About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

CNN's Cooper detonates Breitbart's NAACP applause falsehood

July 22, 2010 4:27 pm ET — 31 Comments

Andrew Breitbart has attempted to divert attention from his falsehoods about former USDA official Shirley Sherrod by claiming that her NAACP audience applauded "as she described how she maltreated the white farmer." While some in the media have uncritically forwarded his falsehood, CNN's Anderson Cooper has definitively exposed it as false.

Breitbart invents false claim that NAACP audience was "applauding" while Sherrod described discrimination 

Breitbart: "The point" of tape is NAACP audience offered cheers and applause for discrimination without knowing that it was a "story of redemption." In a July 20 interview on Fox News' Hannity, Breitbart claimed that the real story revealed by his Sherrod clip is how "the audience was laughing and applauding as she described how she maltreated the white farmer." Breitbart also asked, "Did the people in the audience know that there was going to be a point of redemption?" After Sean Hannity replied "no," Breitbart said, "The point is that the NAACP at a dinner honoring this person is cheering on a person describing -- describing a white person as the other." Similarly, in a July 21 interview on ABC's Good Morning America, Breitbart claimed that his video shows that "at an NAACP event, people are applauding racism."

Breitbart offered a very different take in his original post. In his initial post on the Sherrod video, Breitbart described the audience reaction as only "nodding approval and murmurs of recognition and agreement."

CNN's Cooper dismantles Breitbart's false claims

Cooper: "The fact is, there was no applause when Ms. Sherrod was talking about the white farmer. Breitbart's claim that the audience was applauding as she "described how she maltreated the white farmer" is demonstrably false. Contrary to Breitbart's claim, the audience does not applaud or cheer at any point during the story about her interaction with the farmer. On his July 21 show, CNN's Anderson Cooper aired comments about "applause" Breitbart made on John King, USA and noted, "The fact is, there was no applause when Ms. Sherrod was talking about the white farmer." He added: "You know, Breitbart also said today that there were cheers over racist comments. Again, the facts do not bear him out."

NAACP chapter president: We were not "cheering racism." Also on Cooper's July 21 show, Hal Pressley, the president of the NAACP chapter that held the event, said that he was in attendance and that no one in the audience was "cheering racism," and that they "were acknowledging that we understand what she is saying, where she's coming from."

Speech attendee Pearson: "totally untrue" that "we were cheering something on and then ... learned something else about it." Another attendee, Olivia Pearson, told Cooper, "to say that, you know, we were cheering something on and then learned out -- and learned something else about it, that's totally untrue. I have known Shirley for -- for 11 years, and I know that that's not her character."

Other media uncritically reported Breitbart's falsehood

Wash. Times quotes Breitbart saying, "What you see on the video are people ... applauding her overt racism." The Washington Times wrote in a July 20 article:

Mr. Breitbart, whose Big Government blog posted the video, said Tuesday that the point was the NAACP audience's reaction to Mrs. Sherrod's account of her past actions.

"This was not about Shirley Sherrod. This was about the NAACP attacking the Tea Party and this is showing racism at an NAACP event. I did not ask for Shirley Sherrod to be fired," he told CNN, adding that Mrs. Sherrod "should have the right to defend herself. But what you see on the video are people ... applauding her overt racism that she is representing."

AP uncritically reports Breitbart said that "the video provides evidence of Georgia NAACP members applauding ... at racist behavior." On July 22, the Associated Press reported:

Breitbart did not immediately respond to an AP request for an interview.

But on ABC's "Good Morning America" Wednesday, he said his story "was not about Shirley Sherrod." Instead, he said, the video provides evidence of Georgia NAACP members applauding or laughing at racist behavior, at the same time national NAACP figures are criticizing the tea party movement for having members that express racist sentiments."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by YouDontMeanThat (July 22, 2010 4:46 pm ET)
      1 31
      As smart as the "watchdogs" on MM like to think they are and "detonates" is the word used they chose to use.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by YouDontMeanThat (July 22, 2010 4:48 pm ET)
        1 32
        As smart as the "watchdogs" on MM like to think they are and "detonates is the word they chose to use.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by teh.stoopid.lib (July 23, 2010 6:53 am ET)
          6  
          Thank you so much for posting this same "smart" comment twice! It gave my 2X the opportunity to "thumbs down" and THAT is a lot of fun! WHEEE!!!
          Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (July 22, 2010 5:00 pm ET)
        10 1
        Detonates means to explode. Nothing wrong with it.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by YouDontMeanThat (July 22, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
          1 25
          I think "exposes" would work much better than "detonate" or "explode". That's just the violent rhetoric of the left coming out.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by bintx (July 22, 2010 5:05 pm ET)
            12  
            Well, do you write for MMFA? If not, I don't really think that they care what you "think."
            Report Abuse
          • Author by soze169880 (July 22, 2010 5:10 pm ET)
            15  
            the violent rhetoric of the left

            This from the Beck groupie.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by armond5028 (July 22, 2010 5:38 pm ET)
              7  
              Did anyone around here note that Anderson Cooper, in an apparent attempt to be "even-handed", several times alluded to journalistic misdeeds on the part of the left while he was castigating Breitbart for his wrongdoing. Interestingly, he didn't cite any actual examples. But he wanted it known that he thinks this kind of misconduct can be found all over the political spectrum.

              I'm afraid that Cooper is wrong about this. Seriously wrong. Sure, you could dig up an example or two, but the Right has turned distortion of the truth into an art form that they practice incessantly. In fact they've got an entire TV Channel-group (all the FOX News outlets) that's devoted to it.

              Since no one is truly a faultless saint, and therefore no political party or news organization can be made up of such people, we can assume that there is distortion and manipulation coming from the left. But it's just not in the same league as what the Right is up to.

              To insist at this particular moment, while trying to undo the damage done by a particularly egregious example of Right-wing nastiness, that the Left must also confess its sins is wrong-headed. In fact it is a well-known tactic of the psychopath and the Right-wing hate-monger to draw just this kind of moral equivalency between acts that are quite different in both quantity and quality.

              Talk to any chronic delinquent who has made multiple trips to the state penitentiary and you'll hear all about the misdeeds of everyone else. Even Mother Theresa, it turns out, once stole a candy bar when she was a little girl, and when caught lied about it, blaming the episode on her little brother. [Okay, okay, this never happened, but you get the point.]

              Filmdog
              Report Abuse
              • Author by bip84124092 (July 24, 2010 11:09 am ET)
                2  
                When I heard Cooper say that I was so angry. This is why I find it difficult to watch CNN. When the facts put the right in a negative light they always feel the need to draw some kind of moral equivalency with the left. From Wolf Blitzer to John King. It must be some kind of corporate edict. For all the good reporting Cooper did he ruined it with that one remark. Even Donna Brazill knew better than to contradict him or she'd no longer be a "contributor".

                Thank you Fimldog for saying it so eloquently.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by Porkeater (July 22, 2010 6:33 pm ET)
              2 1
              Got nothing to say. Felt lonely.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by dkylep (July 22, 2010 7:42 pm ET)
            8  
            So when the 'left' uses words that can also be used in a violent context, you claim that it is wrong. When the 'right' does it, there's no problem and it has no effect?

            How do you answer that one? You say 'yes' and you instantly annihilate (uh oh, more violence!) your own little talking heads. You say 'no' and you admit that you're simply making up crap to stir up trouble.

            Oh, by the way, nobody cares what you think about which word should have been chosen. You're not a writer (though no doubt you'll claim to have written something as a response me writing that) and your instant jump to try and take issue with a word that is used perfectly illustrates your total lack of literary understanding.

            Try again Champ.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by cst (July 22, 2010 8:30 pm ET)
            9  
            " That's just the violent rhetoric of the left coming out. "
            Well, if we want to get into the subtle semantics of political discourse, why don't we have a little chat about... oh, pretty much any randomly chosen episode of Glenn Beck's show?
            Report Abuse
            • Author by nitwhits3702 (July 22, 2010 8:36 pm ET)
              4  
              What about the fact that this right wing journalistic hero is blatantly and provably lying? Again? I guess the best retort is to pick apart MM's wording. Lame.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by cugagcmu805031 (July 23, 2010 12:16 am ET)
            6  
            I can imagine you had nothing to say when Bachmann suggested taking up arms to oppose health care reform, or when Palin used democratic candidates as targets on her web site, or when Angle suggested taking up arms if the elections did turn out the way republicans think they should in November, or when Erickson said he'd use his wife's shotgun to run off any census worker who approached his home.

            All of these references to violence have come from the far right. The most virulent purveyor of violence is Beck who promotes it daily on both his radio show and on Faux News.



            Report Abuse
          • Author by worrierking (July 23, 2010 1:07 am ET)
            5  
            Some people say the word "exposes" has been soiled from a certain wingnut leader who exposes himself to minors.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by raddave43 (July 23, 2010 1:57 am ET)
            5 1
            Exposes? No it was pretty much blown out of the water.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by redrage (July 23, 2010 8:51 am ET)
            5 1
            Other than your issue with "explode," do you agree that Breitbart was dishonest? Is it to much to ask that you address the actual point or do you have nothing to contribute there?
            Report Abuse
          • Author by Max the Dog (July 23, 2010 9:11 am ET)
            3  
            So are you saying that only the right can use "violent rhetoric'?
            Report Abuse
        • Author by cugagcmu805031 (July 23, 2010 12:08 am ET)
          5  
          Or destroy. bintx, we know that many on the far right have problems with knowing that a word can have many definitions. Remember how unhinged Palin became when Rahm Emanuel used the word retarded by immediately connecting it to her son Trig? Emanuel probably wasn't even thinking about her when he was using the word. Many on the right seem to have the same issue with words because they seem to think there is only one definition per word.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by grmce (July 23, 2010 4:37 am ET)
            3  
            Remember how unhinged Palin became when Rahm Emanuel used the word retarded by immediately connecting it to her son Trig?
            Well what do you expect from the narcissistic little bogan? It's always all about her.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by spooky3 (July 22, 2010 11:00 pm ET)
        7  
        Memo to MMFA: Throw away the thesaurus! There is now only One Best Word to use in every situation.

        :sarcasm:
        Report Abuse
      • Author by hitchikerforajax (July 23, 2010 9:21 am ET)
        1  
        Responding to you don't mean that, again & again the right wingers of America, have nothing that is even remotely intelligent to say, so they lie & distort anything progressive! How the hell are the conservatives who have done nothing to actually help the recovery from the economy they butchered while Bush & Fools were in the W.H. & congress, even be mentioned about retaking congress & God forbid the W.H. Heard that Palin & Ginrich are the front runners for 2012, if that comes to reality, then Americans deserve to be flushed down the toilet. But the rich will absolutely become wealthier. The rest will get slaughtered!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by TruthSpotlight (July 22, 2010 10:37 pm ET)
        10
      Cooper? Really? LOL

      I don't think Cooper is even able to tell the truth he is so twisted. He must really do a lot of drug.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by redrage (July 23, 2010 10:01 am ET)
        1  
        Whatever, he's telling the truth here, and you know it.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Old_Benjamin (July 23, 2010 12:10 pm ET)
        3  
        He must really do a lot of drug.


        And you must have been doing a lot of drink to post that.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jibal (July 24, 2010 2:11 am ET)
        3  
        Ad hominem / poisoning the well. Anyone can tell the truth occasionally, even you. In this case, it's an objective, confirmable fact that Cooper is telling the truth, and that you are doing what is so typical of right wingers.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (July 23, 2010 4:31 am ET)
      9  
      A sad current running through much of the coverage of this and similar matters is the gutless way in which many journalists preface the story with a "they all do it" type comment without backing it up (yes, this includes you, Mr. Cooper) - thus smearing the left with the grime of the likes of Breitbart. This renders them no better than the slimeballs they are criticising.

      Where are the similar lying smears coming from the left? Put up or admit your gutlessness. This sort of unsubstantiated moral equivalence line is perilously close to he rubbish being peddled by Breitbart and his ilk.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jarjarbush (July 23, 2010 10:49 am ET)
      4  
      The Sherrod Brown case exposes the moral bankruptcy of the conservative media. And while it is true that American journalism died years ago, what Americans don't need are the maggots like Drudge, Breitbart and the collective newsroom of FNC, et al, living and feeding on it's corpse. It's referred to as a public trust for a reason, but these and many other "journalists" have abandoned both trust and reason. A healthy democracy depends on a well informed electorate and these aforementioned "journalists" are by their actions, domestic terrorists, enemies of the state and should be dealt with accordingly. Disinformation in journalism is moral bankruptcy at best and treason at worst. Let's enforce the laws we have in place to combat it.

      The bankruptcy is in the promotion of edited footage, without a care for the context of the speech, even less for the context of the thought contained in the edited sound bite. Letting people "see for themselves", a truncated sound bite serves only the promoters nefarious motives. There is obviously a pattern of method and motive from Breitbart between this latest escapade and his previous clever dismemberment of facts and reality in his set up scam of ACORN and his involvement in the attempted bugging of a US Senator's office. Breitbart is either a criminal, or he's pimping criminals. Either way, he reeks of moral bankruptcy.

      Breitbart should consider teaming with stud/journalist, James 'Gannon' Guckert. That might lend him much needed credibility.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by jibal (July 24, 2010 2:02 am ET)
      1 1
      I predict that Anderson Cooper will eventually be let go by CNN for taking his role as a truthteller too seriously; the guy seems to actually have a conscience. No such scruples exist at AP or the Moonie Times.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by papajohn (July 24, 2010 9:45 am ET)
           
        Cooper didn't make much of the fact that the video was doctored, Fox news and the other networks (including his) immediately promoted it, stated that the so-called "Left" is just as guilty without providing examples, etc.

        MMFA used to find this garbage objectionable a few years ago. Now with their obsession with Fox News and the Far Right Cooper and CNN seem reasonable to MMFA by default. Pathetic example of a so-called "watchdog".

        John
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bip84124092 (July 24, 2010 11:35 am ET)
      1  
      So another rightwinger got caught doing a dirty trick. Breitbart, the new Karl Rove. The usual MO is to blame the other side, obscure the facts with trivia like who did what when, say "they did it too", or just lie. Never, ever apologize. Now Breitbart is twisting himself into a pretzel trying to come up with a new explanation every day. Unfortunately for him and Fox this is one trick the public saw through. The facts are he did what he did and Fox promoted the hell out of it. Interesting how the party of "personal responsibility" never seems to take any.
      Report Abuse