About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Newt Gingrich's history of bigoted remarks

September 13, 2010 6:24 pm ET — 78 Comments

Newt Gingrich's history of bigoted and offensive remarks far predates his recent statement that President Obama has pretended to be "normal" but actually seems to be engaged in "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior."

Gingrich on Obama's "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior"

Gingrich: Obama is engaged in "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior." On September 12, Gingrich reportedly told National Review Online that Obama has pretended to be "normal" but actually seems to be engaged in "Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior":

Citing a recent Forbes article by Dinesh D'Souza, former House speaker Newt Gingrich tells National Review Online that President Obama may follow a "Kenyan, anti-colonial" worldview.

Gingrich says that D'Souza has made a "stunning insight" into Obama's behavior -- the "most profound insight I have read in the last six years about Barack Obama."

"What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension, that only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin to piece together [his actions]?" Gingrich asks. "That is the most accurate, predictive model for his behavior."

"This is a person who is fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now president," Gingrich tells us.

"I think he worked very hard at being a person who is normal, reasonable, moderate, bipartisan, transparent, accommodating -- none of which was true," Gingrich continues. "In the Alinksy tradition, he was being the person he needed to be in order to achieve the position he needed to achieve . . . He was authentically dishonest."

Gingrich has a history of making bigoted and offensive statements

Gingrich compares Islamic center to Nazis erecting a sign near Holocaust Museum and to a Japanese site near Pearl Harbor. On the August 16 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, Newt Gingrich said, "Nazis don't have the right to put up a sign next to the Holocaust Museum in Washington. We would never accept the Japanese putting up a site next to Pearl Harbor. There's no reason for us to accept a mosque next to the World Trade Center."

Gingrich smears Sotomayor as a "racist." ABC's Jake Tapper and Huma Khan reported on May 27, 2009, that Gingrich had written on Twitter: "Imagine a judicial nominee said 'my experience as a white man makes me better than a Latina woman' new racism is no better than old racism" and "White man racist nominee would be forced to withdraw. Latina woman racist should also withdraw." Gingrich later said that he didn't know whether Sotomayor herself was a racist, but her quote about a wise Latina was "clearly racist."

Gingrich: Bilingual education teaches "the language of living in a ghetto." An April 1, 2007, Associated Press article reported that Gingrich described bilingual education as teaching "the language of living in a ghetto" and mocked requirements that ballots be printed in multiple languages:

"The government should quit mandating that various documents be printed in any one of 700 languages depending on who randomly shows up" to vote, Gingrich said. The former Georgia congressman, who is considering seeking the GOP presidential nomination in 2008, made the comments in a speech to the National Federation of Republican Women.

"The American people believe English should be the official language of the government. . . . We should replace bilingual education with immersion in English so people learn the common language of the country and they learn the language of prosperity, not the language of living in a ghetto," Gingrich said, drawing cheers from the crowd of more than 100.

"Citizenship requires passing a test on American history in English. If that's true, then we do not have to create ballots in any language except English," he said.

The AP article further reported that in 1995 Gingrich said that bilingualism poses "long-term dangers to the fabric of our nation" and that "allowing bilingualism to continue to grow is very dangerous."

Gingrich: Poor blacks fail to acquire wealth partly because of their "habits." A June 16, 1995, Washington Post article reported that Gingrich, in a discussion with black journalists, stated that the failure of poor black people to acquire wealth was in part due to their "habits." From the Post article:

He acknowledged that it was more "difficult to acquire wealth as a black in America," but added that more than skin color is at play. "The truth is that preachers and lawyers have been more dominant in the black culture in the last 40 years than have business people," said Gingrich. "The habits of the church and the habits of the lawsuit have been more powerful than the habits of acquisition and the habits of job creation."

[...]

Asked what he would tell a black child who grew up with the notion of the United States as a colorblind nation, Gingrich said he'd respond: "We're not colorblind. I'd say it's a lie to walk into a school in America and say, 'This is a colorblind society.' And we shouldn't lie to children."

Pressed on what he would tell children who wondered what their opportunities were, Gingrich said his answer would be: "If you're black you have to work harder, and if you're black and poor you have to work twice as hard."

Gingrich, who has been intimately involved in District affairs, also was asked to respond to the suspicions of some residents that Republican interest in the city is part of a "conspiracy to boot out the black-run government" and "roust out" poor blacks.

"I understand the fear," he said. "What I want to do is transform Anacostia so the people currently living there are able to participate in the transformation so that five or 10 years from now they have new habits. Let me be very clear about this: I'm prepared to say to the poor, 'You have to learn new habits. The habits of being poor don't work. So yes, you've got to change.' "

Gingrich on women in combat: Women would have trouble staying in ditches "because they get infections;" "males are biologically driven to go out and hunt giraffes." A January 19, 1995, New York Times article reported on concerns about women in military combat roles that Gingrich had raised while teaching a history course at Georgia's Reinhardt College. The Times reported that Gingrich told his students that "females have biological problems staying in a ditch for 30 days because they get infections, and they don't have upper body strength," and added that men "are basically little piglets; you drop them in a ditch, they roll around in it."

Gingrich reportedly further said that if being in combat "means being on an Aegis class cruiser managing the computer controls for 12 ships and their rockets, a female again may be dramatically better than a male who gets very, very frustrated sitting in a chair all the time because males are biologically driven to go out and hunt giraffes."

Gingrich proposes denying welfare benefits to young mothers and instead using funds to establish orphanages. A December 11, 1994, New York Times article reported: "Mr. Gingrich ... has proposed that money saved by denying welfare benefits to young mothers be used to provided services to children, including promoting adoptions and establishing orphanages or group homes." Gingrich's proposal was included in his "Contract with America" under "The Personal Responsibility Act," which proposed to "[d]iscourage illegitimacy and teen pregnancy by prohibiting welfare to minor mothers and denying increased AFDC [Aid to Families with Dependent Children] for additional children while on welfare, cut spending for welfare programs, and enact a tough two-years-and-out provision with work requirements to promote individual responsibility."

According to the Contract's description of the proposal, "The state will use the funds for programs to reduce out-of-wedlock pregnancies, to promote adoption, to establish and operate orphanages, to establish and operate residential group homes for unwed mothers, or for any purpose the state deems appropriate."

Gingrich: "[T]here is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us." On the November 14, 2008, edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor, Gingrich stated of Proposition 8 protestors: "I think there is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us, is prepared to use violence, to use harassment. I think it is prepared to use the government if it can get control of it. I think that it is a very dangerous threat to anybody who believes in traditional religion." Gingrich also stated: "[W]hen the radicals lost the vote in California, they are determined to impose their will on this country no matter what the popular opinion, no matter what the law of the land."

Gingrich: It's time to "profile" and "actively discriminate based on suspicious terrorist information."  In a December 30, 2009, HumanEvents.com op-ed headlined "On Terrorism it's Time to Know, to Profile, and to Discriminate," Gingrich wrote that "our politically correct government" is not "targeting the source of threats." He added: "We know how to identify these enemies but our elites have refused to do so." Gingrich later wrote: "It is time to know more about would-be terrorists, to profile for terrorists and to actively discriminate based on suspicious terrorist information."   

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by Bad News (September 13, 2010 6:54 pm ET)
      9 4
      It's truly Amazing what a Politician will do & say to get Elected.
      But Newt Gingrich in his Racist Rhetoric has gone further than Expected.
      Mr. Gingrich is calling The President of the United States the "N" word Loud & Clear.
      You can Candy-Coat all you want, Newt Gingrich is a Racist, He's exactly as he Appears.

      Speak truth to power.


      Mr. News
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AC_Mem (September 13, 2010 7:57 pm ET)
      10  
      What a pig he is.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave (September 13, 2010 8:14 pm ET)
        1 20
        I didn't quite get the giraffe hunting or the anti colonial behavior remarks, but the rest was right on.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by RiffRabbit (September 13, 2010 8:58 pm ET)
          15  
          How so? Very little of what the guy says seem to make any sense.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by dave (September 13, 2010 9:33 pm ET)
            2 25
            Blacks need to work harder to get out of poverty, English should be the official language, gays are trying to become mainstream, wise Latinos are no better than white males, mosques at ground 0 are equivalent to the Japanese having a museum at Pearl Harbor. Anything else?

            Newt's not perfect, but he makes alot more sense than the current administration.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by sbreader (September 13, 2010 9:43 pm ET)
              16 1
              The depth and breadth of your ignorance is astonishing, Newt.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by wookie (September 13, 2010 9:56 pm ET)
              16  
              Huh? Poor whites are working hard enough? Why should English should be the official language if we have done OK so far? So what if gays are trying to become mainstream? That's hardly "fascism". Wise Latinas might have more background in discrimination cases. And mosques, contrary to popular belief, don't exist solely to celebrate military victories.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by loonz (September 13, 2010 10:14 pm ET)
                13  
                I'm still trying to figure out what's wrong with the Japanese building a museum at Pearl Harbor. I guess if it were a museum glorifying the bombing of Pearl Harbor they would have a point.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by foghornleghorn (September 13, 2010 10:49 pm ET)
                  14  
                  A better analogy would be someone opening a sushi or hibachi bar within 2 blocks of the USS Arizona - in other words, its meaningless to those who think rationally.
                  Report Abuse
            • Author by loonz (September 13, 2010 10:04 pm ET)
              12  
              You don't think Black people work hard? Should gays remain in hiding? If so, why? Minorities have very different experiences in this country than White males do and they can identify with certain situations that White males can't. What's wrong with the Japanese building a museum at Pearl Harbor?
              Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (September 14, 2010 12:37 am ET)
              9  
              WTF does "gays are trying to go mainstream" mean? They just want the same rights as everyone else. You forget that there are American citizens born in territories that speak languages other than English. Newt only makes sense to other wingnuts.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by raddave43 (September 14, 2010 12:38 am ET)
              7  
              WTF does "gays are trying to go mainstream" mean? They just want the same rights as everyone else. You forget that there are American citizens born in territories that speak languages other than English. Newt only makes sense to other wingnuts.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by soze169880 (September 14, 2010 7:49 am ET)
                9  
                WTF does "gays are trying to go mainstream" mean?

                They're acting as though they're worthy of human dignity even though dave thinks they're icky.
                Report Abuse
            • Author by proudObamasupporter (September 14, 2010 9:22 am ET)
              9 1
              If you think that Newt makes sense, I feel very sorry for you. He is a pathetic excuse for a human being and hearing how he thinks about children born in poverty AND his ideas for controlling teen pregnancy tells me exactly how it is he so easily treats his wives like the dirt beneath his feet. I hope you don't think he cares about you, once he has your vote, he will be working for his rich friends and you will become not even an afterthought. Count on it.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by grmce (September 14, 2010 11:45 am ET)
              5  
              The traditional Japanese cemetery for pearl divers who died whilst practicing their trade is still an important part of the Western Australian town of Broome - the same small town of Broome in which at least 88 people were killed in a Japanese air raid in 1942.

              Why carry a grudge - no one benefits.
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 12:33 pm ET)
              5  
              and you are the most bigoted blatant racist on this thread.

              enjoy your buddy hitler in hell
              Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 12:34 pm ET)
              5  
              flagged troll
              Report Abuse
              • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:05 pm ET)
                1 10
                How can you flag someone who is just agreeing with the person that MMfA's piece is about? Why don't you just tell MMfA to take this whole thread down?
                Report Abuse
                • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 1:09 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  i flagged dave for being a bigoted troll
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:13 pm ET)
                    1 7
                    I know who you flagged, but dave is just agreeing with much of what Gingrich says. How can say that is being a troll? You may not agree with it, I don't agree with some of it either, but dave is not being a troll and if MMfA removes a post from someone simply because they agree with what MMfA doesn't, that's absurd.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 1:11 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  and he was agreeing with the bigoted statements of newt. who has no leg to stand on anything. the man is the worst sort of person. you wanna defend dave and defend newt? go right ahead. you can join them in being sleazebags
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:16 pm ET)
                    1 9
                    Did I defend the content of what they are saying? No. You are being ridiculous to flag someone for simply agreeing with the person MMfA is discussing.
                    Report Abuse
                • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:12 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  Not the point and you know it. Dave made a blatant racist comment. You know it and if not maybe you should be flagged.
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:14 pm ET)
                    1 8
                    He agreed with Gingrich, then tell MMfA to take the whole thread down. If you can't handle the disagreement perhaps you should read and post where only your opinions are accepted as comments.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
                      4  
                      Read his FIRST sentence. That is not agreeing with Newt that is interjecting his own opinion. Do you agree with him?
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:32 pm ET)
                        1 6
                        No, I don't agree with him. And Gingrich did say that, but it's dave's opinion too. And stop thinking that if someone defends another person's right to express their opinion that must mean they agree with it. It doesn't.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:34 pm ET)
                          4  
                          He has every right to make bigotted comments and I have every right to flag his silly butt. Gotta love freedom. You gonna stick up for my rights too?
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:36 pm ET)
                            1 6
                            Well, MMfA will never flag a comment that is just agreeing with the person they have highlighted. Because it's absurd.
                            Report Abuse
                        • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:35 pm ET)
                          5  
                          I agree he has the right to express his opinion but there are rule here that we all must follow. I want to swear but I can't. I don't think we have the right to make racist statements. This ain't stormfront or Fox news.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:38 pm ET)
                            1 6
                            So if MMfA highlights a comment from say like Rush who says I hate black people, and a poster comes on says I agree with Rush - they deserve to get flagged and removed?

                            If that is the case then don't put up "Rush's" comment in the first place.
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:45 pm ET)
                              6  
                              READ HIS POST. He did not say "I agree with Newt" he wrote in his own words "Blacks need to work harder to get out of poverty". Now is that a bigotted statement or not? If it is it is offensive and racist and needs to be flagged.
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:49 pm ET)
                                1 6
                                He didn't just swoop down and say that. Gingrich essentially said the same thing above, READ IT. dave was agreeing with him.

                                I already told you I disagreed with it. Why do you keep asking me that?
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:53 pm ET)
                                  6  
                                  Newt said what he did and got put on blast by MMFA, Dave made a bigotted comment and got put on blast by the posters. If you agree it was a bigotted/racist comment then by definition should it not have been flagged as racist? Your argument makes no sense.
                                  Report Abuse
                                  • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:57 pm ET)
                                    1 6
                                    Put on blast? We will see if MMfA removes dave's post, I bet they don't.
                                    Report Abuse
                                    • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:59 pm ET)
                                      6 1
                                      Maybe but they should and at least it was not tolerated by the posters. Well, except you RO. Duly noted.
                                      Report Abuse
                                      • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 2:04 pm ET)
                                        1 6
                                        Note whatever the hell you want, I couldn't care less. The point I made is dave did not exhibit trollish behavior for simply agreeing with who MMfA is highlighting. And you have yet to put forth a logical reason why, because you don't have one. That doesn't mean dave is immune from disagreeing posters, I guess the nuance of that is too complicated for you to grasp.

                                        Duly noted.
                                        Report Abuse
                                        • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 3:36 pm ET)
                                          6 1
                                          And your ability of not being able to read what he wrote is noted. Defend racism much?
                                          Report Abuse
                            • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 1:51 pm ET)
                              8 1
                              so rush should be allowed to spew his racism without consequence. and so should newt for that matter? and dave?

                              they say these things and there should not be consequences? thats what you are saying?
                              Report Abuse
                              • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 1:57 pm ET)
                                1 7
                                Your comment is too stupid for a response.
                                Report Abuse
                                • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 2:27 pm ET)
                                  7 1
                                  oh of course it is, it has to be. you have no problem running your mouth about everything else.

                                  u have in the past shown no such inhibitions to bash on things i or others say so what makes this any different?

                                  or is it that you have no response? i think thats the more likely thing.

                                  or is what im pointing out too complicated for you?

                                  here its simple. you say something racist. you deserve to get called out and ridiculed for it. simple as that
                                  Report Abuse
                              • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 14, 2010 4:26 pm ET)
                                5  
                                No, he should have to face the consequences of what he says. But, that does not mean he would should pretend these ideas are not allowed. People should be able to say whatever they want. It's the closeted racists you have to worry about. Dave rarely gets out of his mother's house. He admits he thinks less of black people. He's not one to get too worked up about.
                                Report Abuse
                  • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 14, 2010 4:24 pm ET)
                    4  
                    Dave is entitled to his opinion. And you are entitled to the opinion that he is a bigot. We need more opinions, not less. I say let Dave and Newt say all the stupid things they want to say. It's when they try to hide what they truly believe that it gets scary. No flagging necessary.
                    Report Abuse
                    • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 4:38 pm ET)
                      5  
                      you know what mike your right. i wont flag the racist commmens from dave and his ilk. and even when they try to hide, like giving thumbs down for being called out what they are. i will keep calling t hem out
                      Report Abuse
                    • Author by southerngal (September 14, 2010 5:04 pm ET)
                        7
                      And I never said expressing opinions or taking dave to the woodshed for his comment was somehow off limits, but that is the leap made by some. It's ridiculous. What I said was that it is inconsistent and silly to want dave's comment flagged and removed and not say the same thing about this entire thread.
                      Report Abuse
                      • Author by Hasa Diga Eebowai (September 14, 2010 5:31 pm ET)
                        3  
                        silly to want dave's comment flagged and removed and not say the same thing about this entire thread.
                        Let's use good old democracy. The person whose comments gets the most flagged gets their comment removed. You have to love democracy.
                        Report Abuse
                      • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 6:08 pm ET)
                        5  
                        i reiterate that racists like dave and newt can say what they want all they want. but for saying racist things. they need to be ridiculed. they deserve it.
                        Report Abuse
                        • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 14, 2010 6:32 pm ET)
                          3 1
                          I think that is the correct route. I actually appreciate the open racists like Dave and Newt. At least we know where they stand.
                          Report Abuse
                          • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 11:30 pm ET)
                            4  
                            I disagree. I have to read enough stupid/racist remarks at so many other sites that it feels almost like a breath of fresh air to be able to read and post at a site that doesn't tolerate racism. Maybe it's me being tired of constantly having to defend my people but I for one am sick of bigots spewing their non-sense everywhere. Go to stormfront or some other racist site, let us have one bastion of civility on the internet. You may not agree but being a person of color in this country isn't the easiest sometimes so give us a break huh?
                            Report Abuse
                            • Author by mikehuck1976 (September 16, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
                                 
                              Racism exists, whether you "tolerate" it or not. I would rather the racists admit their racism, as Dave does, than hide it. At least we know where we stand with them.
                              Report Abuse
            • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 12:43 pm ET)
              5 1
              how about the racial profiling? thats illegal.

              oh wait you hate all muslims so they should just get out of the country right? black muslims too right?

              whats next? jewish people? black people?

              where does it end? when in this country there are only whie christians?

              explain how you aren't a racist again?

              Report Abuse
              • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 4:35 pm ET)
                5  
                awww did the poor gutless wonder troll not like me calling out your bigotry? dont have the stones to admit what you are?
                Report Abuse
            • Author by historygeek001 (September 14, 2010 1:07 pm ET)
              5 1
              Your bigotry is showing again, Dave.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by dave (September 14, 2010 10:08 pm ET)
                  7
                No bigotry noted. Just pointing out that as long as this nation has bigotry in it, blacks will have to work harder to advance. I think Newt said that as well. If racism was taken from it, so be it. It's the truth.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by DellDolly (September 15, 2010 12:30 am ET)
                  2  
                  Yes, bigotry noted and well-documented.

                  You're denying the undeniable and disputing the indisputable.
                  Report Abuse
                • Author by pilotx (September 15, 2010 10:37 pm ET)
                     
                  That's not what you said earlier. If that's what you meant that is an entirely different statement but why praytell in 2010 do we still have to work harder than anyone else? So this is not a poet racial nation? Why do my kids have to deal with the same crap their great-grand partents had to deal with? Do tell Dave, where is this racism coming from?
                  Report Abuse
                  • Author by dave (September 16, 2010 8:59 am ET)
                       
                    That is exactly what I said earlier. Blacks need to work harder. We are still not a colorblind nation.
                    Report Abuse
            • Author by pilotx (September 14, 2010 1:08 pm ET)
              5 1
              All Blacks need to work harder? I'm not poor so what about me? How about poor whites, so they need to work harder or are they natrually hard working due to the color of their skin? Should the hundreds of Black people in Tulsa who worked hard and established their own community so prosperous it was dubbed the "Black Wall Street" but it was burned and many of them killed by jealous whites should they have just worker harder in your bigotted estimation? No matter what we do a bigot like yourself won't know or care.
              Report Abuse
        • Author by wookie (September 13, 2010 9:09 pm ET)
          5 1
          I'm geussing that Africans weren't doing a good enough job hunting giraffes so European colonists had to get in on the action.
          Report Abuse
        • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 12:32 pm ET)
          4 1
          so you are just as bigoted as newt. well done and its not right on. its wrong, your wrong.

          congradulations on earning your membership in the Gutless Wonder Troll Club
          Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (September 14, 2010 12:35 am ET)
        9  
        While I would not put it exactly that way, I can say truthfully, that Newt is a terrible embarrassment to our party. His racist rhetoric is appalling. He has morphed back into a true racist Southerner. I feel though, that it is all politics with this yarn of his. He knows good and well he is lying when he makes that ridiculous statement. But sad to say, Newt seems to have lost his mojo and stoops to this sort of stupidity to make himself look relevant again. He is a shadow of his former self and frankly all his comment did was to make himself look like he is stupid.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudObamasupporter (September 14, 2010 9:25 am ET)
          5 2
          I have never given a republican a thumbs up before but this post was deserving. You give me hope that not all republicans are stoopid.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mjlilgui (September 14, 2010 10:47 am ET)
            5 2
            There are plenty of reasonable conservatives. They're just not outspoken and pushy about it. You've got to remember that the loudest Republicans are the furthest right, and they don't represent the majority of their party.
            Report Abuse
      • Author by mari2jj (September 16, 2010 2:19 am ET)
           
        And that is not just because he sounds the racist garbage all the time. He is a disgusting person who served his sick wife divorce papers whele she was being treated for cancer. What a gentleman, eh? NOT!!!!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by peace4all (September 13, 2010 9:12 pm ET)
      4  
      so this is the mind of the great gingrich. this is the "intellectual" side of the republicain party? well, that explains a lot about some of the right wing posts we get here.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by dave (September 13, 2010 9:27 pm ET)
          14
        Minus the giraffes, what did you have a problem with? And what wasn't posted were his thoughts on national spending and taxation. Those are good, too.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by peace4all (September 13, 2010 10:52 pm ET)
          10  
          really??? like shutting down the govenment? i must say, that worked out real good for the country and republicans in general yeah?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by mhughen (September 14, 2010 4:17 am ET)
            7  
            IMHO, Newt is actually going for a VP nomination - or talk show host. He is going to be the 'attack dog' for a 'reasonable, main stream' republican Pres. nomination like Romney or Huckabee.
            It's tough to position yourself as a veep candidate, but I think Newt is gaming the system in that direction; to extreme for Pres, but, an almost irresistible choice for veep.
            Report Abuse
        • Author by jediknight65 (September 14, 2010 12:36 pm ET)
          5 1
          women can't be in combat because of their period? hows that for starters

          how about the "habits" of black people. thats bullcrap too.

          i could go on. but racist bigoted pigs like yourself cannot stomach the idea of maybe being wrong

          Report Abuse
    • Author by sluggo (September 13, 2010 9:27 pm ET)
      3  
      I'm waiting for Newt to announce Pat Buchanan as is VP pick...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (September 13, 2010 10:07 pm ET)
      4  
      hey newtie, check the moss growing around your chair!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by loonz (September 13, 2010 10:19 pm ET)
      7  
      This is the first time I'm seeing some of these remarks. He does seem like an overt bigot.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by txthinker (September 14, 2010 10:31 am ET)
      3 1
      Gingrich: Bilingual education teaches "the language of living in a ghetto."
      Newt Gingrich speaks the language of living with your head up your own a$$.

      [http://bambamworld.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/head-up-ass.jpg]
      Report Abuse
    • Author by NiceguyEddie (September 14, 2010 12:17 pm ET)
      7  
      Gingrich compares Islamic center to Nazis erecting a sign near Holocaust Museum and to a Japanese site near Pearl Harbor.

      To the first point, I give you James Von Brunn... who sure as hell didn't vote for Obama!

      To the second point... Has this guy even BEEN to Pearl Harbor?! Because I have. And it was FILLED with Japanese Tourists. Packed to the gills. And you know what? We WELCOME THEM. (@$$hole.) And you know what else? They welcome Americans to the memorials and the sacred sites in Hiroshima. That's what CIVILZED people DO: They forgive and they come together and they HEAL.

      The rest of it's almost too easy, so I'm not going to bother.

      If this $#!t-pot even tries to run in 2012, we need to plaster soundbites from this moron all over the place. He's an idiot. An absolute whacko. If I were a Conservtaive, I'd be embrassaed to be anywhere NEAR this waste of donor organs.

      ----------------------------------------------
      Thank you MMFA for collecting all this. I certainly hope you washed your hands afterwards.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by little poncho (September 14, 2010 5:55 pm ET)
      3  
      easy money, on fixed news!!!!!!!!!!
      Report Abuse
    • Author by publius II (September 15, 2010 7:26 pm ET)
         
      A sense of Gingrich's own views on "colonialism" can perhaps be found in his Tualne U PhD dissertation on education policy in the Belgian Congo. As I recall he judged it rather favorably.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by hmbascom (September 16, 2010 3:24 pm ET)
         
      The sad and unfortunate truth is that many people in America will vote for this man.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

Push Back

Phone calls, emails and letters from the public do make a difference. Remember that to be effective you must be polite, and professional. Express your specific concerns regarding that particular news report or commentary, and indicate what you would like the media outlet to do differently in the future.