Steyn Smears Environmentalism As "Fundamentally Anti-Human"

Well, that depends on what the definition of "human" is. If a corporation is a human person, he might have a point. If our descendants, and cultures around the world whose subsistence cultures are threatened by destruction of habitat, he's a raving lunatic. I'll take Lunatic for a thousand, Alex.

Well, he's right about the bedbugs. Environmental wacko Rachel Carson's Silent Spring gave rise to a world-wide ban on DDT which has resulted in the deaths of millions of children as well as the resurgence of the bedbug.
And the Environmentalist movement basic tenet is that humans are 'destroying the planet.' The environmental cure for our planetary woes is logically the elimination of humans (at least white, western humans). Some poor environmental diddly wrote a book a few years ago that explored how wonderful the world would be if there were no humans! Of course, the wonder would be totally unknown, as humans are the only cognitive species on the planet. His book would have sold even less copies than it did!
By the way, subsistence cultures wouldn't get the above reference to Alex. They wouldn't have access to a computer to read the joke, they wouldn't have television, electricity, nor all those environmentally nasty things that silly westerners use every day to complain about the destruction of the world.