About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Breitbart flounders as his Sherrod story collapses

July 21, 2010 4:35 pm ET — 33 Comments

As his story about former Obama administration official Shirley Sherrod has disintegrated, Andrew Breitbart has desperately tried to maintain his credibility. Media Matters chronicles Breitbart's shifting stories, lies, and attempts to spin the story and pass the blame to others.

Breitbart Ascendant: Video is "evidence of racism" by Sherrod

Initial post: "Video Proof: The NAACP Awards Racism" by Sherrod. In his initial July 19 BigGovernment.com post, published at 11:18 AM ET and headlined "Video Proof: The NAACP Awards Racism--2010," Breitbart wrote in the piece's first two sentences:

Context is everything.

In this piece you will see video evidence of racism coming from a federal appointee and NAACP award recipient and in another clip from the same event a perfect rationalization for why the Tea Party needs to exist.

After detailing the "context" - that "Americans who consider themselves aligned with the Tea Party movement have suffered the indignity of being falsely labeled racist by the NAACP and their pro-bono publicity managers, the main stream media" -- Breitbart wrote:

We are in possession of a video from in which Shirley Sherrod, USDA Georgia Director of Rural Development, speaks at the NAACP Freedom Fund dinner in Georgia. In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience, this federally appointed executive bureaucrat lays out in stark detail, that her federal duties are managed through the prism of race and class distinctions.

In the first video, Sherrod describes how she racially discriminates against a white farmer. She describes how she is torn over how much she will choose to help him. And, she admits that she doesn't do everything she can for him, because he is white. Eventually, her basic humanity informs that this white man is poor and needs help. But she decides that he should get help from "one of his own kind". She refers him to a white lawyer.

Sherrod's racist tale is received by the NAACP audience with nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement. Hardly the behavior of the group now holding itself up as the supreme judge of another groups' racial tolerance.

Breitbart then posted the heavily edited video clip from Sherrod's speech.

On Twitter, Breitbart says Sherrod "Brags About Discriminating Against Whites," asks if DOJ will investigate. In tweets posted at 11:51 AM and 12:31 PM on July 19, Breitbart wrote:

Breitbart victory lap: "Racist Govt Official/NAACP Award Recipient Resigns after Big Government Expose." In a July 19 blog post published at 7:51 pm ET, "Publius," the pseudonym of BigGovernment.com's "Editorial Panel," wrote that "This morning, we broke video of a USDA official, Shirley Sherrod, recounting for attendees at an NAACP awards dinner how she withheld help from a white farmer seeking the agency's help in saving his farm." After noting a report that Sherrod had resigned, they wrote that "Presumably, [the NAACP] will denounce the racism in the video." The post was headlined, "Racist Govt Official/NAACP Award Recipient Resigns after Big Government Expose."

As cracks form in story, Breitbart doubles down

Atlanta Journal-Constitution: Sherrod says clip "completely misconstrued" her comments. In the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's July 20 article (since updated) on the controversy surrounding Shirley Sherrod's statements at an NAACP banquet, the paper reported that "the tale she told at the banquet happened 24 years ago -- before she got the USDA job -- when she worked with the Georgia field office for the Federation of Southern Cooperative/Land Assistance Fund." The article also reported that, according to Sherrod, the "38-second video posted online Monday by biggovernment.com and reported on by FoxNews.com and the AJC completely misconstrued the message she was trying to convey."

"White farmer" and his wife: Sherrod is a "friend" who "helped us save our farm." Later in the day, Sherrod appeared on CNN Newsroom to discuss the accusations against her. On the show, anchor Tony Harris contacted the wife of the "white farmer" Sherrod had discussed in her appearance at the NAACP banquet. The wife, Eloise Spooner, described Sherrod as "a good friend" who "helped us save our farm." In a later CNN interview, the farmer, Roger Spooner, said that Sherrod "did her level best" to help him save his farm and those that are smearing her as a racist "don't know what they're talking about."

Video producer confirmed that "the full speech is exactly as Sherrod described ... she goes on to explain learning the error of her initial impression." Talking Points Memo reported at 1:03 PM ET on July 20 that "The Douglas, Ga., company which filmed the banquet for the local NAACP has refused to release" the video until the national NAACP gives him "permission" to post it. However, Wilkerson told TPM "that the full speech is exactly as Sherrod described, and that she goes on to explain learning the error of her initial impression and helping the farmer keep his farm."

Breitbart: "I don't have" the full video, but heavily edited clip "speaks for itself." At 3:58 PM ET on July 20, TPM Media reported that in an interview, Breitbart acknowledged that he hadn't seen the full video, but believed that the video "speaks for itself" and illustrated "a present tense racism" by Sherrod:

The crux of the Shirley Sherrod controversy is what she said outside of the two-minute video clip posted by Big Government -- whether she was, as she claims, telling a story about how she overcame racial prejudice while helping poor farmers in Georgia, or whether the clip is a good encapsulation of her views. So we asked Andrew Breitbart, the founder of Big Government, why he hasn't posted the full video.

"I don't have it," Breitbart told TPMmuckraker in an interview. Breitbart said his source sent him just the edited clips at first, but is in the process of sending the full video.

Breitbart said he'll post the full video, if he can get permission from the video production company who filmed it for a local NAACP chapter. He also maintained that he didn't edit the clip and that it was sent to him already edited.

[...]

"I think the video speaks for itself," he said. "The way she's talking about white people ... is conveying a present tense racism in my opinion. But racism is in the eye of the beholder."

In media blitz, Breitbart flounders, hurls bizarre accusations, tries to change story

NAACP releases full tape vindicating Sherrod. The NAACP released the full video of Sherrod's comments on the evening of July 20. In the video, Sherrod sates that "working with him [the white farmer] made me see that it's really about those who have versus those who don't." She went on to state that "they could be black, and they could be white, they could be Hispanic. And it made me realize then that I needed to work to help poor people -- those who don't have access the way others have."

Breitbart now says his story is "not about Shirley Sherrod," blames White House for making her the story. On the July 20 edition of CNN's John King Live, Breitbart was asked whether there is a "factual mistake" in his initial report. He replied, "This story is about the NAACP. This story is about the NAACP falsely accusing the Tea Party of being racist." Throughout the interview, Breitbart denied that his story was about Sherrod, saying at one point, "It's not about Shirley Sherrod. I can say it 20 times. It's about the NAACP." Likewise, in a July 20 interview on Hannity, Breitbart said (accessed from Nexis):

The reason why Shirley Sherrod is the story right now, not the NAACP, is because the White House which stands by the firing or the forced resignation -- harassment as she said -- they made the story about Shirley. They threw her under the bus.

I have not asked that she get fired. I've not asked for an investigation into her. The whole point was to show that the -- for the NAACP to spend five days on national TV saying that the Tea Party is racist without any evidence when we can prove that the central argument didn't happen and the mainstream media won't play it -- for them to talk about racism they should not be throwing stones in glass houses.

Similarly, on the July 20 edition of America's Nightly Scoreboard, Breitbart said the story is "about the NAACP, not about Shirley Sherrod."

Breitbart invents NAACP audience cheers and applause, claims they are the real story. On Hannity, Breitbart claimed that the real story is how "the audience was laughing and applauding as she described how she maltreated the white farmer." He also said that "The point is that the NAACP at a dinner honoring this person is cheering on a person describing -- describing a white person as the other." And on a July 21 Good Morning America interview, Breitbart again claimed that his video shows that "at an NAACP event, people are applauding racism." But in his initial post, Breitbart described the audience reaction as only "nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement." And in fact, Breitbart's claim that the audience was applauding as she "described how she maltreated the white farmer" is demonstrably false. Contrary to Breitbart's claim, the audience does not applaud or cheer at any point during the story about her interaction with the farmer.

Freak-out: On CNN, Breitbart suggests events didn't happen decades ago, "farmer's wife" isn't who she says she is. On John King Live, Breitbart suggested that the incident Sherrod discussed in the clip didn't happen decades ago, saying, "I mean there -- if you're going to accuse me of a falsehood, tell me where you've confirmed that this incident happened 24 years ago. This is Shirley Sherrod trying to save her job." In fact, in the clip he posted, Sherrod placed the events of her story when "Chapter 12 bankruptcy had just been enacted." This occurred in 1986. Breitbart also asked King, "You tell me as a reporter how CNN put on a person today who purported to be the farmer's wife? What did you do to find out whether or not that was the actual farmer's wife?" He later added: "You're going off of her word that the farmer's wife is the farmer's wife. What type of extra reporting have you done on this?"

Reaction becomes farce: Breitbart feels "sorry" that "the media" made Sherrod fiasco "about her"

Breitbart is "sympathetic" to Sherrod's "plight." In a July 21 interview with MSNBC, Breitbart - who smeared Sherrod for racism, cheered her resignation, and questioned whether she would be investigated by the Justice Department - said:

I feel bad that they made this about her. And I feel sorry that they made this about her. I'm not sure if that was done because they rushed to judgment or whether they wanted to make it about Shirley versus me, because that's what it's become. But watching how they've misconstrued, the media has misconstrued the intention behind this, I do feel a sympathy for her plight, currently. And I do think that she's gone -- when you look at the full video and you look at the video that was excerpted, you see that she mentions that she went through some type of a transformation. So I'm sympathetic to her that she's caught in this plight right now. I'm sympathetic to the fact that they went after her and not after the NAACP.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rkcomments (July 21, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
      11 1
      Thugs like Breitbart don't have an ounce of integrity in them. It's his loser parents (he probably does not even know who they are) who are to be blamed for bringing this worthless creature into this world.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by progressivevoicedaily (July 21, 2010 4:47 pm ET)
      17  
      What an absolute slimeball. I hope this spells the end of this doUch bag's career.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by crimson2 (July 22, 2010 9:51 am ET)
        5  
        Unfortunately, his best customers are d-bags. Business will only get better.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Obsidion (July 23, 2010 4:22 pm ET)
          1  
          You are so right look how the conservatives still talk about acorn like it was all true and completely accurate.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by indigo1968 (July 22, 2010 11:34 am ET)
        6  
        It can't be said nearly enough: Shirley Sharrod, sue Breitbart in civil court for defamation.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jeremy Danials (July 23, 2010 12:49 am ET)
          2  
          Libel and Slander would hold up better in court, and would end this idiot's career.

          Except he'd probably get a show on MindFox for it...
          Report Abuse
    • Author by armendale (July 21, 2010 4:48 pm ET)
      11  
      This lying sack would have us believe that he's the victim in all of this. That "somebody else" edited the tape just at the point where it would best misleadingly make Breitbart's case that the Obama Administration is filled with reverse racists. He was merely airing the tape, UNAWARE that this edited tape he "received" misrepresented Sharrod's story.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by swayjay (July 22, 2010 1:40 pm ET)
        4  
        Meanwhile, he calls out CNN for not investigating it further. Hilarious.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (July 21, 2010 4:49 pm ET)
      6  
      Maybe Breitbart should attend Beck University.

      Just a thought ....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by armendale (July 21, 2010 4:57 pm ET)
      16  
      Breitbart: "It's not about Shirley Sherrod. I can say it 20 times. It's about the NAACP."

      Sorry buddy. This story is now about YOU- Andrew Breitbart.
      You might want to take a remedial course in right-wing spin and framing. Cuz YOU flunked out, bruh!

      Though I'm sure you can get Hannity to agree with you it's about the NAACP and Obama and... MAYBE even Bill Ayers could be tied into this!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by tazp (July 21, 2010 5:19 pm ET)
        1 13
        Oh My God.....when will everyone (including Sherrod) realize if you just exclude any references of race, color (black/white/yellow/red), ethnicity when conducting everyday business and personal life, we wouldn't have any issue to address, resolve. We are All are just people, /Citizens of this great Nation. I'm color blind and do not make reference to a persons skin color. I live in a multi-cultural State where we are just people trying to make a living. If everyone are color-blind you would need associations like NAACP.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by MiniTru (July 22, 2010 1:23 pm ET)
          4  
          If everyone are color-blind you would need associations like NAACP.
          Could someone please translate this into "coherent"?
          Report Abuse
      • Author by timbermanx (July 21, 2010 5:21 pm ET)
        1 7
        Thanks for a reasonable response. the "It's his loser parents" the "lying sack" the "slimebal" nonsense (though I might agree) that sets us on a level w the others.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by sciguy (July 21, 2010 10:36 pm ET)
          7  
          Sorry, but slime ball is an appropriate description of Breitbart. Seriously, check out his history. Not a decent person by any stretch of the imagination.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by FGFM (July 21, 2010 6:23 pm ET)
        6  
        Some of the wingnuts are trying to link Sherrod to Ayers through her husband, but it seems to be tenuous at best.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by swayjay (July 22, 2010 1:41 pm ET)
        3  
        Hannity was deflecting it pretty hard yesterday. Afterall, he "didn't report on it until after she was fired". Sort of like the playground "he did it first" excuse.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Swine the Mad (July 21, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
      4 2
      I'm mad at Breitbart, but I'm also upset at who sent him the tape.

      From what I figure, the station that aired the speech initially is viewable by a maximum of 17,000 people. The station is very local and is unaffiliated with any network. I'm from the area and didn't even know it existed.

      Now, how many people of 17,000 care to not only tune in to a local NAACP speech, but record the thing? And not only record it, send it to Andrew Breitbart.

      Breitbart aired it, but someone deep in conservative Georgia sent it to him and for no other reason but try to destroy the NAACP. I doubt the local who sent him the tape cared about Shirley Sherrod specifically.

      To Breitbart, it wasn't specifically about Sherrod, but if he had take someone out in his quest to majorly discredit the NAACP, he was going to do it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by albertsenj (July 21, 2010 10:15 pm ET)
        5  
        Aside from Breitbart (and we're getting a pretty good idea how reliable he is) who says he got the tape from someone else, already edited? Has this been independently verified?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Swine the Mad (July 21, 2010 10:27 pm ET)
          3 1
          Only Breitbart has said it, but I don't think it makes a difference.

          He published a video that he knew was edited, whether it was by himself or by someone else. Either way, the intent was the same.

          I'm guessing Breitbart is lying again, though. If it had been edited beforehand, wouldn't there only be one clip, instead of the two?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eb (July 21, 2010 5:12 pm ET)
      20  
      Unfortunately much of the Fox news audience has been primed to believe that most liberal or non-conservative organizations are racist, socialist, anti-white, anti-American, corrupt, dishonest, and very powerful. Basically the fox audience is the fertile soil for this type of smear because they have been educated this way and the news is basically a place to go to get these ideas vindicated.

      After listening to people like Glenn Beck, what else would you expect from the NAACP or Obama. Beck expects his audience to believe (and they do) that America has been held hostage by socialist progressives for the last hundred years. If you believe this, you are just waiting to hear about the next outrageous plot from non-conservatives to destroy your way of life.

      Imagine thinking that you live in a country where all those black and brown people are out to get you, that all those educated elites want to take away your wealth, property, guns and speech and that the rest of the media has entered a conspiracy to hid all these threats from you.

      What else can the NAACP be but racist. Why they criticized the tea parties. What else could they be?

      Report Abuse
    • Author by rwmacdonald2091 (July 21, 2010 5:30 pm ET)
      10  
      Breitbart will use the Glenn Beck theory of rehabilitation. Just do something even crazier tomorrow, that way everyone forgets about your earlier "sane" moments.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by papa bear3 (July 21, 2010 5:44 pm ET)
      7  
      . . . I see a Sherrod - Acorn - Ayers - Stalin linkage coming soon, I wonder how that will be spun, The tape editing would give everybody a stroke.

      I think Beck could do it, and have pictures of Sherrod with Woodrow Wilson

      This will be must-see-TV!!

      For FOX it is a win win situation, they can play it either way
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (July 21, 2010 6:09 pm ET)
        8  
        Beck's chalkboard will work overtime on your ideas. Woodrow wilson invented ACORN with the collaboration of Stalin. Maybe Lenin and Trotsky too.

        Breitbart is a victim of discrimination against idiot douch4bag tools.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ajzito (July 21, 2010 6:18 pm ET)
      12  
      This is an infuriating incident all around. The most blatant case of lying yet by a serial liar, and to round it out, both the White House and the NAACP fall over themselves to accept the story and ditch the victim. Where the h$ll have Barack Obama, Tom Vilsack and Ben Jealous been the past two years, that they would put ANY stock in something posted by this...give me a month to make up a word for Breitbart. Venality and cowardice all around.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Meremark (July 21, 2010 6:58 pm ET)
      4  
      -

      That twit is sick in the head.

      Watching the video clips makes me sick to my stomach.

      Any nearing him good people need protection from flecks of his foaming spittle.

      -
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fantagor (July 21, 2010 7:13 pm ET)
      10  
      I am praying for Election Day blow-back from this outrage.

      Remember, folks: if you vote GOBP in the Fall, Breitbart is one of the buffoons a GOBP congress will listened to for wisdom...like Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack did.

      If anyone deserves to lose their job, it's Vilsack. Breitbart deserves to be exiled to Antarctica.

      Randy
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Junito65 (July 21, 2010 11:23 pm ET)
      1 10
      What's that old saying 'Idle hands are the Devil's workshop'?
      Thank you, Mr. President, your inaction the past 18 months to confront these issues from the Right have led to this. Smear after smear day in and day out from the Right without ANYTHING.....NOTHING! Those advising you are worthless, they do not see the damage being caused that YOU are being shielded from.
      Race relations will NEVER be the same due to your ineptitude on this.....you have never gotten in front of these issues before they happen, you and your administration are reactionary ONLY and it is disgusting. ENOUGH already. Develope a spine, grow some ballz! ENOUGH ALREADY!

      Do the honorable thing, Mr. President, do NOT run for a 2nd term in 2012. You, nor your advisers, nor your adversaries, nor this country can take four more years of this.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by kyle b.c. (July 22, 2010 12:55 am ET)
      3  
      so Brietbart needs permission in order to air the tape in its entirety but not to air a two minute clip of it? hmmm....
      Report Abuse
      • Author by MiniTru (July 22, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
        2  
        Yes, it's the "Unfair Use" provision of the Copyright Law...
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Xihuitl (July 23, 2010 1:30 pm ET)
      2  
      Breitbart says "In her meandering speech to what appears to be an all-black audience .." Question: His video clip was only two and a half minutes. He claims he never had or saw the whole speech. How did he know it was a "meandering speech" if he only saw a couple of minutes of it?
      Report Abuse