About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Right wing rushes to malign AZ judge -- whom Kyl called "highly competent, very well respected"

July 29, 2010 12:48 pm ET — 14 Comments

Following her decision to place an injunction on certain parts of Arizona's immigration law, right-wing media have attacked Judge Susan Bolton by suggesting she is a partisan who was "bought by" the Obama administration. However, Judge Bolton, a registered Independent, is widely respected, and has recently been praised by Arizona Republicans Gov. Jan Brewer and Sen. Jon Kyl -- who recommended her nomination to then-Pres. Bill Clinton in 2000.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Right-wing media attacks and attempts to discredit Judge Bolton

RedState: There is anger "about Federal Judge Susan Bolton's willingness to be bought by Obama and the Holder DoJ." In a July 28 RedState post, blogger David Poff wrote, "I know there is a great deal of anger and frustration out there... amongst the 70% of you who are racists that believe immigration laws should be enforced... about Federal Judge Susan Bolton's willingness to be bought by Obama and the Holder DoJ." Poff also referred to Bolton as "this so-called federal judge."

National Review: Bolton was "determined ... to follow the Obama administration's political strategy." In a July 28 National Review Online blog, Heather Mac Donald claimed Bolton's ruling "maintain[ed] the Obama administration's carefully cultivated fiction: that what concerns the White House regarding S.B. 1070 is its effect on legal, rather than illegal, aliens." Mac Donald also claimed that "so determined was Judge Bolton to follow the Obama administration's political strategy regarding the law's putative impact on legal immigrants that she exploited a drafting error in the law that Arizona had already acknowledged and repudiated."

Gingrich: "If anybody in Arizona is hurt during this intervening period, I think the judge in many ways is responsible." On the July 29 edition of Fox & Friends, Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich claimed Bolton "in many ways is responsible" if "anyone in Arizona gets hurt during this intervening period." From Fox & Friends:

CARLSON: You have the administration, speaker, but now you've got this Judge Bolton who has stepped in front of this moving train. And she has effectively stopped a lot of the parts of it from going into effect at midnight. Some of the parts in effect, other parts not. How much responsibility does she bear for what happens down there going forward? 

GINGRICH: She should bear a great deal of responsibility and if anybody in Arizona is hurt during this intervening period, I think that judge in many ways is responsible. The people of Arizona with a freely elected legislature and freely elected governor were trying to solve a problem the federal government had created and now you have a federal judge stepping in, blocking the people of Arizona in their own freely elected institutions from trying to protect themselves. It's fundamentally wrong.

Fox Nation: "Clinton-Appointed Judge Guts Ariz. Immigration Law." The Fox Nation suggested that Bolton was partisan, by posting a FoxNews.com article under the headline "Clinton-Appointed Judge Guts Ariz. Immigration Law." From The Fox Nation:

Fox Nation headline

Drudge suggests partisanship with headline "Clinton appointee made ruling." On July 29, Drudge linked to an AP article on Bolton's ruling with the headline "Clinton appointee made ruling..." From the Drudge Report:

Drudge headlines

But Arizona conservatives, including Gov. Brewer, have praised Judge Bolton

Gov. Brewer: Bolton is "so well informed" and has a "very, very good grasp of" the issues involved. On the July 22 edition of Fox News' On the Record with Greta van Susteren, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer said she was "very, very confident of Judge Bolton. She seems to have a very, very good grasp of the issues":

VAN SUSTEREN: As you listened to the argument from the lawyer representing the United States, did you begin to worry about whether or not that your statute would stand? 

BREWER: No. I feel very, very confident even more so now that we have been there and had the presentation. It was very well done and I'm very, very confident of Judge Bolton. She seems to have a very, very good grasp of the issues. I thought that it went very, very well. I feel very confident.

VAN SUSTEREN: Did the judge grill the lawyers on both sides? 

BREWER: She did. She asked them questions. And of course some of the testimony from the earlier morning testimony kind of bled through to the afternoon testimony so it didn't have to be repeated again. But yes she did. She asked questions and tried to get them to qualify some of the issues. She was so well informed and had such a great grasp of what she was dealing with that it just gave you a really good sense of confidence.

Kyl: "People should know that Judge Bolton is a highly competent, very well respected judge." On the July 28 edition of Fox News' America's Newsroom, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) called Bolton "highly competent" and "very well respected," adding, "however she rules on this, I'll certainly respect her decision." From America's Newsroom:

HEMMER: What's your expectation from this judge?

KYL: Well first of all, people should know that Judge Bolton is a highly competent, very well respected judge, and however she rules on this, I'll certainly respect her decision. ' 

My guess is that she will parse the law, that is to say, she will perhaps extract certain portions of it that she thinks might be problematic and might enjoin the operations of those portions calling for additional briefing from the parties, perhaps, but that the biggest part of the law, I don't think she will enjoin, and that's essentially the part that says if a police officer stops someone in the normal course of his responsibilities for like a traffic ticket, for example, and then has reasonable cause to believe after that stop, that the individual is not here in the country lawfully, he may - or he should further inquire into their status. ... It's my opinion she will not enjoin that portion of the law.

Bolton nominated by Clinton at the recommendation of Kyl. Bolton was nominated to the United States Disctrict Court by President Clinton on Kyl's recommendation. Kyl reportedly said during her confirmation hearing, "There is one person in our state who's a real expert on this in the judiciary, and that's Judge Bolton ... And because of her expertise and fairness, all of the contending interests from Arizona have been willing to place their concerns before her to be resolved."

Arizona Daily Star: Bolton is a "registered independent." In a July 21 article, the Arizona Daily Star reported that "Judge Susan Bolton is a registered independent in Maricopa County. She was appointed to the federal court on Oct. 20, 2000, as an independent. She was nominated by Democratic President Bill Clinton on the recommendation of Republican Sen. Jon Kyl." The article further notes:

The federal judge who will be ruling on whether to block Arizona's new immigration law from taking effect is known as a thorough, efficient, intelligent and fair jurist.

U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton has earned that reputation during nearly a decade on the federal bench in Arizona and 11 years before that as a Superior Court judge in Maricopa County.

"I don't think that either party could ask for a better judge," said Dave Cole a law professor at the Phoenix School of Law and former Maricopa County Superior Court judge. "She is very deliberative, very reflective, runs a very tight ship in the courtroom. Very detached, objective, good at applying the law."

[...]

The consensus among members of the legal community interviewed for this story is that she's the right person to have making such an important decision.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by terrapin53 (July 29, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
      8 1
      I am amazed that all these pundits, many who never went to college or flunked out of college know more about the law than these judges. Anytiime the right does not get their way, all they do is whine. That would be ok if they would serve cheese with their whine.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Illinoisian (July 30, 2010 10:17 pm ET)
           
        Don't act like the right has a corner on the whining market. The dems did plenty of that during the previous administration. You people were frustrated then and everyone else is frustrated now. I don't understand though, why the left is so anti-America in this debate. Does our country and its laws mean nothing to you? Do any of you people live in Arizona? Do you know what's going on there? I am afraid for the people of the border states. It's bad enough here in Illinois, but we've seen nothing like they have endured. This judge may be qualified, but that doesn't mean she can't make a mistake or follow "the party line." I'm very disappointed that our federal government spend our tax payer dollars on this. There were, what, seven other suits. We did not have to jump in and spend more money that we don't have.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (July 29, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
      2 1
      I am amazed that all these pundits, many who never went to college or flunked out of college know more about the law than these judges. Anytime the right does not get their way, all they do is whine. I would not mid as much if they would serve cheese with their whine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by terrapin53 (July 29, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
      2 1
      I am amazed that all these pundits, many who never went to college or flunked out of college know more about the law than these judges. Anytiime the right does not get their way, all they do is whine. That would be ok if they would serve cheese with their whine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dogbreath (July 29, 2010 1:00 pm ET)
      8 1
      Well, she obviously isn't compentent anymore. She is just an activist judge looking to score political points. ---- this message was brought to you by Wingnut Talking Points, LLC.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by eb (July 29, 2010 1:21 pm ET)
        6 1
        Why are they so surprised that a judge put this on hold? Wasn't this all about having the state of AZ take over immigration enforcement because the feds supposedly have been neglecting their duties.

        The twisted thing is that these right wing hyper-ventilators are always crying about how the progressives are attacking the constitution. Well, this was quite clearly a challenge aimed at federal responsibilities which are clearly written in the constitution. Otherwise why not direct efforts at strengthening more the federal enforcement?

        That federal effort, by the way, has been getting stronger ever year since W.

        When they have a pet issue or are frustrated, the conservative media celebrities expect it to be cakewalk to get their way. Its a childish media.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (July 29, 2010 1:51 pm ET)
      6 1
      RedState: There is anger "about Federal Judge Susan Bolton's willingness to be bought by Obama and the Holder DoJ."


      This is typical stupid commentary meant to sound as if it means something. Obviously there is a legal argument against the law. Even Napolitano who usually tells Fox what they want to hear was against it.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Oldphoto678 (July 29, 2010 2:01 pm ET)
      4 1
      I was just reading comment on one of the wingnut blogs. One of the sheep was crying a river about Bolton being an activist judge. then in the same breath said that 70% of Americans are in favor of 1070, and that any judge that went against the will of the people should be removed. Just goes to show how little some of these wingnuts respect the law and the constitution.
      The will of the people is determinded at the ballot box. Not in the courthouse. Any judge that conciders the will of the mob while making a legal decision should be removed. Not the other way round.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by indigo1968 (July 29, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
        2 1
        Isn't what you are describing what Jefferson called "mobocracy"?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by rikntx (July 29, 2010 3:09 pm ET)
      2 1
      And it gets better. Want to guess who released the following:
      It’s bad enough the Federal Government won’t secure our borders, but today’s ruling is an absolute outrage. Harry Reid and the Democrats in Washington have failed to secure America’s borders, refused to enforce federal laws, and neglected to address one of the most serious problems facing our country. This is an unacceptable failure of our federal government and the people of Nevada deserve better than a so-called leader in the Senate who won’t even acknowledge that illegal immigration is a problem here at home. Instead of waging a legal battle against Arizona, this current administration should instead secure the borders and allow the people of Arizona the right to no longer live in fear of criminals and drug traffickers. Illegal immigration burdens our economy, threatens our safety, and undermines the legitimate process by which millions of people became American citizens
      Report Abuse
      • Author by cugagcmu805031 (July 29, 2010 8:00 pm ET)
        2  
        I would say Angle, but instead I'll say Angle's ghostwriter.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Conchobhar (July 29, 2010 10:46 pm ET)
          4  
          I thought Newt was great, the way he blamed the judge for anyone who "might get hurt," just the way he nailed Glenn Beck for inciting lethal rage against Tides.

          Oh, he didn't? Never mind.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Illinoisian (July 30, 2010 10:18 pm ET)
         
      I think I have posted plenty of comments by now (or at least tried to post) Enough is enough already. This site is ridiculous.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by ptm (July 31, 2010 1:28 pm ET)
         
      More of the Gingrich half-truth and distortion structure; He falsely claimed Gov. Brewer is the "freely elected" governor of Arizona. The Governor was elected AZ Secretary of State and succeeded to the governor's office when Janet Napolitano was named Secretary of Homeland Security. Typical distortion by Newt.

      Report Abuse