About us Login Get email updates
Research
Print

Beck's historian delivered talks to racist, anti-Semitic Christian Identity groups

October 07, 2010 5:29 am ET — 55 Comments

According to the Anti-Defamation League, David Barton, a self-described historian promoted by Fox News' Glenn Beck, has twice spoken to groups affiliated with the racist and anti-Semitic Christian Identity movement. Beck himself has promoted the work and ideas of anti-Semites.

ADL: Barton has twice addressed groups affiliated with Christian Identity movement

ADL: "Barton has delivered his revisionist presentation in the meeting halls of the racist and anti-Semitic extreme right." In the 1994 book, The Religious Right: The Assault on Tolerance & Pluralism in America, the Anti-Defamation League wrote that Barton "purveys a slick, cut-and-paste revisionist history of the United States and the Constitution." ADL further stated that Barton spoke at events hosted by the Christian Identity movement, which "asserts that Jews are 'the synagogue of Satan'; that Blacks and other people of color are subhuman; and that northern European whites and their American descendants are the 'chosen people' of scriptural prophesy." From the book:

On at least two occasions, Barton has delivered his revisionist presentation in the meeting halls of the racist and anti-Semitic extreme right. In July 1991, Barton addressed the Colorado summer retreat of Scriptures for America, the Identity Church group headed by firebrand Pete Peters. He was advertised as "a new and special speaker" who would "bring the following messages: America's Godly Heritage -- Was it the plan of our forefathers that America be the melting pot home of various religions and philosophies? ..." Barton's fellow-speakers at the retreat included the virulently anti-Semitic Virginia stockbroker-polemicist Richard Kelly Hoskins; "Bo" Gritz, the 1992 presidential nominee of the far-right Populist Party and a self-described "white separatist"; and Canadian Holocaust-denier Malcolm Ross.

On November 24, 1991, Barton appeared at another Identity gathering, presenting the second annual Thanksgiving message to Identity preacher Mike Watson's Kingdom Covenant College in Grants Pass, Oregon. In a subsequent edition of The Centinel [sic], Watson's publication, Barton was described as a "nationally acclaimed speaker" who "has introduced many Americans to their godly Christian heritage." [Pages 55-56]

Barton later said he was not aware that the events were hosted by groups with a racist ideology and said "that with as many as 400 speaking engagements a year, he cannot do background checks on each of the invitations he receives," according to an April 10, 1996, Seattle Times article (retrieved via Nexis).

ADL: Pete Peters "has compiled a substantial record of anti-Jewish sentiment." The ADL states that Pete Peters, who convened the July 1991 Christian Identity meeting that Barton attended, has "a substantial record of anti-Jewish sentiment":

Peters has compiled a substantial record of anti-Jewish sentiment:

In a 1990 sermon, he insinuated, in the form of questions, stereo-typically conspiratorial views of Jewish power:

"Is there a Jewish conspiracy against America? Do Jews control America's media? Do Jews have a death grip on America's government? Are Jews left-wing, liberal anti-gunners? Do Jews cry anti-Semitism as a weapon to suppress the truth? Are Jews wanting to disarm Americans? [sic] Do Jews prevent a free press in America? Are Jews against freedom in America? Do Jews want total people control? Are Jews liars? Do Jews want to put America under tyranny? Must Jews leave America if America is to survive?

"These are all questions that you can answer from 'The Inadvertent Confessions of a Jew,' the message of this cassette tape," Peters said.

ADL: Several members of the 1980s "far-right terrorist group" The Order attended Peters' church. From the ADL Web page on Peters:

Peters and his church first came to national attention in 1985 when Colorado newspapers reported that several members of The Order, the most violent far-right terrorist group of the 1980s, had attended the LaPorte Church of Christ during their criminal heyday. Subsequent investigation into The Order's activities revealed a string of firebombings, armed robberies, counterfeiting and the execution of one of their own members suspected of disloyalty. In 1987 two members of The Order were convicted and sentenced to prison terms of 150 years in connection with the murder in June 1984 of Alan Berg, a Jewish talk-show host in Denver. Several months earlier, in February 1984, Peters, along with Jack Mohr, appeared on Berg's program and Berg angrily confronted the two men about their white supremacist views.

ADL: Christian Identity movement linked to numerous violent incidents. The ADL reports that the Christian Identity movement is linked to many violent events, including a number that occurred before Barton spoke at the Christian Identity-affiliated events:

Christian Identity's racist and apocalyptic qualities helped lead to several well-known incidents of domestic terrorism during the past quarter century. In North Dakota in 1983, Gordon Kahl demonstrated how radical Identity adherents could be when he killed two U.S. Marshals who had come to arrest him for a parole violation (a mourner at one funeral was Assistant Attorney General Rudolph W. Giuliani, later to become all too familiar with such funerals). A four-month manhunt ended in another shootout in Arkansas, where Kahl killed a local sheriff before he himself was killed.

That same year, the white supremacist terrorist group known as The Order began its series of armed robberies (to which it would add additional crimes ranging from counterfeiting to assassination). Several members of the gang were Christian Identity, including David Tate, who in 1985 killed a Missouri State Highway Patrol officer attempting to reach an Identity survivalist compound called the Covenant, the Sword, and the Arm of the Lord (CSA). An ensuing standoff resulted in the demise of the CSA and the arrest of its leadership. During the 1980s, several Identity groups attempted to follow in the footsteps of The Order, including The Order II and the Arizona Patriots, who committed bombings and an attempted armored car robbery, respectively.

Barton's scholarship has been criticized as phony

ADL: "Barton's 'scholarship,' like that of Holocaust denial and Atlantic slave trade conspiracy-mongering is ... not history." From The Religious Right:

[Barton's] ostensible scholarship functions in fact as an assault on scholarship: in the manner of other recent phony revisionisms, the history it supports is little more than a compendium of anecdotes divorced from their original context, linked harum-scarum and laced with factual errors and distorted innuendo. Barton's "scholarship," like that of Holocaust denial and Atlantic slave trade conspiracy-mongering is rigged to arrive at predetermined conclusions, not history. [Page 54]

The Religious Right goes on to say:

Appendix C of this report refutes some of Barton's -- and other religious right revisionists' -- most important Constitutional and historical misreadings. To provide a sense of these misreadings, a few basic facts may be noted here.

The Framers of the Constitution were men who, for the most part, held strong Christian beliefs. They were not "evangelicals" -- the term did not even enter common parlance until the latter half of the nineteenth century, and only a few would be considered evangelical today. Likewise, while several states maintained established churches after the Constitution was ratified -- a circumstance emphasized by many who believe the First Amendment merely disallows a national denomination -- this early period in the country's history does not merit the "Christian nation" tag. Statistics suggest that the current era, despite the latter-day jeremiads heaped on it by prophets of decline, is in fact far more broadly "Christian."

Sen. Specter: Barton's arguments "range from the technical to the absurd." According to People for the American Way, in 1996, Sen. Arlen Specter -- a Republican at the time -- criticized Barton's "pseudoscholarship":

In 1995, Republican Senator Arlen Specter wrote in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy that many of Barton's arguments "range from the technical to the absurd" and that they "proceed from flawed and highly selective readings of both text and history." Specter went on to state that Barton's "pseudoscholarship would hardly be worth discussing, let alone disproving, were it not for the fact that it is taken so very seriously by so many people."

Beck has praised and promoted Barton

Beck: Barton "is one of the most important people in America to save America today." Barton appeared on the June 25 edition of Beck's Fox News show, during which Beck said:

BECK: We're back with David Barton, founder and president of WallBuilders. He is a -- he is an amazing guy because you can -- you know, when I get on and I say, you know, here's what I think is going on. You can dispute that all you want because that's my opinion. But when we talk about history and you can produce the documents -- and that's why I really believe David Barton is one of the most important people in America to save America today because he didn't give you his opinion, but he'll produce the document to show you the fact. [via Nexis]

Beck credits Barton with coming up with the idea for Beck's Black Robe Brigade. During the April 29 edition of his Fox News show, Beck asked Barton, whom he referred to as "a new friend," to describe the "Black Robe Brigade." Barton stated that these were preachers the British blamed for fomenting the American Revolution. Later, on the August 30 edition of his radio show, Beck said:

BECK: And didn't know how to go about it and didn't even know the Black Robe Regiment or anything else. And I had been talking to David Barton when we first met and I said, "David, I just feel that I'm -- we're supposed to get religious leaders together. God is the answer. But I don't know -- and I'm a Mormon, I mean, nobody's going to talk to me." And he said, "Oh, you need the Black Robe Regiment." And I said, "What is that?" We started talking about it and I read up on it and I'm like, "Exactly it. That's exactly it. It's not about politics."

Beck chose Barton to give his first "Glenn Beck Morning Prayer." On August 16, Beck chose Barton to give the first daily "Glenn Beck Morning Prayer." In his prayer, Barton said that God "conceived," "planned," and "called" for Beck's 8-28 rally.

Barton spoke at Beck's "Divine Destiny" event. Barton was one of the speakers at Beck's Divine Destiny event at the Kennedy Center, part of Beck's weekend of 8-28 events. In his speech, Barton stated that Jews and Christians united against "Muslim terrorists" during the Barbary War.

Beck himself has promoted the work of racists and anti-Semites

Beck promoted racist anti-Semite Elizabeth Dilling. On the June 4 edition of his radio program, Beck promoted The Red Network by Elizabeth Dilling, which is a book that contains numerous passages espousing anti-Semitism and racism. At various points throughout the book, Dilling attacked "racial inter-mixture" as a communist plot, referred to "un-Christianized" "colored people" as "savages," called Hinduism and Islam "debasing and degrading," and blamed Nazi Germany's anti-Semitism on "revolutionary Russian Jews." Furthermore, Dilling was a Nazi sympathizer who visited Germany in the late 1930s, attended Nazi party meetings, and praised Adolf Hitler's leadership. Dilling also spoke at rallies hosted by the leading U.S. Nazi organization, the German-American Bund

Dilling's history of anti-Semitism includes calling President Eisenhower "Ike the Kike" and labeling President Kennedy's New Frontier program the "Jew frontier." British Professors Christopher Partridge and Ron Geaves wrote that Dilling was a "pro-Nazi anti-Semite" who disseminated the anti-Semitic hoax, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. Furthermore, Dilling's work has been promoted by David Duke and the Women for Aryan Unity group. 

Beck refused to apologize for promoting Dilling's work, saying on the June 7 edition of his radio show:

BECK: But I'm also getting some amazing mail from the left that now says I'm a Nazi anti-Semite because I quoted a book on Friday -- it was the Red Book, or something like that. It was a who's who, who's in the communist party in 1935. Apparently, I don't know, apparently written by a Nazi sympathizer here in America. Part of the, I'm sure -- I don't know because I didn't look it up -- but I'm sure part of the Father Coughlin, social justice crowd, because this is the choice that progressives give you -- you're either a Nazi or a communist. No, I'm neither. But now -- so now I'm kind of stuck between the place where the left says that I'm a Nazi sympathizer and a Jew lover. So I guess the left can have it all, that I'm a Jew-loving Nazi sympathizer. It's a really interesting place that I don't know if anybody's ever been.

Beck cited book by anti-Semitic Eustace Mullins. On the September 22 edition of his Fox News show, Beck cited Eustace Mullins' book Secrets of the Federal Reserve. Mullins was a 9-11 truther who has been described as an "anti-Semitic conspiracy theorist" and a "nationally known white supremacist"; the ADL called the book "a re-hash of Mullins' anti-Semitic theories about the origins of the Federal Reserve." In addition, in an obituary for Mullins, the Daily News Leader of Staunton, Virginia, described Mullins as a "[n]ationally known white supremacist and anti-Semite."

Beck pushed anti-Semitic conspiracy about George Soros. On the October 5 edition of his Fox News show, Beck advanced former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad's anti-Semitic claim that Soros "helped trigger the economic meltdown" of Southeast Asian currencies in 1997, which Mahathir had reportedly suggested was part of a Jewish "agenda." In fact, Soros and other hedge funds were found not to be primarily responsible for the currency crisis, and Mahathir later retracted the claim.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by rikntx (October 07, 2010 6:44 am ET)
      12  
      Oh goody...now we'll get to hear from Beck the Victim in the next day or so.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by IRONY 101 (October 07, 2010 7:16 am ET)
        11  
        And we'll hear all about Marxists and communists who hate God...very predictable and tiresome. I just wonder how brain dead his followers must be to listen to this crop day after day...
        Report Abuse
        • Author by rikntx (October 07, 2010 7:30 am ET)
          14  
          My mom's husband listens to FNC almost 12 hours a day. His take on Beck is, "I don't care for his theatrics but he can't be proven wrong."
          I made the mistake of trying to do so once...and all my points were denegrated as coming from the "liberal media".
          Report Abuse
          • Author by IRONY 101 (October 07, 2010 7:58 am ET)
            14 1
            You can't win with those people...which is why I prefer to simply ridicule their ignorance, gullibility and stupidity to their face. I am capable of conducting a civil discussion with someone whose views are different from mine...but not someone who is a glassy-eyed devotee of Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc.; or someone who obtains the entirety of his information from FOX News.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by wesley_fpt (October 07, 2010 1:29 pm ET)
              5  
              Try explaining to them that the "liberal media" is really just a right wing myth. News is entertainment, and a society's arts and entertainment tend to reflect the views of society in general. I don't think most people have a problem with the poor, gays, or minorities..or sympathize with the plight of the downtrodden billionaire in America, and thats what's reflected in the normal news media.

              Fox DOES have a problem with the poor, gays, minorities, and is all about the plight of the billioniaire. The only way for them to deceive its viewers into thinking it has any credibility is to tear down the rest of the media as being "liberal," when in reality the rest of the media is just a reflection of mainstream society.

              They won't get it, waaaay too reasonable a concept for a right winger to grasp.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Far Left but Always Right (October 07, 2010 8:05 am ET)
            9  
            I bet you tried to use facts from books written by REAL historians. If you did, that's the problem. Beck's followers only believe the "Professors" of Beck University.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by RumpshakerSlim (October 07, 2010 9:54 am ET)
            9  
            "...he can't be proven wrong."

            He can't be proven right either.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by mescal (October 08, 2010 1:32 am ET)
              3  
              Doughboy has often been proven right.

              And by right, I mean far right... extremist right... neo-Nazi right.
              Report Abuse
          • Author by nerzog (October 07, 2010 9:55 am ET)
            9 1
            Bingo. That's why the Republicans spent 20 years and millions of dollars creating their own alternative media universe, and planting the "Liberal Media" myth into the empty heads of the Republican base.

            Now, whenever they get caught lying or promoting bad policy, they just play the "Liberal Media" card. Unfortunately, it's worked very well for them.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by right ON 2 (October 07, 2010 2:22 pm ET)
                7
              To deny the liberal bent in the media is to deny reality. You can't judge all the media against the obsession with Fox News around here.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by jediknight65 (October 08, 2010 10:45 pm ET)
                2  
                tell ya what. you stop defending fixed noise and the scumbags they employ and maybe fox wont get judged so harshly..............oh wait your not gonna do that. because your as big a scumbag no matter what guise you post under.
                Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (October 07, 2010 10:07 am ET)
            18  
            "...he can't be proven wrong."


            This is one of the favorite defenses of beck fans, Rush fans, Fox fans, wingnuts in general. Of course, all of their sources get their facts wrong on a regular basis, and can be proven wrong, but the defenders will always cherry-pick the statements they like to focus on, and insist that they can't be proven wrong.

            And they're right in a lot of cases. As many objectively false statements as beck makes, the bulk of his babbling is made up of rambling half-thoughts and incomplete sentences. If you don't really say anything , you can't say anything false, but the message is still delivered.

            For example, if Glenda says " Obama has a czar. The Russians had czars. The Soviets did x,y, and z regarding totalitarian tactics and human rights violations... George Soros...ACORN", he hasn't really lied. He's just strung together a series of irrelevant and meaningless words and phrases with some vague and meaningless facts that form a scary connection for his gullible followers.

            Just as if I say "Beck is a German name. The Nazis came from Germany...hmmm... Glenn Beck holds big outdoor rallies about national pride. He also has emotional breakdowns and cries. Kruschev screamed and banged his shoe on the table...Hitler", I can't be proved wrong on anything I wrote.

            Report Abuse
            • Author by okami (October 07, 2010 11:13 am ET)
              6  
              "GLENN BECK HAS NAZI TOURETTES!" - Lewis Black Steamrolls Glenn Beck!
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1s4fj-5zlk
              Report Abuse
          • Author by Andy Kreiss (October 07, 2010 10:09 am ET)
            9  
            Oh, btw, rikntx, I saw the thread the other day where the Dittoheads were resorting to ad hominem attacks on your gravatar, not realizing it was their pervy hero. Hilarious and awesome.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by dogbreath (October 07, 2010 11:37 am ET)
            5  
            You can't argue with crazy.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by grrson (October 07, 2010 12:54 pm ET)
              7 1
              Nor can you argue with someone who is proud to be born stupid and raised ignorant.

              And anyone who is a fan of Glenn Beck has to be either one of those or, most likely, both.
              Report Abuse
              • Author by kamrom (October 07, 2010 4:06 pm ET)
                6 1
                Yes. I remember when Rush called his fans "Dittoheads" and they proudly repeated the slogan -- of course thats not used much anymore, since it conflicts with their strange accusations of the left always walking "in lock step," or that we are "sheeple," and since these rightwingers are already well known for acting like a single hive mind, they dont want to keep calilng themselves stuff like dittoheads. It makes criticising the liberals, who dont actually walk in lock step, a lot harder if you scream that you always follow a news-entertainer's opinions without applying critical thinking. The republicans dont need a physical 'memory hole' to dispose of ideas that would conflict with new ones. their brains willingly do that work for them and erase any contradictions.

                The way they debate and talk sounds like a 10 year old who stumbled onto a philosophy book and now thinks he understands all things. The ideas are childish, simplistic and based on a view built on half-truths. Their method of arguing is so based on this warped view in the rightwing rank and file that they will always shoot to extremes (like a child), that its not possible to get information to/from them.

                See also: That stupid meme that "The left sees in black and white" worldview, when the rightwing are the ones who routinely try to set up groups of "Us vs. Them," cannot discern between different religious factions and terrorists, demanding "all muslims need to denounce terrorism every time they pray to mecca." and "They cant build a mosque there because jesus!" vs "I can build a protestant church on a muslim graveyard if I want! FREESPEECH! SHARIA! You hate america!"

                There IS a group out there who has not only a black and white view (literally) of everyone and everything, but a vastly ignorant view as well, not able to comprehend their own hypocrisy, even when decrying muslim atrocities that the christians are actively engaging in. This group is so warped, that to them it truly does sound like everyone but them are the ones engaging in a distorted, good v evil worldview. (See: Beholder Syndrome.)

                Who is this group that has this view, exactly?
                Hint: The one made up of 95% elderly white conservatives who don't have an internet connection.
                Report Abuse
                • Author by mary59 (October 07, 2010 10:03 pm ET)
                  5 1
                  Some of them do have the internets, but they use it to visit only right wing sites, which spread like mildew.
                  Report Abuse
          • Author by n'est-ce pas (October 07, 2010 11:45 am ET)
            4  
            and all my points were denegrated as coming from the "liberal media".

            Dunning-Kruger
            Report Abuse
    • Author by timesthree (October 07, 2010 8:18 am ET)
      6  
      Of course Beck promotes bogus scholarship and scholars. No credible historian would spew the nonsence that fits with his narrative.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by epkklk851 (October 07, 2010 8:37 am ET)
        8 1
        It's something of a vicious circle, Glennie is an ignorant, angry man who looks for answers that help him to understand. He finds ignorant, angry answers from people just like himself, and he is comforted. He uses his bully pulpit to spread the ingorance, anger, and hatred to other people in his audience who are just like him, but lack the desire to entertain. His audience, fed on a careful diet of bilge flexes its collective, but uninformed agenda in the public forum. The children are affected, rinse, lather, repeat.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by kamrom (October 07, 2010 9:34 pm ET)
        4  
        Beck is such an alarmingly massive fraud. Were it not for his drones' thought capacity being based on a skinner box, he would be off the air in days. I still remember when he got all emotional and told his jerks about when he "Held the constitution/declaration of independance/bill of rights/whatever." of course, he was lying. Because touching these documents destroys them, so only the most well trained are allowed to ever ever do so, and even then must document every tiny thing they do to it. Its always so fun to watch Beck talk himself into absurd loops, then try to pass it off. "Its like that show..I mean, I dont watch it, i just heard about it...the Home Makeover show. thats what you have to do." in reference to the tea bagger costumes. Or basically promote the financial advancement of an anti-semite who likes to use strange references to hitler to attack people; he had to twist his word sso much, that our pointing out that he's interviewing an anti-semite becomes "the left is anti-semite." Its like some kind of Moromancy magic (the magic that only works if its caster and targets are morons)

        Note to Teabaggers: I use the phrase "teabagger" because I think its funny that it took two months after you started calling yourselves that, that you finally realised why we were laughing at you, and then tried to turn it into hate speech. Since you fight against hate speech laws, Teabagger remains valid, humorous and massively hypocritical about who can say what. Ciao!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by bodhi057 (October 07, 2010 8:36 am ET)
      7  
      So Beck "Pals around with terrorists" huh? Good to know. And Barton's "I don't have time to do a background check on every group I speak to." Well, perhaps you should.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by achrispage6992 (October 07, 2010 8:51 am ET)
      6 1
      What a surprise! I would have never dreamed that Glenn Beck would associate with men of such questionable character. Eerily enough, we can only assume that Beck is also a racist because he hangs out with one. Isn't that the standard he has set for Obama?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by soze169880 (October 07, 2010 9:21 am ET)
        7  
        I think the standard he's set for Obama makes him a racist if he's talked to people who have talked to people who hang out with racists.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Andy Kreiss (October 07, 2010 9:56 am ET)
          7  
          But only Reverse Racists, meaning non-white people who imply that white people may not be the most oppressed group of people on the planet.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by Rickamabob (October 07, 2010 9:19 am ET)
      6  
      Beck's "historian" delivered talks to racist, anti-Semitic Christian Identity groups

      Media Matters, I fixed the title you forget the quote marks around historian.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by AB-001 (October 07, 2010 9:30 am ET)
      6  
      I'm shocked! Shocked to find there's gambling.

      Here are your winnings sir

      Oh, thank you very much
      Report Abuse
    • Author by wookie (October 07, 2010 9:44 am ET)
      6  
      ADL further stated that Barton spoke at events hosted by the Christian Identity movement, which "asserts that Jews are 'the synagogue of Satan'; that Blacks and other people of color are subhuman; and that northern European whites and their American descendants are the 'chosen people' of scriptural prophesy."


      I never got why so many people would base their beliefs on Jewish writings while hating Jews. Its like saying "I love Wings but the Beatles are the band of Satan".
      Report Abuse
      • Author by mjgrimm690 (October 07, 2010 9:04 pm ET)
        4  
        This analogy is fantastic! I am going to steal it repeatedly. So funny!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by Jen7 (October 07, 2010 9:52 am ET)
      5  
      I noticed this from TPM, dunno if it's been covered here.

      http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/10/top_evangelical_david_barton_government_should_regulate_homosexuality.php
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nerzog (October 07, 2010 9:59 am ET)
        4  
        Scary stuff, and I'm sure the "small government" Teabaggers will be all in favor of it.

        The frightening part is that these are the idiots who may take over the House of Representatives in a few weeks.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Jen7 (October 07, 2010 10:20 am ET)
          5  
          Crossing my fingers that never happens. I'm not so sure it will be as bad as everyone is predicting. We'll see..
          Report Abuse
    • Author by knowledgereigns (October 07, 2010 12:59 pm ET)
      5 1
      Isn't this kind of a bit of guilt by association? I don't think this proves anything other than Beck will do anything to confirm his viewpoints, even if it means using antisemitic sources.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by AB-001 (October 07, 2010 3:28 pm ET)
        3  
        Keep in mind, Beck is opening this guy up to a larger audience; some of his books are now in the top 100 list on Amazon which is no mean feat. I know if I like something by an author, I'll look for more of his/her work. Beck doesn't give a rat's tushy what Barton has to say elsewhere as long as he pushes the Beckian agenda. And in doing so, Pandora's Box is opened.

        Besides, this is the third author Beck has pushed with known anti-Semitic ideologies. Think his buddy (and--I'm sorry to say--a member of my faith) Rabbi Lapin knows about this--or cares?
        Report Abuse
        • Author by soze169880 (October 07, 2010 4:34 pm ET)
          2  
          Well, considering Lapin is also very close friends with a man who calls Indians "monkeys", I kinda doubt it.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by wesley_fpt (October 07, 2010 1:03 pm ET)
      4 1
      Not surprising at all. Fox has provided mainstream exposure and success to a fringe wingnut ideologue, making racism and anti-semitism seem more acceptable to the morons who watch them. How sad that they're the most watched cable news network and they have so much sway over the electorate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by K1234 (October 07, 2010 1:27 pm ET)
      2  
      Glen Beck and the people who support him are the scum of the earth, not surprising to see a racist among the ranks

      I was always convinced the "Right wing" made up of wealthy corrupt people and white supremacists, I guess this is the truth
      Report Abuse
    • Author by LJM (October 07, 2010 1:36 pm ET)
      1  
      Calling Barton a Historian is a stretch
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Ray Mendoza (October 07, 2010 2:56 pm ET)
      1  
      I wonder how many listeners Beck really has...

      Could it be that we are all inflating his numbers just cause we want to hear what crazy BS will come out of his mouth?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by union (October 07, 2010 3:11 pm ET)
      4  
      I used to work in an office where all they listened to was the Bo Gritz show. All these right-wing talk show freaks need to start taking Risperdal.

      Barton's 'scholarship' is so embarrassing, he should be greeted in public appearances with a clown slapping shoes together.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by Dragonmaw (October 07, 2010 3:48 pm ET)
      3  
      I believe there should be a disclaimer. It is Beck's "historian," not Beck's historian. The man obviously doesn't know anything about history.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by weirdpro (October 08, 2010 1:21 am ET)
      2  
      Is this guy another Ken Mellamn....actually uber-Ken?
      Report Abuse
    • Author by brdt7107 (October 08, 2010 3:03 am ET)
        5
      Media Matters is a 501(c)(3) tax exempt non-profit organization. As a matter of law, it must not use its funds in any political manner. Yet, if you examine the Media Matters website, the only causes it promotes are whatever Obama and the Democrats are promoting. It is a propaganda machine for the Democrats. That's the sole purpose. It only attacks coservatives and Republicans. It is not advocating a particular principle, say, free speech. Media Matters' entire existence is political. It its well known that America-hater George Soros has been a major donor.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Dragonmaw (October 08, 2010 2:10 pm ET)
        4  
        No matter how many times people repeat the myth about the Soros-MMFA connection, it never gets old.

        Furthermore, I think you need to actually read the tax code there, buddy.

        http://www.irs.gov/charities/charitable/article/0,,id=96099,00.html

        To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.


        MMFA does not use any earnings for private shareholders or individuals. It does not attempt to influence legislation, and does not participate in a campaign activity for or against political candidates. It does have a political slant, but most 501(c)(3) organizations do. Here's another definer:

        The exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3) are charitable, religious, educational, scientific, literary, testing for public safety, fostering national or international amateur sports competition, and preventing cruelty to children or animals.


        In this case, MMFA falls under the literary and educational clauses.

        You don't see MMFA actively saying "vote for this person" or "don't vote for this person." There is no "vote only for democrats" or "vote only for republicans." It is an organization designed to disseminate information countering right-wing media rhetoric and misinformation. So while its stated mission goal is potentially leftist, the organization does not actively promote any leftist causes. You could say it passively does (by offering facts on controversial issues like health care reform) but that does not mark it as exempt, as it is not an action organization.

        Please, next time you try to accuse MMFA of not being tax-exempt (which is too common with right-wing folk), do your research.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by jediknight65 (October 08, 2010 10:43 pm ET)
        1  
        and scumbags like you defend neo cons any day of the week and twice on sundays.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by mdey (October 08, 2010 3:51 am ET)
      2  
      Please don't refer to this guy as an historian. Pseudo-historian is fine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mdey (October 08, 2010 3:52 am ET)
      2  
      Please don't refer to this guy as an historian. Pseudo-historian is fine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by mdey (October 08, 2010 4:23 am ET)
      2  
      Please don't refer to this guy as an historian. Pseudo-historian is fine.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by j238 (October 08, 2010 8:51 am ET)
      2  
      Notice in that picture, Beck has put on eye glasses to pretend he is conducting a scholarly discussion.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by nativeofsf (October 09, 2010 1:44 am ET)
      2  
      Darn, there you go again...I thought you said, Becky's hysterectomy delivered...what?
      Report Abuse
      • Author by nativeofsf (October 09, 2010 1:52 am ET)
        2  
        Even though...Barton resembles a benign cyst,
        I'm inclined to agree with either a necrotic lesion or an evasive carcinoma.

        So both these schmucks require exploratory surgeries -- really invasive exploratory procedures...
        Report Abuse