About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Fox tries to have it both ways with census job figures

September 05, 2010 5:24 pm ET — 20 Comments

In June, Fox News figures downplayed job growth numbers by pointing out that many of the jobs created were temporary census positions. Now, those same Fox figures are hyping net job losses over the summer while ignoring that the losses are largely explained by the conclusion of those same temporary census positions.

Please upgrade your flash player. The video for this item requires a newer version of Flash Player. If you are unable to install flash you can download a QuickTime version of the video.

EMBED

Net job losses explained by conclusion of hundreds of thousands of census jobs

BLS: Census 2010 employment peaked at 564,000 in May, dropped to 82,000 in August. In its September press release on the U.S. employment situation, the Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) stated, "Over the month, government employment fell by 121,000, largely reflecting the loss of 114,000 temporary workers hired for Census 2010. The number of temporary Census 2010 workers peaked in May at 564,000 but has declined to 82,000 in August."

Net job losses highlighted by Fox figures are explained by conclusion of those temporary census jobs they previously used to downplay job growth. Fox News figures have pointed to the loss of 283,000 net jobs during the summer months to suggest that the Obama administration's "recovery summer" was, in the words of Chris Wallace, "an economic and political bust." But those net job losses are more than explained by the hundreds of thousands of temporary census jobs which concluded during the summer - temporary census jobs those same Fox News figures previously highlighted in downplaying May's large net jobs increases.

Chris Wallace

THEN: Wallace on May jobs figures: "431,000 jobs were added," but many "were government census hires, and those are, of course, temporary." On the June 6 edition of Fox News Sunday (accessed via Nexis), host Chis Wallace said, "And here's why the stock market took such a dim view of the job numbers in May. Let's put it up on the screen. Four hundred -- yes, 431,000 jobs were added, but only 41,000 of those were private sector employment. All the rest were government census hires, and those are, of course, temporary."

NOW: Wallace: "[O]ver the summer, the economy lost 283,000 jobs."On the September 5 edition of Fox News Sunday, Wallace began an interview with Democratic National Committee chairman Tim Kaine by saying, in part, "[O]ver the summer, the economy lost 283,000 jobs. ... Wasn't 'recovery summer' an economic and political bust?" In response, Kaine said, "After nearly 20 months in a row of private-sector job loss, we've gained jobs in the private sector now eight months in a row. There was some net losses over the summer because the census phased out."

NOW: After being told about "eight months of growth in terms of job creation," Wallace repeats "283,000 jobs" talking point. During a panel discussion later on Fox News Sunday, Fox News political contributor Juan Williams said, "When you hear from President Obama, as we did yesterday in his radio-Internet address, he says, 'Look, we've had eight months of growth in terms of job creation.' In fact, the numbers would have been better this last report -- " At this point, Wallace interrupted and said, "Private job creation. But total job creation -- the economy lost 283,000 jobs in 'recovery summer.' "

NOW: Wallace: "[I]n what the White House was billing as the summer of recovery, a total of 283,000 jobs were lost." Guest-hosting the September 3 edition of Special Report with Bret Baier (accessed via Nexis), Wallace said, "So the August job numbers came out today, and unemployment, the total unemployment number rose from 9.5 to 9.6 percent. Steve [Hayes], let's take a look at the internal numbers, which are more alarming. The economy lost 54,000 jobs in August along with the revised numbers of 54,000 in July and 175,000 in June. So Steve, in what the White House was billing as the summer of recovery, a total of 283,000 jobs were lost."

Stuart Varney

THEN: Varney on May jobs figures: "[A]ll these new jobs created, the vast majority were temporary government census workers." On the June 4 edition of America's Newsroom, Stuart Varney said, "[T]his is an extremely disappointing unemployment report. Yes, the unemployment rate went down to 9.7 percent -- got it -- but the fact that of all these new jobs created, the vast majority were temporary government Census workers, which will be gone by the late summer -- that is very bad news indeed because after spending a trillion dollars on stimulus, we only have tens of -- just a few ten thousand -- basically it's 20,000 new private sector jobs. Very disappointing."

NOW: Varney on summer job losses: "Summer's up, so where is that recovery?" On the September 4 edition of Your World with Neil Cavuto, guest host Varney said, "A recovery summer? One hundred and seventy-five thousand jobs lost in June; 54,000 lost in July; another 54,000 lost in August -- well, summer's up, so where is that recovery?" He continued, "Eight hundred and fourteen billion dollars in stimulus and still no jobs? Another 54,000 lost just last month. Yet, the president says he has no regrets, continuing his push today for another $30 billion in tax breaks for small businesses." During the segment, an on-screen graphic used the "283,000 jobs lost" figure:

Fred Barnes

THEN: Barnes on May jobs figures: "[I]t will get worse next month when many of these census workers are let go." On the June 4 edition of Special Report (accessed via Nexis), Fox News political contributor Fred Barnes said, "[T]he unemployment numbers today were horrible. Only 10 percent were private jobs in the job growth, and a good number of those were probably from the clean up down in the Gulf of Mexico and so are not permanent jobs. Everyone knew that was a setback and it will get worse next month when many of these census workers are let go."

NOW: Barnes: "[T]he so-called summer of recovery will probably wind up with net loss of jobs." On the August 30 edition of Special Report (accessed via Nexis), Barnes said, "And the ultimate embarrassment may be, and I think this will happen, the so-called summer of recovery will probably wind up with net loss of jobs in June, July, and August, a net loss of jobs in the Obama administration so-called summer of recovery."

Talking point about "283,000 jobs" lost in "recovery summer" apparently originated on Drudge Report

Drudge: "Economy LOST 283,000 jobs during 'Recovery Summer' months..." At 8:35 a.m. ET on September 3, text was posted at the top of the Drudge Report that read "Economy LOST 283,000 jobs during the 'Recovery Summer' months..." The text was later linked to a Bureau of Labor Statistics press release, and that headline and several related headlines were featured at the top of the sitethroughout the day:

Gateway Pundit: "The Obama economy lost 283,000 jobs in last three months." Shortly after the figure appeared on the Drudge Report,frequently incorrect Gateway Pundit blogger Jim Hoft posted an entry headlined "Obama's Disastrous Jobs Record Makes George W. Bush Look Godlike." Hoft included a screenshot of the Drudge Report and wrote, "So much for that Recovery Summer... The Obama economylost 283,000 jobs in last three months."

Wallace uses talking point on Special Report. Later that evening, on the September 3 edition of Special Report (accessed via Nexis), Wallace said to Hayes, "[I]n what the White House was billing as the summer of recovery, a total of 283,000 jobs were lost."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (September 05, 2010 8:14 pm ET)
        5
      Chris Wallace, Are you Really worth my Time?
      Who are you? You're not your Father's Son, are you even Worth my Rhyme?
      I need to keep my Powder Dry for more Serious Targets like say "Billo the Clown"
      Cause Mr. O'Reilly likes to Hurt little girls, to him Pedophile is a Verb & not a Noun.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News

      Report Abuse
    • Author by DellDolly (September 06, 2010 2:27 am ET)
      2 1
      They are very adept at lying by omission. Failing to note that the jobs that have been lost recently were temp jobs that were never intended to be long term jobs is a lie of omission, and failing to acknowledge that they were cognizant of this fact back when the jobs were first created in late spring is an even grosser lie by omission!

      You can't have it both ways, not if you're a legitimate news organization. FoxNews is NOT a legit news organization. That's why Roger Ailes talked Rupert Murdock into having the parent company of FoxNews and the Wall Street Journal, News Corp, give the Republican Governors Association $1 million dollars and not a penny to the Democratic Govenors Association. They don't even pretend to be legit any more.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley (September 06, 2010 9:19 am ET)
      1 8
      What a load of hooey from the partisan talking heads at FOX and mmfa...arguing semantics...while the job market flounders.

      The only measurement that really matters is improvement in private sector jobs...and the results are worse than measly...they're anemic...particularly when faced with the fact that "the economy needs about 150,000 new jobs a month to keep up with population growth and new entries into the jobs market."

      According to mmfa's link to the Bureau of Labor statistics the economy has added only 26,000 private sector jobs per month over the last year.

      This summer? June through August saw a paltry 58,000 private sector job growth per month.

      While the political operatives at FOX and mmfa get their jollies jaw-boning and parsing words...the economy and the resultant job market remains undeniably in the tank.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by sjw (September 06, 2010 9:45 am ET)
        4 1
        You do realize MMFA is not a policy making body? Their mission statement is to report conservative misinformation - not to recommend specific actions. Just because they are a liberal organization, doesn't mean they are recommending a particular course.

        To lump them in with Fox shows how you don't understand this simple distinction.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by wesley (September 06, 2010 9:47 am ET)
          1 8
          MOTO
          Report Abuse
          • Author by sjw (September 06, 2010 10:26 am ET)
            2 1
            English, please.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by pete592 (September 06, 2010 12:56 pm ET)
              6  
              Wesley's done that to me before, and also ducked explanation in the face of my puzzlement. I've narrowed it down to two possibilities:

              He's making a reference to the rock band Masters of the Obvious, maybe thinking it's clever somehow.

              OR

              He's calling you a fat girl in the Urdu language.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by sjw (September 07, 2010 8:41 pm ET)
                   
                I pick option 3 - Wesley was picking his nose and he doesn't type very well with the other thumb.
                Report Abuse
              • Author by sjw (September 07, 2010 9:05 pm ET)
                   
                I pick option 3 - Wesley was picking his nose and he doesn't type very well with the other thumb.
                Report Abuse
        • Author by DellDolly (September 06, 2010 2:08 pm ET)
          3 3
          You do realize that Wesley the weasel's efforts are to derail the thread and distract from the actual topic - the disinformation coming from FoxNews' talking heads, right?

          He can't defend the indefensible here - the doubletalk from FoxNews about the temp jobs.

          So his job here was to derail the thread by bringing up a couple of irrelevancies.
          Report Abuse
      • Author by raddave43 (September 06, 2010 11:35 am ET)
        2  
        It's still better to be adding jobs rather than losing them as was happening for the first six months of last year.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by Johaely (September 06, 2010 12:57 pm ET)
        4 1
        Permanent jobs are good no matter the sector.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by DellDolly (September 06, 2010 2:05 pm ET)
        2 1
        Job growth is NOT the topic here.

        What TYPE of job growth is necessary for a successful economy is NOT the topic here either, Wesley the weasel.

        The topic HERE is that FoxNews tried to have it both ways.

        MMFA isn't "parsing words" at all. They are documenting misinformation and objecting to undeniable dishonesty!

        MMFA isn't a news organization nor is it a journal of economic analysis.

        Yet again, just as you did on "The Blaze" thread under an alternative screen name, you are trying to pretend the subject is something it's not.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by steeve (September 06, 2010 5:33 pm ET)
        2  
        "the economy and the resultant job market remains undeniably in the tank"

        Remember when we were all shouting at Obama to be liberal at the start of his term? He didn't listen and here we are.

        At least the tank doesn't have a gaping hole in it any more.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by aBeck in 10-O-C (September 06, 2010 11:07 am ET)
      3  
      Of course Fox AND the Republicans want to have everything both ways.

      They talk about how the Dems have failed for two years, to conjure up 15 million jobs to relieve the unemployment crisis. Then they talk about how the unemployed are too lazy to go out and get one of the 15 million jobs that--what...apparently DO exist? The jobs that don't exist are going unfilled because unemployment benefits allow people to get paid not to work at jobs that don't exist?

      Their arguments are such glaringly insane contradictions---and they get away with it. I have not seen one reporter or talking head call them out for it.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by luvnmaggie (September 06, 2010 2:39 pm ET)
           
        I wish they would get called out for it also. They don't want to ever admit that this has been the fastest job creation in the recovery than in any other recession in 25 years. Didn't hear any republicans complaining about Bush when he wouldn't even admit we were in a recession. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, the Recession began in 2007.Jobs are being added but not as fast as we would like it to be. According to many economists it may take about 5 yrs.to
        get back on track. For all those who have been unemployed and have been for a while, before they vote they should know that the republicans are more interested in extending the tax breaks to the wealthy than extending unemployment benefits to them. According to Sharron Angle, a candidate for the senate, those who are unemployed are too lazy to go out and get work. The unemployed should think more than twice before they vote in November.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (September 06, 2010 4:36 pm ET)
      2  
      With the Corporate Media Channel (FOX) all you get is "news" filtered through the lens of Money.

      The goal is to put Republicans back in power so they can continue to enable various corporate interests that don't want to pay:

      1. Taxes (any at all)
      2. Wages (or as little as possible)
      3. Health-care costs for their employees

      What the various corporate interests do want are:

      1. All the Social Security Money transferred to Wall street.
      2. Removal of all health and safety regulations.
      3. A regular infusion of taxpayer money if they (the corporations) don't make a profit. (Or perhaps, just a regular infusion even if they DO make a profit.)

      How the corporate interests get what they want:

      1. Purchase a cable TV network (FOX)
      2. Ensure that the various news presenters will do ANYTHING for money and have no ethical values.
      3. Ensure that voters mark their ballots with the "correct" candidate.

      What a world....
      Report Abuse
      • Author by pete592 (September 06, 2010 7:05 pm ET)
        1 1
        As an addendum to the last one... Thanks to Citizens United v. FEC, corporations can now dump as much money as they want into political advertising to influence election outcomes. Of course, labor unions and left-wing organizations are free to do the same, but the depth of their pockets pales in comparison.
        Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.