About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Limbaugh: "I'm Not Here To Rip Into General Motors," But ...

July 30, 2010 5:12 pm ET — 6 Comments

In response to recent criticism from White House, Rush Limbaugh repeatedly claimed that he was "not here to rip into General Motors." Nonetheless, Rush launched into a rant about the Chevy Volt, saying that "putting four seats on top of a lawnmower ... is not innovation," and suggesting that GM was forced into making it by an "authoritarian-type regime" that is "dictating that cars be made that nobody wants." Limbaugh lambasted the electric car's battery for only getting 40 miles per charge and said that the Volt is not "evidence of progress" or "success."

Limbaugh also railed against the decision to bail out the automakers in the first place, claiming that it was made to prop up "a bunch of union jobs" because Obama "owed them." Rush also argued that the president was touting jobs in Detroit today in order to create the illusion that "the government saved something that capitalism broke." Rush further suggested that the real cause of the automakers' financial troubles was government mandated fuel efficiency standards.

Rush also took time to criticize the Democrats for a recent House vote on funding for 9-11 first responders, calling it "a trick." Limbaugh later warned that "there are gonna be tax increases next year for everything," which will lead to a "double-dip recession, guaranteed." Limbaugh rounded out his criticism of the Democrats by summing up what he thinks it means to be a Democrat in two words: "Screw you."

Highlights from today's show:

Limbaugh: House vote on 9/11 responders bill is "a trick"

Limbaugh blames CAFE standards for auto industry troubles

Limbaugh: We have an "authoritarian-type regime," "dictating that cars be made that nobody wants"

Limbaugh: "There are gonna be tax increases next year for everything," "double-dip recession, guaranteed"

Limbaugh on what it means to be a Democrat: "Screw you"

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by LonesomeinNE (July 30, 2010 7:15 pm ET)
      1  
      Once again Fatso hasn't said anything worthy of a response.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by rkcomments (August 01, 2010 4:01 pm ET)
           
        yes, just more vacuous talk from a fat, uneducated, three-time married, draft-dodging, drug-addict.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Tony Pablo (August 01, 2010 1:11 pm ET)
         
      Wouldn't it be more efficient for all of us to just listen to the Rush Limbaugh show rather than go to Media Matters for a run down of his talking points? Let's not give the man yet another platform for disseminating his lies and vitriol. We can all hear well enough what the radical right is saying, what we need is truth and an accurate response to the falsehoods which are being disseminated. To post the lies without providing the context of truth is only serving to aid in the dissemination of misinformation.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by rhoiberg2209 (August 02, 2010 3:30 am ET)
         
      Rush has a point. Why would I want to pay $41,000 for a car that can you can only drive 40 miles round trip. Then you have to use the "backup" engine, that will take you 340 miles. The concept sounds a little odd to me.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by dwbat (August 02, 2010 3:49 am ET)
         
      so is that why japanese automakers sales have been steadily increasing in the u.s. market?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by caecho (August 02, 2010 4:40 pm ET)
         
      No response for this maggot1
      Report Abuse