About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Right-wing media absurdly compare Michelle Obama to Marie Antoinette

August 05, 2010 11:21 am ET — 77 Comments

Right-wing media have repeatedly compared First Lady Michelle Obama to Marie Antoinette, the eighteenth century queen who was executed during the French Revolution.

"Pampered" Michelle Obama is a "modern-day Marie Antoinette" 

Tantaros: "Material girl Michelle Obama is a modern-day Marie Antoinette on a glitzy Spanish vacation." In an August 5 column in the New York Daily News, Andrea Tantaros claimed "Michelle Obama is a modern-day Marie Antoinette on a glitzy Spanish vacation." In the column, Tantaros criticized the First Lady, suggesting "while many of us are struggling, the First Lady is spending the next few days in a five-star hotel on the chic Costa del Sol in southern Spain with 40 of her 'closest friends.' "

Malkin: "Andrea Tantaros rightly dubs Mrs. O a 'modern-day Marie Antoinette.' " In a July 5 blog post, Michelle Malkin criticized Michelle Obama's "lavish Spanish adventure," and referred to Tantaros' column stating, "Andrea Tantaros rightly dubs Mrs. O a 'modern-day Marie Antoinette.' " Malkin added, "Like Mrs. O's old Chicago socialite pal Desiree Rogers liked to say before her profligate, negligent ways got her kicked out of the White House: Laissez les bon temps rouler."

Beck on state dinner: "I feel like I am watching King Louis and Marie Antoinette." On the May 20 edition of his radio show, Glenn Beck remarked that a  state dinner at the White House in honor of Mexican President Felipe Calderòn made him "feel like I am watching King Louis and Marie Antoinette." Beck said "we could be much more frugal" and that "there's no need for all of this extravagance." Beck then asked, "How are these people treated as the common man? This isn't the common man."

Beck: An outfit worn by Michelle Obama shows she's "out of touch," and like "Marie Antoinette." On the July 14 edition of his radio show, Beck highlighted the outfit worn by Michelle Obama on her visit to the Gulf coast in order to compare her to Antoinette. Beck claimed he'd "never been more embarrassed for the First Lady" and stated "this is the biggest outrage I think I've ever seen from a First Lady." Beck said that Obama was wearing "a white designer dress with black spotches -- splotches -- all over it." Beck then suggested "if that doesn't look like Marie Antoinette saying 'oh you know what I'm going to do? I'm going to relate to the problem. I'm going to have a designer dress that's all white but looks like it has oil spots all over it. Let them eat cake. I'm just like you, oh peasants!' "

Erickson: "How long before the Marie Antoinette comparisons start?" When asked by CNN's John King what he believed the "top three bullet points that are driving the day's conversation in and outside Washington" were on August 4, RedState.com editor and CNN contributor Erick Erickson replied that one would be that "Michelle Obama, her daughter, friends, and security take over 60 rooms at a hotel in Spain while Barack Obama celebrates his birthday home alone." Erickson then asked, "How long before the Marie Antoinette comparisons start?"

American Thinker invokes Antoinette's "let them eat cake" comment to criticize Obama's trip to Spain. On July 27, American Thinker's Ralph Alter claimed that the "pampered" Michelle Obama has taken "maximum advantage" of her "unlimited expense account as first lady." Alter opened his post by invoking Antoinette, stating: "When Marie Antoinette was told the peasants had no bread, her famous rejoinder was the suggestion to 'Let them eat cake.' " Alter also claimed that like Antoinette, "Barack and Michelle are living very large at the taxpayer's expense without so much as a second thought."

Marie Antoinette comparison based in part on Bo plane falsehood

Right-wing media use Bo plane falsehood to compare Michelle Obama to Marie Antoinette.  Tantaros and Alter based their comparisons of Michelle Obama to Marie Antoinette in part on the false claim that the Obama's dog flew on his own "separate aircraft to vacation with them in Maine."

The Obamas' dog flew to Maine with Obama support staff, not on his own separate plane. As PolitiFact.com noted, the claim that the Obamas' dog Bo flew on his own plane to Maine is "false." PolitiFact explains: "it's ridiculous to claim that [Bo] has his own airplane. He traveled on a government-owned plane with government staffers who didn't fit in the small Gulfstream G3 that the First Family had to take because of the physical limitations of the Trenton airport runway."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Porkeater (August 05, 2010 11:39 am ET)
      14 1
      I suppose they are also wishing the First Lady a similar fate ... ?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 11:44 am ET)
      18 1
      Phony outrage. All presidents and their wives travel like this and vacation like this and live like this. Trashing Michele Obama is just a stupid idea.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (August 05, 2010 12:32 pm ET)
        10 1
        True enough. And, the Obama's are fairly well off.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 12:38 pm ET)
          3 19
          It's flat out hypocrisy when you dump on something your political opponent, or their family does, but say nothing when your side does it. Or when you are so invested in keeping score (see Sue as an example of that in the other thread) that it just becomes hacks battling hacks.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (August 05, 2010 12:53 pm ET)
            18 3
            I'm not invested in keeping score.

            I'm righteously invested in stopping YOU, and people like you, from making false equivalency arguments, which is what you were doing.

            Now, I understand you don't like getting your dishonesty called out. You liked it a lot better before I got here, when you still had some credibility and respect. It's got to be frustrating, and you let us know that by showing us how teed off you get when I catch you. Too bad, so sad.

            Being a hypocrite is YOUR SIDE's flaw, for the most part. It's not a "both sides do it with equal vigor" kind of thing.

            That's not keeping score. That's calling for accountability.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 12:57 pm ET)
              4 20
              Thank you, again, for making my point about the counter-productiveness of partisan hacks, partisan hack.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by DellDolly (August 05, 2010 3:15 pm ET)
                13 1
                Noting that one side does something more than the other side by calling out someone who tries to HIDE that fact, is NOT keeping score. It's STOPPING you or anyone like you from dishonestly portraying the score!

                You're the known partisan hack and paid troll who tried a bogus false equivalency argument and got caught, and then couldn't restrain yourself from showing the resultant personal animus on this UNRELATED thread!
                Report Abuse
                • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 3:19 pm ET)
                  1 14
                  Because you are more invested in making sure the score and the tally are perfectly on point accurate than you are about admonishing it broadly, because you are a partisan hack. Pure and simple. Oh, and Sue, how am I a partisan hack? Which partisan party am I a hack too? Democrats? No. Republicans? No.

                  You scorekeep because that is what's important to you. It's as plain as your fraudulent phony hypocrisy that is on display everyday here.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 1:58 am ET)
                    5 1
                    Again, keeping YOU from dishonestly portraying the score is NOT equivalent to ME keeping score, doofus.

                    And please, note who's got credibility in this argument, and who doesn't. Here's a hint - it's NOT you.

                    No one believes that you aren't partisan for the right. You denying alignment with Republicans isn't worth the paper it's not written on.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (August 06, 2010 11:21 am ET)
                      1 6
                      When you get cornered you can't help but flail then lie, can you Sue?

                      Can you link to anything I have written here that is gushy and complimentary to Republicans? Because I can link to plenty where I have criticized and dumped on them pretty hard.

                      Are you up to the challenge?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 1:30 pm ET)
                        3 1
                        Of course you've asserted in the past that you're not aligned with Republicans, just as you did above. No one denied that you've done that in the past. But no one believes it, dummy.

                        You've repeatedly, almost exclusively, pushed the rightwing philosophy. And guess what? The Republicans are on the right.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by southerngal (August 06, 2010 1:45 pm ET)
                          1 6
                          So you made it up about me being aligned with Republicans and cannot link to one post where I either said I was one, or even complimented them?

                          Another lie, isn't it Sue?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 4:17 pm ET)
                            3 1
                            Nope, YOU'RE the one who got caught LYING about his links to Republicans, doofus.

                            And the day I have to accede to YOUR unreasonable demands hasn't arrived yet.

                            I made up NOTHING. You just don't want to admit it.

                            You're the lying paid troll here, dummy, and everyone knows it.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by southerngal (August 06, 2010 4:41 pm ET)
                              1 5
                              HAHAHA!! You can't even defend what you say because it's an outright lie. You made it up and you know it, we all know it.

                              It's what is expected from you, Sue. Name calling, insults, it's all there. Good job.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by DellDolly (August 07, 2010 11:33 pm ET)
                                3  
                                Nope, what you wrote is not true at all.

                                The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, doofus.

                                And calling a dummy a dummy isn't calling someone a name, just like it's not calling a convicted murderer a name when you call him a murderer, or when you call a person who supports the right a person who supports the right, just like I did to you.

                                You TRY to claim that you don't have a side, but that's a ridiculous claim. EVERYONE has a side. On many arguments, there are MULTIPLE sides, but YOU stupidly try to claim that you don't HAVE a side.

                                And you do so because you're trying to dishonestly portray yourself. And that behavior was uncovered by me about a year ago, and it really tees you off, and so you go after me all the time.

                                And everyone sees this, doofus.
                                Report Abuse
      • Author by dogbreath (August 05, 2010 2:16 pm ET)
        14 3
        Absolutely. But those other women were white and deserved to live that way.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 2:18 pm ET)
          4 17
          Whatever. Inject race into everything you see if it makes you feel better.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dogbreath (August 05, 2010 5:58 pm ET)
            10 1
            I don't inject race into everything. Your side does a fine job of doing that all by itself, righton. The simple fact is that Michelle Obama is a fine first lady. She's bright, articulate, classy and caring. Other first ladies have also met that criteria.

            I agree that is it a Democratic thing, I have also read some of the most appalling things on other websites regarding our first lady, none of which I am either willing or able to repeat here. The simple fact is that there is a racist strain running rampant in the Republican party and the sooner you realize that the sooner it can be dealt with.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 6:04 pm ET)
              1 14
              Well, I am not a Republican and have no vested interest in whatever agenda and political maneuverings they engage in. You will have to take it up with them.

              And I don't have a "side", as I have said repeatedly here. Many of you do, that is fine. I don't. I am 100% responsible for what I say, not someone who you think is on my "side".

              Are there racists in our midst? Absolutely. And are there people who hate the Obamas simply because they don't like black people? Sadly, yes. But unless I see a direct racial reference then I don't just assume there is one, when there is clearly a political motive in place, as there is here.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by catfish1968 (August 06, 2010 2:55 am ET)
                5 1
                so the word "right" in your moniker is a coincidence?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by cArn (August 06, 2010 3:07 am ET)
                    5
                  He definitely leans to the right, but that doesn't make him a shill for the Republicans.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by chrisgodawgs (August 06, 2010 8:40 am ET)
                    5  
                    If he "leans to the right" as you say and his name says, then he has a side. And until I see him say one single thing that is supportive of a left viewpoint, which I never have, then I will believe he has a side. Which having a side is fine. Just don't lie and say you don't have one. Hey Righton, say a compliment about a democrat. Betchu can't do it.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (August 06, 2010 11:19 am ET)
                      2 5
                      A Democrat? I don't have much good to say about either political party, for they are about retaining or regaining power and pandering to get votes. I don't have much respect for it. It is what it is and a necessary evil in politics I suppose, but I want no part of either. So I don't have much good to say about Republicans either.

                      You see, unlike many here it isn't either/or for me.

                      I do have respect for certain Democrats and Republicans when they act like statesmen and women, just not when they act like politicians.
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 4:20 pm ET)
                      5 1
                      This nonsense about how he supposedly doesn't have a side is just that - nonsense!

                      Everyone has a SIDE. On some arguments, there are MULTIPLE sides! RightON argues for the same SIDE that Republicans are on almost all issues. He can deny it, but it's undeniable!
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by cArn (August 06, 2010 6:41 pm ET)
                        5
                      You're conflating being a conservative\leaning to the right with being a Republican. That's what catfish (who I was responding) was also suggesting, and I was merely pointing out the error in that.

                      rightON has posted like enough on here to show while he is definitely a proponent of small government\lox taxes, he isn't a fan of the Republican Party and their collective stupidity either. Oh, and he supports marriage equality for gays, which is a "left viewpoint".
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by southerngal (August 06, 2010 6:48 pm ET)
                        1 6
                        Thank you cArn. People like DollySue can't imagine reflexively rubber stamping whatever Democrats do because that means she is good liberal, and takes her marching orders from strict down the line Democrats like MMfA, embedded party loyalists.

                        I loathe the Republican party, have said so many times.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by southerngal (August 06, 2010 6:49 pm ET)
                            4
                          can't imagine anything other than reflexively
                          Report Abuse
                        • Author by DellDolly (August 07, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
                          3 1
                          Yes, you've dishonestly portrayed yourself as loathing the Republican Party many times.

                          But it's always been a dishonest portrayal, based upon the things you've said in other venues.

                          And it used to be that you got away with that kind of a statement. But I held your feet to the fire, and you haven't been able to squirm away, and your true colors have shown through, and you can't hide your allegiances any more, despite your desires to do so.

                          Too bad, so sad.
                          Report Abuse
              • Author by pearlene_scott1602 (August 06, 2010 3:38 pm ET)
                8  
                But unless I see a direct racial reference then I don't just assume there is one, when there is clearly a political motive in place, as there is here.

                Is this direct enough for you?

                Rush: The media thinks "Mrs. Obama deserves" her vacation because of our "slave past"

                Rush: The Obamas "look at it as though they are owed" their "special" food and clothes "because of racial discrimination"
                Report Abuse
        • Author by magnolialover (August 05, 2010 2:46 pm ET)
          9 1
          Nah, I think it's more about being the wife of a democratic President.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 3:00 pm ET)
            2 15
            I believe that too. Just like DollySue below and her "uppity black woman" irrelevancy where this is concerned. There is no indication that this is racially motivated, but tons of indications that it's politically motivated.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by DellDolly (August 05, 2010 3:18 pm ET)
              11 1
              Yeah, right, there's NO evidence that there's any racism when we see them going after Obama. None. Anyone who thinks that there's been any evidence of racism is delusional!

              There's no evidence that they're calling her an uppity black woman - except that they're comparing her to Marie Antoinette and she's a black woman, that is.

              Report Abuse
              • Author by southerngal (August 05, 2010 3:20 pm ET)
                1 12
                Then show us the specific racial implications here Sue. Proof? Can you?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 1:59 am ET)
                  4 1
                  Other first ladies have done similar things and NOT gotten criticized. The ONLY difference between those other first ladies and her is the color of her skin, doofus.

                  This is NOT rocket science.
                  Report Abuse
    • Author by nerzog (August 05, 2010 11:48 am ET)
      13  
      King Louie and Marie Antoinette, eh?

      George and Laura Bush's Tea with the Queen

      And, in case anyone is wondering, this took place in June, 2008, well into the Financial Crisis.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by mk3872 (August 05, 2010 11:59 am ET)
      15  
      Tantaros:

      ... while many of us are struggling, the First Lady is spending the next few days in a five-star hotel ...


      Oh, I soooo love the way right wingers love to think of themselves as regular old folk.

      Yessss, I am sure Andrea Tantaros and her contracts with the Daily News and Fox have her struggling real BAD!
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (August 05, 2010 12:09 pm ET)
        20 2
        Yeah, because her security detail would LET her stay at some less-expensive hotel with less security and less ability to keep her safe! Duh.

        Last week Rush was trying to mock saving energy and he couldn't resist drawing Obama in to the baseless smear, so he said that the Secret Service would never let the President's transportation be the Chevy Volt.

        Like they'd let the President travel in ANY car other than a chauffeur driven bulletproof vehicle equipped with its own air supply and an encrypted phone? Like he doesn't understand why EVERY President gets that secure transportation? After all, haven't we had several Presidents shot and killed, and a couple of others shot at?

        Their denial of reality is either astonishingly ignorant, or it's a bogus ploy to enflame their base by asserting that this uppity black woman is taking what she isn't entitled to.

        Of course we know that it's not that they don't understand the value of protecting Michelle Obama, and of course they know that the only way to have any kind of a private life is to go massively overboard by renting out an entire floor of a hotel (look at what Hollywood celebs do to keep their lives private), and so it's clearly NOT excusable ignorance.

        It's a politically partisan ploy to enflame the people who listen to them. Dishonest to the core.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rcoplen (August 06, 2010 10:48 am ET)
          4  
          Also the fact that this president has received many more death threats than other presidents.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
            2 4
            Actually, that's an urban legend that's not true. Right before and immediately after his inauguration, he was getting more death threats than other Presidents, but the threat levels supposedly dropped off after that to 'normal' levels.
            Report Abuse
    • Author by blk-in-alabam (August 05, 2010 12:02 pm ET)
      17  
      Michelle Obama can afford to travel anywhere in the world she wants,in or out the White House.She has offered to pay part of the cost of this trip.This is something no other USA first lady has never been hounded to do........I have got tired calling this for what it is.Maybe republican party media will take this as a tip.When people have got tired of calling it for what it is,that means it is becoming a useless trick that will cost the one using it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by proudconservative (August 06, 2010 12:16 am ET)
          13
        milkinsweethomealabama,

        Guess you missed the Reagan years and their 'support' from the msm about their lifestyles.

        They were ripped for remodeling the whitehouse and getting private contributions to buy new china and you would have thought they were the most insensitive couple ever, let alone presidential couple. The msm refusal to get any thought about this opulence in such difficult times shows how they are invested in making this administration succeed. Which by the way, ain't working for Americans but is adored by leftys.

        [http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2009/news/090223/obamas.jpg]
        Report Abuse
        • Author by catfish1968 (August 06, 2010 2:56 am ET)
          9  
          No, Reagan was a union-busting poser president. I don't care what he did to the white house, he was a vile man.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by raddave43 (August 06, 2010 10:52 am ET)
          5  
          Funny, I don't remember the MSM ripping the Raygun's lifestyle, the tabloids did that. But, you probably consdier the Enquiror, Globe, and NY Post as respectible news sources.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 07, 2010 4:07 pm ET)
          2 1
          Well, your evidence is overwhelming, pc. Are you proud of your complete lack of evidence to support your contention yet again?
          Report Abuse
    • Author by soze169880 (August 05, 2010 12:15 pm ET)
      12  
      How can one be both Marie Antoinette and a vengeful, socialist liberation theologian? Is this like whatever allows Obama to be Hitler and Neville Chamberlain simultaneously?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by magnolialover (August 05, 2010 12:33 pm ET)
        10  
        Don't forget, he's also a Muslim, who is a member of a black separatist christian church.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by princeofwheels (August 05, 2010 12:21 pm ET)
      16  
      Tantaros and Malkin are just two ugly women who can only wish to have the class of the First Lady.

      It is even doubly troubling for these two creatures because, I'll whisper it, the First Lady is a black woman.

      Sorry Mickey and Tanny, you are Motel 6 material..get used to it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mary59 (August 05, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
        11  
        Now prince, be fair. They're sort of Shiloh Inn types. Affordable excellence, brought to you by Mark Hemstreet, Republican jerk who is despised by his neighbors in Wallowa county, Oregon.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by princeofwheels (August 05, 2010 2:24 pm ET)
          10  
          Sorry Mary,

          I meant the bars at Motel 6. Besides, I was being nice. Some people say that Tanny prefers truck stops but the truckers threw her out.

          I will join the Republican Party so that I can say these thing and will be considered 'nice'.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by eb (August 05, 2010 12:40 pm ET)
      12  
      Another irrelevant phony issue designed to rile up the conservative base.

      Report Abuse
    • Author by JnvReno (August 05, 2010 12:47 pm ET)
      10  
      Say, didn't Sarah Palin use campaign funds to buy extravagant clothing?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by marco21 (August 05, 2010 1:44 pm ET)
      11  
      Lord, these people are shameless hacks.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by scubcap647 (August 05, 2010 2:15 pm ET)
      10  
      This is nothing more than a show of their hate and contempt. Since when do you want the president of the United States to start "slumming"? Seriously. If he or the first lady ever showed up to a major gala and weren't presentable, these windbags would be complaining that they don't seem "presidential". It's as if no matter what the president or his family does, it will never be good enough for these right wing idiots.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by txthinker (August 05, 2010 2:41 pm ET)
      10  
      Right-wing media absurdly compare Michelle Obama to Marie Antoinette
      There is no comparison.

      When told that the people had no bread, Marie Antoinette said "Let them eat cake."

      Cake does not fit in with Michelle Obama's anti-obesity program....

      :-)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by goonhee9633 (August 05, 2010 8:54 pm ET)
        3  
        Even the above quote attributed to Marie Antoinette is of extremely questionable accuracy. We had an exhibit on her at one of our fine museums a while back and I ended up buying a history book on the French Revolution that was very enlightening. This creep Tantaros is an opportunistic, lying, Beck, Levin, Rush wannabe. I saw her on C-span giving a speech to some conservative college students (frightening), and she all but admitted that she was nothing more than a s!!t disturber. She really doesn't care what she says, it's all a means to an end (more cash in her pocket), just like with all these right wing pundits.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by draftedin68 (August 05, 2010 3:27 pm ET)
      9 3
      Handy-Dandy Secret Bigot Decoder Ring

      Next time you read, see and/or hear B.S. from foaming-at-the-mouth idiots like those quoted above, just let your mind hear a crowd of bigots screaming:

      "NI66ER! NI66ER! NI66ER! NI66ER! NI66ER!..."

      'Cause that's exactly what they're thinking.

      Report Abuse
      • Author by proudconservative (August 06, 2010 12:02 am ET)
        1 14
        stuckin68,

        Nice try, but the racist ploy is losing more steam than the summer of recovery.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by draftedin68 (August 06, 2010 10:59 am ET)
          7 1
          I must say that you don't have much to proud about.

          The vast majority of conservatives in Congress today are acting about as un-American as is possible.

          Working together to help rebuild what was left to rot by the Dick-n-Duhhbya Show would be a sign of true patriotism.

          Just saying "No, no, no!" is not.

          Report Abuse
    • Author by cugagcmu805031 (August 05, 2010 6:13 pm ET)
      9 3
      I thought that some on the right always defended the rich, even at the expense of themselves.

      Oh, Michelle Obama is rich, but she's also African American, and America's First Lady.

      Well, she shares at least 2 of these 3 characteristics with Laura Bush, so it must be the other one that's causing these attacks.

      Right. Got it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 2:01 am ET)
        4 1
        You nailed it, as usual. Your life experience has taught you well.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by donaldmaddog5642 (August 05, 2010 10:35 pm ET)
      5  
      Just another example of where the right wingers are leading us. Right down the hole of swill where they are the most comfortable. Their interest is not in our country, but with their party, the one that is completely at odds with the rest of us. Nothing ever surprises me or shocks me any more. But, I do feel ashamed.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (August 05, 2010 11:35 pm ET)
      1 13
      Gee, when Nancy Reagan solicited contributions to purchase new china and renovate the whitehouse during a recession, she was called Marie Antoinette.

      Now, during a recession, err excuse me, during the summer of recovery, the mrs. trapes off to a foreign country with a bunch load of friends and security, at our expense and that doesn't deserve scrutiny? If you're going to waste millions, at least do it in this country to move along that 'summer of recovery'!

      We now can see why she's finally proud to be an American! (in a Spanish resort on our dime!) Ain't America grand!
      [http://edition.cnn.com/video/world/2010/08/03/goodman.obamas.spain.cnn.576x324.jpg]

      Report Abuse
      • Author by MickD (August 06, 2010 8:57 am ET)
        5  
        Where is your sources for Nancy R. being called Marie Antoinette?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (August 06, 2010 10:45 am ET)
        4  
        I lived through the 80s and I don't remember a time when Nancy Raygun was called Marie Antoinette, if it was, it wasn't by the MSM, but probably the tabloids. But, that is one of the problems now, tabloids are considered news sources, just take the NY Post for example. But, even if she had been called Marie Antoinette, does it make it right to do it to Michelle Obama? Haven't you heard that two wrongs don't make a right?
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 07, 2010 4:09 pm ET)
        1  
        Once again, are you proud of your complete lack of evidence to support your contentions? Do you really believe because you say something, it is true? Are you Sean Hannity?
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (August 06, 2010 8:59 am ET)
      2  
      What ever happened to the pride of Americans lifting themselves up by their bootstraps and enjoying the fruits of their success. Michelle Obama was the daughter of working class African American parents on the South side of Chicago. In American terms, you can't uplift yourself more than to come from there to get to here. Are we not proud of that for our first lady?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by time to fight back (August 06, 2010 9:03 am ET)
      6 4
      Last time I checked, Michelle Obama never killed anyone while driving drunk like that "classy"Laura Bush.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Ruby (August 06, 2010 9:25 am ET)
        6 6
        Wow. That is so disgusting for you to say. For one thing, Laura Bush wasn't drunk when she got in that accident. It was her fault, but she wasn't intoxicated. And I'm sure she has suffered tremendously because of that.

        Laura Bush is an incredibly graceful, classy, and intelligent woman. She was an awesome first lady. She did great work promoting education and literacy, breast cancer research, and AIDS prevention in Africa. Michelle Obama certainly had some big shoes to fill and so far, I think she's been doing an amazing job. We've been lucky to have some wonderful first ladies in recent history--they all deserve our respect.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (August 06, 2010 10:48 am ET)
        3  
        Three wrongs don't make a right either.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 1:37 pm ET)
        4 2
        This is a horrible thing to say. Please don't say it again here. It's wrong in about 6 ways.

        Attacking Laura Bush inappropriately after Michelle Obama is attacked inappropriately is even MORE offensive than doing it on its own! Why don't you see this?

        There's no evidence that Laura Bush was drunk.

        The "classy" comment was uncalled for.

        There's no evidence that the accident was anything other than an accident.

        Two wrongs don't make a right.

        Laura Bush's accident from 40 years ago is not comparable to this event.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by mikehuck1976 (August 07, 2010 4:10 pm ET)
        3  
        Laura Bush killed someone in an accident. She is not a murderer. She was a young woman who made a mistake while driving and we have no proof that she was intoxicated at the time. I am sure she still feels great amounts of regret for her mistake. It is anything but "classy" to attack her for such.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (August 06, 2010 4:24 pm ET)
      5  
      Hmm, and guess what?

      Michelle Obama is paying for the extra rooms herself.

      The Secret Service is having to staff a few more people, and the cost is a little more to protect her overseas then they have to do when she's sitting in the private living quarters at the White House, but that's the price we pay for ANY member of the President's family, and it's a price we shouldn't quibble about - they shouldn't be required to stay in their home all the time.

      She gets to go on vacation, and when she does, she has to travel in a secure way as the wife and child of the President of the USA. There's nothing wrong with her taking a vacation.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.