizes two distinct sectors within the financial services spectrum -- Main Street community banks and Wall Street megabanks." The press release also highlighted the fact that "[i]mportant ICBA-advocated wins in the bill such as changes in the FDIC assessment base, stricter oversight of too-big-to-fail institutions, and the inclusion of non-bank financial firms under consumer compliance regulations will save community banks money and allow them to better compete, serve their communities and promote economic growth in their markets."
ICBA: Provisions in the financial reform bill "will save community banks roughly $4.5 billion over the next three years." In a June 25 press release, ICBA chairman Jim MacPhee stated that a "change in the deposit insurance assessment base, which ICBA advocated, will save community banks roughly $4.5 billion over the next three years." Additionally, MacPhee stated that the bill's "provisions will go a long way to help community banks continue to do what they do best -- serve the needs of their local communities."
Financial reform bill targets Wall Street "superbanks"
Senate Banking Committee: Financial reform bill imposes "greater costs and restrictions on the superbanks" while "allowing community banks to continue serving their communities." A March 29 press release from the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs highlighted the differences between Wall Street firms and community banks, noting that "[s]ome giant Wall Street firms abused their customers and took enormous risks that nearly brought down our economy while our nation's nearly 8,000 community banks have been responsible actors who have paid dearly for big banks' mistakes." The release went on to state that "[t]he financial reform bill reflects those differences, imposing greater costs and restrictions on the superbanks, reining in the abuses that caused the crisis, but allowing community banks to continue serving their communities."
Reuters: Financial reform a "rewrite of Wall Street rules" that "subject it to tougher oversight and tighter restrictions." A June 25 Reuters article noted that the financial reform bill is "a rewrite of Wall Street rules that may crimp the industry's profits and subject it to tougher oversight and tighter restrictions." The report highlights a provision of the bill that "forces much of the over-the-counter derivatives market, which worsened the financial crisis and led to a $182 billion bailout of insurer AIG, onto more accountable channels like clearinghouses and exchanges."

















I'm more worried that the new restrictions won't be enough.
You're sick of getting socked with fees, or tripped by hidden penalties, or earning lousy interest rates. You're tired of being treated like a nuisance rather than a customer. And yet you have little hope that the bank down the street is any better.
But who says you have to settle for a bank? Relief could be as close as the nearest credit union.
Because so many people are fuzzy about the differences between banks and credit unions, I'll highlight the three most important distinctions:
Credit unions are member-owned. If you have an account at a credit union, you're a part owner in the enterprise. That may not entitle you to use the executive washroom -- your CU probably doesn't even have an executive washroom -- but you're likely to be seen as a person rather than as a "cost center."
Credit unions are not-for-profit. This status helps explain why interest rates tend to be significantly better, and fees fewer and smaller, at credit unions than at banks. Any profits credit unions do make are distributed as dividends to their members. Contrast that with banks, which continually invent new fees and policies to boost profits (and to pay those stunning executive salaries).
Banks hate -- hate -- credit unions. President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Federal Credit Union Act into law in 1934 to "promote thrift and thwart usury," and banks have been gunning for them pretty much ever since.
Because of their not-for-profit, cooperative structures, credit unions are exempted from most state and federal taxes. Banks have convinced themselves this is an unfair advantage and have spent a lot of effort, plus a fortune in lobbying fees, trying to legislate credit unions out of existence, or at least limit who can join. (I guess they thought the money was better spent there than on, say, improving their interest rates, reducing their fees or slashing their telephone hold times.)
http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Banking/BetterBanking/DitchYourBankForACreditUnion.aspx
I changed to a Credit Union and love it....
"I hate the f_ckin' Eagles, man."
- The Dude
I'll have mercy and not list some from it. Some would remain in your brain all day.