About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

O'Reilly falsely claims that Sherrod story marks "first time" he's had to retract a story

July 27, 2010 9:26 am ET — 21 Comments

On The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, Bill O'Reilly falsely claimed that his apology to Shirley Sherrod was the "first time in 13 years" he had to apologize or retract a story. In fact, Media Matters has documented several instances in which O'Reilly has apologized for or corrected a story that he got wrong.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

O'Reilly on Sherrod story: "First time in 13 years" he's had to apologize or retract a story

O'Reilly falsely claimed that the Sherrod story was "the first time in 13 years we've had to retract a story," and the "first time" he's "apologized." On The Tonight Show, Fox News' Bill O'Reilly told host Jay Leno that apologizing to Sherrod was "the first time in 13 years we've had to retract a story," and that it was the first time he apologized:

LENO: Do you find there's less fact-checking? I remember, it wasn't that long ago, I --

O'REILLY: No, no.

LENO: -- the swimmer, Michael Phelps.

O'REILLY: Yeah.

LENO: He -- I see this article, "Michael Phelps, $20,000 tax cheat," and they show his picture on the news. And I go, "I haven't heard anything about this." So we start writing --

O'REILLY: It's not so much fact-checking, it's just too much gossip.

LENO: Well, here's the thing. So we start writing jokes, and I go, you know, it doesn't sound right. And, three days later -- oh, wrong, some guy named Michael Phelps. It was the wrong guy. But it was on the Internet, it came up with a story --

O'REILLY: Right, right.

LENO: This happens all the time.

O'REILLY: It does, but it doesn't happen to me. This is the first time in 13 years -- it's true.

LENO: Is that the first time you've --

O'REILLY: Thirteen -- the first time in 13 years we've had to retract a story, and the problem was that it was all my fault. I couldn't blame anybody.

LENO: Right.

O'REILLY: I mean, I'm the writer of the show. I write the stuff. So I just didn't check it. I should have checked it. I will in the future.

LENO: Is that the first time you've apologized?

O'REILLY: Yeah, except for just being me.

LENO: Right, right.

In fact, O'Reilly has apologized or corrected a story on several occasions

O'Reilly apologized for falsely claiming "only Anderson Cooper on CNN covered the murder of Private Long." On the June 6, 2009, broadcast of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly apologized for falsely claiming that "only Anderson Cooper on CNN covered the murder of" Army Recruiter Pvt. William Long. As Media Matters noted, three days earlier O'Reilly had accused the network of ignoring the story outside of Cooper's show, when in fact, at least six other CNN shows covered the story at least 15 times prior to O'Reilly's claim. O'Reilly said of his claim:

O'REILLY: We have a correction -- a rare correction on The Factor. Earlier this week, I said that only Anderson Cooper on CNN covered the murder of Private Long in Arkansas. Well, today, a snide and surly guy on CNN pointed out that the story was covered more extensively by that network, and that is true. I was wrong. My apologies to CNN. I was talking about primetime, but I did not say that. So, I was wrong. As they say in third grade, "My bad."

O'Reilly apologized for running with Murtha misquote. On the June 29, 2006, edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly apologized for "pick[ing] up" a quote from a South Florida Sun-Sentinel article which incorrectly reported that Rep. John Murtha had claimed the "American presence in Iraq is more dangerous to world peace than nuclear threats from North Korea or Iran." On June 26, 2006, O'Reilly cited the Sun-Sentinel report to allege that Murtha's "kind of extreme thinking, based on little evidence, by the way, is putting all Americans in danger." After the Sun-Sentinel published its correction, O'Reilly stated on June 29 that "[t]he newspaper has apologized, and since we picked up the paper's quote, we should apologize, as well," adding: "I should have checked it out myself and called Murtha's office. Next time, we will do that."

O'Reilly apologized for using "lynching party" while discussing Michelle Obama. As Media Matters documented, during the February 19, 2008, edition of his nationally syndicated radio program, O'Reilly discussed Michelle Obama's assertion that "[f]or the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country" and said of those upset with her remarks: "I don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she really feels -- that America is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down." On the February 21, 2008, broadcast of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly apologized for his use of the phrase "lynching party," saying, "I'm sorry if my statement offended anybody. That, of course, was not the intention. Context is everything."

O'Reilly routinely makes false claims on his television show

Media Matters has documented hundreds of examples of O'Reilly making false claims on his television and radio shows. Some recent examples include:

O'Reilly falsely claimed New Black Panthers were "standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies." O'Reilly attacked the mainstream media for failing to cover the New Black Panthers case, which he described as "guys with batons standing in front of a polling place and saying they want to kill white babies." In fact, the hate speech to which he referred is from video produced prior to Election Day.

O'Reilly falsely claimed Houston, San Francisco are "sanctuary cities" that are breaking the law. On the July 19 edition of The O'Reilly Factor, O'Reilly falsely claimed that San Francisco and Houston are "sanctuary cities" that are violating federal law. In fact, O'Reilly has misconstrued the law's requirements, and the Bush administration's Justice Department concluded that Houston and San Francisco are not violating the applicable laws that do exist.

O'Reilly declared it was "fiction" that the stimulus created jobs. On July 13, O'Reilly declared it was "fiction" that the stimulus created jobs. In fact, as Media Matters has noted, the stimulus has been estimated by both the White House and independent analysts to have increased employment by about 2 million jobs relative to a baseline estimate of what jobs levels would have been without the stimulus.

O'Reilly falsely claims ICE official Hurtt "refused to enforce federal immigration law." On June 25, O'Reilly claimed that Obama "has appointed a sanctuary city supporter as a liaison" between the federal government and the states on the issue of illegal immigration. O'Reilly falsely claimed that Harold Hurtt "refused to enforce federal immigration law" while he served as Houston police chief. In fact, Houston is not a "sanctuary city" and was not one when Hurtt was police chief. Indeed, Houston cooperated with ICE when Hurtt was serving as police chief.

O'Reilly falsely claimed law was violated in Romanoff matter. On June 3, O'Reilly repeated the false claim that 18 U.S.C. § 600 was violated in the Andrew Romanoff controversy. In fact, legal and ethical experts have repudiated the claim that a crime was committed.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by IRONY 101 (July 27, 2010 9:36 am ET)
      6  
      With an ego as large as Billo's, and an employer who cares little or nothing about factual accuracy, he can say whatever the f**k he wants. Why do you think this guy is so arrogant...?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Bad News (July 27, 2010 10:02 am ET)
        2 4
        "An Employer Who Cares Little or Nothing about Factual Accuracy"
        Hmm, is that why they hired "Billo the Clown" because of his Fallacy?
        Billo will read my Poem today & the only thing he'll be able to Gleam from it is "Fallace"
        Bill O'Reilly, I bet he drinks his Water from a Chalice, as his Female employees feel his Malice.

        Speak truth to power.


        Mr. News
        Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (July 27, 2010 3:46 pm ET)
          1 5
          Your poem has nothing to do with the post you attached it to.

          You're just an attention hog who thinks his poems are clever - mostly, they aren't.

          It's rude to think that you should continue to behave this way.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Old_Benjamin (July 27, 2010 4:14 pm ET)
            1  
            Yeah!

            DD - tell us again how "lynching" must inculde a rope and how Shirley Sherrod is given to hyperbole.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (July 27, 2010 4:17 pm ET)
              1  
              "lynching" must inculde a rope"

              Sue actually said that?
              Report Abuse
              • Author by Old_Benjamin (July 27, 2010 4:21 pm ET)
                   
                Well to be (sorta) fair, I'm given to a bit of hyperbole myself from time to time. But from yesterday...
                Well, given the statements given by Sherrod over the past week, and the speech she gave, the evidence is clear that she is given to hyperbole, and that's why she classified what happened to Bobby Hall as a lynching. Most people wouldn't. There was no rope involved and there was not a mob of private citizens that went after this guy wholly outside of the justice system. In looking through most definitions of "lynching", a mob is part of that definition, and I wouldn't call a county sheriff and his two deputies "a mob".

                Now, it's not untrue, as The American Spectator journalist asserts.

                And it's not untrue simply because there's no rope involved, although that would stop most people from calling it a lynching. And when Sherrod used the term lynching, I expect the image most people would have gotten was the use of a rope and a tree.


                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (July 27, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
                    1
                  Wow. Just when you think she can't top herself, she tops herself.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by usp (July 27, 2010 8:12 pm ET)
                    2  
                    i kinda like the poetry. it's different. who knows? maybe we are helping s/he keep bad poetry off the street!
                    Report Abuse
      • Author by NiceguyEddie (July 27, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
        4  
        Why do you think this guy is so arrogant...?

        Umm... He's a conservative?

        Seriously. Can this question NOT apply to Limbaugh? Beck? Hannity? Coulter? Savage? Morris? Napolitano? Gingrich? Cheney? Bush? Boehner? McConnell? Palin? Bachmann? or any one of a thousand other of these fools?

        Arrognace goes with the ideology. And it has been every since Rush Limbaugh elevate being an @$$hole into an artform and a lucrative profession back in the early 1990's. ARROGANCE is what they substitute for FACTS and EVIDENCE.

        Becuase... Who's going to argue when you show THAT MUCH confidence, and THAT MUSH contempt for the other guy?

        --------------------------------------------------
        It's just how these fools THINK.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Sks1 (July 27, 2010 10:03 am ET)
      7  
      Billo the clown didnt really make a personal apology to Mrs Sherrod,,,he made a half hearted offering admitting he owed Mrs Sherrod an apology ,,yet he never looked into the camera and said he apologizes for judging her before all the facts came out...now to listen to him with his arrogance tell yet another lie about this was the 1st time he ever had to retract a story on air,,,well without having any facts to prove otherwise before me,,i give him benefit of the doubt, however im certain there are several instances where he should have not only retracted a story but also offered an apology for his inaccurate reporting
      Report Abuse
      • Author by donwelty (July 27, 2010 5:45 pm ET)
        2  
        O'Reilly apolgized for not doing his homework. He did not apologize for spreading false information, for harming her reputation, for possibly hurting her feelings, or for asking her to resign.

        It was halfhearted at best.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MidnightWriter (July 27, 2010 10:07 am ET)
      4  
      I know a full list of O'Reilly's false claims would take too much time to read, but no list of the corrections and apologies he's had to make would be complete without mentioning one Andrea May Mackris.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (July 27, 2010 10:52 am ET)
        5  
        What I love about the Andrea Mackris episode is that O'Reilly never denied any of Mackris' accusations. All O'Reilly ever said was that he said some "stupid things" which got him in trouble.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (July 27, 2010 5:19 pm ET)
        1  
        [http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2004/10/13/image649167g.jpg]

        That look on Mackris' face is priceless. I think that was when her lawyer was announcing the lawsuit in front of the press.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ForTheLoveOfEllipsis... (July 27, 2010 11:26 am ET)
      2  
      And while we're at it, Billo, have you ever corrected that little Bizarro-Worldy little Malmedy Massacre thingy?...
      Report Abuse
      • Author by ProgLib (July 27, 2010 5:11 pm ET)
        1  
        After his website transcript changed Malmedy to Normandy, O'Reilly probably forgot all about it, just like the rest of his lies.

        [http://i26.tinypic.com/33thzrk.jpg]
        Report Abuse
    • Author by ProgLib (July 27, 2010 5:04 pm ET)
      1  
      I've been a big fan of Jay Leno, but I want to know why he always brings O'Reilly on his show? He's also brought Rush and Palin, too. WTF, Jay?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by donwelty (July 27, 2010 5:38 pm ET)
      2  
      Bill O'Reilly claimed that American soldiers killed German prisoners of War at Malmady during World War II. Olbermann pointed out that at Malmady actually the Germans killed American prisoners of War.

      I don't recall hearing Bill O'Reilly correcting that one. It is an error as egregious as they come. Correct me if I'm wrong--I would like to know.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by btrue10280 (July 27, 2010 10:54 pm ET)
         
      What about those two peabody awards he claimed to have won. Has he ever apologized for that lie?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudObamasupporter (July 28, 2010 8:45 am ET)
      1  
      A few years ago a young man was rescued from a pedophile who kidnapped him. Media Matters covered Bill's reaction to the situation, he claimed the child liked his circumstances. He did not however apologize so you are right not to list it here. He said if he found he was wrong, that he would but surprise, surprise, he lied.

      http://mediamatters.org/research/200701170009

      http://mediamatters.org/research/200702060010

      If I thought he deserved the time of day before he said this about this young boy taken at the age of 12 from his life and family, afterwards, I knew better. This man is the scum I clean from my bathtub and is deserving of none of my thoughts or time, I am out.

      Thanks Media Matters for doing what needs to be done, trying to keep 'em honest!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Lizinbklyn (July 28, 2010 12:23 pm ET)
         
      June, 2009:

      O'REILLY: We have a correction -- a rare correction on The Factor. Earlier this week, I said that only Anderson Cooper on CNN covered the murder of Private Long in Arkansas. Well, today, a snide and surly guy on CNN pointed out that the story was covered more extensively by that network, and that is true. I was wrong. My apologies to CNN. I was talking about primetime, but I did not say that. So, I was wrong. As they say in third grade, "My bad."
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.