About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

The White House made me do it: Ingraham and Gingrich absolve themselves for attacking Sherrod

July 25, 2010 4:50 pm ET — 18 Comments

Right-wing media figures have tried to absolve themselves for attacking Shirley Sherrod by pointing out that the White House fired her. However, regardless of the White House's actions, these media figures are far from blameless; as Salon's Joan Walsh noted, media figures "pounc[ed] on" Sherrod without seeking any comment from her.

Right-wing media project blame for their Sherrod attacks onto White House

Ingraham: "My mistake was believing" the White House "had read the entire transcript." After previously appearing on Fox News' Fox & Friends, where she stated that Sherrod was evidence that people with "radical outlooks, a radical agenda and in this case a racist sentiment" had "burrowed their way into the Obama administration," Laura Ingraham appeared on the July 22 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor to further discuss the Sherrod controversy after the full context of Sherrod's remarks had come to light. Rather than accepting responsibility for hastily and erroneously calling Sherrod a "racist," Ingraham told Bill O'Reilly: "You know what? My mistake was this. My mistake was believing that when the Obama White House had moved to remove her from her position, that they had read the entire transcript of the remarks."

Gingrich: Secretary of Agriculture "validated" clip of Sherrod by firing her. On the July 25 edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, host Chris Wallace played a clip of Newt Gingrich stating that "firing" Sherrod "after that kind of viciously racist attitude was exactly the right thing to do" and then asked Gingrich if calling Sherrod "viciously racist" was irresponsible. Gingrich responded:

GINGRICH: Well, remember, I was operating in the context of the Secretary of Agriculture having summarily fired her, and therefore there was no reason to disbelieve the clip. And what you see was one more example of the Obama administration's continuing incompetence. Apparently, she didn't even get the courtesy of a chance to talk to the Secretary of Agriculture, who I suspect fired her under pressure from the White House. And she says she was told they were firing her under pressure from the White House. 

So my comments were in the context of a clip which had been validated by the Secretary of Agriculture, who had fired her. Clearly, when you look at the complete clip, and when you look at the background information, and when you listen to the white farmer say she had actually been very helpful, I think it's a fair case can be made that this administration acted with destructive irresponsibility in the way that they fired her.

Right-wing media wildly speculated that White House might have orchestrated a "set-up" to "smear Breitbart" and Fox News. As Breitbart's Shirley Sherrod smear dissolved, rather than blame Breitbart for posting the deceptive clip of her speech, right-wing media ludicrously began speculating that he and the conservative media could have been the victim of a "set-up" that had been "orchestrated" by the White House. Beck speculated that the Sherrod controversy might be part of a plot to "destroy the credibility of Fox News" and said that if it "wasn't a set up -- I have to tell you -- it is certainly Rahm Emanuel's don't let a good crisis go to waste." Michael Savage stated, "I'm beginning to believe that the entire affair was orchestrated by the government itself to smear Breitbart." And Rush Limbaugh claimed, "For all I know, the White House orchestrated this whole thing."

Walsh: "Pouncing on Shirley Sherrod" without seeking comment "is unconscionable"

Walsh: "How Fox News or anybody else could run a story and not seek comment from a person that they were calling a racist -- it's quite extraordinary." During her July 25 appearance on CNN's Reliable Sources, Salon's Joan Walsh dismantled the media's attempt to deflect responsibility for their false accusations of racism onto the White House. Affirming that "Fox played a much bigger role than people want to admit," she stated that "[i]t doesn't matter that merely the Obama administration overreacted" --  "pouncing on Shirley Sherrod without getting her reaction or her response" is still "unconscionable." From Walsh's appearance on Reliable Sources:

WALSH: I think they [the TV networks] bear a lot of responsibility. You know, I want to give CNN credit, because I believe CNN was among the first to search out Shirley Sherrod and find out that there was a very different story than the one that was being told. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, I believe, was also very quick to go to Sherrod. How Fox News or anybody else could run a story and not seek comment from a person that they were calling a racist -- it's quite extraordinary. 

And you know, a lot has been made about "Fox didn't do -- Fox isn't the cause of her firing." I'm going to stipulate that. Let's say that that's true. But Fox played a much bigger role than people want to admit. It -- that story -- the Breitbart version of the story ran on FoxNews.com all day Monday. O'Reilly mentioned it, Sean Hannity went on to mention it, Sean Hannity and Newt Gingrich had a lovely conversation about what a racist this woman was after she had resigned. Fox & Friends went crazy the next morning. It doesn't matter that merely the Obama administration overreacted. It matters -- that's terrible that they did that -- but there was this pouncing on Shirley Sherrod without getting her reaction or her response that I think is unconscionable. She was easy to find.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by eb (July 25, 2010 6:17 pm ET)
      21  
      Ingraham: "My mistake was believing" the White House "had read the entire transcript."

      In other words, she missed the chance to pounce on Obama for wrongly firing Sherrod because she was busy pouncing on Obama for having "radical outlooks, a radical agenda and in this case a racist sentiment".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by hurricaneyankee52983 (July 26, 2010 5:20 pm ET)
        5  
        INGRAHAM: "My mistake is being on the air with no knowlige of what i'm talking about." There i corrected it for you LAURA.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (July 25, 2010 6:30 pm ET)
      12  
      Spelling Is Correct

      It would be hard to find two lying, fact-twisting, pull-it-from-your-assers who were more deserving of the label "Two Pees in a Pod" than this pair of hate-flinging low-lifes.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (July 25, 2010 9:49 pm ET)
      11  
      Want to hear something funny? for the past week Laura Ingraham has been trying to talk nice get some of the shrill out of her voice.Laura Ingraham has no natural ability to do either.She can't last long doing this.She is going to explode soon.Because was ordered to do so by Sugar Daddy (TRN).She may explode when she gets her walking papers.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by magnolialover (July 26, 2010 8:13 am ET)
      6  
      What happened to the cannard from republicans and conservatives of personal responsibility? Oh, I remember now. If they say that they made a mistake, the terrorists win.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eb (July 26, 2010 8:52 am ET)
        6  
        Yes the conservatives are always saying they are the repository of virtue, while libs/progressives are full of situational ethics, avoiding accountability and personal responsibility.

        In reality, again and again, we see the opposite. When conservatives fail, its always someone else's fault. Often their defense is that the other guy is doing it too. Conservatives also like to point out how partisan and ideologically driven liberals are when, again and again, we see conservative decision making based on ideology according to an ends justify the means strategy.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (July 26, 2010 9:15 am ET)
          5  
          Thing is, I see it time and again, when liberals screw up, they tend to acknowledge it, apologize (if required), and then try to fix what they screwed up.

          Being a conservative means never having to say you're sorry, or fix your mistakes.

          Heck, most of the conservatives are looking at a takeover in Congress in the Fall, and if they do, expect a return to Bush era economic policy as soon as possible.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by CrashGordon (July 26, 2010 9:11 am ET)
      6  
      I absolutely LOVE the setup angle. Let me see if I can get this straight. The White House hires Sherrod (even though she's only a mid-level employee for the USDA and usually well below the level of being a White House decision) because her life story contains a lesson in racism that can be misleadingly edited if she ever tells it in speech form. They then orchestrate a regional NAACP event and get Sherrod a speaking gig at this event. They then write the speech for her, making sure that she can deliver it in such a way that it can be easily edited to sound as if she's making the exact opposite point than she's actually making. Then all they have to do is bring the speech to the attention of Andrew Breitbart and voila!! The Perfect Setup! Obama really is an evil genius.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by bobklahn (July 26, 2010 10:30 am ET)
        6  
        Yep, you got it right. When we supported Obama we never realized how truly great an evil genius we were supporting. We expected Boris Badenov or Snidely Whiplash, instead we got a whole new catagory of evil genius. One who makes Lex Luthor look like a minor grifter.

        Now I do have one question, why did it take so long for Obama's evil genius to manifest itself?

        Oh, wait, he also stage managed the BP oil spill. Another brilliant ploy.

        Doesn't Limbaugh live in Florida? I'll bet Obama has sandhogs working under Limbaugh's house, hollowing out an artificial sinkhole to swallow Limbaugh whole. What a coup that will be.

        Though his true evil genius will be demonstrated if he can arrange for a hurricane to hit Florida. We will wait and see on that.

        Report Abuse
        • Author by srichardson (July 27, 2010 12:49 am ET)
             
          Come on guys, Obama's best evil act of genius was getting his mom to falsify his birth certificate and put an announcement in the Hawaiian newspaper so that he could become president when he grew up. Obama came out of the womb with this evil plan to overtake America and turn it into some evil socialist nation!
          Report Abuse
    • Author by txthinker (July 26, 2010 2:08 pm ET)
      1  
      The White House made me do it: Ingraham and Gingrich absolve themselves for attacking Sherrod
      So much for the GOP being "The Party of Personal Responsibility".....
      Report Abuse
    • Author by louee (July 26, 2010 2:13 pm ET)
      2  
      Ingraham is a total dirtbag. Gingrich is a lying sewer system. And these little weasel comments just prove the point more concretely. Where's any mention of the wrongdoing of Breitbart and Fox? You won't find it from these two creeps. They're perfectly fine with inciting racial hatred to smear the President regardless of the truth. And this is about the millionth example. Seriously I hate their guts.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by armendale (July 26, 2010 5:07 pm ET)
      3  
      Even when righties are caught red-handed peddling fiction - even that is Obama's fault.

      "Being a righty is never having to say you're sorry for being wrong."
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Timmee (July 26, 2010 11:16 pm ET)
      1  
      I hate to remind everyone, but if you JUST WATCH FOX, or listen to one of these pro liars, then this is perfectly reasonable. Obama's a racists and it just makes sense that it's his fault...whatever it is that happened.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wallyonek (July 27, 2010 3:46 am ET)
      1  
      Wow - these folks are dangerous.... Are the right really authentic in their attacks - Do they really believe what they are putting out. This is scary. But maybe these folks believe that there fear festering talk works politically. Anyhow many thanks to media matters for setting things straight
      W
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.