About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly falsely claims New Black Panthers said "they want to kill white babies" at polling place

July 23, 2010 10:43 pm ET — 35 Comments

Bill O'Reilly falsely claimed that members of the New Black Panthers were "standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies." In fact, O'Reilly conflated two separate incidents: Video of a member of the New Black Panther Party suggesting the murder of babies is from a documentary produced prior to Election Day 2008.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

O'Reilly's falsehood: New Black Panthers were "saying they want to kill white babies" at polling place

O'Reilly: New Black Panthers were "standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies." O'Reilly attacked the mainstream media for failing to cover the New Black Panthers case, which he described as "guys with batons standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies." From the July 23 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:

O'REILLY: The establishment liberal media that you and I both talked about said, look, we don't like this tea party business. This could really amount to something, and it already has in places like Kentucky. So we don't like it -- and it's all primarily whites, so let's call them racists. Let's throw that charge out there, and there'll be a few nuts that help us with that. So that was established, all right.

So, then, conservative Americans or tea party supporters, whatever, they got angry about that. And then they started to look, all right, you know, OK, let's -- and then the Black Panthers show up. Oh, look at that. And then, as you pointed out, the media didn't cover that, and they're going, wait a minute, you're demonizing the tea party for being racist, but here we've got guys with batons standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies, and you don't mention it.

FACT: Hate speech is from video produced prior to Election Day 2008 incident

Civil Rights Commission general counsel: "National Geographic Channel's documentary" was "produced in 2008, before the election." In a video produced prior to Election Day 2008 -- not, as O'Reilly stated, in front of the polling place -- a member of the New Black Panther Party states, "You want freedom? You're going to have to kill some crackers. You're going to have to kill some of their babies." During an April 23 hearing of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, David Blackwood, the commission's general counsel, introduced the video as evidence, including what he said was "the National Geographic Channel's documentary on the New Black Panther Party." Blackwood said that the documentary was "produced in 2008, before the election." From Blackwood's comments introducing video evidence to the commission:

BLACKWOOD: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. What we're going to show in this next segment are three video clips that the Commission has obtained. The first -- and they will run one right after the other. The first is from the National Geographic Channel's documentary on the New Black Panther Party, which was obtained by subpoena.

The documentary was produced in 2008, before the election. It has background as to the New Black Panther Party. It shows clips of statements from Malik Zulu Shabazz, who is head of the party, and has footage and comments from the New Black Panther Party members who were at the Fairmount Street Polling Place: Minister King Samir Shabazz and Jerry Jackson.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by terrapin53 (July 23, 2010 10:47 pm ET)
      9 1
      Billo don't care about facts.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bongo Fury (July 23, 2010 10:49 pm ET)
           
        Funky Nassau!In the words of Gomer Pyle..shame,shame,shame.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Bad News (July 24, 2010 4:52 am ET)
          3 6
          I'm ready to Cut Billo some Slack.
          He's getting older & i hear the Poor guy can only have Sex on his Back.
          Shame is when you make an Honest mistake & then realize that you were Wrong.
          Evil is when you intentionally say something to Hurt Blacks just to inflame your Throngs.

          Speak truth to power.


          Mr. News
          Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (July 23, 2010 11:19 pm ET)
      9 1
      The guy at the polling place with the nightstick had the potential to scare away a voter. But no voters ever said that they were in fact scared away by him, and so no voter intimidation ever happened.

      O'Reilly is trying to act as though this guy actually DID something for which he should have been arrested - because otherwise, the rightwing furor over the issue is exposed as all having been part of an act!

      And sorry to have to inform you of this, O'Reilly, but the First Amendment protects this fool's free speech, even if what he says is really obnoxious!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ilikeike (July 25, 2010 4:40 pm ET)
           
        standing in front of a polling station is voter intimidation any way you slice it. it matters not whether the voters themselves allowed themselves to be intimidated
        Report Abuse
    • Author by David2012 (July 24, 2010 7:12 am ET)
      8 3
      Okay, well. Here comes a confession.

      At the risk of stereotyping, which is one I guess I'll take, O'Reilly is typical of a particular kind of Northeastern, Long Island descendant of Irish immigrants. The roots go back to the Civil War draft riots. He has a visceral dislike, distrust of people of color, and it is just in him, part of him. He's no more likely to change it than the color of his eyes.

      I know many, many people like Bill. You have to overlook their racial views in order to be friends with them. It can be done, and once done, they are okay. They actually understand that you find that part of them abhorrent, but since it is usually, make that always, just talk on their part, it doesn't mean much practically.

      The other peculiar thing is that, when they -- and I am thinking about several particular people here --- deal with individual people of color, they are okay. It's only when they talk about an undifferentiated mass that they express racism.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (July 24, 2010 10:12 am ET)
        9 1
        There are a lot of people out there like that. My mother was one of them. I am sure a lot of the Teabaggers are like this, and that is part of the reason they resent being called for their racism. Since they wouldn't hurt a single person, and they can't hurt the group beyond expressing resentment, they don't see it as racism.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by mary59 (July 24, 2010 5:34 pm ET)
          4 1
          Bet he's having a hard time finding a lily white baby. Poor billo.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by ilikeike (July 25, 2010 4:42 pm ET)
           
        an undifferentiated mass? like northeastern, long island descendants of irish immigrants.... just pure idiocy. bill oreilly is a racist because he is a bitter, mean unhappy, dishonest jackoff who doesnt think but has knee jerk reactions to everything
        Report Abuse
    • Author by eb (July 24, 2010 7:53 am ET)
      4 1
      Bill O'Reilly falsely claimed that members of the New Black Panthers were "standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies."

      Hey Bill: Even if this was true SO WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Yea this is news. Some crazy guy was standing around a polling place almost two years ago. This is so completely irrelevant. It had no effect on the election and it has nothing to do with anything happening right now.

      It does get all of the Fox viewers hysterical and fearful of some kind of ghetto liberal threat.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by okiepoli (July 24, 2010 9:28 am ET)
        6  
        Yeah, I mean, it's not like several hundred crazy(paid) folks were storming around the election supervisor's office, yelling, physically assaulting people, etc. That was so irrelevant then - O'Reilly didn't hammer on it non-stop. It's not like, you know, the first time I can remember the SC getting so directly involved in the outcome of an election.
        And besides, what is scarier; hundreds of folks mobbing an office, or the scary(evil) BLACK MAN!!!11!
        Ref: Brooks Brothers riot vs. NBPP
        /snark
        Report Abuse
    • Author by worrierking (July 24, 2010 9:45 am ET)
      9  
      So far, no one has claimed that they were intimidated by the NBPP at the 4th voting district of Philadelphia's 14th Ward.

      Here's some historical info, not to be confused with O'Really's hysterical info:

      These are the results of the last three presidential races at this polling place.

      2000

      Al Gore 382 votes George W. Bush 8 votes

      2004

      John Kerry 501 votes George W. Bush 24 votes

      2008

      Barack Obama 596 votes John McCain 13 votes

      Source
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (July 24, 2010 10:17 am ET)
        12 1
        I'm pretty sure the White poll watcher chose this polling place for this reason. Shabazz had a right to question why a White group would show up and allege that intimidation is going on. I don't think we have seen the full incident, just what they wanted us to see. I think they may have talked trash to Shabazz, but even so, he never yells or threatens, in the video I have seen, the nightstick is at his side, below his waist. I wouldn't have been threatened, would you?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by worrierking (July 24, 2010 10:48 am ET)
          8  
          No I wouldn't have been. I worked the nightshift, three blocks from there for more than eight years.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jpeagle21 (July 25, 2010 6:31 pm ET)
              12
            Both of you are liars, especially you epkklk851, who has tried to smear the tea parties by documenting racism at their rallies, but never found any. And, I think I remember you saying that you felt fearful for your safety as a liberal at a tea party rally. But, a couple of guys standing by a door holding batons (something they could physically harm you with)....you're fine with.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by Johaely (July 25, 2010 7:03 pm ET)
              10  
              First off, it was ONE guy holding a baton, which was told to leave shortly thereafter. Second thing, i don't feel like looking once more for the racist tea party signs which have been posted so many times here just for you and others to just say either "they are plants" or "they are unafiliated". Own them up and stop trying to discredit an organization for having the gal to even question the tea parties intentions.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by magnolialover (July 26, 2010 8:25 am ET)
              5  
              It's not hard to find racists at a tea party event. Just show up, and walk around. I've been to a few, and have seen, and taken pictures of it myself.

              Did I fear for my safety? No. But then again, I'm a man, women sometimes feel different within the same groups of people, or in the same locations.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by worrierking (July 26, 2010 8:46 am ET)
              7  
              Lying's a pretty serious charge. Are you claiming that my statistics from the last three elections were wrong? Are you claiming I'm not being truthful about no voters coming out to say they were intimidated? It's from a right wing source, in the city of Philadelphia.

              Or are you saying I'm lying about working three blocks away and not being afraid? I live in NJ now, but I've lived and worked within the Philadelphia city limits for more than thirty years.

              I think you just shot yourself in the foot. You're attempting to Breitbart both epkklk851 and me.

              So once again, your attempt to refute has floundered. All you're doing with comments like this is to confirm everyone's idea that teabaggers are mislead, misinformed and proud of their ignorance.

              Report Abuse
            • Author by epkklk851 (July 26, 2010 1:56 pm ET)
              2  
              A picture is worth a thousand words. I went, I took pictures, I posted them. Not one lie in there. That you can't see the racism doesn't speak well of you. And yes, I was in a mob that was chanting in unison in a menacing tone under the House side of the Capitol. It was scary, it was also the same day that Congress members were harrassed. Staffers in multiple offices told me they were afraid or felt intimidated. But that doesn't matter, to you does it?
              Report Abuse
    • Author by pete592 (July 24, 2010 12:06 pm ET)
      6 3
      You know what? I'm all for setting the record straight on all the trumped-up charges against the Obama administration in regard to the New Black Panthers polling incident... but why the hell is MMfA trying to set the record straight on a trumped-up charge against the NBP itself?

      Is the NBP really an organization that progressives want to defend against misinformation?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by wookie (July 24, 2010 1:43 pm ET)
        6  
        I don't think the idea is that the NBP represents progressive views. We aren't like the right claiming that a report on extremism damns everyone on that side of the fence. But MMFA has to take this up because O'Reilly is trying to dupe his suckers into to thinking that the NBP is part of an overall election strategy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by n'est-ce pas (July 24, 2010 2:58 pm ET)
          6 1
          I think the other thing to consider is the fact that by taking this incident and running with it, Fox is building up the narrative that will allow them to racebait in the next Presidential election. They've consistently tried to make false equivalencies between their entrenched, institutionalized Republican racism and so-called "reverse" racism. Two guys at a polling place (who, by the way, openly stated that their purpose was to guard AGAINST voter intimidation in an historically black polling place) somehow equals 1,500 Teabaggers spitting on civil rights heroes and calling them horrendous racial and sexual-orientation epithets. That's the exculpatory meme they're building for Barack Obama's next Republican challenger. They can't win a race without using race. When was the last time they even tried to?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by jpeagle21 (July 25, 2010 9:17 pm ET)
              9
            "1,500 Teabaggers spitting on civil rights heroes and calling them horrendous racial and sexual-orientation epithets."

            Never proven to be true, first of all. Second, even if something of the sort did happen, it would have been done by a few people during a rally of thousands. That you would say that 1500 people spit on and hurled slurs at a "civil rights hero" shows how flawed your views are.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by n'est-ce pas (July 25, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
              5  
              Not been proven true? What the hell are you talking about? The entire demostration was estimated at 1,500 by the Capitol Police. And there was plenty of video to substantiate the claim. Not that it was ever really in the realm of implausible, considering the history of race baiting inherent in the Teabagger movement.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by achrispage6992 (July 26, 2010 1:05 pm ET)
                1 3
                so it is your position that all 1,500 hundred protesters spit on and hurled racial epithets at those black congressman? there simply isn't "plenty of video" to substantiate your claim. There is no doubt that there were some of these protesters who engaged in vile conduct, but to insist that all of them did and then further insist that there is video to prove it is ridiculous.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by n'est-ce pas (July 26, 2010 9:19 pm ET)
                  2  
                  Yeah, actually it is my position that all 1,500 Teabaggers were culpable in spitting on, and hurling epithets at, Congressmen Barney Frank, Emmanuel Cleaver, John Lewis and Andre Carson. Those who did the spitting, and those who stood by and did nothing are exactly as culpable. And the anti-gay epithets Barney Frank endured were chanted by quite a lot of those "patriots." But you go on ahead and try to defend them, skippy. I like it when you people try to parse words and play games with the truth.
                  Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (July 24, 2010 3:23 pm ET)
        4  
        It's because the idea that this guy did this on election day furthers the conservative agenda, by making this guy look guilty of something!
        Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (July 24, 2010 4:27 pm ET)
        3  
        Is the NBP really an organization that progressives want to defend against misinformation?


        So nobody should point out right wing misinformation if it's directed at an organization we don't agree with? If O'Reilly makes a false claim about David Duke, then I would hope that someone would be able to point that out without being accused of sympathizing with or defending David Duke.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (July 24, 2010 4:27 pm ET)
        6  
        Is the NBP really an organization that progressives want to defend against misinformation?


        So nobody should point out right wing misinformation if it's directed at an organization we don't agree with? If O'Reilly makes a false claim about David Duke, then I would hope that someone would be able to point that out without being accused of sympathizing with or defending David Duke.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ilikeike (July 25, 2010 4:45 pm ET)
           
        because mmfa is practising what all real journalists should. they are disseminating the truth of what actually happened without political spin
        Report Abuse
    • Author by jpeagle21 (July 25, 2010 6:23 pm ET)
        7
      "but here we've got guys with batons standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies" - O'Reilly

      Why must you lie again, MMFA? O'reilly never said the Black Panthers were saying they wanted to kill white babies WHILE standing at a polling place. He just said they did both things, which they did: 1. They were standing at a polling place with batons. 2. The did say black people should kill white babies.

      But, nice job defending people who said they wanted to kill white people, specificaly babies. Stay classy, MMFA. Stay classy.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (July 25, 2010 8:26 pm ET)
        4  
        The quotation clearly gives the impression that they were saying it at the polling place. O'Reilly pushed two things together and pretended they happened at the same time and location to rachet up the theme that voters were being intimidated at the polls by these idiots.

        No one here including Media Matters, is "defending" these nutcases. The challenge for you is to understand the distinction. O'Reilly has every right to call out these guys but why not do it honestly?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by achrispage6992 (July 26, 2010 1:01 pm ET)
          2  
          In any event, are these "panthers" racists?

          I firmly believe that the men saying "crackers" are going to have to be "killed" as well as their babies in order to have freedom is beyond the pale. I hope that everyone here will openly denounce these men as bigoted pigs. Killing white babies in order to have freedom!! As far as I'm concerned the "New Black Panther Party" is a dangerous and vile organization that deserves to be denounced by every self respecting citizen of this nation. Does anyone know whether of not the leader of this radical group has denounced these statements?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by clams casino (July 26, 2010 4:51 pm ET)
            1  
            They've already been denounced up and down, every which way, since they first established themselves as the New Black Panthers. You do realize that we're talking about a handful of idiots, right? They are insignificant, except as a tool for Fox News to scare white voters with. Self-righteously asking for everyone to denounce them is like demanding that everyone denounce the Central Michigan Regional Militia. Pointless and insignificant.

            Report Abuse
      • Author by clams casino (July 25, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
        3  
        If that's what O'Reilly was trying to say, then maybe next time he'll be a little more careful with his sentence structure. The way he said it clearly implied that they were standing in front of the polling center calling for white babies to be killed.

        And it's also worth pointing out that there weren't "guys with batons" standing in front of the polling center, as O'Reilly claims. That's another lie. There was one guy with one baton.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.