CNN's Cooper detonates Breitbart's NAACP applause falsehood
Andrew Breitbart has attempted to divert attention from his falsehoods about former USDA official Shirley Sherrod by claiming that her NAACP audience applauded "as she described how she maltreated the white farmer." While some in the media have uncritically forwarded his falsehood, CNN's Anderson Cooper has definitively exposed it as false.
Breitbart invents false claim that NAACP audience was "applauding" while Sherrod described discrimination
Breitbart: "The point" of tape is NAACP audience offered cheers and applause for discrimination without knowing that it was a "story of redemption." In a July 20 interview on Fox News' Hannity, Breitbart claimed that the real story revealed by his Sherrod clip is how "the audience was laughing and applauding as she described how she maltreated the white farmer." Breitbart also asked, "Did the people in the audience know that there was going to be a point of redemption?" After Sean Hannity replied "no," Breitbart said, "The point is that the NAACP at a dinner honoring this person is cheering on a person describing -- describing a white person as the other." Similarly, in a July 21 interview on ABC's Good Morning America, Breitbart claimed that his video shows that "at an NAACP event, people are applauding racism."
Breitbart offered a very different take in his original post. In his initial post on the Sherrod video, Breitbart described the audience reaction as only "nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement."
CNN's Cooper dismantles Breitbart's false claims
Cooper: "The fact is, there was no applause when Ms. Sherrod was talking about the white farmer. Breitbart's claim that the audience was applauding as she "described how she maltreated the white farmer" is demonstrably false. Contrary to Breitbart's claim, the audience does not applaud or cheer at any point during the story about her interaction with the farmer. On his July 21 show, CNN's Anderson Cooper aired comments about "applause" Breitbart made on John King, USA and noted, "The fact is, there was no applause when Ms. Sherrod was talking about the white farmer." He added: "You know, Breitbart also said today that there were cheers over racist comments. Again, the facts do not bear him out."
NAACP chapter president: We were not "cheering racism." Also on Cooper's July 21 show, Hal Pressley, the president of the NAACP chapter that held the event, said that he was in attendance and that no one in the audience was "cheering racism," and that they "were acknowledging that we understand what she is saying, where she's coming from."
Speech attendee Pearson: "totally untrue" that "we were cheering something on and then ... learned something else about it." Another attendee, Olivia Pearson, told Cooper, "to say that, you know, we were cheering something on and then learned out -- and learned something else about it, that's totally untrue. I have known Shirley for -- for 11 years, and I know that that's not her character."
Other media uncritically reported Breitbart's falsehood
Wash. Times quotes Breitbart saying, "What you see on the video are people ... applauding her overt racism." The Washington Times wrote in a July 20 article:
Mr. Breitbart, whose Big Government blog posted the video, said Tuesday that the point was the NAACP audience's reaction to Mrs. Sherrod's account of her past actions.
"This was not about Shirley Sherrod. This was about the NAACP attacking the Tea Party and this is showing racism at an NAACP event. I did not ask for Shirley Sherrod to be fired," he told CNN, adding that Mrs. Sherrod "should have the right to defend herself. But what you see on the video are people ... applauding her overt racism that she is representing."
AP uncritically reports Breitbart said that "the video provides evidence of Georgia NAACP members applauding ... at racist behavior." On July 22, the Associated Press reported:
Breitbart did not immediately respond to an AP request for an interview.
But on ABC's "Good Morning America" Wednesday, he said his story "was not about Shirley Sherrod." Instead, he said, the video provides evidence of Georgia NAACP members applauding or laughing at racist behavior, at the same time national NAACP figures are criticizing the tea party movement for having members that express racist sentiments."
















This from the Beck groupie.
I'm afraid that Cooper is wrong about this. Seriously wrong. Sure, you could dig up an example or two, but the Right has turned distortion of the truth into an art form that they practice incessantly. In fact they've got an entire TV Channel-group (all the FOX News outlets) that's devoted to it.
Since no one is truly a faultless saint, and therefore no political party or news organization can be made up of such people, we can assume that there is distortion and manipulation coming from the left. But it's just not in the same league as what the Right is up to.
To insist at this particular moment, while trying to undo the damage done by a particularly egregious example of Right-wing nastiness, that the Left must also confess its sins is wrong-headed. In fact it is a well-known tactic of the psychopath and the Right-wing hate-monger to draw just this kind of moral equivalency between acts that are quite different in both quantity and quality.
Talk to any chronic delinquent who has made multiple trips to the state penitentiary and you'll hear all about the misdeeds of everyone else. Even Mother Theresa, it turns out, once stole a candy bar when she was a little girl, and when caught lied about it, blaming the episode on her little brother. [Okay, okay, this never happened, but you get the point.]
Filmdog
Thank you Fimldog for saying it so eloquently.
How do you answer that one? You say 'yes' and you instantly annihilate (uh oh, more violence!) your own little talking heads. You say 'no' and you admit that you're simply making up crap to stir up trouble.
Oh, by the way, nobody cares what you think about which word should have been chosen. You're not a writer (though no doubt you'll claim to have written something as a response me writing that) and your instant jump to try and take issue with a word that is used perfectly illustrates your total lack of literary understanding.
Try again Champ.
Well, if we want to get into the subtle semantics of political discourse, why don't we have a little chat about... oh, pretty much any randomly chosen episode of Glenn Beck's show?
All of these references to violence have come from the far right. The most virulent purveyor of violence is Beck who promotes it daily on both his radio show and on Faux News.
:sarcasm:
I don't think Cooper is even able to tell the truth he is so twisted. He must really do a lot of drug.
And you must have been doing a lot of drink to post that.
Where are the similar lying smears coming from the left? Put up or admit your gutlessness. This sort of unsubstantiated moral equivalence line is perilously close to he rubbish being peddled by Breitbart and his ilk.
The bankruptcy is in the promotion of edited footage, without a care for the context of the speech, even less for the context of the thought contained in the edited sound bite. Letting people "see for themselves", a truncated sound bite serves only the promoters nefarious motives. There is obviously a pattern of method and motive from Breitbart between this latest escapade and his previous clever dismemberment of facts and reality in his set up scam of ACORN and his involvement in the attempted bugging of a US Senator's office. Breitbart is either a criminal, or he's pimping criminals. Either way, he reeks of moral bankruptcy.
Breitbart should consider teaming with stud/journalist, James 'Gannon' Guckert. That might lend him much needed credibility.
MMFA used to find this garbage objectionable a few years ago. Now with their obsession with Fox News and the Far Right Cooper and CNN seem reasonable to MMFA by default. Pathetic example of a so-called "watchdog".
John