Union busting: Right-wing media relentlessly attack worker representation
Media conservatives have waged a relentless war against labor unions, blaming them for a wide variety of problems and smearing them as "communists" and "thugs," among other attacks. However, experts have credited unions for establishing many of the "most fundamental and valued features of today's society" and "paving the road to the middle class for many millions of working families."
The blame game: Conservative media try to pin problems on unions
Beck says unions have "raped" police and fire fighters. On the August 4 edition of his radio program, Glenn Beck said of unions: "Look what they've done to the police and firemen. They've raped these guys. Along with politicians. Along with politicians -- raped them. The bravest among us." Beck went on to ask, "What, do you think the politicians are not in bed with the unions?"
Beck blames unions for woes of local governments and industries. On the February 25 edition of The Glenn Beck Program, Beck blamed unions for the financial woes of local governments, the auto industry, airlines, schools, the steel industry, and the textile industry. He continued: "Mr. President, until you get the unions out of this business, I don't think we have anything to talk about."
Carlson blames cost of living in NYC on "union pensions" and "raising taxes" for "schools." On the August 5 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, co-host Gretchen Carlson asserted that the cost of living in New York City, California, and Honolulu is "so expensive" "because of union pensions; because of raising costs for other things; for raising taxes along the way for schools." Carlson concluded: "If you go back in history and look at who incorporated a lot of that, maybe the blame comes right back to the same party. Or maybe it doesn't."
Root: "Unions destroy capitalism and free enterprise." On the May 27, 2009, edition of Fox News' Glenn Beck, guest Wayne Allyn Root stated that a "point we all agree on" is that "unions destroy capitalism and free enterprise." As examples, Root cited the public school system, the auto industry, and the steel industry. Beck pushed back slightly, stating that he's "against unions, but not all unions" and explaining that "the way to success is to be a decent person, treat other people with dignity, give them a good fair living wage because if you're good to your people they're going to make a better product, everybody wins."
Bernard: "[A] lot of labor unions are what holds America back and keeps us from being as good as we can be." On the August 19, 2009, edition of MSNBC's Morning Meeting, Independent Women's Forum CEO Michelle Bernard stated:
The labor unions right now simply exist for one reason: To self-perpetuate, receiving union dues, and having political influence. I think it's absolutely amazing to watch that clip from The Rachel Maddow Show last night where this guy is, he's saying to President Obama, "I'm strong arming you, buddy."
And my answer to this would be they are showing themselves to be as ridiculous as many members of the American public think they are. What happened to pragmatism, what happened to competition, and what actually happened to winning? Maybe it would be great for the Democratic Party to lose the support of labor unions because quite honestly, a lot of labor unions are what holds America back and keeps us from being as good as we can be.
Conservatives smear unions as violent "thugs"
Limbaugh accuses unions of resorting to violence. On the May 18, 2009, broadcast of his radio show, Rush Limbaugh attempted to smear unions as violent, declaring that the Employee Free Choice Act should be titled "The Union Brass Knuckles Busting On Your Knees Act."
Beck warns of "possible super-union" of "out-and-out thugs" that will have "extraordinary power." On the April 14 edition of his radio show, Beck warned listeners of "a possible super-union coming" with "extraordinary power." He added: "And they're thugs. Out-and-out thugs. Not the members, the unions."
Beck says violence is a "self-fulfilling prophecy" of labor unions. During the May 3 edition of his Fox News show, Beck said, "The unions are in bed with Washington and special interests and they are not in your or this nation's best interest anymore. They are following the playbooks from Europe." Beck went on to spell out the "playbooks from Europe," concluding that the process ends with "violence. ... This is a self-fulfilling prophecy."
Beck suggests unions are prone to violence. On the April 12 broadcast of his radio show, suggesting that unions are prone to violence, Beck asked of New Jersey Governor Chris Christie: "How long does that guy live? Seriously, how long does that guy survive? He's in New Jersey. He's got to break up the union pensions." Beck further said, "If I do my job and I don't get paid, I'm angry too."
Trace Gallagher: "With the 1930s came ... the labor movement -- organization by way of strikes, votes, violence." During the January 15, 2008, edition of The Fox Report with Shepard Smith, in a segment discussing Michigan history and the issues pertinent to voters there, chief correspondent Trace Gallagher asserted: "With the 1930s came men like Jimmy Hoffa and the labor movement -- organization by way of strikes, votes, violence." However, Gallagher did not mention the positive effects of the 1930s labor movement for workers in Michigan, which included banning "oppressive child labor" and federal laws "which strengthened unions' rights to organize and negotiate with employers."
Beck uses blatant distortions to smear SEIU as violent organization of "thugs." During the November 16, 2009, edition of his Fox News program, Beck fired off a series of attacks to claim that SEIU members are "thugs" who "beat down" opponents and command elected officials. In fact, Beck's claims were nothing more than blatant distortions used to smear the SEIU, its former president Andy Stern, and President Obama. These distortions included: A quote falsely attributed to Rep. Michael Michaud (D-ME) that suggested Michaud was "bribe[d]" or "scare[d]" by Obama and SEIU; falsely smearing Stern as a communist because he said, "Workers of the world, unite;" and an absurd claim that "even the Boy Scouts aren't safe from SEIU's thuggery."
Beck pushes Obama "civilian army" conspiracy theory: "The unions are his enforcers." On the April 12 edition of The Glenn Beck Program, Beck told listeners, "People say, 'Oh, Barack Obama's building a civilian defense force -- a civilian army.' He has one. It's called the unions. The unions are his enforcers."
Cavuto tells union spokesman: "You politely do your Tony Soprano thing, albeit in your little sweater vest there." During the January 11 edition of Fox News' Your World with Neil Cavuto, Stewart Acuff of the Utility Workers Union of America appeared to discuss union leader opposition to a tax on health care plans backed by President Obama. Cavuto told Acuff: "You politely do your Tony Soprano thing, albeit in your little sweater vest there, 'cause you're such a decent guy, but you're saying 'Mr. President, may I remind you that you are sitting in this room because of us.' Which is a very nice way of saying, 'Tread slowly, big guy.' "
Breitbart fabricates smear that SEIU's Stern is "sending SEIU goons" to "beat up innocent Americans." In November 8, 2009, comments posted on his Twitter account, Andrew Breitbart accused Service Employees International Union president Andy Stern of "sending SEIU goons" to "beat up innocent Americans." In fact, the article to which Breitbart linked offered no evidence to support the claim that Stern was involved in violence at a local SEIU office in Sacramento, and it reported comments from local SEIU leaders that disputed the purported victim's account of the incident.
Beck asserts union "members" don't bother him, just "Leadership & Thugs." In a Twitter post, Beck wrote:

Limbaugh invokes Tony Soprano "with a lead pipe" to describe the EFCA: On the March 10, 2009, broadcast of The Rush Limbaugh Show, Limbaugh said of the Employee Free Choice Act, "After this legislation passes, one day Tony Soprano will walk in with a lead pipe and he will start beating people upside the head to vote to unionize because you cannot vote in private."
Right-wing media attack unions as "freeloaders," "communists," terrorists
Limbaugh says public-sector union employees are "freeloaders" and "leftist, socialist, neo-communist." On the April 22 edition of his radio program, Limbaugh asserted that public-sector union employees are "freeloaders" who "live off taxes." Limbaugh went on to decry these public-sector union employees as "leftist, socialist, neo-communist."
Beck and crew state that labor unions are assumed to be subversive. On the February 12 broadcast of his radio show, while discussing South Carolina's "Subversive Activities Registration Act," Beck asked, "Why are [labor unions] exempt?" Co-host Pat Gray responded: "It's already assumed they are subversive."
Limbaugh says "government union" leaders "essentially are communists." On the March 4 edition of his radio program, Limbaugh said, "The union heads -- the leaders of these unions -- essentially are communists." He added: "I'm talking about government union people. I'm not talking about the UAW and Teamsters -- although they might be. But I'm talking about unions that exist in the federal government."
Kristol: "Thank God most of the workforce isn't unionized." On the October 18, 2009, edition of Fox Broadcasting Co.'s Fox News Sunday, while defending remarks made by Rush Limbaugh, The Weekly Standard's Bill Kristol declared: "Thank God most of the workforce isn't unionized."
Limbaugh: "If you want to clean up the schools, get rid of the unions." On the October 19, 2009, broadcast of his radio show, Limbaugh said, "Until we get rid of the unions, we're not going to have any change in public schools." Limbaugh continued: "If you want to clean up the schools, get rid of the unions."
Beck compares the SEIU to al Qaeda: The leaders get "the youth" to do their dirty work. On the August 2 edition of his radio program, Beck called members of the SEIU "burnout, loser hippies." Beck then compared the SEIU to al Qaeda, saying: "You'll notice that people in al Qaeda, the leaders never blow themselves up. They just get the youth to do it." He went on: "Well here you have SEIU and SDS in bed in California, or I mean in Arizona. Here you have these grand leaders ... that, you know, they did their tour of duty. Now it's the young. And they'll reap all of the benefits."
Dobbs claims that half of Culinary Workers Union "are illegal aliens." On the January 16, 2008, edition of CNN's Lou Dobbs Tonight, host Lou Dobbs claimed: "[I]n point of fact, as many as half of the [Culinary Workers] union's members are illegal aliens." Near the end of the segment, Dobbs again referred to the "Culinary Workers Union, with just about half of its membership assumed to be illegal aliens." In fact, the Associated Press reported that, according to the Union's then-political director, "about half" of the union's members are "immigrants."
Experts credit unions for many "valued features of today's society," and greatly expanding the middle class
UC Berkeley Professor Shaiken: Labor movement "pav[ed] the road to the middle class for many millions of working families." In a June 2004 report, University of California-Berkeley Professor Harley Shaiken wrote that after World War II, "the labor movement forged the link between economic growth and rising wages," helping improve working conditions for both union workers and nonunion workers. From The High Road to a Competitive Economy: A Labor Law Strategy:
In postwar America the labor movement forged the link between economic growth and rising wages, paving the road to the middle class for many millions of working families. Unions did benefit their members, but union wage and benefit gains coursed their way through the economy aiding those who did not belong as well. The result was a more vibrant economy in which strong consumer-led growth led to a virtuous circle of prosperity and jobs. At the lower end of the pay scale, unions have been particularly critical in winning decent compensation for low-skilled workers who often have had few opportunities and less hope.
Author Philip Dine: "Unions have had a lead role in establishing many of the most fundamental and valued features of today's society." In his 2008 book State of the Unions: How Labor Can Strengthen the Middle Class, Improve Our Economy, and Regain Political Influence, journalist and author Philip M. Dine wrote:
Unions have had a lead role in establishing many of the most fundamental and valued features of today's society. The eight-hour workday, five-day workweek, paid vacations, retirement and health-care benefits, safety regulations, bans on sweatshops or child labor, protections against employment discrimination, and other workplace advances now taken for granted were the result of struggles -- invariably protracted, often bloody, and sometimes even deadly -- by workers and their unions.
Labor has also played an integral part in the expansion of the middle class, a phenomenon that helped define America and that has been key to assuring its political and social stability.
Nobel laureate Krugman links "strong union movement" to "strong middle class. In a December 2007 New York Times column, Nobel prize-winning economist Paul Krugman wrote that America's "strong middle class" and "strong union movement" were "connected":
Once upon a time, back when America had a strong middle class, it also had a strong union movement.
These two facts were connected. Unions negotiated good wages and benefits for their workers, gains that often ended up being matched even by nonunion employers. They also provided an important counterbalance to the political influence of corporations and the economic elite.

















I remember when MSNBC's Dylan Ratigan held his program at one of the AFL-CIO's protest rallies... the people were perfectly peaceful and normal, contrary to the way the conservatives and wing nuts want to paint them as.
It's all about money and greed. And you can't really turn that statement back on organized labor, because management already HAS all the money. GREED is wanting more when you already have the most, not wanting you fair share when you've worked to make someone else rich.
And without those healthy wages being paid to the unwashed masses, you can't sustain demand! Basically, any company owner wants to pay HIS GUYS nothing, but hopes that EVERYONE ELSE pays their guys well. (So he has a market to sell to.) But that doesn't work - because EVERYONE thinks that way! And given free reign, no one, opther than the owers would have any decent income. (And even THEN they couldn't sustain it!)
Unions are the only way the wealth gets distributed evenly enough for our economy to keep working. Otherwise the top 2% grab all the money, but then can't sell anything and wonder why there's no more growth!
----------------------------------------------------
Their greed makes them shortsighted.
Here's a nice little 10 minute animation critiquing the system that enables this worker exploitation garbage.
Huh? That is the most ridiculous thing I have ever read. Obviously you know nothing about running a business or employing quality people. Think about what you wrote. So you are saying that I want to pay my guys nothing but I hope that everyone other employer pays his guys a lot more? Great. I will really have some happy satisfied employees won't I? If I thought that way I would be out of employees and out of business in one day.
Wow.
No offense, but that's very naive thinking and completely ignores the history of labor movements in this country.
You're not serious.
Companies also realize that hiring and keeping good employees is very valuable to the well being of their company. It's a fact, unskilled labor jobs will never demand huge salaries because there is more competition for those jobs. So, it is incumbent upon each of us to do what we can to make ourselves the most employable we can be. That means staying in school, working to get the best grades possible, staying out of trouble, and being more "attractive" to an employer than someone else.
Nobody is owed a job, or a salary.
RO
Then he posts this...
Looks like the liar is at it again. He blames poor folks, in this case the working poor in menial jobs, for their situation after he has stated he doesn't do that!
Is the countdown to WalMart's demise still on?
Now that is unattractive.
Go ahead, call me a racist again and then run like a baby.
Run like a baby? You get more hysterically emotional as this rolls along. It's quite revelaing.
When you state that the obstacles to bettering oneself are centred on...
What conclusion would one make about a poor person that hasn't bettered themselves based on your criteria? Seems it would be resonable to assume that person is lazy. See? Oh, I know, you will claim you don't and then call me more names. Cause that's what Mr Manly Man does.
And you really seem to be hung up on the non-statement that you are a racist. Why is that?
So today you try a new tactic, saying I don't like "brown people", and then deny you called me a racist. Duh. If you don't think you look like a little child on that one, think again.
I say exactly what is on my mind and exactly what I mean. If you are not capable of taking my opinions on in that simple direct format, and feel some victory after you try and tell me what I meant, you go ahead. I won't stand in the way of making you feel better about yourself.
I just find you rather funny today.
Another demonstrable lie.
This is what I posted (again)
Nothing about you being a racist or disliking "brown people". Only that you blamed them. So, who's "twisting my words to fit the argument".
If this is too hard for you, I understand. I can tell because sometimes when a simple person can't grasp more complex ideas they get angry and lash out.
So blaming "brown people" is not disliking them or having any racial animosity towards them?
Why then did you change my words, illegal immigrants, to "brown people"?
I stand by what I just wrote above.
I find that you folks that love to rail against "illegal immigrants" use that term when referring to latin american undocumented workers/immigrants. So I just switched it up.
Anyway, I see that I have allowed you enough distracting posts around the non-allegation of you being a racist. I'm sure that made you happy in that you no longer had to defend your assertion that WalMart is on the verge of handing out big raises because they are about to go under due to their poor labour relations.
Buh bye troll. See you at your next stupid post.
"You can never seem to intelligently argue your point without twisting my words to fit the argument with me you'd like to have, that is the rub, and you know it" - Me, earlier.
Lol, god was I right about you.
Buh bye now.
And I still don't see those WalMart is about to hand out...
The point is not literally just that you want your ocmpetition to pay more than you do. That's a very narrow, literal interpretation of what I wrote. Legitimate, perhaps, but not what I meant. (ANd I think most everyone understands it as I intended.)
The point is that you want to pay as little as possible, and let someone else (or everyone else) pick up the slack, so that we don't kill demmand for our produtc or seyvrice.
A rational person realizes taht we can't ALL pay slave wages, or no one will be able to sell anything. But the owners themselves seek to pay as little as possible to increase THEIR OWN profits.
You recognize that you benefit from lots of people having healthy, disposable income - you just don't want it coming from YOUR payroll.
Basically: Let the other guy over pay HIS lazy bums, and I'll benefit without haveing to do the same.
Unfortunately (for the worker) EVERYONES thinks this way. So without Unions, NO ONE gets more than the lowest wage possible to keep them from quitting.
-------------------------------------
Labor's only negotiating power in their numbers. Hence their need to organize.
Do you think employers will pay their employees fair wages out of the goodness of their heart?
It isn't out of the "goodness of their hearts". Your premise is stupid as is your question.
Fine, you don't have to answer my question.
And that's why your question is irrelevant.
See the difference?
And as for losing all your employees? You really needn't worry about the other guy scooping them all up, because you can rest assured that he thinks the same way you do.
-----------------------------------------
Which is why we need unions.
Never has the chasm been so great between the wages of the average worker and CEO wages. In 1980 the ratio was 42:1, in 2000 it was 531:1, 364:1 in 2006...and they have the nerve to complain about unions?
"Emerging Markets" is the republicants new meme. Emerging Markets is nothing but a euphamism for "Cheap Labor."
Meanwhile the financial sector is sitting on $1.7 trillion dollars because they are too "scared" to invest here, while America is still teetering on the brink? It's a load of hogwash and poppycock.
Time for unions to start recruiting.
Get knee jerk conservative class warfare out of here. If you think drumming up enmity for public employees and their livelihood isn't pitting one class against another- private against public- then you're simply dishonest.
But you with your head in the sand with your hand out looking for money from somebody else. How pathetic. Grow up.
We are all affected and brought down by bad business practices. We are all brought down. We don't keep quiet when a company pollutes and low wages are a societal pollutant. We have a responsibility to act up for the good of working people and their families.
It's every bit our obligation to speak our minds about cheap labor and to hold business owners accountable for the people who make them rich as it is to hold politicians accountable for their policy decisions.
It's the simple truth of living in an open democracy. Sorry you don't like it. Maybe you should go live in a fascist country where dissent is crushed, wealth is strictly controlled and labor keeps their mouth shut?
If you can't see that, then you don't want to.
It is none of your business to stick your nose into somebody elses salary structure.
So Wal Mart is about to go out of business?
So WalMart employees are not to be respected because they just bring down the curve for everyone else? And WalMart is a sweatshop?
Have you noticed what they do? The decimating of local businesses so there are very few or no other retail jobs in an area, so if that's your line of work, you have no choice but to work for crap wages.
But I am glad to hear that according to you, Wal Mart is about to run out of their pool of potential employees and will be forced to raise their wages and/or benefits. Or they will fail.
I said the same thing in my reply to you.
And your constant victim whining regarding this or that is tiring. My god, don't you get sick of it?
Oh I see, your lack of understanding of the english language coupled with your inability to realize your posts are there for all to see led us to this point.
So I'll do this...
And then I point out WalMart, which has been engaging in these types of business practices and is flourishing, you come back with...
So now you have changed the argument from attracting better employees through better wages or they will go out of business to eventually no one will work there because of crap wages and then WalMart will go out of business.
And again, you do realize WalMart is quite successful with their business model and does not appear to be in any peril because of it?
My victim whining? No that would be you when called out on your stupidity. You know like further down thread where you blame the brown folks for depressing wages (you call them illegal immigrants).
And you supposedly are concerned with low wages for people in this country after such a staggeringly stupid assertion that they don't. You are a phony.
Of course not. I just don't think they are the sole reason as your post indicated. There are citizens that take lower wage jobs when that's all that's available. I would however, put the majority of the blame on falling wages on the employers hiring undocumented workers and/or paying low wages to citizens. But that's probably way to nuanced to a dolt such as yourself.
And I'm a moron? This from the guy who is predicting the imminent demise of WalMart due to their low wage business model. You must be proud!
"So you don't think illegal immigrants depress wages for American citizens? Is that your position?" - me, in response.
"Of course not" - you, now.
And you wonder why your dishonesty trumps any reasonable discussion you and I can have.
This is why.
I prefer to discuss and debate people with integrity who don't change their opinions every 10 minutes. Go away.
You then ask me if I don't agree with that assertion. I state I don't and explain why.
I'd ask how that is inconsistant, but I'm a bit frightened as to what might flow forth from your diseased mind.
You know, when you lie you usually have to cover it up with another. That is why you look foolish here.
Obviously dishonesty is what flows from your mind.
I'd work on that, but you won't.
Which was a reply to this...
Readers may think your position is that the undocuumented worker is the sole reason for depressed wages.
Why, here's another reader that had to point out the same thing to you...
So I wasn't the only one to get the same impression from your post.
But what should I expect from the guy that thinks WalMart is about to fail or start paying fair wages. You must be proud.
Tsk, tsk, lies upon lies only demand more lying so I am casually interested in seeing where you go now.
See if you had said something along the lines of "part of the solution would be..." or some such. But no - you blamed "illegal immigrants".
Oh wait, what's this...
To which you reply...
See - you qualified your original position without calling names or accusing others of lying. It wasn't hard there, why the vitriol when I'm making a similar point?
Oh well, I'll just be celebrating the big fat raises WalMart is about to hand out to their employee's in order to avoid going out of business! It's a great day for workers!
What the hell was this?
Is that where I supposedly called you a racist? Oh my, thin-skinned much?
What an emotional cry-baby whiner you are. Grow up.
And once again - a big congratulations to all WalMart employees on their imepending huge pay raises!
Enjoy your afternoon and your weekend.
Small boy! Ohhh does that make you a BIG MAN? Getting so emotional at being called on your sh!t isn't very manly, you know?
And you're proud of...?
C'mon, post again the quote where I called you a racist! Here, I'll even do it for you...
Old_Benjamin
See everybody! This is where I ummm, said you blame brown folks. Which in the diseased mind of ro means I called him a racist!
It's freakin' hilarious!
Meanwhile in reality, if an American company is facing the prospect of having to raise or even maintain domestic wage levels to get quality people, they simply look elsewhere.
I mean, if you can generalize, so can I.
I imagine your employer has competitors. What happens when one of those competitors starts off-shoring and gains a significant advantage?
So why are you not on board with that?
You're such a disgusting hypocrite. RO.
You also believe that poor people are poor because they're lazy; you have no interest in seeing them succeed. You'd rather see them get what they deserve. So stop lying to us with your phony altruism. Hypocrite.
But it fits into your phony narrative so you have to say it. We both know why. And I thought you at least argued from integrity and honesty, I guess I was wrong.
You cannot make somebody rich by making somebody else poor.
You can't build a fair and just economy on slave wages. You can't have a vibrant society when politics, policy and the money changers hinder your path to real financial security.
This crap is gonna break down even worse if we don't adjust our current course.
We went from having over 30% of the private workforce unionized down to 9% today and things have not gotten any better. Yet, when union membership was at it's highest, we had the strongest middle class ever.
I think public employees who are unionized will be fighting a losing battle because the low standards of the private sector with drag them down. This country is going backwards instead of forwards and it's sad to watch.